National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix A: Revised Telephone Survey Instrument
Page 16
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 16
Page 17
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 17
Page 18
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 18
Page 19
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 19
Page 20
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 20
Page 21
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 21
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 22
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 23
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 24
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 25
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 26
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 27
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 28
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 29
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 30
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 31
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 32
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 33
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 34
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 35
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 36
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 37
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 38
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 39
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 40
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 41
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 42
Page 43
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 43
Page 44
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 44
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 45
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 46
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 47
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 48
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 49
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 50
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 51
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 52
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 53
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 54
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 55
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 56
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 57
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 58
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 59
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 60
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 61
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 62
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 63
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 64
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 66
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 67
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 68
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 69
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 71
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 72
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 73
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 74
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 75
Page 76
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 76
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 77
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 78
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 79
Page 80
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 80
Page 81
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 81
Page 82
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 82
Page 83
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 83
Page 84
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 84
Page 85
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 85
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 86
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 87
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 88
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 89
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 92
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 93
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 94
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 95
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 96
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 97
Page 98
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 98
Page 99
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 99
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 100
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 101
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 102
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 103
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 104
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 105
Page 106
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 106
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 107
Page 108
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 108
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 109
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 110
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 111
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 112
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 113
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 114
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22002.
×
Page 115

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

APPENDIX B STATE SUMMARIES

Alabama B-2 STATE: Alabama PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT), Bureau of Multi-Modal Transportation Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes ___X__ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: ___X__ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: The state solicits for projects every two years. Communities submit a single grant application to apply for all available State/Federal funds. The state decides which funding programs to use, mixing and matching between State and Federal funding as needed to fund as many transit needs as possible. Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 40 grants /year 29 6 29 19 88 • All 6 Section 5307 programs that Alabama administers are also Section 5311 recipients. • JARC program beginning this Fiscal Year. These are also the Section 5311 recipients. • Section 5309 funds are applied on behalf of entities. State is used to pass through the funding. Section 5309 recipients are non-traditional (i.e. senior services). The Transit Section is organized under the Multimodal Transportation Bureau, which is under the direction of the Assistant Bureau Chief. The Assistant reports to the Bureau Chief, which are all under the direction of the Transportation Director (Secretary of Transportation). The transit section staff provide general oversight for the subrecipients in managing the Federal programs. Thus, staff are tasked with both core functions and grant program-related duties.

Alabama B-3 • ALDOT receives Section 5313 funds, but these will now be administered by the Bureau of Transportation Planning this fiscal year. Does the state provide the “local match” for Federal programs? _____ Yes __X___No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ___X__ Yes _____No There are 12 small urban systems in Alabama (5 large and 6 small). The five large and 1 small system received funds directly from FTA. If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? __6__ Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes ____No If no, please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______9_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______9_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes and matches for each grantee, allocation of staff by federal program was not possible. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Ass’t Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 1 Local Grant Coordinator 4 Other: Transportation Technologist 1 Other: Engineering Assistant 1 However, the S.5313 funds are administered by the Bureau of Transportation Planning within ALDOT.

Alabama B-4 Notes: • Public Transit Director (called Program Manager) is also responsible for the following functions: FTA grants administrator, public transportation planning director, and transportation legislation/policy specialist. • Assistant Public Transit Director also is responsible for rideshare/alternative transportation. • Administrative support specialist also has the role of the fiscal officer. • Local grant coordinators (called Transportation Planners) often are individually assigned multiple functions: fiscal officer, FTA grants administrator, compliance monitor, vehicle and equipment specialist. • Public transportation planning is performed by the Transportation Planning Section. • Safety section within Bureau handles safety initiatives. • Training is contracted with Auburn University – RTAP. • Transportation Technologist performs the same functions as the Transportation Planners in addition to serving as ITS coordinator for the transit section. • Engineering Assistant supports all functions within the transit section – assists procurement officer with new data entries into the statewide database, removal of vehicles from database upon disposal, etc. and assists the grant manager with TEAM entries. NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 5 5 5 5 9 9 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS They need more people if additional Federal programs are issued, but no decisions have been made. Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The RTAP program is contracted to Auburn University - about 1 FTE. The Bureau of Multimodal Transportation also contracts out special projects to the State University System (i.e. intercity bus study or other transit element work for the Bureau’s work plan.) Currently, they have a contract with the University of Alabama at Huntsville for technical support. This is about 3 FTEs.

Alaska B-5 STATE: Alaska PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Alaska Department of Transportation, Division of Program Development, under Statewide Systems Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ______ Yes ___X__ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions ____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 (JARC) Section 5309 Section 5304 Statewide Planning Other State Programs Section 5303 Metro- politan Planning TOTAL 10-12 annual recipients 8 annual recipients 6 annual recipients 10 annual recipients Approximately 8 public transit, 4 complemen- tary paratransit, and 30 human service providers Alaska Mental Health Trust, 10 recipients 2 annual recipients Approx. 50 The public transit unit head supervises both transit employees and reports to the Program Development Divisional Director. No formal transit division exists, but the transit program is managed within the Division of Program Development, under Statewide Systems. There are 2 Transportation Planners dedicated to transit. Also one day per week of the State Long Range Transportation Planner’s time is devoted to transit responsibilities; therefore, the number of staff is about 2.2. All grant programs have dedicated staff, but no staff are dedicated to only one grant program. The staff all perform some degree of training, compliance, and administration/planning.

Alaska B-6 Description of state transit programs: • Three JARC grants awarded to the Alaska Mobility Coalition and the Alaska Mental Health Trust, administered by DOT Transit, which are available to all eligible agencies through a competitive process. • Two 5309 earmarks (one each) are awarded to the Alaska Mobility Coalition and the Alaska Mental Health Trust, which are administered by DOT Transit and available to all eligible agencies through a competitive process. • The Alaska Mental Health Trust originated as part of a lawsuit and, now, revenues for state lands are given to the Trust. This Trust is actually incorporated into the Revenue Department; the funds are not part of FTA, although they are given to DOT to pay for human service vehicles for mentally disabled people--- this money constitutes more than 50% of what they have in the pot for human service vehicles; it is earmarked for mentally disabled people. A portion of the money can also go to planning activities. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ______ Yes __X__No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X__No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes _____No Total Number of Grant Recipients Managed by State: 50 PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _____2_____ Full-time slots in transit section _____2______ of these are currently filled _____0______ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ FEDERAL TIME BY PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5304 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director .20 FTA Grants Administrator 1.5 37% 14% 14% 7% 14% 14% 6% Public Transportation Planner .30 8% 4% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% Compliance Monitor .15 5% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% Training Coordinator .10 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1%

Alaska B-7 NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: Grants management activities are not performed by an outside agency or contractor.

Arizona B-8 STATE: Arizona PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Arizona Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ___X__ Yes _____ No Primarily in an advocacy role. Also assists with State budget and statutory requests. Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions ___X__ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5303 TOTAL ANNUAL 55-65 per year 16 5 76-86 The Public Transportation Division reports directly to the DOT Director. The Public Transportation Division staff is organized by grant programs. Specifically, they are grouped by Federal programs – 1) Section 5311, 2) Section 5310, 3) Section 5303 & Section 5304, and 4) State Rail Oversight.

Arizona B-9 Description of state transit programs: Arizona has four state-related transit programs. The first, Local Transportation Assistance Fund II (LTAF II), provides $8-9M in funds for “transit use only” for public transportation sponsored by a local government entity or special needs transportation for jurisdictions allocated more than $2,500 (basically all Federal recipients). This program is funded through Arizona Lottery proceeds and can be used for capital purchases, to match Federal funds or enhance operations. The second program, Arizona Rides, provides funds and guidance under the Governor’s Executive Order 2005-16 to coordinate the state’s United We Ride grant planning and submittal. The third program is the Surface Transportation Program (STP) Flexible Funding, which is distributed only to the State’s federal transit programs and cities or regions that participate in FTA programs and have operating systems in place to utilize the funding. The Public Transportation Division allocated $900,000 of STP funding for capital funding in the Section 5311 program, $1.5 million for the Section 5310 program, and $4.1 million as pass-through funding to four Section 5307 systems. The last program, Light Rail Transit Funding, administers $200,000 to provide state safety oversight of the light rail system. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _____ Yes ___X__No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes ___X__No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X__Yes _______No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______14_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______13_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Allocating staff time among the Federal programs is not possible. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 2 FTA Grants Administrator 4 Training Coordinator 1 Other: Public Transportation Planner 1

Arizona B-10 Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Other: Rail Transportation Planner 1 vacant Other: Transit Automated Programs Systems Manager 1 Other: Management Analyst for Arizona Rides 1 Other: Section 5310 Transit Specialist 1 Other: Section 5311 Transit Specialist 1 Notes: • Director is also responsible for transportation legislation/policy analysis. • Fiscal officer responsibilities are performed within the Financial Management Services Division within DOT. • Four FTA grants administrators (Section 5311, Section 5310, State Safety Oversight, and Section 5304 managers) also function as local grant coordinators and compliance monitors. • The Section 5304 Manager (already accounted for as a FTA grants administrator) also functions as the public transportation planning director and the rideshare/alternative transportation coordinator. • Vehicle and equipment specialist handled by the Fleet Services Division within DOT. • Public Transportation Planner (VACANT) assists with the Section 5304 program and the state’s LTAF II, including public transportation planning studies throughout the state. • Rail Transportation Planner is responsible for many of the principal planning functions surrounding Arizona’s rail infrastructure, including freight and passenger rail modes, for both the Public Transportation Division and the Transportation Planning Division, providing technical resources and support, and managing planning studies. • Transit Automated Systems Manager conducts transit asset management to support Section 5310 and 5311 programs, oversees the design and update of Public Transportation Division website, and technical assistance to planning studies throughout the state. • Section 5310 Transit Specialist develops and coordinates the processes and procedures for vehicle delivery and monitors active liens and eligible lien releases on all vehicles in the Section 5310 program. • Section 5311 Transit Specialist manages procurement requirements, project billings and provides application and budget assistance to transit providers under the Section 5311 program.

Arizona B-11 NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 10 10 10 10 14 13 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Hiring to Fill Vacancy Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The transit division has a consultant to support planning for the Section 5304, and at times the Section 5311 programs (1 FTE).

California STATE: California PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Division of Mass Transportation, Federal Transit Grants Office Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? __X___ Yes _____ No If yes, explain arrangement: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes ___X__ No Caltrans Legislative Affairs is the intermediary between the divisions and the legislature. The Office Chief of the Federal Transit Grants Office is not allowed to have direct contact with state or federal elected officials. Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs __X___ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: _____ All Central Staff ___X__ District Staff The Division of Mass Transportation is under the Deputy Director of Planning & Modal Programs, who reports to the Chief Deputy Director and Director of the overall agency. Within the Division of Mass Transportation, a recent reorganization has placed all the Federal programs under a section devoted to Federal Transit Grants only. A separate section addresses State programs and funding. The DOT contracts for and funds the California Amtrak Rail and Bus Feeder System, but it does not receive Federal transit funding, and is under a separate division, the Rail Division. The Federal Transit Grants Office is organized into three program-related sections (JARC & New Freedom-S.5316 Rural and Small Transit Operators - S.5311 and S.5311(f), and Specialized Federal Transit-S.5310) and three functions (FTA DBE/Title VI Liaison, Homeland Security, Interagency Coordination and Liaison). In addition, staff with responsibilities that are primarily functional are located within the program-related sections (a grants management specialist who covers all programs is under the JARC/New Freedom Section, procurement/vehicles specialists are located in Rural and Small Urban and Specialized Federal Transit Sections), the FTA DBE/Title VI Liaison also covers other FTA compliance issues such as Drug and Alcohol/Drug-Free workplace, the Interagency Coordination and Liaison also covers other SAFETEA-LU issues, and the contract for the RTAP program and other training is monitored by a staff position under the Rural & Small Urban Section. B-12

California Role of district staff and chain of command: Significant role for District/decentralized staff. PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: The state solicits for projects every year. Eligible entities submit grant applications to apply for federal funding under particular programs. Most use state Transportation Development Act (TDA) sales tax receipts as part of the proposed local match. Estimating numbers of recipients by program is somewhat misleading because many recipients may have projects under different funding sources, and so are double-counted. Figures below are estimates. Also, S.5307 Small Urban programs will no longer be administered by DMT effective July 1, but will be administered by FTA as they become direct recipients—the figure below reflects this change, though there are previous S.5307 grants that were administered by the state. Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL* Approx. 150 annually Approx. 100 Now 0 35 existing, primarily Small Urban Operators No state- wide grant Local grants primarily managed by Division of Transportation Planning 250 grantees *represents 900-1,100 grants (some recipients with multiple grants) Description of state transit programs: California has several state transit funding programs. 1) TDA allows local jurisdiction to use the portion of the sales tax for transportation for transit purposes, unless it can be shown that there is no need. TDA is used as local match by recipients. DMT has a monitoring, legislative and regulatory role, though the actual allocation and distribution of funds is through the State Treasurer’s office. 2) State Transportation Improvement Program funds—state funds for projects in the STIP, 3) new program to provide funding for transportation projects addressing farm worker needs, regulations yet to be developed. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _X____ Yes _____No Indirectly, by providing TDA to local areas who then use it as match. Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No They used to, but effective 7/1/06 FTA will provide direct funding to these systems. If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? ____Approx. 35_________ Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _____Yes _X___No The major functions are handled centrally, in Sacramento. In 11 of the 12 Caltrans Districts, the transit program pays for staff time to perform transit related functions on both the Federal and state transit grant programs. The District staff perform first level project review, provide technical assistance, and do some compliance monitoring. Transit time is paid by the transit program, but the staff who perform these functions in the District offices report to District Planners. Federal Transit Grants staff in Sacramento act as liaisons to these District transportation planners regarding transit projects that have Federal transit funds as part of the project. B-13

California If no, please explain: PART III- STAFFING LEVELS __100 FTE Full-time slots in transit section (50 bodies full-time, plus equivalent of 50, but work is spread among more people) __95__ of these are currently filled (all but new JARC/New Freedom slots) __58__ staff people administer state programs only. Note: 26 are in the Federal Transit Grants Section, plus 8 FTE federally-funded in the District offices for a total of 34. ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Ass’t Public Transit Director 2-1 for fed, 1 for state 10% 10% 5% 10% 40% 10% 5% 10% Administrative Support Specialist 5 FTE Not tied to programs Fiscal Officer 1 Provided by another unit in DOT FTA Grants Administrator 1 30% 20% 10% 20% 10% 10% Local Grant Coordinator 8 90% 10% Planning Director (in Div. Of Transp. Planning) 1 100% Public Transportation Planners (FTE’s) 25 7% 7% 5% 1% 1% Legislative Policy Specialist 1 10% 10% 5% 10% 40% 10% 5% 10% The Division of Transportation Planning administers S. 5313 funds. They are pooled in the Comprehensive Planning Program, and passed along to the MPOs. B-14

California Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Safety Specialist (Homeland Security) 1 30% 20% 50% Compliance Monitor 1 10% 50% 30% 10% Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 3 FTEs 50% 40% RTAP and Training Coordinator 1 20% 20% 10% 10% 40% Interagency Coordination/ Liaison 1 30% 5% 5% 40% (20% JARC, 20%NF) 20% NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 150 135 105 105 100 100 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain 5 (4 are two-year positions) for New Freedom and JARC Description of any contracted grant activities: The RTAP program is contracted to CalACT, but is closely monitored by DMT Federal Transit Programs staff. B-15

Colorado STATE: Colorado PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Intermodal Planning Branch, Modal Program Section Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? ____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes __X___ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions ______ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5304 TOTAL ANNUAL 25-30 grantees annually 30 10 65 Description of state transit programs: Transit projects in Colorado are funded solely with federal and state dollars. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ____ Yes __X___No Local match for S.5307 and S. 5311 but not for S.5310 Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ______ Yes __ X_No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes _____No The federal transit program funds are administered by the Modal Program Section. The Chief of that Section reports to the Intermodal Planning Branch Manager who reports to the Director of the Transportation Development Division, under the Deputy and Executive Directors of CDOT. The staff is assigned both to federal grant programs (S.5311 and S.5310) and to specific functional areas (procurement, compliance, etc) . B-16

Colorado PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _____6_____ Full-time slots in transit section _____3_____ of these are currently filled _____0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public/ S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5304 Planning S. 5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight Modal Program Section Chief .5 Public Transit Unit Manager 1 35% 45% 15% lt 5% Fiscal Officer .5 35% 45% 15% lt 5% FTA Grants Administrator 3 (all currently vacant) 45% 55% Public Transportation Planner 1 30% 20% NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 5 5 5 5 5 5 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring to Fill Vacant Positions Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: CDOT contracts for the administration of the RTAP program, drug/alcohol reviews and compliance reviews. It is estimated that these activities are equivalent to over two FTEs. B-17

Connecticut STATE: Connecticut PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), Bureau of Public Transit Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? __X___ Yes _____ No If yes, explain arrangement: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff The Bureau of Public Transportation contains 1) Office of Transit and Ridesharing (with responsibility for virtually all FTA programs), 2) Office of Rail, and 3) Office of Fiscal and Administrative Services that supports both of the other offices. The Public Transit Administrator in the Office of Transit and Ridersharing reports to the Bureau Chief, Bureau of Public Transportation, who reports to the Deputy Commissioner for Operations (who oversees all modal programs). ConnDOT contracts with (indirectly operates) both rail and bus services: • With Metro-North for rail operations on a main and 3 branch lines into NYC; • With Amtrak for operation of the Shore Line East rail service; • With (3) private providers for services in 8 CT Transit Divisions (Hartford/New Haven/Stamford, Waterbury/Meriden/Wellingford, New Britain/Bristol) • For “I” express bus service on I-95, Stamford-White Plain, NY ConnDOT also contracts with private providers for express bus and ridesharing services The Office of Transit and Ridesharing contains two units: • Program Design and Implementation (Community advocacy, Bus capital projects, Marketing and TDM units) • Transit Development and Support Services (Contract Services and Support, Project Development, Regulatory and Compliance (non-FTA) units) B-18

Connecticut PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients (CONTRACTS) by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 25 (estimate) 5 8 Description of state transit programs: • ConnDOT provides all operating assistance to all Federal program recipients; Federal funds are used only for capital and some planning. • ConnDOT administers a state-funded Municipal Grant Program providing formula funds (pop+area) for dial-a-ride services to 54 municipalities, 8 Transit Districts and 2 Regional Planning Agencies. • $2.5 mil provided for operating enhancements by state Strategy Board. • Note: ConnDOT no longer matches all 5310 grants (ConnDOT provides the smaller of 80% or $40,000 per accepted application). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X___ Yes _____No (All except Fed funds for vans not used in public service.) Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? __X___ Yes _____No All S.5307 funds are used for capital; ConnDOT “pools” all apportioned S.5307 funds and establishes priorities with recipients/systems; recipients manage resulting individual grants themselves with FTA. If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? ___8____ Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes _____No …But not all program functions (see below) PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ____ 36*_____ Full-time slots in transit section (Office of Transit and Ridesharing) _____24______ of these are currently filled ___5 of 24_____ staff people administer state programs only *Note: 8 staffers in Regulatory and Compliance Division have no transit role. • All grant-making activity is administered within the Bureau of Transit. • Project development and grant development and monitoring is done within the Office of Transit and Ridesharing (and Office of Rail, if appropriate). • Office of Fiscal Administrative Services tracks grants, does fiscal management, post award. • Current Hartford Busway Project is managed in ConnDOT Highway Design; the grants are managed by ConnDOT Transit staff. • Affirmative Action and training are managed in separate Departmental Offices. B-19

Connecticut ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus CMAQ Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 3 Fiscal Officer 2 in Fiscal Admin Services Planner 12 1.0 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.5 3.0 Legislative Policy Specialist 2 Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 1 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain 6 (budgeted) Description of any contracted grant activities: Vehicle specifications often written by contractors/consultants. B-20

Florida STATE: Florida PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), State Transit Office Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Explain arrangement: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No On an intermittent basis, but not as one of the departments officially Registered Lobbyists. Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: _____ All Central Staff __X___ District Staff Role of district staff and chain of command: The Public Transit Manager reports to State Public Transportation and Modal Administrator who reports to the Assistant Secretary for Intermodal Systems Development who reports to the Secretary. FDOT anticipates contracting for initial operation of the Central Florida Commuter Rail service for some period in the future. The State’s Transit Programs Office contains three sections – Planning, Grant Programs Administration, and Transit Operations. No staff are assigned to specific grant programs. Seven FDOT Districts have approximately ten FTE program managers who solicit and evaluate funding requests, administer grants and contracts, and oversee implementation. District FTEs report to the District Engineers, with regular consultation with Headquarters transit staff. Headquarters staff does administrative/policy/guidance with no sustained responsibility for local grantees. B-21

Florida PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5315 TOTAL 97 annually 52 16 (local) 165 Description of state transit programs: The State has several independent state programs ($90M plus in FY 2002) including: • Urban Transit Capital Program • State Transit Block grant to 5307 recipients, and county-based social service coordination • Public Transit Service Development Program for discretionary demonstration projects • Transit Corridor Program for discretionary capital or operating support in designated corridors • Commuter Assistance Program for TMNA-based ridesharing support • Park and Ride Program Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X__ Yes _____No S.5310 match is 80-10-10; 5311 is all operating with no state match. Does the State administer the S. 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No Locals directly contract with FTA; State allocates funds, signs an agreement with locals giving them responsibility for FTA requirements. Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X__Yes _____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ___21 ___ Full-time slots in transit section (11 in Headquarters; 10 FTEs in Districts) ___21___ of these are currently filled ____0___ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% B-22

Florida Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Administrative Support Specialist 1 Fiscal Officer* FTA Grants Administrator 1 Local Grant Coordinator (10 FTE)** yes yes yes yes yes Planning Director 1 10% Planner 2 20% Rideshare Coordinator 1 10% 10% Safety Specialist 1 15% Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 2 50% 25% * Comptroller’s Office keeps books ** District staff not all full-time transit NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 21 21 21 21 21 21 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X B-23

Florida Description of any contracted grant activities: Considerable contracting in support of FDOT transit program administration and technical activities, largely through CUTR, including: • Management of state vehicle procurement program; • Management and technical assistance to locals for Commuter Assistance/Ridesharing program • Conduct of drug and alcohol testing • Management of training coordination and delivery • Research B-24

Georgia STATE: Georgia PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Georgia Department of Transportation, Office of Intermodal Programs, Transit Programs Section Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: _____ All Central Staff __X__ District Staff Role of district staff and chain of command: PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5315 TOTAL At GA DHS 118 5 123 The transit programs section is located under the Office of Intermodal Programs, which is located under the Division of Transportation Planning, Data, & Intermodal Development, which is under the Chief Engineer, who reports to the Commissioner. The function of administering grant applications has dedicated staff; the function of MPO planning has dedicated staff, the function of FTA TEAM reporting has dedicated staff, and the function of vehicle procurement has dedicated staff. The district staff has oversight over the S.5311 grantees. The Manager of Transit Programs (located at the central office) has oversight over the district staff people. The central office has a Memorandum of Understanding with the district offices to house the staff people. There are six people in the districts and a seventh in Atlanta. B-25

Georgia Description of state transit programs: There are no state programs. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X__ Yes _____No Does the State administer the S. 5307 Small Urban Program? __X__ Yes _____No If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? ____5____ Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _____Yes __X__No If no, please explain: Th PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _____12_____Full-time slots in transit section _____12____ of these are currently filled _____0_____ staff people administer state programs only Plus parts of three positions that also serve other intermodal programs. ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 25% 25% 20% 5% 5% 5% 10% 5% Fiscal Officer .33 40% 30% 10% 5% 5% 10% FTA Grants Administrator .33 40% 30% 10% 5% 5% 10% Local Grant Coordinator 7 100% Planner 3 20% 30% 10% 30% 5% 5% Compliance Monitor .33 Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 1 90% 10% The Section 5310 program is administered by the Georgia Department of Human Resources. B-26

Georgia NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 12 12 12 12 12 12 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: There are no contracted grant activities. B-27

Hawaii STATE: Hawaii PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: The Department of Transportation is organized largely by three program divisions (Airports, Highways, and Harbors) which do not include transit as a separate entity. Transit-related activities are submerged in the Statewide Transportation Planning Office which is in the administrative arm of the organization. Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: That Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ______ Yes ___X___ No The respondent does coordinate with the State on earmarks, but any policy-type of decisions go through the Director of the Statewide Planning Office. Transit staff organized by: _____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ____X___ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 (JARC) Section 5309 Section 5304 Section 5303 Metropolitan Planning TOTAL 10 annual recipients 3 5 1 (Oahu MPO) 19 annual recipients The Statewide Transportation Planning Office serves a coordinating and planning function in establishing a multimodal transportation planning process and plan. The Office also provides technical assistance to counties to fulfill their roles of participation in that process. Within the Office, the Programming Staff Division handles the transit work through two engineers on staff. The Division has had a planner vacancy for the past 1.5 years. The two FTEs have broad intermodal planning responsibilities; they wear several hats and neither is fully dedicated to transit. The transit work was supposed to take only 25% of each person’s time, but in reality it takes up about 75%; so roughly, 1.5 FTE workload supports transit grants management. The respondent performs all grant management duties, with the assistance of the other Engineer for S.5311, S.5310, S.5303 (Metro/State Planning), S.5304, S.5309 discretionary funds (the urban system in the City & County of Honolulu get capital grants using those funds), earmarks, and new starts. B-28

Hawaii Description of state transit programs: The State does not provide any operating funds for public transit; they do, however, provide capital assistance for bus purchases on occasion (this has not been used very often though). The counties provide matches or operating assistance; about 75% of the operating budget comes from the counties. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _____ Yes ___X__No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ______ Yes ___X__No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes _____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS __ 1.5*____ Full-time slots in transit section __ 1.5*____ of these are currently filled ____0_____ staff people administer state programs only * Note: Technically, neither of the two staff that work on transit issues are dedicated exclusively to transit. They accepted their positions with the expectation that transit work would take up 25% of their time. Instead it takes up 75% of each person’s time. That would equate to a 1.5 FTE. ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ FEDERAL TIME BY PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Planners/ Engineers 2 NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: None B-29

Idaho STATE: Idaho PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), Division of Public Transportation ________________________________________________________________________________ Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The T Does the DOT directly operate transit services? ______ Yes __X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ___X__ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: ___X__ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: The state solicits for projects every two years. Communities submit a single grant application to apply for all available State/Federal funds. The State decides which funding programs to use, mixing and matching between State and Federal funding as needed to fund as many transit needs as possible. Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 12 annually 13 + 3 intercity 4 fiduciary oversight 25 includes S. 5303 The Division of Public Transportation is under the direction of the Director of the ITD (equivalent to S cretary), who reports to a governor appointed seven member transportation board that has final authority. The Division of Public Transportation is organized by a combination of the grant programs and core functions assigned to the staff. B-30

Idaho Description of state transit programs: Idaho has one state transit funding program – Vehicle Investment Program which awards around $312,000 per year. The funds are used to purchase vehicles for both public and non-profit agencies after federal program dollars are exhausted. As noted above, Idaho also has 3 Section 5311(f ) recipients for intercity service. They also only provide fiduciary oversight and technical assistance to 4 out of the 5 small urban areas within the state. Section 5309 funds are currently used for technical assistance, though this fiscal year will be the first where funds will be used for an ITS statewide earmark. Lastly, the Division of Public Transportation co-manages the consolidated Section 5303 program funds for 5 urbanized MPOs, though the funds are moved to FHWA to oversee. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _____ Yes ___X__No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No They provide technical assistance only. Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _X____Yes ____No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ____ 9 ____ Full-time slots in transit section (plus 1 part-time temp) ____ 9_____ of these are currently filled ____ 1 (clerical) staff person administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes and matches for each grantee, allocating time among the programs was not possible. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 2 Fiscal Officer .3 FTA Grants Administrator .5 The S. 5313 funds are passed along to the MPOs. B-31

Idaho Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Local Grant Coordinator 3 Planning Director .4 Program Manager Rideshare Coordinator .2 Legislative Policy Specialist .2 Safety Specialist .1 Training Coordinator .3 Other: ITS Coordinator 1 Special Needs Staff 4 Notes: • Transit Administrator (Director) – 40% of time on federal programs, 20% of time on dealing with other state agencies, and 40% of time dealing with Idaho Transportation Department business. • 2 Administrative support specialist – 1) accountant/clerical 60% federal and 40% state and 2) secretary 100% state. • Public transportation planning director – time is divided as follows: 40% to public transportation planning, 30% as the business manager (fiscal officer), 20% legislation/policy, and 10% safety specialist. • 4 Local grant coordinators – 2 are 100% for this function, 1 is 50% and 50% FTA grants administrator, and 1 is 50% and 20% rideshare/alternative transportation and 30% training coordinator. NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 8 8 8 8 8 8 B-32

Idaho ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS They need more people, but legislation caps number of assigned employees. Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: None to date, but they are considering outsourcing drug and alcohol monitoring. B-33

Illinois STATE: Illinois PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Public and Intermodal Transportation Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: _X___ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: _X____ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5315 TOTAL 65 annually 30 2-3/year 2 100 The Transit side of the Public and Intermodal Transportation Division is comprised of four major s ctions (NE Illinois Area Programs, Downstate Area Programs, Support Services, and Administrative Services). These chiefs/managers report to the Director of the Division of Public and Intermodal Transportation who reports to the Secretary. There are two bureaus which are organized geographically (NE Illinois and Downstate). In addition, there is an administrative section and a technical studies section. B-34

Illinois Description of state transit programs: There are two major state programs, each of which has a NE Illinois component and a Downstate component. The first program is Operating Assistance, which provides $61 million to Downstate systems ($56 million to urban systems, and $5 million to rural systems); and $135 million for the NE Illinois component (the Chicago Metropolitan area). The second program is a reduced fare program, which is used to reimburse transit agencies for the lost revenue that result from reduced fares for elderly people and people with disabilities. The downstate reduced fare is funded at about $400,000 annually and the NE Illinois reduced fare program is funded at $37 million annually. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _____ Yes __X___No In past years the state provided local match for the S.5309 program, but no longer has the funds to do it. The state operating assistance funds can be used for “local match” Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes _____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______34_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______24_____ of these are currently filled ________4_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Ass’t Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 1 Fiscal Officer 1 1% 5% 1% 1% FTA Grants Administrator 2 30% 45% 5% 10% 5% Local Grant Coordinator 8 33% 32% 4% Planning Director 1 70% B-35

Illinois Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Planner 2 60% Legislative Policy Specialist 2 Compliance Monitor 5 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The Transit Division contracts with a consultant to conduct program reviews and to provide a staff person for the Division for two years. The division also has a consultant for writing vehicle specifications and inspecting vehicles. The Division has an Inter-Agency agreement for Western Illinois University to run the RTAP program. B-36

Indiana STATE: Indiana PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), Division of Local Programs, Office of Transit Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No In conjunction with the INDOT Legislative Office. Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions ___X__ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL ANNUAL 45-50 per year 37 9 80 The statewide transit programs, including federal grant management, are administered by the INDOT Office of Transit, within the Division of Local Programs. The head of the transit section is the Transit Manager of the Office of Transit. The Transit Manager reports to the Local Program Division Director, under the Deputy Director for Planning and Production, who ultimately reports to the Commissioner of INDOT. Under the direction of the Transit Manager, the Office of Transit has three staff members assigned to work with S.5311 grantees, one assigned to work with S.5310 grants, one assigned to planning functions. In addition, they contract for two additional full-time staff that provides technical assistance and compliance monitoring. Outside of the Office of Transit, INDOT provides support with fiscal matters, procurement and civil rights functions. B-37

Indiana Description of state transit programs: Indiana has a sales and use tax that funds its Public Mass Transportation Fund ($30M in FY2005). These funds are used to match federal S.5311, S.5307, and S.5309 funds Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X__ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ______ Yes __X__ No . Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X__Yes _____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______6_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______6____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 25% 25% 50% on general administration and other programs Local Grant Coordinator 5 20% 60% 20% NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 6 6 6 6 6 6 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: INDOT has two staff through a contactor. One primarily employee performs RTAP functions (training and technical assistance) with a little S.5311 administration. The second contract employee conducts compliance reviews. B-38

Maine STATE: Maine PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Maine Department of Transportation, Office of Passenger Transportation Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ___X__ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions ___X__ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: ___X__ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 10 grants annually 14 10 4 5-15 per year Pays for Administrator for technical assistance 22 The transit program is directed by the Transportation Programming Unit Manager. The Division is organized under the Office of Passenger Transportation, which is under the direction of the Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Communications, who reports to the Commissioner (Secretary of Transportation). The Programming Division is organized by grant programs which are assigned to the four local grant coordinators (the Transportation Programming Unit Manager functions both as the transit director and as one of the local grant coordinators). The transit staff receive administrative support that is shared among the divisions. An additional three planners work on FTA projects, but are not included in the transit section. B-39

Maine Description of state transit programs: Maine provides about $550,000 per year from the State’s General Fund which is used for federal operating match. Maine also provides assistance for capital purchases where the state pays 50% of the non-federal share for traditional vehicles and 75% for alternative fuel vehicles. Maine also administers Section 5303 funds which are provided to metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X___ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ___X__ Yes _____No If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? ____10______ There are also three direct S. 5307 recipients. Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X___Yes ____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______4_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______4_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes/matches for each grantee, it was not possible to allocate time among federal programs. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Local Grant Coordinator 3 Notes: • Public Transit Director (called Transportation Programming Unit Manager) – fills other major functions including: fiscal officer, FTA grants administrator, and transportation legislation/policy specialist. • Three Administrative support specialist – two are filled and one is open. These positions are shared among departments. • Four Local Grant Coordinators (Public Transit Director is one of the four) – other major functions include: FTA grants administrator, compliance monitor, vehicle and equipment specialist (one of the coordinators), and training coordinator (one of the coordinators). • Public Transportation Planning Director is a function within Maine DOT under the Planning, Development, and Engineering Division within the Office of Passenger Transportation. • Other: Planners – There are three planners who are not funded by FTA but work on FTA projects. One of these planners is responsible for rideshare/alternative transportation. • Engineers – For construction projects as needed B-40

Maine NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 4 4 4 4 4 4 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: Maine contracts the following activities: Vehicle maintenance consultant – .5 FTE; drug and alcohol – .2 FTE; and service planning – .5 FTE. In addition, they share administrative support, planning and engineering staff with the rest of MDOT. B-41

Maryland STATE: Maryland PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Maryland Department of Transportation, Maryland Transit Administration, Office of Planning, Statewide Planning Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? __X___ Yes _____ No If yes, explain arrangement: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes ___X__ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs __X___ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff The statewide transit programs, including federal grant management, are managed out of the Maryland Transit Administration’s (MTA) Office of Planning, under the Director of Planning. Most of the functions are performed within the Statewide Planning Division, under the Manager of Statewide Planning. The functions dealing with management of the federal grants (link between state and feds) are handled by the Capital Programming Division which is also within the Office of Planning. The MTA operates the bus, rail (heavy and light), and ADA paratransit in the Baltimore region, commuter bus and commuter rail. The Statewide Planning unit is split into two sections – regional planning (which manages the public transit programs – S.5307, S.5309, S.5311, and JARC, state public transit programs) and statewide programs (which manages the state’s coordination program and S.5310, ridesharing, specialized transportation). In addition, the regional planning staff are assigned to manage grantees in specific regions of the state. The staff are not dedicated to a particular federal program, but rather to grantees and/or projects. The functions dealing with management of the federal grants (link between state and feds) is handled by the Capital Programming Division within the Office of Planning. The only dedicated staff person is the one assigned to the S.5310 program. B-42

Maryland PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5315 TOTAL ANNUAL 20 grantees annually 24 8 18 11 47 Description of state transit programs: In addition to using state funds to match federal operating/capital grants under S.5307, S.5311, S.5309, JARC and ridesharing, Maryland has a number of state programs funded entirely with state dollars. These include the ADA program ($2.4M in FY06), the Specialized Service Transportation Assistance Program - SSTAP ($4.3M in FY06), Rural and Community Based Transportation Program ($1.8M in FY06), the Senior Ride Demonstration Program ($100,000 in FY06). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _X____ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _X___ Yes _____No If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? ___8 _______________ Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _X____Yes ____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______12_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______8_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only B-43

Maryland ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Cannot distribute among the programs no no Ass’t Public Transit Director 2 Chief Regional Planning is distributed among 5311/5307/JARC/RTAP Chief Statewide Programs is distributed among S.5310 and various state programs no no Administrative Support Specialist 1 Cannot distribute among the programs no no Fiscal Officer In Capital Programming Division FTA Grants Administrator In Capital Programming Division Local Grant Coordinator 4 .5 person 3.5 people split their time among the remaining federal/state programs NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 8 8 8 8 8 8 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The MTA contracts with a consulting firm to provide one of the Local Grant Coordinators listed above. MTA also contracts for administration of the RTAP program. B-44

Massachusetts STATE: Massachusetts PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Executive Office of Transportation, Office of Transportation Programs, Federal Transit Administration Program Unit Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? ____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes __X___ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions ___X___ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL ANNUAL 12-20 grantees annually 13 10 1 30 Program Managers and staff of Federal Transit Administration Programs Unit report to a Director of FTA Programs who reports to the Deputy Secretary of Transportation for Transportation Programs who reports to the EOT Secretary. The S. 5311 program is managed by the state, but funds flow to 15 Regional Transit Authorities (RTAs) statewide (awards are discretionary based on need). The S. 5310 program is managed by EOT with vehicle purchases by the RTAs and/or Councils on Aging. The S. 5307 and S. 5309 program funds flow directly to the RTAs with no state management. S. 5303 (planning) funds flow directly to the MPOs with no state management. B-45

Massachusetts Description of state transit programs: Massachusetts uses state funds to match federal operating/capital grants under S.5307 and S.5311. In addition (by legislation), 231 municipalities in the state pay an annual assessment to the state that also is used to subsidizes the operating deficit of the 15 RTAs. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X__ Yes _____No Local match for S.5307 and S. 5311, but not for S.5310 Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ______ Yes __ X_No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _X____Yes _____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _____17_____ Full-time slots in transit section _____17_____ of these are currently filled ______7_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 2 5% 5% 2% 3% 15% 15% Administrative Support Specialist 1 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Fiscal Officer 1 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% FTA Grants Administrator 2 25% 25% 2% 3% 5% 10% 5% Planning Director 1 50% Planner/Transit Specialist 3 3% 40% 10% Rail 3 100% Legislative Policy Specialist 2 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Compliance Monitor 2 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% B-46

Massachusetts NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 9 9 11 10 11 11 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X B-47

Michigan STATE: Michigan PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), Multi-Modal Transportation Services Bureau, Passenger Transportation Division Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes __X___ No Only advice and counsel to senior management staff. Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff Role of district staff and chain of command: The Passenger Transportation Division of the Multi-Modal Transportation Services Bureau is organized in two sections. The Program Administration Section provides program support, contracts, payment, plus for hire transportation regulation. The Transportation Services Section manages the Federal programs and liaison, client project managers, Federal program compliance, etc. The Passenger Transportation Division Administrator reports to the Multi-modal Bureau Director who reports to the MDOT CAO/Director. Staff in the Transportation Services section are designated as either Project Managers with multiple client responsibilities, or Program Managers responsible for one or more Federal programs. Management of state funding and federal funding are largely inseparable following federal grant application activities. Far more funding is available through the state Comprehensive Transportation Fund ($200M+) than from all FTA programs ($33M+). The PT Division formerly had district staff, i.e., more decentralized 2-3 years ago, which have been reassigned out of the transit division as budgets were cut and staffs DOT reduced. B-48

Michigan PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 60 annually (estimate) 58 14 130 (estimate) Description of state transit programs: • Local Operating Assistance, $161.7M(‘04) (urban, small rural systems on formula). • Public Transportation Development, $27.0 mil (’04) (Capital, operating, planning; Federal capital match). • Intercity Passenger and Freight, $21.0M (’04) (Amtrak, Intercity Bus). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X___ Yes _____No • State policy is to provide the entire Federal capital match (20%); Legislative mandate exists for a minimum of 2/3 from the state for capital. • No state match for new programs (New Freedom); JARC operations fully funded by state as a budget line item. Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No Apportioned funds are directly allocated to local operators. Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __ X___Yes _____No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ______28______ Full-time slots in transit section* ______28______ of these are currently filled ______na_____ staff people administer state programs only *13 in each section, plus two Administrative; five are non-transit (for-hire service regulation). Staff levels down 40% from 50 two years ago (early-out offer and budget driven reassignments) • S. 5313 planning funds are administered by the Bureau of Planning. • DOT Finance and Accounting handles traditional processes (contracts, billing, payments). • DOT Compliance Office handles DBE, Drug and Alcohol compliance (with decline in Passenger Transportation Division staff). • State OMB handles aspects of pooled vehicle procurement. B-49

Michigan NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 50 50 50 43 36 28 Note: Early-out and two cycles of “reassignments” reduced staff from 50 to current 28. ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain 8 – 10 expected for FY ‘07 B-50

Minnesota STATE: Minnesota PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Office of Transit Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Explain arrangement: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Report-making and responses; no lobbying/advocacy. Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __27___ All Central Staff __7___ District Staff (including 7 bike/ped) Role of district staff and chain of command: Office of Transit contains three sections - Management Service Section (various functions other than program management), Transit Program Section, and Bike and Pedestrian Section. The Office of Transit reports to the Program Management Division Director who reports to the Deputy Commissioner who reports to the Commissioner (who is also the current Lt. Governor). Under prior administration, MnDOT operated commuter bus service under contract that is planned to be replaced by commuter rail. Service contract was transferred to local governments to operate. Federal and state program management is mixed; responsibilities not separated. District staff report to District Planning Directors. They analyze needs and funding applications, oversee providers, conduct provider evaluations/inspections, and assist with local planning. A portion of their salary is funded by Office of Transit and they meet at Headquarters monthly. Headquarters does grant solicitations, policy and program guidance, vehicle procurements, central grant administration, financial accounting). B-51

Minnesota PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 32 grants annually (130 grantees active) 62 annual contracts 6 (Contract directly w/ FTA) 5-10 var. 1 typically w/ 3-5 direct recipients Widely variable 100 Estimate Description of state transit programs: Local Transit Operating and Capital Assistance Safe Routes to Schools Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X-variable___ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _____Yes __X___No If no, please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ______34*_____ Full-time slots in transit section ______25**____ of these are currently filled ______0______ staff people administer state programs only *27 at Headquarters (including 7 Bike/Ped) and 7 District representatives **Estimated 12 FTEs involved in Federal grant programs North Star Commuter Rail Office administers Federal rail funds, does project work and reporting. In addition: Minnesota Department of Administration supports pooled vehicle procurement; MnDOT Audit Office does audits; MnDOT IT supports IT projects. B-52

Minnesota ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM (Based on 18 HQ current staff; estimate 12 FTEs for Federal programs; estimates of FTEs shares based on salaries assigned; excludes Bike/Ped staff, 2 vacancies) Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 majority Ass’t Public Transit Director 0 Administrative Support Specialist 4 19% 12.5% 12.5% Fiscal Officer 1 50% Local Grant Coordinator (7) Dist 14% 43% 3% Planning Director 2 15% 5% 10% Planner 5 10% 10% Rideshare Coordinator 1 Legislative Policy Specialist 1 10% 40% Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 1 30% 50% Training Coordinator 1 100% Prog Admin: 1 50% 25% 25% B-53

Minnesota NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 20 20 20 20 20 20 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X B-54

Missouri STATE: Missouri PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Missouri Department of Transportation, Transit Section Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes ___X__ No This job is handled by the Director of Multimodal Operations, although sometimes the Transit Administrator provides back-up. Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 60 this year. Over 200 with active vehicles 31 4 4 17 varies from year to year 3 119 The Administrator of Transit reports to the Director of Multimodal Operations who reports to the Chief Engineer who reports to the DOT Director who reports to the Transportation Commission (there is no Secretary of Transportation in Missouri). The Transit Section is small (7 FTEs). Each staff member is in charge of more than one program and all facets of the programs that they oversee, with similar programs grouped together under one staff person. For example, there is a Transit Operations Specialist who oversees the S. 5311 program, along with the state rural operating assistance program and JARC. B-55

Missouri Description of state transit programs: There are two major state transit programs. One is State Transit Operating Assistance and it is funded at $3.8 million annually, with the funds flowing to the 31 rural and 7 urban systems. The second program is the Missouri Elderly and Handicapped Transportation Assistance Program (MEHTAP) which provides direct operating assistance to private non-profits. The funds ($2.8 million) can only be used to fund the direct cost of transportation service- no administrative funds are included. There are 202 MEHTAP grantees. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X___ Yes _____No Not directly, but the State Operating Assistance Program funds are eligible to be used for match. Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X__No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X__ Yes _____No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ____7______ Full-time slots in transit section ____7______ of these are currently filled ____0______ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 S.5303 Planning State Programs S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 1 15% 5% 15% 5% 30% 30% FTA Grants Administrator 3 20% 25% 25% 20% 5% 5% Planner 1 5% S. 5313 90% 5303 5% Training Coordinator 1 100 All grant programs are, but the Rail Safety Oversight is handled by the Rail Division. B-56

Missouri NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 6 6 6 6 6 7 The seventh position came after a State Management Review showed that the S 5309 program was not being adequately administered- largely because the workload was too much for one person. ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: They do not currently contract for any grant activities, but are looking at having some RTAP training contracted - particularly those courses such as CPR and First Aid. There is also a Center for Human Development that they are considering working with for classes pertaining to persons with disabilities. Also, the Fiscal Officer is not within the Transit Section. The Section does have access to parts of two staff people to perform the fiscal duties necessary for the State funding programs. The vanpool aspects of ridesharing are performed by the Department of Natural Resources and at the MPOS. There is a bike/pedestrian position at the Planning Division. Rail Safety is done in the Rail Section. B-57

Nevada STATE: Nevada PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: The State’s transit program is managed within the Planning Division, which has the following sections: Pedestrian, Rail, Bicycle, Transit, and Aviation. Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: That Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ___X___ Yes ______ No They often respond to legislative requests “as appropriate”. Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff The public transit unit head supervises transit employees in the Transit section for 1/3 of his time, another 1/3 in the Rail section (specifically, in the area of rail safety oversight), and another 1/3 in the Aviation section. He reports to the Planning Division Chief, who reports to the Assistant Director, who then reports to the Deputy Director, then to the Director. In addition to this unit head, the section has four FTEs in the Transit section, as well as two full-time consultants. Several support divisions, such as accounting and programming, provide assistance to these Transit staff as well as staff in the other Division sections. The Transit section staff are assigned to various “core functions”. In regard to core functions, staff have distinct dedicated responsibilities. For example, one person is tasked with paying invoices, record- keeping, processing of agreements, awarding of Federal funds, and supporting and participating in the Advisory Committee for transit, etc. They tried to organize by grant program in the past, but this did not work well due to imbalances in workload among various programs. For example, the S.5310 program had 60 recipients, while others had many fewer less. B-58

Nevada PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 (JARC) Section 5309 Section 5313 (State Planning funds to subrecipients /operators) Section 5303 Metropolitan Planning TOTAL 60 annual recipients 5 2 2 2-3 annual recipients (this is their first grant) 1 60-65 Description of state transit programs: Nevada does not have any separate state funding programs, but does provide ½ of the non-federal match for capital under the S.5310 and S.5311 programs ($95,000 total). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X___ Yes ____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ___X__ Yes _____No If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? ____1_____ They only support Carson City, which is a new urbanized area. They will eventually be self-sufficient. Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X___Yes _____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ____ 6* _____ Full-time slots in transit section _____6______ of these are currently filled _____0______ staff people administer state programs only *4 NDOT FTEs plus 2 full-time consultant staff on site ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ FEDERAL TIME BY PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 (only 2/3 of time in transit-related activities; other 1/3 in the Aviation Division) Approx 5% Approx 5% Approx 5% Appro x 5% Approx 5% Approx 5% 33% Appro x 5% FTA Grants Administrator 1 25% 25% 25% 25% B-59

Nevada Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Local Grant Coordinator 1 (mostly outreach activities) 5-10% 5-10% 5-10% 5-10% 30% 5-10% 20% 5-10% Public Transportation Planner 1 (mostly monitoring and reporting requirements functions) 20% 10% 20% 20% 20% 10% Compliance Monitor 1 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Compliance Monitor 1 consultant (drug and alcohol and monitoring) 10% 20% 20% 20% 10% 10% Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 1 (consultant responsible for vehicle purchases and specs) 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 6 6 6 6 6 6 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: Grants management activities are performed by a contractor on-site, so considered part of staff. B-60

New Hampshire STATE: New Hampshire PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: New Hampshire Department of Transportation, Bureau of Rail and Transit, Public Transportation Section Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5315 Total Annual 10 per year/ 30-40 active 6 3 19 The statewide transit programs, including federal grant management, are managed out of the NH DOT’s Bureau of Rail and Transit. The Bureau Administrator reports to the Director of the Division of Aeronautics, Rail and Transit who reports to the Commissioner. Most of the transit grant administrative functions are performed within the Public Transportation Section, under the Public Transit Administrator. Outside the Bureau of Rail and Transit, the DOT’s finance office handles FTA drawdowns and other federal grant financial matters. The Bureau of Rail and Transit is split into three sections – railroads, bicycle/pedestrian and public transportation. Under the direction of the Public Transportation Administrator, the public transportation section manages the federal grant programs. The section also has a Transit Grants Coordinator, a Transportation Coordinator, and a Rideshare Coordinator. Staff members are not dedicated to a particular federal program but the Transit Grants Coordinator (a newly created position) handles the primary grant management functions with the S.5307/S.5311 grantees/projects. Other staff are assigned to specific management functions (compliance, financial/reporting, intercity bus, park-n-ride). B-61

New Hampshire Description of state transit programs: New Hampshire provides state funding to 1) match federal S.5311/S.5307 operating funds ($125,000) and 2) match federal S.5309/S.5307 capital funding ($100,000). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X__ Yes ____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ______ Yes _X__ No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X__Yes ____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______4.5_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______4.5_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes and matches for each grantee, this exercise is an estimate. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Transit 50% – could not distribute Ass’t Public Transit Dir. 1 50% to 5311/5311(f) and 50% to rest -- -- Local Grant Coordinator 2 • Transit Grant Coordinator estimated 50% S.5311, 25% S.5310 and 25% rest • Transportation Coordinator estimated 50% on compliance and 50% on grant reporting/data for all federal programs Rideshare Coordinator 1 100% ridesharing including park-n-ride lots and intercity bus links – paid with FHWA funds NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS # FTEs hiring for Expansion Purposes # FTEs Eliminating for Contraction Purposes # FTEs Staying the Same Uncertain X B-62

New Jersey STATE: New Jersey PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJT) Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? __X___ Yes _____ No If yes, explain arrangement: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes __X___ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs __X___ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff NJT handles all FTA program activity and funding for the state, acting as the transit division of NJDOT (NJDOT has no direct role in any FTA program activity). Within NJT, the Federal transit grants are managed within two primary sections. The Capital Planning and Programming division has a Program and Grants Management section, led by a Chief, that deals with administration of the FTA grants, project lists, and the STIP. The Policy, Technology and Customer Service division, also led by a Chief, has a Service Planning and Development section that manages the local grants and grantees. There are two directors within Service Planning and Development that deal with transit: the Director of Local Programs (S.5310, S.5311, UWR) and the Director of Innovate Services (JARC). Thus, each of the transit directors is 3-4 layers into the organization. NJT is the major statewide operator (bus, rail) and also subsidizes/supports private operators. Transit program responsibility lies in functional areas (see above): • Grant Management is in Capital Program and Grant Management • Program Management lies in (2) offices of Service Planning and Development • Project Management lies in various office based on type of activity NJT concentrates Federal funds in as few projects as possible to ease administrative requirements B-63

New Jersey PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 50 14 4 Description of state transit programs: The Private Carrier Program is part of the larger NJT Bus–LRT program and is the major state program providing capital assistance and operating support to private carriers throughout the state. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X___ Yes __ ___No • S.5310 - match provided by the state • S.5311 – match split 50/50 • JARC – not matched • State funds used to match all other programs • S.5307, S.5309 match almost exclusively made up of “soft”state match Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? __X___ Yes _____No If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? _____4________ Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X__Yes _____No Please explain: Description of any contracted grant activities: • A “Business Diversity group within NJT supports DBE compliance, driven more by state requirements than Federal. • A “Procurement” office supports state pooled vehicle purchases. • Drug and alcohol testing and compliance is managed by a contractor. • RTAP training is done by a contractor (Rutgers University). However, there is no single “transit section;” (2) main divisions administer FTA programs, another tracks grants, others support compliance requirements (see below) B-64

New York STATE: New York PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: New York State Department of Transportation (NYDOT), Assistance Program Delivery Bureau Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Explain any arrangements: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs __X___ Combination/geographically Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff Role of district staff and chain of command: The Assistance Program Delivery Bureau (passenger, freight rail, transit), contains two units, one dealing with Transit Services and the other dealing with Passenger Policy and Program Evaluation. The Transit Services Unit has four sections: • Downstate Section • Upstate Section (S. 5311, Intercity) • Specialized Section (S. 5310, etc.) • Upstate Urban and Technical Assistance Section (RTAP, etc.) The Passenger Policy and Program Evaluation Unit has three sections: • Grants and Payments Section • Mobility and Innovation Section • Regulation Section The Bureau’s Transportation Modal Manager reports to Office of Program Development and Management which reports to the DOT Chief Operating Officer/Operating Division who reports to the NYDOT Commissioner. NYDOT contracts with intercity bus and commuter service providers to support intercity connectivity. The Upstate/Downstate sections of the Transit Services Unit contain specific Federal program responsibilities (S.5310, S.5311, Intercity, RTAP) and these programs have some dedicated staff. The Policy/Program Evaluation unit have similar program responsibility across all units. Four of the seven districts have ‘ex officio’ staff following/overseeing transit program activity (service planning and implementation of NYDOT contracts and projects). B-65

New York PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 89 recipients 270 active grantees 42 grantees 60 operators 9 Direct FTA grants 4-8/yr state 140 (estimate) Description of state transit programs: • Statewide Mass Transit Operating Assistance ($2.5B, 130 recipients) • Omnibus Program, ½ non-Federal share for capital ($18M for S. 5307, S. 5311, S. 5309) • Transit State Dedicated Fund, state-of-good-repair capital ($16M for 12 large recipients) • Hybrid Electric Bus Program (under-writes extra vehicle cost; $50M/5 years; enacted in 2005; first applications arriving now) Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X___ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes _____No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _____43_______ Full-time slots in transit section _____33_______ of these are currently filled ______1______ staff people administer state programs only Other organizational units support transit programs: • State equivalent of GSA procures transit vehicles • Grant payments go through Accounting/Fiscal Services unit and the Comptroller’s Office • Attorney General approves contracts • NYDOT Office of Safety and Security authorizes intercity motor carriers, inspects and trains B-66

New York ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ FEDERAL TIME BY PROGRAM Note: NYDOT spends $3B in state funds, dwarfing Federal funding. As a result, an estimated 15% of total staff time is spent on Federal programs. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 40% 15% 10% Administrative Support Specialist 6 5% 5% 5% Planner/Transit Specialists 5 50% 50% Planner/Transit Specialists 3 100% Planner/Transit Specialists 1 50% 50% Planner/Transit Specialists 1 100% NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed (estimate) 42 42 42 38 38 33 Note: Lost 1/3 of staff in two prior early-out offers (9 staff). ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: Contractors used for drug/alcohol testing, safety compliance, state management reviews. Constraint on contracting is on lack of contract oversight/management capability. B-67

Ohio STATE: Ohio PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Transit Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes ___X__ No DOT has a chief legislative affairs person, although the Office of Transit provides direct input regarding transit issues. Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL ANNUAL 25 (typically per year) 36 61 The Office of Transit is organized under the Division of Local Programs, which is under the direction of the Assistant Director for Planning and Production, who reports to the Director (equivalent to the Secretary of Transportation). The Office of Transit staff is organized by core functions. The office is divided into two sections – Program Management and Special Projects. Program Management coordinates federal programs such as Section 5311 and Section 5307 along with state funded programs. Special Projects coordinates Section 5310, RTAP, and other special projects like safety oversight. B-68

Ohio Description of state transit programs: The Ohio Coordination Program (about $800,000 per year) provides funding to areas that have no or limited public transit. Funds are used to pay for human service coordination of transportation. The second program is the Elderly and Disabled Transit Fare Assistance Program ($7 M) which is available strictly for transit programs to off-set farebox loss due to the ½ fare requirement. All but the top four urban systems (20 out of 24) utilize this program. The Ohio Public Transit Grants Program (approximately $3.8 M rural and $4.4 M urban) is the third program. This is essentially funds provided to the systems to be used as match. Ohio uses S. 5313 funds for personal services contracts – consultant services for planning projects based on the needs of the systems (requests made on an informal, non-application format). Ohio has three state transit funded programs. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _X____ Yes _____No Ohio Public Transit Grants Program. Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __ X__Yes _______No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______17_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______13_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes and matches for each grantee, allocation of staff time among the federal grants is not possible. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Ass’t Public Transit Director 2 Administrative Support Specialist 1 All the FTA transit programs are administered by the transit section except the Consolidated Planning Grants go to the Division of Planning. B-69

Ohio Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Local Grant Coordinators 2 FTA Grants Administrator 6 Safety Specialist 2 (only one for transit) Notes: • Director (Public Transit Administrator) is also responsible for transportation legislation/policy analysis. • Two Assistant Directors (Public Transit Managers) are also responsible for fiscal officer related functions. • Two Safety Specialists – one for rail and one for buses. The rail safety and security oversight specialist technically is not counted as part of the Transit Division (for purposes of PINs, counted as part of the Office of Local Projects Division). Bus Safety Specialist also responsible for compliance monitoring and training. • Two Grant Coordinators – they take care of the recipients’ invoices and contracts. • Public transportation planning is a joint effort with the Planning Department within DOT – TIP and STIP requirements. • Vehicle and equipment specialist responsibilities are contracted out. NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 13 13 13 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Looking to fill their vacancies within the Transit Division. Might be able to add ½ FTE. Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The Transit Division utilizes consultants for a myriad of activities. Specific ones noted were 1) ½ FTE to cover vehicle and equipment issues (S. 5310 vehicle equipment), 2) Rural transit assistance ½ FTE, 3) Planning assistance, 4) QAR coordination, 5) Drug and alcohol testing, 6) Contract administration, 7) Transit manager curriculum through Wright State, and 8) Other programs not identified. B-70

Oklahoma STATE: Oklahoma PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), Transit Programs Branch ________________________________________________________________________________ Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ___X__ Yes ______ No Comments on pending legislation Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL ANNUAL (DHR administered) 19 Starting this year Between 12-20 Used for internal planning 31-39 Description of state transit programs: Oklahoma has one state transit funding program – Public Transportation Revolving Funds. This program is annually appropriated ($2.9 million last year) and is distributed to all public providers based on revenue miles. The original intent of the program was to support public transportation providers by offering funds as a means for local match. The Transit Programs Branch is organized under the Chief Engineer, which is under the direction of the Director of ODOT, who reports to the Secretary of Transportation. The Transit Programs Branch staff is organized by both functional duties and grant programs. There is dedicated staff for the New Freedom and JARC programs. The remaining staff are organized by a combination of core functions and grant programs. B-71

Oklahoma Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X___ Yes _____No Public Transportation Revolving Funds program. Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _____Yes __X__No If no, please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______6_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______6_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes and matches for each grantee, it is not possible to allocate staff time among Federal programs. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 1 FTA Grants Administrator 4 Notes: • Director is also responsible for the following functions: FTA grants administrator, public transportation planning director, and transportation legislation/policy specialist. • Administrative support specialist also has the role of the fiscal officer. • Local grant coordinators (called project managers) often are individually assigned other functions: safety specialist/compliance monitor, vehicle equipment specialist, and training coordinator. Section 5310 program is administered by DHS. B-72

Oklahoma NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 6 6 6 6 6 6 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS They need more people, but no decisions have been made. Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The Transit Program Branch has a contract with Oklahoma State University to assist with on-site project monitoring (i.e. compliance reviews), to assist with training, and for assistance concerning technical issues (i.e. software). They deduced that this is probably equivalent to two FTEs. B-73

Oregon STATE: Oregon PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Public Transit Division Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Largely responsive/advisory Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs __X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X__ All Central Staff _____ District Staff Role of district staff and chain of command: PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Description of state transit programs: State and Federal programs and resources are largely intermingled. State funds flow more toward operations; Federal funds more toward capital. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X__ Yes ______No State funds flow to designated agencies by formula; recipients can use state funds in whatever way they choose, i.e., state funds become ‘local’ and are not directed at any particular program or investment. The Public Transit Division Director reports directly to the ODOT Director and participates on the senior management team. Varying levels of support staff (5) assist program managers (7) and division managers (2) with varied roles, and responsibilities generally related to specific programs in a loose mix of program and functional responsibilities. There are designated program managers (with other responsibilities) for S. 5309, S. 5311, and a capital program manager handles S. 5310. Regional staff, especially planners, collaborate with Headquarters transit managers and formal Area Transportation Councils (ACTs); basic communications are the focus, not program management per se. B-74

Oregon Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X___No S.5307 grantees have separate grant agreements with FTA. Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X__Yes _____No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ______14*_____ Full-time slots in transit section ______13______ of these are currently filled ______0_______ staff people administer state programs only** *Lower than in 1989. **State and Federal funding and programs are interwoven so that all program managers deal with Federal programs to some degree. ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Support for Public Transit Division administration comes from other DOT offices and other state departments. The State Department of Administration supports Public Transit procurement, largely for vehicles (price agreements, specifications disposal). The ODOT budget office supports fund tracking and the ODOT Human Resources and Civil Rights sections play roles in hiring and DBE goal-setting, Title VI. Public Transit Division contractors are used for drug/alcohol testing, some other training, and trouble- shooting B-75

Pennsylvania STATE: Pennsylvania PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), Bureau of Public Transportation Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes __X___ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions __X___ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5315 TOTAL ANNUAL 50-60 per year 20 24 90 The statewide transit programs, including Federal grant management, are administered by PennDOT’s Bureau of Public Transportation. The head of the transit section is the Bureau Director who reports to the Deputy Secretary for Local and Area Transportation, who reports to the Secretary of PennDOT The Bureau has three divisions: the Lottery Transportation Division, the Urban Transportation Division, and the Rural and Intercity Transportation Division. The Lottery Division primarily administers the various programs funded through the State lottery funds. While most Federal program management is handled by the Rural and Intercity Transportation Division, a staff person in the Urban Transportation Division administers the S.5310 program. One staff member is dedicated to each Federal program -- S.5311 program, S.5310 program, and S.5311(f) program. In addition, one person is assigned to audit oversight for all grantees. B-76

Pennsylvania Description of state transit programs: Pennsylvania provided $785M in State transit funding in FY04 including non-federal match for the S.5310 and S.5311 programs, as well as the many state-only programs funded through the Lottery. Most of the State lottery funding is dedicated to special programs for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X___ Yes ______No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _______ Yes __X__ No . Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X___Yes ______No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______26_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______23_____ of these are currently filled _______17_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Small portion Ass’t Public Transit Director 1 20% 40% 40% Local Grant Coordinator 3 1-100% 1- 100% 1- 100% Safety Specialist 1 100% NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 25 25 24 24 23 23 B-77

Pennsylvania ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Hiring to Fill Vacancies Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Filling 3 vacancies B-78

South Dakota STATE: South Dakota PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) Division of Finance and Management, Office of Local Transportation Programs Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes ___X__ No Transit staff organized by: __X__ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 Total Annual 7-8 per year 23 2 Included in S.5311 30 Description of state transit programs: South Dakota provides State funding to S.5311 grantees. Generally these funds are used to match Federal S.5311operating funds ($1.9M), but operators can use for other purposes. The statewide transit programs, including Federal grant management, are administered by the SDDOT’s Office of Local Transportation Programs. The head of the transit section is the Office’s Program Manager. The Program Manager reports to the Division Director of the Division of Finance and Management who reports to the Secretary of Transportation. The Office of Local Transportation Programs is under the direction of the Program Manager (who manages other programs in addition to transit). In addition to a small portion of the Program Manager’s time, transit grants are managed by two full-time staff; one staff member is assigned to work with the FTA side of the Federal grants and one is assigned to deal with local grantees. B-79

South Dakota Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X___ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _______ Yes __X__ No . Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X___ Yes ______No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______3_____ Full-time slots in transit section (FY2007) _______3____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 (general admin only) 1% 9% FTE split among S.5311/S.5309/S.5311(f) FTA Grants Administrator 1 10% 90% FTE split among S.5311/S.5309/S.5311(f) Local Grant Coordinator 1 10% 90% FTE split among S.5311/S.5309/S.5311(f) NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: None B-80

Texas STATE: Texas PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Public Transit Division (PTN) Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X__ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: _____ All Central Staff __X__ District Staff Role of district staff and chain of command: The transit programs are managed by the TxDOT/PTN. The Division Director reports to a Deputy Executive Director, who is under the Executive Director, who reports to the Commissioners. Public transit grants administration is shared by the PTN staff at headquarters and the Public Transit Coordinators (PTCs) in TxDOT’s 25 District Offices. The Division both 1) administers Federal and State transit funds, and 2) functions as the statewide broker for the State’s Medicaid transportation program. Functions associated with the Medicaid transportation program (and the 158 FTEs involved in these activities) are not included in this review. Transit is handled by two sections within PTN, namely Program Management and Planning & Support. Each has a Director. Specific staff is assigned to be program managers for specific Federal programs -- S.5310, S.5311, S.5311(f), RTAP, and Rail Safety Oversight. In addition, these staff members and the remainder of the staff are assigned additional functional responsibilities (e.g., compliance monitoring, procurement, MPO TIP/STP). While the whole of PTN is involved in administrating the Federal transit funds to some extent, most grants management functions are performed in the Program Management section and by the PTCs in the District Offices. The PTCs in the District handle day-to-day administration of transit grants at the local level and functions as the transit “point of contact” at the District level. While PTN staff at headquarters provides direction to the PTCs, the PTCs report to the District Engineers. B-81

Texas PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5311(f) TOTAL 60 39 30 1 20 90-95 Description of state transit programs: State transit funds are allocated to rural and small urban areas based on formulas. Local areas can choose to use the State funds as the non-federal portion of their Federal grant. State funds are available for S.5311 recipients and S.5307 recipients that have populations between 50,000 -200,000 and certain larger urban areas that do not have a transit tax. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X__ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes ___X__No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes ____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _____41_____ Full-time slots in transit section _____39____ of these are currently filled _____0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Could not allocate individual staff to various programs. Do have total FTEs by program for S.5311, S.5310, and S.5313. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus OVERALL FTEs 39.1 7.3 11.8 10.1 Included in S5311 Public Transit Director 1 Ass’t Public Transit Director 1 B-82

Texas Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Administrative Support Specialist 1 Fiscal Officer 1 FTA Grants Administrator 1 Local Grant Coordinator 25 PTCs – FTE 16.7 Planning Director 1 Planner 1 Safety Specialist 2 Compliance Monitor 2 Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 2 Training Coordinator 1 Other: Coordination 1 Other: ITS/Technology 1 Other: Public Info 1 Other: Data Collection 3 B-83

Texas NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 20 at PTN plus PTCs at District offices 20 at PTN plus PTCs at District offices 20 at PTN plus PTCs at District offices 20 at PTN plus PTCs at District offices 20 at PTN plus PTCs at District offices 20 at PTN plus PTCs at District offices ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: There are no contracted grant activities. B-84

Utah STATE: Utah PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Utah Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Section Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? _____ Yes ___X__ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions ___X__ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL ANNUAL 40 annually 4 3 47 Description of state transit programs: Utah does not have any state transit programs. The Public Transportation Section is organized under Programming Financing, which is under the direction of Systems Planning and Programming, who reports to the Deputy Director, who ultimately reports to the Executive Director. The Public Transportation Section staff is organized by grant programs. Specifically, there is a Section 5311 Manager and a Section 5310 Manager. They are managed by the Public Transportation Section Director and supported by the Programs Compliance Officer. In addition, the State has hired a contract employee to manage the United We Ride grant program. B-85

Utah Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X__ Yes __X___No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _____ Yes __X__No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X__Yes _____No If no, please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______5_____ Full-time slots in transit section (including the UWR contract employee) _______5_____ of these are currently filled (including the UWR contract employee) _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital United We Ride S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 33% 33% 33% FTA Grants Administrator 3 33% (1 person) 33% (1 person) 33% (1 person) Compliance Monitor 1 33% 33% 33% Notes: • Director is also responsible for the following functions – fiscal officer, public transportation planning director, safety specialist. • Two FTA grants administrators (Section 5311 & Section 5310 managers) also function as fiscal managers, local grant coordinators, and safety specialist. • Rideshare/alternative transportation used to be under the Public Transportation Section, but went to Utah Transit Authority six months ago (previously contracted this responsibility to Utah Transit Authority). • Transportation legislation/policy analysis performed by another unit within the DOT. • Vehicle and equipment specialist handled by the Procurement Department within DOT. • Training is performed by all transit staff as well as under a small contract with a consult at their Spring and Fall conference. • United We Ride Position – two-year contracted position that is in its first year. Section 5307 and Section 5309 funds are applied for directly by the local recipients from FTA. B-86

Utah NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 4 4 4 4 4 4 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The Public Transportation Section has five activities – 1) United We Ride position, 2) a consultant for the Section 5311 planning update, 3) a consultant to support the United We Ride, JARC, and New Freedom programs, 4) a consultant (state’s transit association) to perform training at the Spring and Fall conferences, and 5) a consultant for the Section 5311 emergency preparedness safety issues. B-87

Virginia STATE: Virginia PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Virginia Department or Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT), Public Transit Division Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Explain any Arrangements: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs __X ___ Combination Explain arrangement: Staff Location: _____ All Central Staff __X___ District Staff Role of district staff and chain of command: PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL 34 annual 16 10 5 14 21 62 The Federal and State public transit programs in Virginia are managed in VDRPT’s Public Transit Division. The Public Transit Division has a total of 13 FTEs in four sections: Planning, Rural and Human Services, Urban, and Transportation Demand Management (TDM). The Finance and IT Divisions handle fiscal matters for the grants, including budgeting and grant payment processing. VDRPT reports to the VDOT Secretary and the Commonwealth Transportation Board. Intermittently VDRPT will contract for transit services to mitigate effects of major construction projects. VDRPT is organized around core functions; the Public Transportation Division is organized around groups of programs/clients. Dulles project staff and one Public Transportation staff person are located in Northern Virginia, remainder are Central staff. B-88

Virginia Description of state transit programs: VDRPT has a Transit Special Project Assistance program that funds ridersharing, TDM, transit technical studies, and transit demonstration grants statewide. In addition, the state funds a portion of a variety of services in the Northern Virginia area through a regional motor fuel tax (WMATA, VRE, commuter bus, etc). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X ___ Yes _____No Except for 5310 where match is all local Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? __X___ Yes _____No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? __X___Yes _____No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS ____13______ Full-time slots in transit section ____13______ of these are currently filled _____4______ staff administers state programs only _____9______ staff administrative responsibility for FTA programs ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ FEDERAL TIME BY PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 5% 10% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% Fiscal Officer 1 5% 10% 5% 2% FTA Grants Administrator 3 a b c 70% 70% 15% 5% 10% 10% 5% 10% Local Grant Coordinator 3 a b c 25% 25% 25% 10% 10% 10% Planning Director 1 30% Compliance Monitor 1 10% 80% Procurement mechanics are done through state Department of General Services with VDRPT collaboration; a central VA DBE office provides some support to VDRPT; all regulatory FTA reporting is done by VDRPT. B-89

Virginia NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed in Public Transportation 11 11 11 11 12 13 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: Outside contractors are used intermittently for assignments like setting up drug and alcohol testing protocols; conducting testing, safety and security, training. B-90

Washington STATE: Washington PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Washington State Department of Transportation, Public Transportation and Commute Options Office Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? __X___ Yes _____ No If yes, explain arrangement: Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ___X__ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: _X___ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs _____ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: _____ All Central Staff ___X__ District Staff Very minor role Role of district staff and chain of command: The Public Transportation and Commute Options Office is organized under the Public Transportation and Rail Division, which is under the direction of the Chief of Staff, who reports to the Secretary of Transportation. The DOT operates the Washington State Ferry Service, which receives S. 5307 funding distributed through the Puget Sound MPO. The Public Transportation/Commute Options Office is organized by two major functions: 1) Program Development and 2) Contracts and Grants Administration. The staff in the program development side of the unit work with local jurisdictions on coordination and commute options, as well as working with rural and intercity bus issues. The staff in the contracts and grants administration side of the unit work on all of the State and Federal tracking and reporting as well as managing the contracts with the local transit systems. The major functions are handled centrally, in Olympia. The Unit does pay a small percentage of a district staff person’s time, primarily to help with the State’s trip reduction program. The district staff people will occasionally attend a local meeting on behalf of the Olympia-based staff. B-91

Washington PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: The state solicits for projects every two years. Communities submit a single grant application to apply for all available State/Federal funds. The State decides which funding programs to use, mixing and matching between State and Federal funding as needed to fund as many transit needs as possible. Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5315 TOTAL 150 Description of state transit programs: Washington State has several state transit funding programs: 1) State Rural Mobility Grant - $14 million for two years, ½ formula, ½ competitive, very flexible. Used to improve transportation in rural areas where public transportation is limited or does not exist. 2) Paratransit Special Needs Funds - $25 million including $19.5 to transit agencies to assist them in providing additional public transit services to people with special needs and $5.5 million to non-profits. 3) Vanpool Program - $8.6 million - flows through the transit systems. The transit systems own the vans and run the programs. The State has 40 vans to place where needed on a short-term basis. King County Metro has 1,400 vans, some of which are occasionally brokered to other areas. Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? __X____ Yes _____No If needed to make the grant package work. Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ______ Yes __X__No Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X___Yes _____No Please explain: PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______27_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______24_____ of these are currently filled _______7.9_____ staff people administer state programs only The S. 5313 funds are passed along to the MPOs. B-92

Washington ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes and matches for each grantee, allocating staff time among the Federal programs was not possible. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Administrative Support Specialist 2.5 Fiscal Officer .8 FTA Grants Administrator 4 Planning Director (in Seattle) 1 Program Manager 1 Rideshare Coordinator 7 Safety Specialist 1 Compliance Monitor 1 Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 1 Rural Specialist 1 Other: Data Analyst/ technical 3 Special Needs Staff 4 B-93

Washington ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X Description of any contracted grant activities: The RTAP program is contracted to the Washington State Transit Insurance Pool. It requires about 1.5 FTE. B-94

West Virginia STATE: West Virginia PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: West Virginia Department of Transportation (WVDOT), Division of Public Transit Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: TheT Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes __X___ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? __X___ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs __X___ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL ANNUAL 20 per year/70 active 12 (including one Intercity) 7 18 10 50 Description of state transit programs: West Virginia provides state funding to 1) match Federal S.5311operating funds ($1.3M) and 2) match Federal S.5309 capital funding in urban and rural areas ($1M). The statewide transit programs, including Federal grant management, are administered by the WVDOT’s Division of Public Transit. The head of the transit section is the Division Transportation Systems Director. By state code, the Div. Director reports directly to the Secretary of Transportation. Under the direction of the Division Director, the Public Transit Division manages the Federal grant programs. In addition to the Division Director, who participates in grants management, the division has one staff member assigned to work with S.5311 grantees, one assigned to work with S.5310 grants, one assigned to planning and procurement, one who handles fiscal management (including FTA ECHO drawdowns), and two clerical/administration staff. While the division currently has seven staff members, it expects to fill one vacant position and add two additional staff in FY 2007. B-95

West Virginia Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? _X____ Yes _____No Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? _______ Yes __X__ No . Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? _X____Yes ____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______10_____ Full-time slots in transit section (FY 2007) _______7____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 person – .2 FTE general admin 5% 50% 25% Administrative Support Specialist 2 (plus 1 vacant) 10% 60% 15% 4% 10% 1% Fiscal Officer 1 10% 65% 17% 4% 3% 1% Local Grant Coordinator 3 (plus 1 vacant) 25% 25% 33% 8% 7% 2% Assistant Grant Coordinator 1 (vacant) NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 7 7 7 7 7 7 ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Hiring for Expansion Purposes Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X (3 persons) Description of any contracted grant activities: WVDOT has a contactor perform on-site reviews for S.5310 and S.5311 grantees including drug and alcohol reviews. They also contract for one full-time person to provide technical assistance. B-96

Wisconsin STATE: Wisconsin PART I: ORGANIZATION Name of DOT and Transit Section: Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transit, Local Roads, Railroads & Harbors, Public & Specialized Transit Section Brief Overview of Organizational Arrangement: The Does the DOT directly operate transit services? _____ Yes ___X__ No Does the transit head have legislative responsibilities? ___X__ Yes _____ No Transit staff organized by: ____ Core Functions _____ Grant Programs ___X__ Combination Explain Arrangement: Staff Location: __X___ All Central Staff _____ District Staff PART II: SCALE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAM Number of grant recipients by Federal program: Section 5310 Section 5311 Section 5307 < 200,000 Section 5316 Section 5309 Section 5313 TOTAL ANNUAL 35 56 13 (pass through only) 15 16 5 140 (191 grant recipients including state funds) The Public & Specialized Transit Section is organized under the Bureau of Transit, Local Roads, Railroads & Harbors, which is under the direction of the Division Administrator of Transportation Investment and Management, who reports to the Secretary of Transportation. The Public & Specialized Transit Section staff are divided into two sections: 1) Policy & Finance Unit and 2) Compliance & Administration Unit. Within each unit staff are organized by both core functions and grant programs. Dedicated grant program staff are for the Section 5311, Section 5309, Section 5310, Section 5313, and JARC programs. The core functions that have dedicated staff include coordination, finance, procurement, Federal compliance (to FTA), maintenance, and safety. B-97

Wisconsin Description of state transit programs: Wisconsin administers three state programs that provide funding to support transit. The first, Statute 8521 ($12M), provides funding for counties as operating assistance for the elderly and disabled (72 recipients). The second program, Statute 8521 ($1M), is an enhancement program for Section 5310. These funds are pooled with the Section 5310 Federal funds to assist in purchasing vehicles. The third program, Statute 8520 ($100M), provides operating assistance for the Section 5311 and Section 5307 systems. The intent is to combine the Federal and state funds so that 60-65 percent of the costs are covered (70 recipients). Does the state provide the “local match” for federal programs? ___X__ Yes _____No See notes on Statute 8520 program. Does the State administer the Section 5307 Small Urban Program? ___X__ Yes _____No If yes, how many S. 5307 small urban grantees are there in the state? ________13______________ Currently, Wisconsin applies for and passes the funds through to the grantees. Starting next year they will pass along the eligibility amounts to the local grantees who will apply directly to FTA. Are all FTA programs administered by the transit section? ___X__Yes ____No PART III: STAFFING LEVELS _______11_____ Full-time slots in transit section _______8_____ of these are currently filled _______0_____ staff people administer state programs only ALLOCATION OF STAFF MEMBERS’ TIME BY FEDERAL PROGRAM Because the State mixes and matches for each grantee, allocating staff time among the Federal programs is not possible. Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Public Transit Director 1 Ass’t Public Transit Director 2 Fiscal Officer 1 FTA Grants Administrator 4 (1 vacant) Safety Specialist 1 B-98

Wisconsin Position No. of Each Position S. 5310 E & H S. 5311 Rural Public S. 5307 Small Urban S. 5309 Capital S. 5313 Planning S.5316 JARC RTAP Rail Safety Oversight S. 5311 (f) Intercity Bus Compliance Monitor 1 (vacant) Vehicle & Equipment Specialist 1 (vacant) Notes: • Director (Public Transit Administrator) is also responsible for transportation legislation/policy analysis. • The Director of the Bureau of Transit, Local Roads, Railroads & Harbors spends about 1/3 of his time on transit, which is not reflected in the position slots for transit. • Two Assistant Directors spend about 40 percent of their time directly on Federal programs, and 60 percent of their time assisting program managers and on state programs. • Administrative support comes from other sections of DOT and through the use of a Limited Term Employees (LTE). • One fiscal officer who also receives support from another unit within DOT. • Four FTA grants administrators who also function as the local grant coordination/regional transportation coordinators, compliance monitors, and training coordinators. • Statewide public transportation planning provided by another unit within DOT. • Rideshare/alternative transportation coordination provided by another unit within DOT. • Transportation legislation/policy is shared among the Director of the Bureau of Transit, Local Roads, Railroads & Harbors, the Public & Specialized Transit Section Chief, a legislative liaison, and a state liaison. NUMBER OF FTES EMPLOYED FOR EACH OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 # Employed 12 12 12 11 7 8 Office was reorganized in 2002, which reduced the number of authorized FTEs to 11 (3 are vacant). ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN STAFFING LEVELS Received support to fill existing vacancies to that section can be fully staffed with all 11 employees. Hiring for Expansion Purposes Hiring to Fill Vacancies Eliminating for Contraction Purposes Staying the Same Uncertain X B-99

Wisconsin Description of any contracted grant activities: The Transit Division utilizes consultants for three activities: 1) Management performance reviews (1 FTE), 2) Transportation Development Plans (1 FTE), and 3) Database development, internally (1 FTE). B-100

Next: Appendix C: Survey Contact List »
Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs Get This Book
×
 Appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 99 contains the appendixes to NCHRP Research Results Digest (RRD) 314: State DOT Staff Resources for Administering Federal Public Transportation Programs. NCHRP RRD 314 examines the staff resources that state departments of transportation (DOTs) devote to public transportation programs and explores the ability of the states to adequately administer existing and emerging Federal Transit Administration public transportation programs.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!