Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
130 1. Jane Sedor and Harry Caldwell, The Freight Story: A National Per- spective on Enhancing Freight Transportation, Office of Freight Management and Operations, Federal Highway Administration, November 2002. 2. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Pocket Guide to Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, January 2004. 3. Federal Highway Administration, Quick Response Freight Manual, developed by Cambridge Systematics, Inc., with Comsis Corpora- tion and the University of Wisconsin for the Travel Model Im- provement Program, September 1996. 4. Transportation Research Board Committee on Freight Trans- portation Data, A Concept for a National Freight Data Program, Special Report 276, 2003. 5. Alan Horowitz, Guidebook on Statewide Travel Forecasting, Federal Highway Administration, Report FHWA-HEP-99-007, July 1999. 6. Frederick W. Memmott, Application of Statewide Freight Demand Forecasting Techniques, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 260, September 1983. 7. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Handbook, 7th ed., 2003. 8. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis 298, Truck Trip Generation Data, Transportation Research Board, 2002. 9. Federal Highway Administration, Accounting for Commercial Ve- hicles in Urban Transportation Models, developed by Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Harry Cohen, and Arun Chattergee, 2004. 10. Torgil Abrahamsson, Estimation of Origin-Destination Matrices Using Traffic Counts: A Literature Survey, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, May 1998. 11. Federal Highway Administration, Accounting for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Transportation Models â Task 3: Magnitude and Distribution, prepared by Cambridge Systematics, November 2003. 12. Wilbur Smith Associates, Kentucky Statewide Traffic Model Final Calibration Report, April 1997. 13. Wilbur Smith Associates, Kentucky Statewide Traffic Model Update, January 2001. 14. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, âModal Analysis of Wisconsin Freight Traffic Data,â prepared by Wilbur Smith Associ- ates, August 2002. 15. Vermont Department of Transportation , Vermont Statewide Freight Study; Final Report, prepared by Cambridge Systematics, March 2001. 16. âIRC TH 10 Corridor Management Plan: TH 24 in Clear Lake to I-35W,â prepared by Howard R. Green Company for the Min- nesota Department of Transportation, Metro Division and Min- nesota Department of Transportation, District 3, May 2002. 17. Haitham Al-Deek, A Model for Heavy Truck Freight Movement on External Road Networks Connecting with Florida Ports, Phase I, Transportation Systems Institute at the University of Central Florida for the Florida Department of Transportation, July 1999. 18. âFreight Impact on Ohioâs Roadway System, Final Report,â pre- pared for the Ohio Department of Transportation by Cambridge Systematics, Reebie Associates, DRI-WEFA, and Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission, June 2002. 19. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000. 20. URS Greiner Woodward Clyde, âStatewide Model Truck Trip Table Update Project,â prepared for the New Jersey Department of Transportation, January 1999. 21. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Operations web site, Indiana State Profile, http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_ analysis/state_info/indiana/profile_in.htm. 22. W.R. Black, Transport Flows in the State of Indiana: Commodity Data- base Development and Traffic Assignment, Phase 2, Bloomington, Indiana: Transportation Research Center, Indiana University, 1997. 23. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Accounts, avail- able at http://www.bea.gov/bea/regional/gsp.htm. 24. United Nations Development Program, Human Development Indicators 2003, available at http://www.unhdp.org. 25. U.S. Census Bureau Commodity Flow Survey 1997, available at http://www.census.gov/econ/www/se0700.html. 26. EMME/2, INRO Consultants Inc., 5160 Décarie Boulevard, Suite 610, Montréal, Québec, H3X 2H9. 27. Marcial Echenique & Partners Limited, 49-51 High Street, Trump- ington, Cambridge, UK CB2 2HZ. 28. Modelistica Systems and Planning, Caracas, Venezuela, www. modelistica.com. 29. IMPLAN, PC-based economic analysis system, Minnesota IMPLAN group, Inc. References