National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Biographical Sketches
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Index

AAMR. See American Association on Mental Retardation

Abecedarian Project, 145, 148-150

Acceleration, 342-344

Accountability, 31-33, 310

Achievement, school social, cultural, and contextual issues influencing, 371-372

Acquired inability to read. See Alexia

Adaptive behavior dimension, 257-259

ADD. See Auditory Discrimination in Depth program

Alcohol exposure, during pregnancy, 102-104

Alexia

acquired, 250

neuroanatomical lesions implicated in, 250

Alternative approaches to assessment, 279-320

alternatives to traditional classification and placement, 291-311

early screening and intervention for behavior problems, 296-299

early screening and intervention in reading, 293-296

eligibility decisions and system reform, 303-310

first step to success, 299

gifted and talented identification, 310-311

Incredible Years Series for training parent, teacher, and child, 300

interventions and referral decisions, 299-303

Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers, 30

recommendations, 311-320

special education without IQ in Iowa, 304-305

the Texas Primary Reading Inventory, 294-295

universal assessment, 298

universal screening, prevention, and early intervention, 292-293

American Association on Mental Deficiency, 252

American Association on Mental Retardation (AAMR), 253-254, 258

Aptitude by ethnic group, comparison of classification as MR, LD, and ineligible using FSIQ and PIQ to estimate, 257

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Assessment, 243-291, 305-306, 312-313, 363-364.

See also Alternative approaches to assessment context, culture, and assessment, 279-291

cross-cultural psychological research on cognitive and intellectual ability, 280-282

disability assessment practices, 270-271

of emotional disturbance, 261-270

functional, and IEP relevance, 218

of gifted and talented, 271-278

of mental retardation, 251-261

psychometric views of culture and context, 282-291

research on test bias, 282-291

of specific learning disabilities, 243-251

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 59

Auditory Discrimination in Depth (ADD) program, 333-334

Authentic questions, 183

Autism, 60

Behavior, school social, cultural, and contextual issues influencing, 371-372

Behavior disorder (BD), 324, 327-328, 336-337, 340

perspectives on, 262-264

Behavior management, 367-369

recommendations, 316-318

teacher quality, 318

Behavior problem profiles, 109

Behavioral adjustment, universal assessment and multiple gating, 298

Behavioral development. See Cognitive and behavioral development

Behavioral deviance, and reading skills, 201

Behavioral dimensions defining MR, 253-259

adaptive behavior, 257-259

comparison of classification as MR, LD, and ineligible using FSIQ and PIQ to estimate aptitude by ethnic group, 257

intellectual, 253-257

proportion of the population falling below certain IQ cutoffs and falling within certain IQ intervals, 254

“Behavioral earthquakes,” 229

Behavioral interventions in general education, 202-203

bullying prevention program, 202-203

through PATHS, 203

Benefits from special education intervention, 323-340

current classroom practice, 337-338

dropout rate among students with disability label by age, 341

evidence of effectiveness, 329-333

features of effective interventions, 324-328

minority students in special education, 338-340

number with disability label dropping out by age, 341

numbers of children who appear to benefit, 333-337

A Better Chance program, 351

Bias in referral and assessment, in terms of race or ethnicity, 5

Bias in the design and delivery of schooling, 181-188

cultural differences, 182-185

role of parents, 185-188

teacher judgments, expectations, and potential self-fulfilling prophecies, 181-182

Biological contributors to cognition and behavior, 97-117

contributors to early brain development, 98

exposure to alcohol during pregnancy, 102-104

exposure to lead, 111-117

Infant Health and Development Program, 103

low birthweight, 98-102

nutrition and development, 106-111

tobacco use and drug abuse, 104-106

Biological risk factors in early childhood, 11-13, 375-378

federal-level recommendations, 12-13

Biosocial developmental contextualism, 95

Biracial children, 38

Black students

“acting white,” 185

in the category of emotional disturbance, 69, 88

in the category of gifted and talented, 71, 89

in the category of learning disabilities, 68, 87

in the category of mental retardation, 66, 86

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Blood lead levels, prevalence of elevated, 113-114

Book awareness, 294

Bower, Eli, 25

Brain development, contributors to early, 98

Brain morphometry, 249

Brookline Early Education Project, 146, 149

Bully/Victim Questionnaire, 202

Bullying prevention program, 202-203

Bureau of Labor Statistics, 31, 339

Calculations, 42-43

composition index, 43

odds ratio, 43

risk index, 42-43

California Achievement Test, 111

Capacity of educational personnel, 30-31

CEI. See Critical Events Index

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 103, 112-113

Change

in accountability, 31-33

challenge of, 207-209

in education policies, 31-33

in the MMR construct, 260-261

in participation rates in judgmental categories, 83

Chicago Child-Parent Center Program, 151

Child Behavior Checklist, 262, 269, 297

Child care quality, 126-128

Child development programs, 144-151

benefits varying with type and level of risk, 149-150

comprehensive service provision, 149

developmental timing, 145

direct provision of learning experiences, 148

effect of early intervention on special education placement, 150-151

intellectual performance of children in the Abecedarian Project during the preschool years, 148

longitudinal studies of, 146-147

planned curriculum, 149

program intensity, 145-147

sustained cognitive, social, and school achievement benefits, 150

Child find procedures, 40

Child poverty, 120

Child psychiatric disorder, 129, 264

CI. See Composition index

Cigarettes, mothers who smoked during pregnancy, 106

Class size, 176-179

Classification decisions, 306-309

Classroom behavior, cultural differences and, 197-199

Classroom management, 199-204, 268

Cocaine exposure, 105-106

Cognitive and behavioral development, 93-140

biological contributors, 97-117

changing perspectives, 93-97

social and environmental influences, 118-140

Coleman Report, 179

Committee on Education Finance, 209, 372

Common Core of Data, 84, 380

Community-wide interventions, 206-207

Compacting, 345-346

Composition index (CI), 43, 57-59, 66-71, 86-89

Comprehension development, 193

Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program, 205

Comprehensive service provision, 149

Conceptual framework, 27-29

Context, 170-172, 279-291

cross-cultural psychological research on cognitive and intellectual ability, 280-282

psychometric views of culture and context, 282-291

research on test bias, 282-291

school delinquency rates in relation to expected level, 171

theories and definitions of, 173

Context of special and gifted education, 17-34

current education context, 30-33

intersection of general and specialized education, 21-27

Contextual model of student achievement, 29

Contributors to early brain development, 98

Cooperative learning, 349-350

Cost of reform, 383-385

Council of State Directors of Gifted Education, 272

Critical Events Index (CEI), 229-230

Cross-cultural psychological research,

on cognitive and intellectual ability, 280-282

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Cultural differences, 182-185, 279-291

and classroom behavior, 197-199

psychometric views of culture and context, 282-291

Current classroom practice, 337-338

Current context, 2-3

Current education context, 30-33

capacity of educational personnel, 30-31

changing education policies, 31-33

Current educational practices with ED students, 267-269

classroom management practices, 268

curricular content, 267-268

screening and assessment practices, 269-270

Current identification procedures, 250-251

Current referral and assessment process, reliably identifying special needs or giftedness, 5

Curricula, 199-204

Curricular content, 267-268

Curriculum models, 343-345

acceleration, 343-344

Integrated Curriculum Model, 345

school-wide enrichment model, 344

Triarchic Componential Model, 344-345

Cutoffs, IQ, proportion of the population falling below certain, 254

Data analysis

controversial, 15

factors compromising, 41-42

Data collection (DC), 7, 83, 378-382

Data on state-to-state variability, 62-72

emotional disturbance, 69-70

gifted and talented category, 70-72

learning disabilities, 67-69

mental retardation, 65-67

Datasets, inadequacy of, 37-39

DC. See Data collection

“Dead-end programs,” 288-289

Deaf-blindness, 60

Decontextualized intelligence, 279

Deficiencies, iron, among 1- to 2-year-old children by race and poverty status, 110

Denominators, 39

Depression, maternal, 125-126

Developmental delay, 6

Developmental disorders, 23

Developmental outcomes, for children by race, 98

Developmental timing, 145

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th ed. (DSM-IV), 262

Dialogue, interactive, between teacher and student and among students, 326

Diana consent decree, 226, 255

Diet changes, national ranking of New York City public schools before and after, 112

“Difficult-to-teach” (DTT) students, 228

Diffusion tensor MRI imaging, 249

Dinosaur Social Skills and Problem-Solving Curriculum, 300

Direct Instruction, 205

Direct instruction and inquiry development, 346

Direct provision of learning experiences, 148

Disability, defining, 3, 32

Disability categories of concern, 36-39

assessment practices, 270-271

distribution of, 221

factors compromising interpretation of data, 41-42

gender breakdown by, 73

inadequacy of datasets, 37-39

legal classification requirements, 219-224

nonjudgmental, 54-61

state-to-state variations, 39-41

status, 38

Dropout rates, among students with disability label by age, 341

Drug abuse. See Tobacco use and drug abuse

DSM-IV. See Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th ed.

DTT. See “Difficult-to-teach” students

Durrell Oral Reading Test, 206

Dyslexia, 246-250

developmental, 250

phonological model of, 247-248


Eager to Learn: Educating Our Preschoolers, 120, 164, 377

Early brain development, contributors to, 98

Early childhood (EC) risk factors, 7

biological, 11-13, 375-378

social, 11-13, 375-378

Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS), 125, 131, 190

Early Head Start, 160, 162, 164

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Early home visitation programs, 142-143

Early intervention, effect on special education placement, 150-151

Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities, 151, 158

Early intervention programs, 141-166, 365-367

child development programs, 144-151

Early Head Start, 162

existing federal early intervention programs, 151-162

federal spending on education and care of children under age 5, 152

Head Start, 159-162

household income and race/ethnicity for children receiving early intervention, 157

under IDEA, 151-159

parenting programs, 142-144

recommendations, 162-166

services for infants and toddlers, 151-158

services for preschoolers, 158-159

Early screening, 314-316

and intervention for behavior problems, 296-299

and intervention in reading, 293-296

EC. See Early childhood risk factors

ECLS. See Early Childhood Longitudinal Study

ED. See Emotional disturbance

Educable mentally retarded (EMR) children, 22-23, 307-308

Education

ability-appropriate, 23

current context, 30-33

Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EHA), 214-216, 244, 262, 310

Education personnel, 172-176

capacity of, 175-176

teacher quality, 172-175

Educational resources, 172-180

class size, 176-179

funding, 179-180

Effective interventions

basic elements of reading and writing, 326

explicit instruction, 325-326

features of, 324-328

general and special education successful for students with LD, 324-32

interactive dialogue between teacher and student and among students, 326

motivation to learn, task difficulty, and task persistence, 327-328

procedural facilitators or strategies, 328

small-group instruction and pairs, 326-327

Effectiveness measures, 329-333

minority students with learning disabilities and behavior disorders, 329-330

special education settings versus the general education classroom, 330-333

EHA. See Education of All Handicapped Children Act

Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Title I, 31, 33, 205

Eligibility decisions, 218-219, 236-237, 312, 361-371

accountability, 310

assessment, 305-306

classification decisions, 306-309

“determinant factor” restrictions, 217

gifted and talented eligibility, 369-371

problem-solving approach, 303-305

special education eligibility, 361-369

and system reform, 303-310

Embedded Phonics (EP) program, 333-334

Emotional disturbance (ED), 1, 36-37, 40, 42, 44, 48-51, 62, 64, 69-70, 72-74, 76, 82-83, 222, 232, 261-271, 284, 324-328, 336-337, 340

black students, 69, 88

current educational practices, 267-269

definitional dilemma, 25, 262-264

educating students with, 266-270

ethnicity and gender breakdown for, 73

Hispanic students, 70, 88

indices of placement by race/ethnicity, 50

and learning disabilities, 23

perspectives on, 262-264

by race/ethnicity, 52

reactive school practices in identifying, 266-267

recent surveys, 48-50

risk indices for, 52-53

students’ characteristics, 265-266

trends over time, 51-53

variation in state-level risk indices for, 64

EMR. See Educable mentally retarded children

English as a Second Language programs, 195

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

English language learners, instruction for, 195-196

EP. See Embedded Phonics program

Equality of Educational Opportunity, 179

Evaluation

data needed, 235-236

“fairness” of, 217, 226, 289

full and individual, 215

initial, 234

procedures for, 234-235

Expectations, and potential self-fulfilling prophecies, 181-182

Explicit instruction, 325-326

Exposure to alcohol during pregnancy, 102-104

alcohol consumption after finding out about pregnancy, among expectant mothers in the United States, 104

Exposure to lead, 111-117

lead levels and measured behavior, 116

prevalence of elevated blood lead levels, 113-114

Fairness, of evaluation, 217, 226, 289

False negatives, 38, 225

False positives, 38

Family adversity, and reading skills, 201

Family and Child Experiences Survey, 161

FAS. See Fetal alcohol syndrome

Federal data sets, 36-42

disability categories of concern, 36-39

Federal disability legal requirements, 213-215

Federal-level change recommendations, 7-8, 11-14, 211-212, 312-314, 354-356, 362-364, 375

assessment, 312-313, 363-364

eligibility, 312, 363

reporting and monitoring, 313-314, 364

Federal Office of Special Education Programs, 364

Federal support

of education and care of children under age 5, 152

of state reform efforts, 9, 319, 369

Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), 102

“Flynn effect,” 27

Focus of instruction, 331-333

From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development, 120

Full evaluation, 215

Full-scale IQ (FSIQ), 255-256

Functional assessment, and IEP relevance, 218

Functional imaging, 249

Funding, 179-180

idiosyncratic, 223

for reform, 383-385


Gardner, Howard, 278

Gating, multiple, 298

Gender comparisons, 72-76, 229

by disability, 73

for ED, 73

for MR, 74-75

Gender influence on referrals, 227-230

General education context, 169-212

bias in the design and delivery of schooling, 181-188

educational resources, 172-180

lessons from tested interventions, 188-204

recommendations, 209-212

successful for students with LD, 324-325

Genetic expression, 94

Gifted and talented (GT) eligibility, 7, 9, 369-371

IQ tests and, 290-291

recommendations, 319-320

Gifted and talented (GT) programs, 23-25

indices of placement in, by race/ethnicity, 53

Gifted and talented (GT) students, 70-72, 78-80, 196-197, 271-278, 340-354

benefits of gifted and talented assignment, 352-354

black students, 71, 89

data monitored by OCR, 51-54

grouping arrangements, 347-352

Hispanic students, 71, 89

identification of, 273-274, 310-311

odds ratios for, 54

percentage of students in gifted and nongifted programs who are assigned to algebra in grade 8, 353

percentage of students with specified grades and test scores by ethnicity for 8th grade gifted and talented students NELS 88 database, 353

percentages of 1st grade and 3rd grade cohorts in prospects study who scored at or above the 50th and 75th percentiles in reading and mathematics, 79

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

percentages of 4th grade students who scored within the proficient and advanced ranges on the reading, math, science, and writing tests of the NAEP, 79

recent surveys, 51, 53

referral and identification procedures, 274-276

research on curriculum models, 343-345

risk indices for, 54-55

screening and identification in

underserved populations, 276-278

specific instructional practices, 345-347

trends over time, 51-55

variation in state-level risk indices for, 65

Giftedness, 38-39

incidence of among racial/ethnic groups, 4

Goals 2000: Educate America Act, 32

Graphophonemic knowledge, 294

Group size, 331

Grouping arrangements, 347-352

cooperative learning, 349-350

for minority and low-income students, 350-352

mixed results of within-class grouping, 347-349

GT. See Gifted and talented eligibility

Guadalupe consent decree, 255

Head Start, 14, 128, 150, 159-162, 201, 351, 377

fiscal year 2000 data, 161

Head Start Impact Study, 160

Health Center Program, 112

Hearing impairment, 56

High Schools that Work, 205

Hispanic students

in the category of emotional disturbance, 70, 88

in the category of gifted and talented, 71, 89

in the category of learning disabilities, 68, 88

in the category of mental retardation, 67, 87

History scores for 12th graders, average NAEP, by race/ethnicity and parent education level, 80

Home environment, parenting style and child development, 124

Household income and race/ethnicity, for children receiving early intervention, 157

Hyperactivity, 59


I Have a Dream program, 351

IDEA. See Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Identification

of giftedness, 273-274

procedures for, 250-251

reactive school practices in, 266-267

IEP. See Individualized education program

IHDP. See Infant Health and Development Program

Immigrants, 21

Improving America’s Schools Act, 32

Improving and expanding the research base, 13-14, 378-383

data collection, 378-382

expanding the research base, 382-383

federal-level recommendations, 13-14

Improving mother-infant attachment, 143

Improving outcomes, 321-385

recommendations, 357-385

weighing the benefits of placement, 323-356

Inadequacy of datasets, 37-39

denominators, 39

disability status, 38

giftedness, 38-39

race/ethnicity, 37-38

Inauthentic questions, 183

Incidence, versus prevalence, 38

Income-to-needs ratios and child cognitive ability

deep poverty and IQ scores, age 5, 121

deep poverty and math ability, 122

Incredible Years Series, parent, teacher, and child training, 300

Individual evaluation, 215

Individualized education program (IEP), 32, 186, 215-216, 219, 235, 302, 308, 313, 318, 339, 364, 366

functional assessment and relevance to, 218

Individualized evaluation, 215

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 2, 18-19, 36, 41, 44, 84, 151, 214-217, 219-220, 222, 226, 244, 279, 308-310, 314, 335, 337, 364-365, 379

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

additional team members, 238

amendments to, 31

criteria for determining the existence of a specific learning disability, 238

definition of a child with a disability, 240-242

determination of eligibility, 236-237

determination of needed evaluation data, 235-236

evaluation procedures, 234-235

initial evaluation, 234

interconnectedness of regulations, 219

observation, 239

procedures for evaluation and determination of eligibility, 234-239

reevaluation, 237

services for infants and toddlers, 151-158

services for preschoolers, 158-159

written report, 239

Infant competence, relation to competence and IQ scores at 4 years of age, 132

Infant Health and Development Program (IHDP), 103, 147, 149

Infants, receiving early intervention services, 154-155

Instruction, 199-204

for English language learners, 195-196

focus on, 331-333

interventions in, 204-206

Integrated Curriculum Model, 345, 351

Intellectual dimension of behavior, 253-257

Intelligence. See also IQ tests decontextualized, 279

“practical,” 281

Interactive dialogue, between teacher and student and among students, 326

Interpretation of data, factors compromising, 41-42

Interrelationship between general and specialized education, 21-27

emotional disturbance and learning disabilities, 23

gifted and talented programs, 23-25

mental retardation, 22-23

student characteristics and school services and settings, 26

Interventions

behavioral, 202-203

explicit instruction, 325-326

instructional, 204-206

interactive dialogue between teacher and student and among students, 326

motivation to learn, task difficulty, and task persistence, 327-328

procedural facilitators or strategies, 328

in reading and writing, 326

and referral decisions, 299-303

small-group instruction and pairs, 326-327

for students with LD, 324-325

successful, 324-328

Iowa Problem Solving Rules, 304

IQ-based disability determinations LD classification criteria, 285

misuse and racism, 284-285

misuse of, 284-285

problems with, 283-285, 289

problems with abandoning, 287-290

treatment validity, 284

IQ cutoffs

full-scale, 255-256

performance, 255-256

proportion of the population falling below certain, 254

IQ tests, 28, 41, 233, 275, 284-291, 313

and gifted and talented determination, 290-291

Iron deficiency, among 1- to 2-year-old children by race and poverty status, 110

Isle of Wight study, 200

Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act, 24-25, 311, 319, 351, 369

Juniper Gardens Children’s Project, 206


Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 41

Kindergartners’ reading mean scale scores, by mother’s education, 138

Kirk, Samuel, 244


Labeling, 18

Language development, poverty and, 124-125

Larry P. decision, 72, 226, 233, 288-289

Lasting Benefits Study, 177-178

Lead, 11

exposure to, 111-117

levels of, and measured behavior, 114, 116

Learning Disabilities Act, 244

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Learning disabilities (LD), 1-2, 36-38, 42- 44, 47-50, 59, 62-63, 67-69, 72, 76, 82-83, 222, 226-227, 243- 251, 256, 270-271, 284-287, 308, 324-326, 330, 337-338, 340

black students, 68, 87

classification criteria, 285

concept of, 244

current identification procedures, 250-251

domain-specific definitions, 245-246

Hispanic students, 68, 88

indices of placement for, 48

legal context, 244-245

“marker variables” for, 330

odds ratios for, 49

by race/ethnicity, 48-49

reading disability, 246-250

recent surveys, 47-48

risk indices for, 49-50

specific, 238, 243-251

trends over time, 47-50

variation in state-level risk indices for, 63

LEAs, 40, 240

Legal context, 213-224, 244-245

IDEA definitions of disabilities, 240-242

IDEA procedures for evaluation and determination of eligibility, 234-239

integration of PEDE with other IDEA regulations, 219

new regulations, 216-219

and the referral process, 213-242

Legal requirements for disability classification, 219-224

continuing, 215-216

disability classification policy, 222

distribution of disabilities by category, 221

federal, 213-215

state, discretionary, 223-224

Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers (LIFT), 301

Locke, John, 288

Longitudinal studies, of child development programs, 146-147

Longitudinal Study of American Youth, 178

Low birthweight infants, 98-102

percentage by detailed race and Hispanic origin, 101-102

Low-income students, grouping arrangements for, 350-352

Magnetoencephalography, 249

Marland Report, 24, 274

Maternal depression, 125-126

Mathematics skills, 188-190, 281-282

Matthew effects, 332

Medicaid, 112, 117

Medical models, of disability classification, 220-222

Mental retardation (MR), 19, 22-23, 36-37, 43-47, 63, 65-67, 74-76, 82-83, 251-261, 270-271

in Alabama, ethnicity and gender breakdown for, 75

behavioral dimensions defining, 253-259

black students, 66, 86

changes in the MMR construct, 260-261

ethnicity and gender breakdown for, 74-75

Hispanic students, 67, 87

indices of placement by race/ethnicity, 45

in New Jersey, ethnicity and gender breakdown for, 75

odds ratios for, 46

recent surveys, 44-45

risk indices for, 46-47

screening for, 233

special classification problem with, 220

trends over time, 45-47

variation in state-level risk indices for, 63

Mercer’s analysis influence of, 225-226

of the “normal” student, 224

Meta-analysis, of the effects of phonological awareness training, 334

Mild mental retardation (MMR), 1, 36-37, 222, 225, 227, 251-252, 255-258, 260, 284, 287-288, 324

Milwaukee Project, 149

Minority students, 76-81

gifted and talented, 78-80

grouping arrangements for, 350-352

with learning disabilities and behavior disorders, 329-330

overrepresentation of, 233, 254, 289

Minority students in special and gifted education, 35-89, 338-340

black students in the category of emotional disturbance, 88

black students in the category of gifted and talented, 89

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

black students in the category of learning disabilities, 87

black students in the category of mental retardation, 86

data on state-to-state variability, 62-72

explaining minority representation, 76-81

federal data sets, 36-42

gender comparisons, 72-76

gifted and talented data monitored by OCR, 51-54

Hispanic students in the category of emotional disturbance, 88

Hispanic students in the category of gifted and talented, 89

Hispanic students in the category of learning disability, 88

Hispanic students in the category of mental retardation, 87

nonjudgmental disability categories, 54-61

recommendations, 81-86

review of the data, 42-51

summary of national data on racial and ethnic representation, 61-62

Mislabeling, 18

Misuse of IQ-based disability determinations, 284-285

MMR. See Mild mental retardation Mnemonic strategies, training in, 347

Mobil Unit for Child Health, 149

Monitoring, 313-314, 364

Mothers who smoked cigarettes during pregnancy, according to mother’s detailed race, Hispanic origin, educational attainment, and age, 106

Motivation to learn, 327-328

MR. See Mental retardation

MRI imaging, diffusion tensor, 249

Multiple disabilities, 60

Multiple domains, 216

Multiple gating, 298

Multiple Option Observation System for Experimental Studies, 269

Multiple risk factors, 128-140

adding and subtracting, 139

and child psychiatric disorder, 129

effects of SES on school readiness, 130-131

first-time kindergartners’ reading mean scale scores, by mother’s education, 138

frequency with which teachers say children exhibit antisocial behavior, 136-137

frequency with which teachers say children persist at a task, are eager to learn new things, and pay attention well, 134-135

multiplicity of risk factors and child psychiatric disorder, 129

print familiarity scores, 133

recognizing words by sight, 139

relation of infant competence to competence and IQ scores, 132

school readiness differences, 132-140

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 77, 190-191, 272, 292

students scoring within the proficient and advanced ranges on the reading, math, science, and writing tests, 79

National Assessment of Title I, 174

National Association of State Directors of Special Education, 39

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 39, 84, 125, 130

Common Core of Data, 84, 380

National Center for Learning Disabilities, 324

National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS), 153, 156, 158, 167

National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS), 179, 352

National Excellence, 24

National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), 191, 285-286, 315, 319, 365, 369

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 128

National Longitudinal Transition Study of Students in Special Education, 340

National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, 102

National Research Council (NRC), 1-2, 18-20, 36, 113, 120, 164, 191, 225, 261, 282, 305-306, 311, 359

Committee on Education Finance, 209, 372

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

National Teacher Examinations, 174

Native language considerations, 217

NCES. See National Center for Education Statistics

Negatives, false, 38, 225

NEILS. See National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study

NELS. See National Education Longitudinal Study

Neurobiological studies, 249-250

Neurological damage, 99

New regulations, 216-219

determination of eligibility, 218-219

disproportionality and nondiscrimination, 217

functional assessment and IEP relevance, 218

NICHD. See National Institute for Child Health and Human Development

Non-Western schooling, 280

Nondiscrimination, 217

Nonjudgmental disability categories, 54-61

autism, 60

deaf-blindness, 60

developmental delay, 6

hearing impairment, 56

multiple disabilities, 60

orthopedic impairment, 56

OSEP data by disability and ethnic group: composition index, risk index, and odds ratio, 57-59

speech and language impairments, 55-56

traumatic brain injury, 60

visual impairment, 56

NRC. See National Research Council Number Worlds, 189

Nutrition and development, 106-111

and behavior problem profiles, 109

iron deficiency by race and poverty status, 110

national ranking of New York City public schools before and after diet changes, 112

standard test score differences at 11 to 14 years old, 110

Observation, 239

Odds ratio (OR), 43-44, 46, 48-49, 51, 56-61

Office for Civil Rights (OCR), 2, 13, 19, 36-39, 42, 44-55, 69, 72-77, 81, 83-85, 198, 379-380

Office for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), 300

Office of Gifted and Talented, 24

Office of Management and Budget, Statistical Directive 15, 37

Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), 13, 36-39, 42, 44-45, 47-50, 53-54, 57-59, 61, 81, 83-84, 222, 324, 379-380

data by disability and ethnic group, 57-59

OJJDP. See Office for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Open Court, 194

Oppositional culture, 184

OR. See Odds ratio

Orthopedic impairment, 56

OSEP. See Office of Special Education Programs

Outcomes

auditory discrimination in-depth, 334

embedded phonics, 335

improving, 321-385

Overrepresentation, of minority students, 233, 254, 289


Pairing, 326-327

Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 162

Paperwork Reduction Act, 84

Parent advocacy, 338-339

Parental referral, versus teacher, 230-232

Parenting interactions, 185-188

parenting style and child development, 124

Parenting programs, 142-144

with children ages 3 to 5, 143-144

from pregnancy through the first two years, 142-143

PATHS. See Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies

Patient disability, versus mental retardation, 62

Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT) math scores, 119, 122

Peckham, Robert, 233, 288-289

PEDE. See Procedures for Evaluation and Determination of Eligibility

Peer tutoring, 346-347

PEP. See Protection in Evaluation Procedures Provisions Percentage of children

in auditory discrimination in-depth program, 336

in embedded phonics program, 336

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Percentage of first-time kindergartners adding and subtracting, 139

by the frequency with which teachers say they exhibit antisocial behavior, 136-137

by the frequency with which teachers say they persist at a task, are eager to learn new things, and pay attention well, 134-135

by print familiarity scores, by child and family characteristics, 133

recognizing the words by sight, 139

Percentage of low-birthweight births, by detailed race and Hispanic origin, 101-102

Percentage of students in gifted and nongifted programs who are assigned to algebra in grade 8, 353

with specified grades and test scores by ethnicity for 8th grade gifted and talented students, 353

Percentages of 1st grade and 3rd grade cohorts in prospects study, who scored at or above the 50th and 75th percentiles in reading and mathematics, 79

Percentages of 4th grade students, who scored within the proficient and advanced ranges on the reading, math, science, and writing tests of the NAEP, 79

Performance, defining, 39

Performance IQ (PIQ), 255-256

Perry Preschool project, 150, 166

Persistent poverty, 122

Phenomenological Variant of Ecological Systems Theory, 173

Phonemic awareness, 294

Phonological awareness, 192

meta-analysis of the effects of training in, 334

Phonological deficit in adolescence and adult life, 248-249

Phonological model of dyslexia, 247-248

PIAT. See Peabody Individual Achievement Test math scores

PIQ. See Performance IQ

Placement in special education as a benefit or a risk, 5-6

for emotional disturbance by race/ethnicity, 50

in gifted and talented programs by race/ethnicity, 53

for learning disabilities by race/ethnicity, 48

for mental retardation by race/ethnicity, 45

outcome differences by race or ethnicity, 5-6

Placing Children in Special Education: A Strategy for Equity, 359

Planned curriculum, 149

Positives, false, 38

Poverty

correlation with single-parent status, 122

and language development, 124-125

persistent, 122

Practical intelligence, 281

Pregnancy through the first two years, 142-143

early home visitation programs, 142-143

early influences on cognition and behavior, 91-166

early intervention programs, 141-166

improving mother-infant attachment, 143

influences on cognitive and behavioral development, 93-140

Prenatal and Infancy Home Visitation by Nurses, 166

Preschool children with disabilities, served under IDEA, by age and year, 159

Preschool Grants Program for Children with Disabilities, 158

President’s Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children, 11, 117, 163, 376

Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children, 164, 377

Print awareness, 294

Problem-solving approach, to eligibility decisions, 303-305

Procedural facilitators, 328

Procedures

for current identification, 250-251

for determining eligibility and placement, 237

for evaluation, 234-235

for finding disabled children, 40

for referral and identification, 274-276

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Procedures for Evaluation and Determination of Eligibility (PEDE), 214-215, 239n

integration with other IDEA regulations, 219

Program intensity, 145-147

Project CARE, 149

Project Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR), 175, 177-178, 208

Projective instruments, 271

Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS), 203

Protection in Evaluation Procedures Provisions (PEP), 214-215

Psychiatric disorders, in children, 129, 264

Psychoeducational assessment, 226, 228

Psychometric views of culture and context, 282-291

IQ tests and gifted and talented determination, 290-291

problems with abandoning IQ-based disability determination, 287-290

problems with IQ-based disability determinations, 283-285

validity of LD discrepancies, 285-287

Psychometrics, 254

Public Law 94-142, 17, 23, 36

Puente project, 352

Race/ethnicity, 37-38

national versus Part C percentages, 156

of preschoolers receiving special education and of the general preschool population, 160

proper use of categories, 37

variability within, 37-38

Racism

in IQ-based disability determinations, 284-285

in referrals, 227-230

Raven’s Progressive Matrices, 276-277

RD. See Research and development base

Reactive school practices in identification, 266-267

Readiness testing, 310

Reading, 190-195

accuracy of, 294

basic elements of, 326

comprehension of, 295

fluency in, 192, 295

Reading disability, 246-250

neurobiological studies, 249-250

phonological deficit in adolescence and adult life, 248-249

the phonological model of dyslexia, 247-248

useful accommodations in, 249

Reading instruction

components of effective, 192-193

comprehension and vocabulary development, 193

phonological awareness, 192

word study, 193

Reading Recovery, 194, 331, 334-335

Reading scores, average NAEP, by race/ethnicity and parent education level, 80

Reading skills, and family adversity and behavioral deviance, 201

Recommendations, 6-14, 81-86, 162-166, 209-212, 311-320, 354-385

behavior management, 316-318

biological and social risk factors in early childhood, 11-13, 375-378

changes in participation rates in judgmental categories, 83

cost of reform, 383-385

federal-level changes, 211-212, 312-314, 354-356

federal support of state reform efforts, 9, 319, 369

gifted and talented eligibility, 9, 319-320

improving and expanding the research base, 13-14, 378-383

referral and eligibility determination, 361-371

school context and student performance, 9-11

school social, cultural, and contextual issues influencing achievement and behavior, 371-372

special education eligibility, 7-9

state-level changes, 314-316, 372-375

teacher quality, 210-211, 372-375

vision for change, 359-361

Referral and identification procedures, 5, 274-276

Referral decisions, 361-371

gifted and talented eligibility, 369-371

interventions and, 299-303

special education eligibility, 361-369

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Referral process, 224-234

influence of Mercer’s analysis, 225-226

race and gender influences on referrals, 227-230

referrals by classroom teachers, 226-227

referred and not referred students, 232-233

subjectivity of, 5

teacher versus parent referral, 230-232

“watch list,” 233

Reform, cost of, 383-385

Regulations. See also Legal requirements for disability classification interconnectedness of IDEA, 219

new, 216-219

Research and development (RD) base, 7

expanding, 382-383

Resolving Conflict Creatively Program, 201

Review of the data, 42-51

calculations, 42-43

emotional disturbance, 48-51

learning disabilities, 47-48

mental retardation, 44-47

Revised Behavior Problem Checklist, 262

Rightstart curriculum, 189-190

Risk index (RI), 42-44, 48-49, 51, 55-61, 65-71, 86-89

Riverside Desegregation Study, 233, 257

Rochester Adaptive Behavior Inventory, 130

SAGE. See Student Achievement Guarantee in Education program

SCHOOL. See Supporting Your Child’s Education

School Archival Records Search, 269

School context and student performance, 9-11

federal-level recommendations, 11

state-level recommendations, 10-11

School delinquency rates, in relation to expected level, 171

School readiness

differences in, 132-140

SES effects on, 130-131

School-wide enrichment model, 344

School-wide interventions, 204-206

Schools’ contributions to incidence of special needs or giftedness among racial/ethnic groups, 4-5

Science Advisory Board, 113

Screening practices, 269-270

in underserved populations, 276-278

SE. See Special education

Self-concept improvements, 326

Self-fulfilling prophecies, and teacher judgments and expectations, 181-182

SES. See Socioeconomic status effects

SFA. See Success for All

Single-parent status, correlation with poverty, 122

SLI. See Speech and language impairments

SM. See Socially maladjusted

Small-group instruction, 326-327

SMART. See Start Making a Reader Today program

Social and environmental influences on development, 118-140

child care quality, 126-128

children under 18 living in poverty, 118

maternal depression, 125-126

multiple risks, 128-140

parenting style and child development, 124

poverty and language development, 124-125

understanding SES effects, 119-122

Social risk factors in early childhood, 11-13, 375-378

federal-level recommendations, 12-13

Social Security Income Maintenance benefits, 287

Social Skills Rating System, 262, 269

Social system models, of disability classification, 220-222

Socially maladjusted (SM), 263

Socioeconomic status (SES) effects, 119-122

child poverty, 120

income-to-needs ratios, and child cognitive ability, 121-122

school readiness, 130-131

understanding, 119-122

Special education (SE), 17-34, 76-78

conceptual framework, 27-29

criticisms direct at, 217

current education context, 30-33

disproportionate representation of minority students and males in, 18-21

intersection of general and specialized education, 21-27

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

paradox of, 20

successful for students with LD, 324-325

without IQ in Iowa, 304-305

Special education (SE) eligibility, 7-9, 361-369

federal-level recommendations, 7-8, 362-364

federal support of state reform efforts, 9, 369

state-level recommendations, 8-9, 365-369

Special education (SE) interventions maintenance of effects of training, 333

numbers of children who appear to benefit from, 333-337

outcomes for auditory discrimination in-depth, 334, 336

outcomes for embedded phonics, 335-336

Special education (SE) settings versus the general education classroom, 330-333

focus of instruction, 331-333

group size, 331

Special Strategies, 206

Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), 112-113

Specific instructional practices, 345-347

compacting, 345-346

direct instruction and inquiry development, 346

peer tutoring, 346-347

training in mnemonic strategies, 347

Specific learning disabilities, 243-251

criteria for determining the existence of, 238

Speech

composition of, 247

decoding, 247-248

Speech and language impairments (SLI), 36-37, 55-56, 222

SSBD. See Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders

Stanford-Binet, 41

STAR. See Project Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio

Start Making a Reader Today (SMART) program, 207

State Departments of Education, Special Education Rules, 224

State-level recommendations, 8-11, 314-316, 365-369

behavior management, 367-369

early intervention, 365-367

early screening, 314-316

teacher quality, 10-11

State-to-state variability, 39-41, 62-72

emotional disturbance, 69-70

gifted and talented category, 70-72

learning disabilities, 67-69

mental retardation, 65-67

Statistical Directive 15, 37

Stereotype vulnerability, 181

Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program, 177-178

Student behavior, 197-204

behavioral interventions in general education, 202-203

culture and classroom behavior, 197-199

instruction, curricula, and classroom management, 199-204

reading skills, family adversity, and behavioral deviance, 201

Student characteristics, 265-266

and school services and settings, 26

Success for All (SFA), 194-196, 205

Supporting Your Child’s Education (SCHOOL), 300

Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence, 301

Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD), 297

Talented students. See Gifted and talented students

Task difficulty and persistence, 327-328

Task Force on Effective Psychosocial Interventions, 300

Teacher judgments and potential self-fulfilling prophecies, 181-182

“teachers as tests,” 229

Teacher Observation of Child Adjustment (TOCA), 297-298

Teacher quality (TQ), 7, 10-11, 172-175, 318, 372-375

federal-level recommendation, 375

state-level recommendations, 210-211, 372-375

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×

Teacher referral

most important factor in assignment, 226

versus parental, 230-232

subjectivity of, 227

and teacher tolerance for misbehavior, 233

Team decision making, 216

Team members, 238

Test bias

IQ tests and gifted and talented determination, 290-291

problems with abandoning IQ-based disability determination, 287-290

problems with IQ-based disability determinations, 283-285

research on, 282-291

validity of LD discrepancies, 285-287

Test-taking skills, 291

Tested interventions

challenge of change, 207-209

community-wide, 206-207

components of effective reading instruction, 192-193

with gifted students, 196-197

instruction for English language learners, 195-196

lessons from, 188-204

in mathematics, 188-190

in reading, 190-195

school-wide, 204-206

with student behaviors, 197-204

Texas Primary Reading Inventory (TPRI), 293-295, 384

Title I, 31, 33, 196

National Assessment of, 174

Tobacco use and drug abuse, 104-106

cocaine exposure, 105-106

mothers who smoked cigarettes during pregnancy, according to mother’s detailed race, Hispanic origin, educational attainment, and age, 106

tobacco exposure rates, 105

TOCA. See Teacher Observation of Child Adjustment

Toddlers, receiving early intervention services, 154-155

TPRI. See Texas Primary Reading Inventory

TQ. See Teacher quality

Tracking, 347

Traumatic brain injury, 60

Treatment validity, 284

Trends over time, 45-55

Triarchic Componential Model, 278, 344-345

Universal assessment, 292-293, 298

behavioral adjustment, 298

Universal K-12 education, assumptions underlying, 17

Upward Bound program, 351

U.S. Department of Education, 84, 250, 319, 324, 369, 380, 382, 384

Office for Civil Rights, 2, 13, 19, 36-39, 42, 44-55, 69, 72-77, 81, 84-85, 198, 379-380

Office of Gifted and Talented, 24

Office of Special Education Programs, 13, 36-39, 42, 44-45, 47-50, 53-54, 57-59, 61, 81, 84, 222, 324, 379-380

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 112

Head Start Impact Study, 160

U.S. Department of Labor, 31

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board, 113


Validity of LD discrepancies, 285-287

Variability. See Race/ethnicity;

State-to-state variability

Vision for change, 359-361

Visual impairment, 56

Vocabulary development, 193

Vocabulary size, 124-125


Wechsler scales, 41, 129-130, 233, 255

Weighing the benefits of placement, 323-356

benefits for gifted students, 340-354

recommendations, 354-356

student benefits from special education intervention, 323-340

WIC. See Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children

Wisconsin Car Sorting Test, 115

“Within-child” problems, 6

Within-class grouping, mixed results from, 347-349

Word study, 193

Writing, basic elements of, 326

Written reports, 239

Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 469
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 470
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 471
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 472
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 473
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 474
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 475
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 476
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 477
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 478
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 479
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 480
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 481
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 482
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 483
Suggested Citation:"Index." National Research Council. 2002. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10128.
×
Page 484
Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education Get This Book
×
 Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education
Buy Paperback | $125.00 Buy Ebook | $99.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Special education and gifted and talented programs were designed for children whose educational needs are not well met in regular classrooms. From their inceptions, these programs have had disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic minority students. What causes this disproportion? Is it a problem?

Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education considers possible contributors to that disparity, including early biological and environmental influences and inequities in opportunities for preschool and K-12 education, as well as the possibilities of bias in the referral and assessment system that leads to placement in special programs. It examines the data on early childhood experience, on differences in educational opportunity, and on referral and placement. The book also considers whether disproportionate representation should be considered a problem. Do special education programs provide valuable educational services, or do they set students off on a path of lower educational expectations? Would students not now placed in gifted and talented programs benefit from raised expectations, more rigorous classes, and the gifted label, or would they suffer failure in classes for which they are unprepared?

By examining this important problem in U.S. education and making recommendations for early intervention and general education, as well as for changes in referral and assessment processes, Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education will be an indispensable resource to educators throughout the nation, as well as to policy makers at all levels, from schools and school districts to the state and federal governments.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!