Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix G Options for Dealing with Uncertainties
Pages 458-462

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 458...
... The most significant inference uncertainties arise in risk assessments whenever attempts are macle to answer the following questions (NRC, 1994~: · What set or sets of hazard and close-response ciata (for a given substance) should be used to characterize risk in the population of interest?
From page 459...
... These types of long-standing assumptions, which are necessary to complete a risk assessment, are recognized by risk assessors as attempts to clear with uncertainties in knowledge (NRC, 1994~.
From page 460...
... The NRC committee recommencleci that regulatory agencies in the Uniteci States identify the neecleci inference options in risk assessment and specify, through written risk assessment guidelines, the specific options that will be used for all assessments. Agencies in the United States have iclentifieci the specific models to be used to fill gaps in ciata and knowledge; these have come to be called default options (EPA, 1986~.
From page 461...
... A1though presenting a number of plausible risk estimates has the acivantage that it would seem to more faithfully reflect the true state of scientific unclerstancling, there are no well-establisheci criteria for using such complex results in risk management. The various approaches to clearing with uncertainties inherent in risk assessment are summarized in Table ~1.
From page 462...
... 1986. Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.