Calling the Shots Immunization Finance Policies and Practices (2000) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix E: Overview of Case Studies and Site Visits
Appendix E: Overview of Case Studies and Site Visits
Pages 263-270
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 263... ...
. The individual case studies were designed to: · trace program changes, development, and performance over time, · collect detailed information on state- (and in the case of Los Angeles and San Diego, county-)
|
From page 264... ...
The sites chosen were Maine; New lersey; North Carolina; Alabama; Michigan; Texas; Washington; and, in California, Los Angeles and San Diego Counties. These states and counties were selected because they vary demographically, and because their immunization policies and program structures reflect distinctive choices that convey a sense of the variety among all the states in immunization strategies, challenges, and achievements.
|
From page 265... ...
In addition to the interviews with key program managers, the case study sites were asked to provide detailed information on state spending from all revenue sources for immunization activities for the period 1992 through 1998: · federal grants, · state revenues (in the case of Los Angeles and San Diego, county revenues as well) , and · foundation grants.
|
From page 266... ...
plan UP $5.00 California 46 51% Mixed non-UP $7.50/do Los Angeles San Diego al998 Managed Care Enrollment, www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/mcstat98.htm. bFMAP = Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, or federal matching rate for Medicaid service expenditures, at www.hcfa.gov.medicaid.
|
From page 267... ...
fFPL = federal poverty level. "Population data for Los Angeles County from U.S.
|
From page 268... ...
National 96.304 135.562 247.692 399.974 195.405 [24~36 34.93 62.65 103.06] [49.42 NOTE: Los Angeles and San Diego include county as well as state spending.
|
From page 269... ...
APPENDIX E 269 Infrastructure ate 317 FA 317 FA VFC FA VFC FA State State vs 1998 1995 1998 1995 1998 Revs 1995 Revs 1998 Structure 1.228 1.665 0.233 0.495 0.1 0.5 [85.04 121.81 16.13 34.28 $6.92 36.58]
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.