The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

3 Art History Programs
Pages 31-46

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 31... ... Approximately one-third are As many as 9 of the programs were initiated since 1970, and no two programs are located in the same university. In addition to the 41 institutions represented in this discipline, another 4 were initially identified as meeting the criteria3 for inclusion in the assessment: Illinois State University -- Normal North Texas State University Texas Tech University -- Lubbock Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities The last institution chose not to participate in the assessment in any discipline. Read the entire page →
From page 32... ... m e committee has decided to report the survey results for these two programs, but with the caution that the reputational ratings may have been influenced by the omission of these names. To assist the reader in interpreting results of the survey evaluations, estimated standard errors have been computed for mean ratings of 4As mentioned in Chapter II, data for measures 04-07 are not reported if they are based on the survey responses of fewer than 10 FYI975-79 program graduates. Read the entire page →
From page 33... ... This generalization results primarily from the fact that evaluators are not as likely to be familiar with the less prestigious programs, and consequently the mean ratings of these programs are usually based on fewer survey responses. Read the entire page →
From page 34... ... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 35... ... 3.6 2.2 1.1 1.5 1.8 .09 .06 .06 .06 58 60 48 59 61 020. 2.3 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.2 .11 .09 .08 .08 47 47 47 45 55 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 36... ... (07) NA NO NA NA .21 10.6 43 39 .67 8.5 74 57 .30 10.0 49 44 NA NA .12 12.3 36 24 NA NA NA 9~5 48 .44 8.4 58 58 .54 7.3 65 68 .28 9.3 47 50 NA NA NA NA .18 8.7 40 56 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA .40 9.0 56 53 NA NA NA NA 78 .33 60 47 59 .32 42 46 70 .20 53 31 NA NA 75 .38 57 54 NA NA NA NA 73 .32 55 46 62 .39 45 55 71 .31 54 46 NA NA NA NA 69 .38 52 54 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 69 .39 52 55 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 37... ... 1.6 0.9 1,0 0.5 1.5 .13 .11 .14 .07 40 40 45 35 58 040. 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.6 .12 .09 .08 .07 42 45 39 42 59 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 38... ... indicates program was initiated since 1970 ~ . NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 39... ... 041. 4.7 2.7 1.1 1.8 2.1 68 68 48 67 64 �05 .05 .08 .04 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 40... ... 40 TABLE 3.2 Summary Statistics Describing Each Program Measure -- Art History Number of Programs Standard D E C I L E S Measure Evaluated Mean Deviation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Program Size 01 Raw Value 41 13 5 7 8 9 10 12 14 14 15 20 Std Value 41 50 10 40 41 43 45 49 52 52 54 64 02 Raw Value 41 18 19 3 5 7 9 11 13 18 23 42 Std Value 41 50 10 42 43 44 45 46 47 50 52 62 03 Raw Value 40 33 43 8 10 12 18 22 26 34 40 68 Std Value 40 50 10 44 45 45 46 47 48 50 52 58 Program Graduates 04 Raw Value 20 .32 .14 .12 .21 .21 .28 .30 .35 .39 .40 .44 Std Value 20 50 10 36 42 42 47 49 52 55 56 59 05 Raw Value 20 9.3 1.1 10.9 10.3 10.0 9.5 9.5 9.0 8.8 8.5 8.0 Std Value 20 50 10 36 41 44 48 48 53 55 57 62 06 Raw Value 20 .67 .10 .46 .62 .63 .65 .69 .70 .71 .75 .78 Std Value 20 50 10 29 45 46 48 52 53 54 58 61 07 Raw Value 20 .35 .08 .20 .27 .32 .33 .35 .38 .39 .39 .42 Std Value 20 50 10 31 40 46 48 50 54 55 55 59 Survey Results 08 Raw Value 41 2.7 1.1 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.5 4.5 Std Value 41 50 10 38 41 45 47 49 52 54 57 66 09 Raw Value 41 1.5 .6 .7 .9 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.5 Std Value 41 50 10 37 40 45 48 48 53 54 59 65 10 Raw Value 40 1.1 .2 .9 .9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 Std Value 40 50 10 40 40 45 50 50 50 55 60 60 11 Raw Value 41 1.1 .4 .5 .7 .8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 Std Value 41 50 10 36 41 43 48 50 53 55 60 67 University Library 12 Raw Value 38 .7 1.0 -1.0 -.4 .1 .4 .7 .9 1.1 1.6 2.0 Std Value 38 50 10 33 39 44 47 50 52 54 59 63 NOTE: Standardized values reported in the preceding table have been computed of the mean and standard deviation and not the rounded values reported from exact values here. Read the entire page →
From page 41... ... 41 TABLE 3.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 41 Programs in Art History Measure 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Program Size 01 .72 .58 -.16 .05 .10 -.04 .69 .67 .00 .66 .49 02 .68 -.14 -.22 .33 .13 .76 .74 -.06 .75 .49 03 -.13 -.10 .04 .16 .52 .50 -.13 .50 .34 Program Graduates 04 .68 .05 .23 .12 .17 -.03 .10 .02 05 -.16 .31 .36 .36 .14 .32 -.11 06 .60 .10 .09 .19 .08 .13 07 .08 .07 .02 .00 .09 Survey Results 08 .99 .05 .98 .54 09 .03 .97 .55 10 .09 -.14 11 University Library 12 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies. Read the entire page →
From page 42... ... r = .69 O O +/+++++++++++++++++++/+++++++++++++++++++/+++++++++++++++++++/+++++++++++++++++++/+++++++++++++++++++/ 1 4 9 16 25 36 Measure 01 (square root scale) Read the entire page →
From page 43... ... + + O O +/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/ 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81 100 Measure 02 (square root scale) Read the entire page →
From page 44... ... 44 TABLE 3.4 Characteristics of Survey Participants in Art History Respondents N Field of Specialization Art History & Appreciation 94 100 Facul Rank Professor 52 55 Associate Professor 24 26 Assistant Professor 17 18 Other/Unknown 1 1 Year of Highest Degree Pre-1950 5 5 1950-59 17 18 1960-69 31 33 Post-1969 41 44 Evaluator Selection Nominated by Institution 76 81 Other 18 19 Survey Form With Faculty Names 85 90 Without Names 9 10 Total Evaluators 94 100 Read the entire page →
From page 45... ... indicate a confidence interval of +1.5 standard errors around the reported mean (x) of each program. Read the entire page →

From page 31...

... Approximately one-third are As many as 9 of the programs were initiated since 1970, and no two programs are located in the same university. In addition to the 41 institutions represented in this discipline, another 4 were initially identified as meeting the criteria3 for inclusion in the assessment: Illinois State University -- Normal North Texas State University Texas Tech University -- Lubbock Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities The last institution chose not to participate in the assessment in any discipline.

3 Art History Programs Pages 31-46

3 Art History Programs
Pages 31-46