Monitoring, Analyzing, and Reporting on the Environmental Streamlining Pilot Projects (2005)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

REFERENCES 1. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Project Development and Environmental Review. “Estimated Time Required to Complete the NEPA Process.” Available at: http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/nepatime.htm (November, 2004). 2. Louis Berger Group, Inc. for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). “Evaluating the Performance of Environmental Streamlining: Development of a NEPA baseline for Measuring Continuous Performance.” Available at: http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/baseline/index.htm, (undated). 3. 23 U.S.C. 109 §1309. “Environmental Streamlining.” (June 9, 1998). 4. Interagency Guidance: Transportation Funding for Federal Agency Coordination with Environmental Streamlining Activities Memorandum from Fred Skaer, Director Office of NEPA Facilitation to FHWA Division Administrators and Susan Borinsky, FTA, Director, Office of Human and Natural Environment. (February 26, 2002). 5. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). “Report to Congress on Federal Highway Administration Environmental Streamlining Activities During 2003.” Available at: http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/rtc0604rpt.htm. (June 2003). 6. James L. Connaughton, President, Council on Environmental Quality to Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation; May 13, 2003. Available at: http://nepa.fhwa.dot.gov/ReNepa/ReNepa.nsf/0/efe6b59be347825685256d890072 2f05?OpenDocument 7. Federal Highway Administration. Successes in Streamlining. December 2002, October 2002, March 2002. Published electronically at http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/es7newsltrs.htm. 8. U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). Executive Order 13274. “Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Review.” (September 18, 2002). 9. Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP). Regional Location for Western Riverside County MSHCP. (2001). 198

10. Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP). Draft EIS/EIR alternatives for the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore Corridor Map. Available at: http://www.rcip.org/Documents/cetap/hcle/Hcle1%20Images/HCLE1%20Figure %202.1.pdf (February 5, 2003a). 11. Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP). Draft EIS/EIR alternatives for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor Map. Available at: http://www.rcip.org/Documents/cetap/wt/WT%20Images/WT%20Figure%202.1. pdf (February 5, 2003b). 12. “Partnership Agreement “Mare Island Accord” Between the United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 and the United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, California Division and the California Department of Transportation.” (July 14, 2000). 13. “Memorandum of Understanding National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Water Act Section 404 Integration Process for Surface Transportation Projects in Arizona, California, and Nevada.” (March 1994). 14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) Partnership. PowerPoint Presentation, page 3. “Guidance Statement”. 15. “A Partnership Agreement Among Departments and Agencies of the United States of America, Departments and Agencies of the State of California, and Merced County Association of Governments.” (May 2001). 16. “Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) and United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) Regarding Priority Review of Transportation Projects.” (September 26, 2001). 17. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Environmental Management Office. “Florida’s ETDM Process.” Available at: http://fdotenvironmentalstreamlining.urs-tally.com/ Public%20Invovlment/ NGO%20Regional%20Forums/ETDM-ngo%20regional%20forums%20print% 20copy.pdf (February 5, 2003). 18. Georgia Rail Passenger Program (GRPP). Georgia Rail Passenger Map. Available at: http://www.garail.com/Pages/Org.html (February 5, 2003a). 19. Georgia Rail Passenger Program (GRPP). Organization Chart. Available at: http://www.garail.com/Media/grppcommutermap.gif (February 5, 2003b). 199

20. “Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT), Georgia Rail Passenger Authority (GRPA), and Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA). Memorandum of Understanding.” (December 1999). 21. 23 C.F.R. § 771.135. Section 4(f) (49 U.S.C 303). (October 14, 1997). 22. U.S. Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration. “Final Nationwide Section 4(F) Evaluation and Approval for Federally-Aided Highway Projects with Minor Involvements with Historic Sites.” (December 23, 1986). 23. 36 C.F.R. 63. “Determinations of Eligibility for Inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.” 24. 36 C.F.R. § 800.11 (e). “Documentation Standards for Finding of No Adverse Effect or Adverse Effect.” (July 1, 2001). 25. New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT). “Parallel Processing of Section 106 and Section 4(F).” (September 5, 2000). 26. “Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT). Route 57 Bridge Replacement over Merrill Creek, Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey, Draft Self-Standing Section 4(F)/Section 106 Documentation for Historic District Impacts.” (October 2002). 27. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), et al. “NEPA/404 Merger Agreement.” (1996). 28. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), et al. “Collaborative Environmental Group Charter.” (February 6, 2001). 29. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). “Collaborative Environmental and Transportation Agreement for Streamlining (Major Transportation Projects Agreement).” (November 2001). 30. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Planning Section. “Transportation System Plan Guidelines.” (2001) 31. The Oregon Coastal Management Program Official Program Description. Available at: http://www.lcd.state.or.us/coast/ocmpdoc/ocmprog4.htm 32. Louis Berger Group, Inc., “Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effects of Proposed Transportation Projects”. NCHRP Report 466, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (2002) pp. 97-99 33. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Loop 12 / Interstate Highway 35E Corridor Major Investment Study/Preliminary Engineering and 200

Environmental Assessment (PE/EA) Study Area Map. Available at: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/dal/mis/loop12/lp12map.htm (February 5, 2003). 34. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Environmental Evaluation of Facilities Development Actions Screening Worksheets. 201