National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY." National Research Council. 2008. Radiation Source Use and Replacement: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11976.
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY." National Research Council. 2008. Radiation Source Use and Replacement: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11976.
Page 2

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Congress asked the National Research Council to review the civilian uses of radionuclide radiation sources and potential replacements for sources that pose a high risk to public health or safety in the event of an accident or attack. Considering technical and economic feasibility and risks to workers, the committee was asked to make findings and recommendations on options for implementing the identified replacements. In carrying out its charge, the committee met with practitioners and researchers in the relevant fields and, in this report, has focused foremost on hazards and risks, feasibility of replacements, and options for implementing the replacements. Approximately 5,000 devices containing nearly 55,000 high-activity radiation sources are licensed for use today in the United States. The devices are used for cancer therapy, sterilization of medical devices, irradiation of blood for transplant patients and of laboratory animals for research, nondestructive testing of structures and industrial equipment, and exploration of geologic formations to find oil and gas deposits. These radiation sources and devices are licensed and regulated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) or by state agencies with authority to regulate materials covered by agreements with the U.S. NRC (Agreement States). Because the array of applications of these radiation sources is so broad and the applications are essential to securing health, safety, and prosperity, the devices are licensed for use and found in every state in the nation. Some types of radiation sources should be replaced with caution, ensuring that the essential functions that they perform are preserved. For prioritizing its efforts to reduce security risks, the U.S. NRC should consider radiation sources’ potential to cause contamination of large areas resulting in area denial. Out of the thousands of manufactured and natural radionuclides, americium-241, cesium-137, cobalt-60, and iridium-192 account for nearly all (over 99 percent) of the sealed sources that pose the highest security risks in the United States. Of the radionuclides mentioned above, cesium-137 in the form of cesium chloride is a greater concern than other radiation sources based on its dispersibility and its presence in population centers across the country. In view of the overall liabilities associated with radioactive cesium chloride and the alternatives that are available now or possible in the future to replace these radiation sources, the committee finds that high-activity cesium chloride sources should be replaced. The committee suggests options for implementing the replacement, including discontinuation of licensing of new cesium chloride irradiator sources and devices and incentives to decommission existing sources and devices. In addition, the committee finds that nonradionuclide replacements exist for nearly all applications of the radiation sources examined, but they may not all now be economically viable or practical. Neither licensees nor manufacturers now bear the full life-cycle cost, including disposal costs, of some of these radiation sources. The committee recommends that the U.S. government provide incentives (market, regulatory, and certification) to facilitate the introduction of alternatives for the high-risk radiation sources and reduce the sources’ attractiveness and availability. These and related findings and recommendations are discussed in detail in the body of the report. The study task did not include detailed cost-benefit analyses and did not permit examination of lower activity radiation sources (Category 3 or lower), even in aggregation. 1

Radiation Source Use and Replacement: Abbreviated Version Get This Book
Buy Paperback | $68.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In the United States there are several thousand devices containing high-activity radiation sources licensed for use in areas ranging from medical uses such as cancer therapy to safety uses such as testing of structures and industrial equipment. Those radiation sources are licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and state agencies. Concerns have been raised about the safety and security of the radiation sources, particularly amid fears that they could be used to create dirty bombs, or radiological dispersal device (RDD). In response to a request from Congress, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission asked the National Research Council to conduct a study to review the uses of high-risk radiation sources and the feasibility of replacing them with lower risk alternatives. The study concludes that the U.S. government should consider factors such as potential economic consequences of misuse of the radiation sources into its assessments of risk. Although the committee found that replacements of most sources are possible, it is not economically feasible in some cases. The committee recommends that the U.S. government take steps to in the near term to replace radioactive cesium chloride radiation sources, a potential "dirty bomb" ingredient used in some medical and research equipment, with lower-risk alternatives. The committee further recommends that longer term efforts be undertaken to replace other sources. The book presents a number of options for making those replacements.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!