National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Summary
Suggested Citation:"1 Introduction." National Research Council. 2010. Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies—Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12826.


Light-duty vehicles play a crucial role in two of the key challenges facing the United States: energy security and climate change. Transportation is responsible for more than two-thirds of U.S. oil consumption, and about 60 percent of the oil we use must be imported. Dependence on imported oil leads to concerns over vulnerability to disruptions, especially if world oil production peaks. Burning that oil in vehicles also accounts for one-third of U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main greenhouse gas linked to global climate change. The U.S. government is seeking to reduce the use of oil to help meet both challenges. This report assesses the contributions that plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) can make to this effort.

The National Research Council (NRC) report Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies—A Focus on Hydrogen (2008) analyzed the potential for hydrogen-fueled fuel cell vehicles to penetrate the market and estimated the reductions in oil consumption and CO2 emissions that might result. The report also compared these benefits to those that might be achieved by two alternatives: vehicles operating on biofuels and vehicles with advanced internal combustion engines. The latter included hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) but not plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) or all-electric vehicles (EVs).

In 2009 the U.S. Department of Energy asked the NRC to extend its analysis to PHEVs, putting them on the same basis as the other alternatives to fuel cell vehicles. This report is the result of that additional task. The statement of task is in Appendix D.

PHEVs have recently been the focus of much attention, in large part because of rapidly improving battery technology. Several manufacturers intend to introduce PHEVs over the next few years. PHEVs are similar to today’s HEVs, but they have larger batteries that can be charged from the electric grid and can supply sufficient energy to propel the vehicle for many miles. When PHEV batteries are discharged, the gasoline engine takes over, by either recharging the battery or directly providing power for propulsion. Short trips could avoid the use of gasoline altogether, and long trips are possible without the risk of being stranded, which is a concern for all-electric vehicles. PHEVs promise to reduce the use of gasoline without necessitating the major infrastructural changes that would be required for hydrogen, thus allowing an evolutionary transition from conventional vehicles. In addition, electric utilities may promote PHEVs because nighttime charging would help smooth out demand.

This report first evaluates battery and vehicle technologies to predict how costs might drop as technology improves and economies of scale increase. It considers PHEVs that can travel 10 (PHEV-10) and 40 (PHEV-40) miles on electric power as representative of all the PHEVs that may be available. Next it examines the ability of the electric grid to supply power for a growing PHEV fleet. Then it analyzes two potential market-penetration rates for PHEVs: (1) a Maximum Practical scenario, which makes optimistic assumptions about the evolution of PHEV technology, especially batteries, and about the barriers to market penetration and (2) a Probable scenario based on more likely assumptions. Because initially PHEVs will be considerably more expensive than equivalent conventional vehicles, the committee used the model developed in the hydrogen study to estimate the costs involved in supporting a transition to PHEVs. It also estimated the reduction of petroleum consumption and CO2 emissions that could result from these two scenarios. Finally, the report discusses the committee’s conclusions. The appendixes provide additional information on this study and the scenario analysis, plus a glossary of the many acronyms used in the report.

The committee was not able to analyze one potential barrier—the changes that PHEVs will require of drivers. The vehicles analyzed in the hydrogen report, even fuel cell vehicles, are functionally similar to current vehicles because they have the same range and refueling patterns. PHEVs, however, will require drivers to plug in their vehicles essentially every day. That will require a place where they can plug it in, preferably a garage or at least a car port, and the willingness to take the time to do it. While many people have the place, their willingness is a great uncertainty.

Suggested Citation:"1 Introduction." National Research Council. 2010. Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies—Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12826.
Page 6
Next: 2 Batteries and Battery Packs for PHEVs »
Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies—Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Get This Book
 Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies—Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Buy Paperback | $41.00 Buy Ebook | $32.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The nation has compelling reasons to reduce its consumption of oil and emissions of carbon dioxide. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) promise to contribute to both goals by allowing some miles to be driven on electricity drawn from the grid, with an internal combustion engine that kicks in when the batteries are discharged. However, while battery technology has made great strides in recent years, batteries are still very expensive.

Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies—Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles builds on a 2008 National Research Council report on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. The present volume reviews the current and projected technology status of PHEVs; considers the factors that will affect how rapidly PHEVs could enter the marketplace, including the interface with the electric transmission and distribution system; determines a maximum practical penetration rate for PHEVs consistent with the time frame and factors considered in the 2008 Hydrogen report; and incorporates PHEVs into the models used in the hydrogen study to estimate the costs and impacts on petroleum consumption and carbon dioxide emissions.


  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!