Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
C CEGIS as Envisioned by McMahon et al. (2005) The following series of quotes from McMahon et al. (2005) gives a sense of the dimensions and process of the Center of Excellence in Geospatial Informa- tion Science (CEGIS) envisioned to be needed to support geographic information science (GIScience) needs within the geography discipline and across the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). âThe GIScience Center of Excellence should lead in the planning and im- plementation of the research associated with goals 7, 8, and 91. The USGS must invest in personnel, resources, and infrastructure to establish a center of excel- lence focused on GIScience that builds, nurtures, and maintains a core of GIScience researchers to further these goals and actions.â McMahon et al. note that additional masterâs and doctoral researchers will be needed. They suggest the need for collaboration with the University Consor- tium for Geographic Information Science (UCGIS) and academic departments. 1 Goal 7: Observe the Earth at all scales using remote sensing to understand the human and environmental dynamics of land change. Goal 8: Provide timely, intelligent access to new and archived USGS geographic data needed to conduct science and support policy decisions. Goal 9: Develop innovative methods of modeling and information synthesis, fusion, and visualization to improve our ability to explore geographic data and create new knowl- edge. 133
134 Appendix C âThrough collaboration with other major research organizations . . . the USGS can establish major research objectives in GIScience that meet the needs of all USGS disciplines and The National Map.â âFormal exchanges with other Fed- eral agencies involved with spatial data (e.g. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency [NGA], Census) are highly desirable.â âUSGS Geographers must evaluate linkages with data user communities so that data specifications and analytical capabilities are based on both strong peer-reviewed science and USGS needs.â McMahon et al. recommend using postdoctoral fellows, internships, and close collaboration with USGS scientists and university researchers. âDirect support of university based GIScience research critical to the USGS mission will be necessary.â âLinkages to private industry for research and development in GIScience will also be fruitful.â âScientists affiliated with these centers [CEGIS and two other centers pro- posed by McMahon et al.] need not all work in a single geographic location, although it is desirable that a core group of staff be collocated. Core researchers include senior scientists who provide leadership and guidance for junior investi- gators. USGS scientists who are not directly affiliated with the centers but have an active interest in the themes addressed by a center can expect center scientists to serve as an important part of their extended intellectual community and act as collaborators and direct colleagues on some projects.â McMahon et al. suggest the following performance measures for CEGIS: ⢠Establish CEGIS within two years. ⢠Staff the center initially with 10 Ph.D. scientists with support staff (within two years) and expand to 20 scientists within five years. ⢠Prepare a science plan addressing key topics from goals 7, 8, 9 that are needed to meet the overall goals of this plan within two years. ⢠Establish postdoctoral, internship and visiting scholar relationships with universities with at least 20 scholars in residence within three years and provide continual rotation to maintain 20 per year.