The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

8 Psychology Programs
Pages 129-154

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 129... ... On the average, 102 full-time and parttime students intending to earn doctorates were enrolled in a program in December 1980, with an average faculty size of 29 members.2 Five programs were initiated since 1970, and each of two universities-University of California at Irvine and University of Kansas -- has two psychology programs included in the assessment. In addition to the 148 institutions represented in this discipline, another 10 were initially identified as meeting the criteria3 for inclusion in the assessment: American University Boston College University of Nevada -- Reno University of Northern Colorado -- Greeley 'Data from the NRC' s Survey of Earned Doctorates indicate that a total of 15,066 doctorates in fields of psychology were awarded by U.S. Read the entire page →
From page 130... ... , and the total number of recently published articles by program faculty (measure 17~. Figure 8.1 illustrates the relation between the mean rating of the scholarly quality of faculty (measure 08) Read the entire page →
From page 131... ... To assist the reader in interpreting results of the survey evaluations, estimated standard errors have been computed for mean ratings of the scholarly quality of faculty in 150 psychology programs (and are Liven in Table 8.11. For each program the mean rating and an associated "confidence interval" of 1.5 standard errors are illustrated in Figure 8.3 (listed in order of highest to lowest mean rating) Read the entire page →
From page 132... ... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Read the entire page →
From page 133... ... raw un1 ,,~c for each met arm rearm on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Read the entire page →
From page 134... ... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Read the entire page →
From page 135... ... 3.0 1.8 1.4 0.9 NA .37 704 73 .73 .12 .09 .09 .08 54 53 65 54 59 47 49 54 040. 1.1 0.8 NA 0.2 NA .00 NA 35 .56 .14 .17 NA .04 36 34 38 38 43 44 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 136... ... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 137... ... 2.1 1.3 0.8 0.3 -0.5 .10 354 101 .71 .16 .16 .14 .06 45 45 3 7 41 44 44 44 53 53 060. 3.3 2.0 0.7 1.1 0.3 .19 532 120 .69 .10 .08 .11 .07 58 59 36 59 52 49 46 56 52 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported: on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 138... ... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Read the entire page →
From page 139... ... (18) 66 .87 48 63 63 .82 47 60 114 .71 55 53 165 .80 63 58 87 .67 51 50 NA 39 .4 8 43 39 NA 3 .20 38 22 224 10 .39 43 39 33 NA 60 .86 47 62 238 70 .51 43 4 8 4 .12 684 101 .66 45 47 53 50 .73 1982 39 .87 81 59 43 63 .35 891 132 .72 59 49 58 54 .04 NA 59 .78 41 47 57 .05 NA 74 .79 41 49 58 .09 1749 43 57 .32 4714 57 85 .33 3408 57 72 tog NA 43 .23 395 52 44 150 6 274 8 221 72 21 40 160 63 ine of data for every program, raw values for on the second line values are reported in standardized fore standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 140... ... (07) .46 6.1 53 51 .58 6.2 58 50 .04 5.5 35 58 .42 5.8 51 54 .10 8.8 38 21 .55 8.3 57 27 .12 7.8 39 32 .77 5.8 66 54 �07 6.2 36 50 .43 5.7 52 55 .00 7.8 33 33 .25 6.5 44 47 .07 5.9 36 53 .54 5.4 56 59 .23 5.4 43 59 .23 5.6 43 57 .35 6.5 48 47 .51 5.9 55 53 .19 5.1 41 61 .59 5.4 58 58 .47 .09 29 39 .61 .19 42 47 .77 .23 57 50 .69 .22 50 49 .58 .12 39 41 .76 .19 56 47 .76 .15 56 43 .71 .28 52 53 .74 .19 54 47 .65 .08 46 39 .58 .15 39 44 .69 .38 50 60 .76 .29 57 54 .63 .39 44 61 .71 .13 52 42 .68 .22 49 49 .83 .10 63 40 .60 .07 42 38 .48 .19 30 47 .76 .35 57 58 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 141... ... (14) 06 NA 42 .14 313 46 44 .31 NA 56 .20 NA 50 .18 215 48 43 .34 643 58 47 .05 NA 41 .28 369 54 44 .05 NA 41 .13 46 NA .00 NA 38 .63 473 74 45 .04 NA 40 .36 596 59 46 .15 NA 47 .13 45 .04 40 .04 41 .29 55 .38 60 469 45 NA NA 358 44 870 49 84 51 30 42 113 55 60 47 21 40 58 46 31 42 46 44 140 59 62 47 159 62 57 46 24 41 25 41 83 50 63 48 .42 35 .73 54 .84 61 .67 50 .65 49 .63 48 .58 45 .75 55 .85 61 .89 64 .65 50 .57 44 .86 62 .68 51 Survey Ratings Standard Error (08) Read the entire page →
From page 142... ... indicates program was initiated since 1970. 20 80 45 52 33 86 52 53 12 50 41 46 138 55 144 56 39 41 32 41 139 52 44 55 33 68 114 52 49 52 .46 6.4 53 48 .47 5.9 54 53 .45 4.4 53 69 .13 6.0 39 52 .46 6.4 53 48 .74 .18 54 46 .68 .17 49 45 .51 .10 33 40 .67 .21 48 48 .63 .26 44 52 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 143... ... 2.6 1.5 1.4 0.8 NA .06 326 64 .56 .10 .08 .09 .07 51 49 62 51 42 44 47 44 120. 3.3 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.4 .27 454 124 .79 .10 .07 .08 .07 58 57 60 57 53 54 45 57 58 NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 144... ... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Read the entire page →
From page 145... ... 0.7 -0 .2 51 48 0.1 NA 37 1.8 2.0 75 70 0.6 -0.3 49 46 0.8 -0.4 53 45 0.7 -0 50 0.3 40 0.2 38 0.1 36 1.4 65 0.4 45 NA NA NA 1.6 65 NA �1 .0 39 NA -0.6 43 �0.7 42 NA NA -0.0 49 0.7 57 �0.3 47 first line of data for every program, .11 44 .06 NA 41 NA NA Research Published Support Articles (13) Read the entire page →
From page 146... ... NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Read the entire page →
From page 147... ... 4.5 2.5 1.1 1.5 2.1 .49 1658 275 .82 .08 .06 .08 .06 70 69 50 69 70 67 56 81 59 150. 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.3 NA .00 NA 12 .31 .13 .12 .11 .05 40 38 36 41 38 39 29 NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. Read the entire page →
From page 148... ... 36 .8 38 .2 38 37 4_ 38 _ .1 - .7 38 42 .00 .05 38 41 215 255 43 43 9 19 21 45 46 42 49 44 45 57 69 44 45 .23 .30 43 46 6.4 6.2 48 50 .63 .67 45 48 .15 .19 44 46 1. 4 44 .9 43 .3 .4 40 43 ., 2.2 44 47 1.5 48 1.0 47 .5 45 - .5 - .4 44 45 .08 .13 42 45 363 456 44 45 24 29 32 38 47 50 52 55 59 67 80 103 47 49 52 57 85 102 123 149 48 50 53 56 44 58 125 61 189 62 .41 .46 .53 .62 .68 51 53 56 60 62 6.0 5.9 5.7 5.4 5.3 52 53 55 58 59 .70 .72 .74 .77 .83 51 53 55 57 63 .21 .24 .30 .35 .41 48 50 54 58 62 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.9 49 52 56 60 64 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 48 52 56 60 62 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 51 51 55 59 63 .6 .8 .9 1.1 1.3 48 52 55 60 64 �.2 .1 47 50 .16 .20 47 49 564 697 46 47 .9 1.6 58 65 .27 .34 .46 54 58 65 950 1659 2198 50 56 61 81 63 17 27 39 57 66 79 92 122 165 50 10 40 41 43 46 48 50 52 57 63 .66 .16 .42 .52 .60 .65 .70 .73 .76 .80 .84 50 10 35 41 46 49 53 54 56 59 61 NOTE: Standardized values reported in the preceding table have been computed from exact values of the mean and standard deviation and not the rounded values reported here. Read the entire page →
From page 149... ... 149 TABLE 8.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 150 Programs in Psychology Measure 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 Program Size 01 .65 .64 .22 -.10 .02 .20 .57 .51 .08 .58 .47 .16 .35 .76 .16 02 .81 .10 -.15 -.06 -.06 .31 .23 -.04 .39 .36 -.04 .24 .49 -.01 03 -.05 -.43 -.11 -.17 .20 .08 -.01 .25 .24 -.17 .11 .34 -.17 Program Graduates 04 .10 .17 .60 .64 .63 -.15 .58 .24 .56 .29 .35 .35 05 .15 .32 .13 .20 .05 .12 -.07 .27 .05 .12 .26 06 .44 .24 .33 .05 .21 .14 .31 .26 .09 .11 07 .74 .73 -.12 .67 .40 .79 .31 .43 .46 Survey Results 08 .97 .05 .97 .73 .75 .49 .74 .57 09 .03 .93 .67 .73 .53 .71 .59 10 .05 -.03 -.02 -.03 .1S .14 11 .73 .71 .47 .77 .54 University Library 12 .46 .45 .63 .37 Research Support 13 14 Publication Records 17 18 .28 .42 .51 .53 .29 .54 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies. Read the entire page →
From page 150... ... FIGURE 8.1 Mean rating of scholarly quality of faculty (measure 08) versus number of faculty members (measure 01) Read the entire page →
From page 151... ... FIGURE 8.2 Mean rating of program effectiveness in educating research scholars/scientists (measure 09) versus nu~ber of graduates in last f ive years (measure 02) Read the entire page →
From page 152... ... Pre-1950 17 6 1950-59 61 22 1960-69 83 30 Post-1969 109 39 Unknown 10 4 Evaluator Select ion Nominated by Institution 253 90 Other 27 10 Survey Form With Faculty Names 251 89 Without Names 29 10 Total Evaluators 280 100 Read the entire page →
From page 153... ... NOTE: Programs are listed in sequence of mean rating, with the highest-rated program appearing at the top of the page. The broken lines ( -- -) Read the entire page →

From page 129...

... On the average, 102 full-time and parttime students intending to earn doctorates were enrolled in a program in December 1980, with an average faculty size of 29 members.2 Five programs were initiated since 1970, and each of two universities-University of California at Irvine and University of Kansas -- has two psychology programs included in the assessment. In addition to the 148 institutions represented in this discipline, another 10 were initially identified as meeting the criteria3 for inclusion in the assessment: American University Boston College University of Nevada -- Reno University of Northern Colorado -- Greeley 'Data from the NRC' s Survey of Earned Doctorates indicate that a total of 15,066 doctorates in fields of psychology were awarded by U.S.

8 Psychology Programs Pages 129-154

8 Psychology Programs
Pages 129-154