National Academies Press: OpenBook

Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices (2015)

Chapter: APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)

« Previous: REFERENCES
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 46
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 47
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 48
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 49
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 50
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 51
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 52
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 53
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 54
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 55
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 56
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 57
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 58
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 59
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 60
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 61
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 62
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 63
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 64
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 66
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 67
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 68
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 69
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 71
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 72
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 73
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 74
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 75
Page 76
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 76
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 77
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 78
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 79
Page 80
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 80
Page 81
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 81
Page 82
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 82
Page 83
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 83
Page 84
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 84
Page 85
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 85
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 86
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 87
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 88
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 89
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 92
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 93
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 94
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 95
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 96
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 97
Page 98
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 98
Page 99
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 99
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 100
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 101
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 102
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web Version Only)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22201.
×
Page 103

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

44 APPENDIX A SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE (WEB VERSION ONLY) This appendix is provided only in the version of the document published on the NCHRP website.

45 A-2 Dear Maintenance Engineer: The Transportation Research Board (TRB) is preparing a synthesis on Maintenance Quality Assurance (MQA) Field Inspection Practices. This is being done for the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), under the sponsorship of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The purpose of this questionnaire is to identify and summarize the MQA field inspection practices used by state highway agencies and the way these processes are administered within maintenance organizations. The results of the survey will be incorporated into a synthesis of highway agency practice that will highlight agency’s practices and lessons learned, with the intent of aiding the implementation process for those agencies that have yet to implement an MQA program or are in the process of implementing a new or revised maintenance inspection regimen. This survey is being sent to the voting member of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance for each state department of transportation. Your cooperation in completing the questionnaire will ensure the success of this effort. If you are not the appropriate person at your agency to complete this questionnaire, please forward it to the correct person. Please complete and submit this survey by February 26, 2014. We estimate that it should take no more than 25 minutes to complete. It is designed so you can exit and return to the survey if you need to allocate your time over several days. If you have any questions or problems related to this questionnaire, please contact our principal investigator Ms. Katie Zimmerman at (217) 398-3977 or kzimmerman@appliedpavement.com. Dear Maintenance Engineer: The Transportation Research Board (TRB) is preparing a synthesis on Maintenance Quality Assurance (MQA) Field Inspection Practices. This is being done for the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), under the sponsorship of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The purpose of this questionnaire is to identify and summarize the MQA field inspection practices used by state highway agencies and the way these processes are administered within maintenance organizations. The results of the survey will be incorporated into a synthesis of highway agency practice that will highlight agency’s practices and lessons learned, with the intent of aiding the implementation process for those agencies t at have yet to implement an MQA program or are in the process of implementi g a new or revised maintenance inspection regimen. This survey is being sent to the voting member of the AASHTO Sub ommittee on Maintenance for each state department of transportation. Your cooperation in completing the questionnaire will ensure the success of this effort. If you are not the appropriate person at your agency to complete this questionnaire, please forward it to the correct person. Please complete and submit this survey by February 26, 2014. We estimate that it should take no more than 25 minutes to complete. It is designed so you can exit and return to the survey if you need to allocate your time over several days. If you have any questions or problems related to this questionnaire, please contact our principal investigator Ms. Katie Zimmerman at (217) 398-3977 or kzimmerman@appliedpavement.com.

46 Questionnaire Instructions 1. To view and print the entire questionnaire, Click on the following link and print using “control p.” //surveygizmolibrary.s3.amazonaws. com/library/64484/NCHRPSynthesis4513survey3.pdf 2. To save your partial answers and complete the questionnaire later, click on the “Save and Continue Later” link at the top of your screen. A link to the incomplete questionnaire will be e-mailed to you from SurveyGizmo. To return to the questionnaire later, open the e-mail from SurveyGizmo and click on the link. We suggest using the “Save and Continue Later” feature if there will be more than 15 minutes of inactivity while the survey is opened, as some firewalls may terminate due to inactivity. Otherwise, utilizing the “next” and “previous” buttons will navigate through the survey. 3. To pass a partially completed questionnaire to a colleague, click on the on the “Save and Continue Later” link in the upper right-hand corner of your screen. A link to the incomplete questionnaire will be e-mailed to you from SurveyGizmo. Open the e-mail from SurveyGizmo and forward it to a colleague. 4. To view and print your answers before submitting the survey, click forward to the page following question 38. Print using “control p.” 5. To submit the survey, click on “Submit” on the last page. Thank you very much for your time and expertise in completing this important questionnaire. Definitions The following definitions are used in conjunction with this questionnaire: • Agency district/region—the different geographic areas of responsibility within a given agency. • Agency division/section—the various areas within a given agency and includes such divisions/sections as materials, construction, roadway design, planning, maintenance, and so on. • Asset—a physical item of roadway infrastructure that has value. Assets are sometimes referred to as roadway “furniture” or “features.” An asset may be a single item, such as a sign, or a linear item, such as a road or guardrail section. An asset may also be a spatial item, such as a rest area or mowable acreage. • Asset inventory—a physical count of assets. The count may be by coordinates, milepoints, road section, geographical area, road network, maintenance section, or other convenient method of sorting and reporting the amount of assets in the road system. • Condition assessment—a physical inspection and rating of roadway assets to determine the condition of individual assets, roadway sections, or overall road networks. • Maintenance Quality Assurance (MQA)—a process of physically inspecting and rating the condition of the roadway assets and maintenance services. The quality assessment employs the same measures used to set performance targets. The data from the maintenance quality assessment is used to assess outcomes, actual performance, and maintenance LOS. A-3 Questionnaire Instructions 1. To view and print the entire questionnaire, Click on the following link and print using “control p.” //surveygizmolibrary.s3.amazonaws.com/library/64484/NCHRPSynthesis4513surve y3.pdf 2. To save your partial answers and complete the questionnaire later, click on the “Save and Continue Later” link at the top of your screen. A link to the incomplete questi n aire will be e-mailed to you from SurveyGizmo. To return to the questionnaire later, open t e e-mail f om SurveyGizmo and click on the link. We suggest using the “Save and Continue Later” feature if there will be more than 15 minutes of inactivity while the survey is opened, as some firewalls may terminate due to inactivity. Otherwise, utilizing the “next” and “previous” buttons will navigate through the survey. 3. To pass a partially completed questionnaire to a colleague, click on the on the “Save and Continue Later” link in the upper right-hand corner of your screen. A link to the incomplete question aire will be e-mailed to you from SurveyGizmo. Open the e- mail from SurveyGizmo and forward it to a colleague. 4. To view and print your answers before submitting the survey, click forward to the page following question 38. Print using “control p.” 5. To submit the survey, click on “Submit” on the last page. Thank you very much for your time and expertise in completing this important questionnaire. Definitions The following definitions re used in conjunction with th s questionnaire: • Agency district/region—the different geographic areas of responsibility within a given agency. • Agency division/section—the various areas within a given agency and includes such divisions/sections as materials, construction, roadway design, planning, maintenance, and so on. • Asset—a physical item of roadway infrastructure that has value. Assets r some imes referred to as roadway “furniture” or “featu es.” An sset may be a single item, such as a sign, or a linear item, such as a road or guardrail section. An asset may also be a spatial item, such as a rest area or mowable acreage. • Asset inventory—a physical count of assets. The count may be by coordinates, milepoints, road section, geographical area, road network, maintenance section, or other convenient method of sorting and reporting the amount of assets in the road system. • Condition assessment—a physical inspection and rating of roadway assets to determine the condition of individual assets, roadway sections, or overall road networks. • Maintenance Quality Assurance (MQA)—a process of physically inspecting and rating the condition of the roadway assets and maintenance services. The quality assessment employs the same measures used to set performance targets. The data

47 A-4 from the maintenance quality assessment is used to assess outcomes, actual performance, and maintenance LOS. • Performance Measure—a quantifiable measure of performance to determine progress toward specific, defined organization objectives based on statistical evidence. Sample measures include height of grass, number of potholes per lane mile, and percent of signs below standard. • Performance Target—a targeted level of an activity or performance expressed as a tangible measurable goal, against which achievement can be compared. A performance target is usually a numerical rating, such as “pavement drop-off less than x inches,” but it could also be an overall rating, such as a targeted LOS equal to “A” in an A to F rating scale. • Sampling—a small group of sections selected from the entire population (usually statistically) that are used to represent the condition of the entire population. • Level of Service (LOS)—a measure of the condition of individual assets as well as the overall condition of the roadway. LOS measures are generally specified in customer service terms related to safety, preservation, convenience, aesthetics, comfort, and mobility. Some states also measure LOS in terms of environmental impacts or legislative mandates. • Maintenance Management System (MMS)—a modern MMS integrates organization structure, business processes, and technology to provide a systematic approach for planning and executing an efficient customer-oriented and performance-based maintenance program. • Perfor ance Measure—a quantifiable measure of performance to determine progress toward specific, defined organization objectives based on statistical evi ence. Sample measures includ height of grass, number of potholes per lane mile, and percent of signs below standard. • Performance Target—a targeted level of an activity or performance expressed as a tangible measurable goal, against which achievement can be compared. A performance target is usually a numerical rating, such as “pavement drop-off less than x inches,” but it could also be an overall rating, such as a targeted LOS equal to “A” in an A to F rating scale. • Sampling—a small group of sections selected from the entire population (usually statistically) that are used to represent the condition of the entire population. • Level of Service (LOS)—a measure of the condition of individual assets as well as the overall conditi of the roadway. LOS measures are generally specified in customer service terms related to safety, preservation, convenience, aesthetics, comfort, and mobility. Some states also measure LOS in terms of environmental impacts or legislative mandates. • Maintenance Management System (MMS)—a modern MMS integrates organization structure, business processes, and technology to provide a systematic approach for planning and executing an efficient customer-oriented and performance- based maintenance program. Definitions continued

48 General Information 1) Select the state you represent.* …… Alabama …… Alaska …… Arizona …… Arkansas …… California …… Colorado …… Connecticut …… Delaware …… District of Columbia …… Florida …… Georgia …… Hawaii …… Idaho …… Illinois …… Indiana …… Iowa …… Kansas …… Kentucky …… Louisiana ……Maine ……Maryland ……Massachusetts ……Michigan ……Minnesota ……Mississippi ……Missouri ……Montana …… Nebraska …… Nevada …… New Hampshire …… New Jersey …… New Mexico …… New York …… North Carolina …… North Dakota …… Ohio …… Oklahoma …… Oregon …… Pennsylvania …… Rhode Island …… South Carolina …… South Dakota …… Tennessee …… Texas …… Utah …… Vermont …… Virginia ……Washington ……West Virginia ……Wisconsin ……Wyoming 2) Approximately how many centerline miles?* ______________________________________________________________________________ 3) Do you have a program for monitoring maintenance condition of highway assets, such as a Maintenance Quality Assurance Program?* …… Yes …… No A-5 General Information 1) Select the state you represent.* Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgi Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming 2) Approximately how many centerline miles?* ______________________________________________________________________________ 3) Do you have a program for monitoring maintenance condition of highway assets, such as a Maintenance Quality Assurance Program?* Yes No A-6 IF: Question #3 = (“Yes”) THEN: Jump to page 6. Final Question If you answered no, please answer this final question before returning the survey: Is your agency planning to develop/implement a program in:* 1 to 2 years 2 to 5 years Not at this time Jump to page 60. General Information 4) What term is used to describe your program? Maintenance Quality Assurance Program Maintenance Accomplishment Program Maintenance Management Program We have developed a unique name for the program. Enter your program name here: ___________________________________________________________________________ 5) Approximately how long has your agency’s MQA program been in place? 0 to 2 years 2 to 5 years 5 to 10 years More than 10 years 6) When was the last time your agency made substantial changes to your MQA program (substantial changes can be software enhancements or the addition of data elements)? 0 to 2 years 2 to 5 years

49 FINAL QUESTION If you answered no, please answer this final question before returning the survey: Is your agency planning to develop/implement a program in:* …… 1 to 2 years …… 2 to 5 years …… Not at this time Jump to page 60. GENERAL INFORMATION 4) What term is used to describe your program? …… Maintenance Quality Assurance Program …… Maintenance Accomplishment Program …… Maintenance Management Program …… We have developed a unique name for the program. Enter your program name here: ___________________________________________________________________________ 5) Approximately how long has your agency’s MQA program been in place? …… 0 to 2 years …… 2 to 5 years …… 5 to 10 years …… More than 10 years 6) When was the last time your agency made substantial changes to your MQA program (substantial changes can be software enhancements or the addition of data elements)? …… 0 to 2 years …… 2 to 5 years …… 5 to 10 years …… More than 10 years A-6 IF: Question #3 = (“Yes”) THEN: Jump to page 6. Final Question If you answered no, please answer this final question before returning the survey: Is your agency planning to develop/implement a program in:* 1 to 2 years 2 to 5 years Not at this time Jump to page 60. General Information 4) What term is used to describe your program? Maintenance Quality Assurance Program Maintenance Accomplishment Program aintenance Management Program We have developed a unique name for the program. Enter your program name here: ___________________________________________________________________________ 5) Approximately how long has your agency’s MQA program been in place? 0 to 2 years 2 to 5 years 5 to 10 years More than 10 years 6) When was the last time your agency made substantial changes to your MQA program (substantial changes can be software enhancements or the addition of data elements)? 0 to 2 years 2 to 5 years

50 7) How was your program developed? …… The agency developed the program. …… A consultant or vendor developed and implemented the program. …… A consultant or vendor developed and implemented the original program, but the agency has modified the program since that time. …… The agency worked in partnership with a consultant or vendor to develop and implement the program. …… The agency partnered with another public agency to develop the program. …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 8) Which of the following items were factors in establishing your MQA program? Select all that apply. …… A mandate …… To make good use of available funding …… To track and report maintenance accomplishments …… To monitor performance of highway assets …… To improve work activity scheduling …… To develop performance-based budgets …… To estimate maintenance needs …… To improve agency accountability …… To improve accountability of personnel …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ A-7 5 to 10 years More than 10 years 7) How was your program developed? The agency developed the program. A consultant or vendor developed and implemented the program. A consultant or vendor developed and implemented the original program, but the agency has modified the program since that time. The agency worked in partnership with a consultant or vendor to develop and implement the program. The agency partnered with another public agency to develop the program. Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 8) Which of the following items were factors in establishing your MQA program? Select all that apply. A mandate To make good use of available funding To track and report maintenance accomplishments To monitor performance of highway assets To improve work activity scheduling To develop performance-based budgets To estimate maintenance needs To improve agency accountability To improve accountability of personnel Other: _____________________________________________________________________

51 Condition Assessment Activities This section of the survey asks about the MQA data being collected on various types of assets. Assets are organized by asset category. Within each category, please identify (a) whether you have a complete inventory for that asset, and (b) whether you assess (rate) the condition of that asset as part of your MQA program. You will be asked for additional information about each asset that is rated as part of your MQA program. These questions will only appear if the asset is included in your MQA program. These questions ask for: 1. the method used to collect the information (Automated, Manual Windshield, Manual Walking, or Other) (Note: Automated may include both LiDAR or digital images from a vehicle traveling at near-traffic speeds), 2. whether representative samples are inspected during the survey process (Yes or No), 3. the cycle used to collect performance data (Annually, Every Other Year, More Than Once a Year, or Other), and 4. the condition assessment attribute used (select “Not Rated” if this asset is not part of your inspections). Please complete the following tables as much as possible with readily-available information. We do not expect you to do extensive research to gather this information. A-8 Condition Assessment Activities This section of the survey asks about the MQA data being collected on various types of assets. A sets are organized by asset category. Within each category, please identify (a) wh ther you have a complete inventory for that asset, and (b) whether you assess (rate) the condition of that asset as part of your MQA program. You will be asked for additional information about each asset that is rated as part of your MQA program. These questions will only appear if the asset is included in your MQA program. These questions ask for: 1. the method used to collect the information (Automated, Manual Windshield, Manual Walking, or Other) (Note: Automated may include both LiDAR or digital images from a vehicle traveling at near-traffic speeds), 2. whether representative samples are inspected during the survey process (Yes or No), 3. the cycle used to collect performance data (Annually, Ev ry Other Year, Mor Than Once a Year, or Other), and 4. the condition assessment attribute used (select “Not Rated” if this asset is not part of your inspections). Please complete the following tables as much as possible with readily-available information. We do not expect you to do extensive research to gather this information.

52 Condition Assessment Activities—Drainage 9) Indicate if Drainage system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Culvert ( ) ( ) ( ) Flume ( ) ( ) ( ) Curb & Gutter ( ) ( ) ( ) Sidewalk ( ) ( ) ( ) Ditch or Slope ( ) ( ) ( ) Drop Inlet ( ) ( ) ( ) Underdrain & Edgedrain ( ) ( ) ( ) 10) Select all Drainage system attributes that are rated. …… Culvert …… Flume …… Curb & Gutter …… Sidewalk …… Ditch or Slope …… Drop Inlet …… Underdrain & Edgedrain A-9 Condition Assessment Activities—Drainage 9) Indicate if Drainage system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Culvert ( ) ( ) ( ) Flume ( ) ( ) ( ) Curb & Gutter ( ) ( ) ( ) Sidewalk ( ) ( ) ( ) Ditch or Slope ( ) ( ) ( ) Drop Inlet ( ) ( ) ( ) Underdrain & Edgedrain ( ) ( ) ( ) 10) Select all Drainage system attributes that are rated. Culvert Flume Curb & Gutter Sidewalk Ditch or Slope Drop Inlet Underdrain & Edgedrain

53 A-10 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 0 co nt ai ns a ny (“ C ul ve rt ”) 11 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Cu lv er t - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r C ul ve rt ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Cu lv er t - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er C ha nn el c on di tio n (e .g ., C lo gg ed ) E ro si on C ul ve rt c on di tio n (e .g ., D et er io ra tio n at b ot to m d ue to sc ou r or c ol la ps e) C ul ve rt [ ] [ ] [ ]

54 A-11 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 0 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Fl um e” ) 12 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Fl um es - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Fl um es ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Fl um es - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er C ha nn el c on di tio n (e .g ., C lo gg ed ) Fl um e co nd iti on (e .g ., de te ri or at ed a nd c au si ng e ro si on ) Fl um es [ ] [ ]

55 A-12 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 0 co nt ai ns a ny (“ C ur b & G ut te r” ) 13 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Cu rb a nd G ut te r - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r C ur b & G ut te r ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Cu rb & G ut te r - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Se ttl em en t (D is pl ac em en t /h ea vi ng ) U nd er m in in g Fl ow lin e in te rr up te d St ru ct ur al da m ag e/ sp al lin g C ur b/ gu tte r cr ac ki ng C ur b/ gu tte r lo w c ur b re ve al C ur b & G ut te r [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

56 A-13 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 0 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Si de w al k” ) 14 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Si de wa lk - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Si de w al k ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Si de wa lk - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er C ra ck in g St ru ct ur al de te ri or at io n D is pl ac em en t/h ea vi ng Se ttl em en t Si de w al k [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

57 A-14 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 0 co nt ai ns a ny (“ D itc h or S lo pe ”) 15 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . D itc h or S lo pe - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r D itc h ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Sl op e ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) D itc h or S lo pe - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Se ttl em en t E ro si on M is al ig nm en t St ru ct ur al de te ri or at io n In ad eq ua te d ra in ag e (d ue to si lti ng o r de br is ) D itc h [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Sl op e [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

58 A-15 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 0 co nt ai ns a ny (“ D ro p In le t” ) 16 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . D ro p In le t - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r D ro p In le t ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) D ro p In le t - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er In su ffi ci en t ca pa ci ty B lo ck ag e St ru ct ur al de fic ie nc y G ra te br ok en /m is si ng D ro p In le t [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

59 A-16 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 0 co nt ai ns a ny (“ U nd er dr ai n & E dg ed ra in ”) 17 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . U nd er dr ai n an d Ed ge dr ai n - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r U nd er dr ai n & Ed ge dr ai n ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) U nd er dr ai n & E dg ed ra in - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er E nd p ro te ct io n da m ag e Pi pe cr us he d Pi pe bl oc ke d U nd er dr ai n & E dg ed ra in [ ] [ ] [ ]

60 Condition Assessment Activities—Roadside 18) Indicate if Roadside system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Fence ( ) ( ) ( ) Landscaping ( ) ( ) ( ) Plant Beds ( ) ( ) ( ) Sound Barrier ( ) ( ) ( ) 19) Select all Roadside system attributes that are rated. …… Fence …… Grass Mowing …… Brush …… Litter …… Weed Control or Noxious Weeds …… Landscaping …… Plant Beds …… Sound Barrier A-17

61 A-18 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Fe nc e” ) 20 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Fe nc e - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Fe nc e ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Fe nc e - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er N um be r of br ok en p os ts L en gt h of d am ag ed or m is si ng R us te d fe nc e co nn ec tio ns V eg et at io n on fe nc e pr es en t Fe nc e [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

62 A-19 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ G ra ss M ow in g” ) 21 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . G ra ss M ow in g - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r G ra ss M ow in g ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) G ra ss M ow in g - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er G ra ss h ei gh t Pr es en ce o f u nd es ir ab le ve ge ta tio n G ra ss M ow in g [ ] [ ]

63 A-20 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ B ru sh ”) 22 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Br us h - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r B ru sh ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Br us h - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er O bs tr uc tio ns in th e cl ea r zo ne V is io n ob st ru ct io ns B ru sh [ ] [ ]

64 A-21 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ L itt er ”) 23 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Li tte r - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Li tte r ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Li tte r - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er V ol um e w ith in a ce rt ai n le ng th O th er Li tte r [ ] [ ]

65 A-22 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ W ee d C on tr ol o r N ox io us W ee ds ”) 24 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Ve ge ta tio n (W ee d) C on tro l o r N ox io us W ee ds - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r V eg et at io n (W ee d) C on tro l o r N ox io us W ee ds ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) W ee d Co nt ro l - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er A m ou nt o r pe rc en ta ge w ith in a ce rt ai n ar ea O th er V eg et at io n (W ee d) C on tro l or N ox io us W ee ds [ ] [ ]

66 A-22 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis Logic: Hidden unless: Question #19 contains any (“Weed Control or Noxious Weeds”) 24) You indicated that you rate this asset. Please complete the associated tables. Vegetation (Weed) Control or Noxious Weeds - Method and Frequency (as part of the MQA program) Method of Collection Method of Collection (Other) Sampling Used? Frequency of Survey Frequency of Survey (Other) Auto- mated Manual Windshield Manual Walking Yes No Annual Every other year More than once/yr Vegetation (Weed) Control or Noxious Weeds ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Weed Control - Condition Assessment Attributes Select one or more attributes. Condition Assessment Attributes Other Amount or percentage within a certain area Other Vegetation (Weed) Control or Noxious Weeds [ ] [ ] A-23 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ L an ds ca pi ng ”) 25 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . La nd sc ap in g - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r La nd sc ap in g ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) La nd sc ap in g - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er A pp ea ra nc e O bs tr uc tio ns La nd sc ap in g [ ] [ ]

67 A-24 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Pl an t B ed s” ) 26 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Pl an t B ed s - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Pl an t B ed s ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pl an t B ed s - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er A pp ea ra nc e Pr es en ce o f u nd es ir ab le v eg et at io n Pl an t B ed s [ ] [ ]

68 A-25 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #1 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ So un d B ar ri er ”) 27 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . So un d Ba rr ie r - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r So un d B ar rie r ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) So un d Ba rr ie r - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Fu nc tio na lit y C le ar o f v eg et at io n So un d B ar rie r [ ] [ ]

69 Condition Assessment Activities—Pavement 28) Indicate if Pavement system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Paved Shoulders ( ) ( ) ( ) Unpaved Shoulders ( ) ( ) ( ) Paved Roadways ( ) ( ) ( ) 29) Select all Pavement system attributes that are rated. …… Paved Shoulders …… Unpaved Shoulders …… Paved Roadways A-26

70 A-27 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #2 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Pa ve d Sh ou ld er s” ) 30 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Pa ve d Sh ou ld er s - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Pa ve d Sh ou ld er s ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pa ve d Sh ou ld er s - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er D ro p- of f St ru ct ur al di st re ss Fu nc tio na l di st re ss R um bl e st ri p no t f un ct io ni ng T ra ve l w ay & sh ou ld er se pa ra tio n Sh ou ld er m ai nt en an ce Pa ve d Sh ou ld er s [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

71 A-28 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #2 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ U np av ed S ho ul de rs ”) 31 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . U np av ed S ho ul de rs - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r U np av ed Sh ou ld er s ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) U np av ed S ho ul de rs - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er D ro p- of f A de qu ac y of g ra ve l U np av ed Sh ou ld er s [ ] [ ]

72 A-29 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #2 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Pa ve d R oa dw ay s” ) 32 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Pa ve d Ro ad wa ys - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Pa ve d R oa dw ay s ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pa ve d Ro ad wa ys - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er W e us e Pa ve m en t M an ag em en t s ur ve y re su lts St ru ct ur al di st re ss H M A St ru ct ur al di st re ss PC C Fu nc tio na l di st re ss H M A Fu nc tio na l di st re ss PC C C ra ck in g /C ra ck Se al in g H M A C ra ck in g /C ra ck Se al in g PC C Fa ul tin g PC C R ou gh ne ss H M A o r PC C R ut tin g H M A P av em en t Pa tc hi ng H M A Pa ve m en t Pa tc hi ng PC C Pa ve d R oa dw ay s [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

73 Condition Assessment Activities—Bridge 33) Indicate if Bridge system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Bridge ( ) ( ) ( ) 34) Are Bridge condition assessment attributes rated? …… Yes …… No A-30 Condition Assessment Activities—Bridge 33) Indicate if Bridge system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. 34) Are Bridge condition assessment attributes rated? Yes No Complete Partially complete No inventory available Bridge ( ) ( ) ( )

74 A-31 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 4 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Y es ”) 35 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Br id ge - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r B rid ge ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Br id ge - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er B ri dg e in sp ec tio ns us ed fo r br id ge m an ag em en t C on di tio n ra tin gs fo r de ck s C on di tio n ra tin gs fo r be ar in gs C on di tio n ra tin gs fo r jo in ts St ru ct ur al ad eq ua cy D ra in ag e B rid ge [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

75 Condition Assessment Activities—Traffic Items 36) Indicate if Traffic Items system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Signal ( ) ( ) ( ) Sign ( ) ( ) ( ) Pavement Marking (long lines, e.g., centerline or edgeline) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pavement Marker (special pavement markings, e.g., only, arrow, etc.) ( ) ( ) ( ) Guardrail End Treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) Overhead Sign Structure ( ) ( ) ( ) Impact Attenuator ( ) ( ) ( ) Protective Barriers ( ) ( ) ( ) 37) Select all Traffic Item system attributes that are rated. …… Signal …… Sign …… Pavement Marking (long lines, e.g., centerline or edgeline) …… Pavement Marker (special pavement markings, e.g., only, arrow, etc.) …… Guardrail End Treatment …… Overhead Sign Structure …… Impact Attenuator …… Protective Barriers (e.g., beam guard, cable guard, and concrete barriers) …… Variable Message Board …… Highway Lighting A-32 Condition Assessment Activities—Traffic Items 36) Indicate if Traffic Items system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Signal ( ) ( ) ( ) Sign ( ) ( ) ( ) Pavement Marking (long lines, e.g., centerline or edgeline) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pavement Marker (special pavement markings, e.g., only, arrow, etc.) ( ) ( ) ( ) Guardrail End Treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) Overhead Sign Structure ( ) ( ) ( ) Impact Attenuator ( ) ( ) ( ) Protective Barriers ( ) ( ) ( ) 37) Select all Traffic Item system attributes that are rated. Signal Sign Pavement Marking (long lines, e.g., centerline or edgeline) Pavement Marker (special pavement markings, e.g., only, arrow, etc.) Guardrail End Treatment Overhead Sign Structure Impact Attenuator Protective Barriers (e.g., beam guard, cable guard, and concrete barriers) Variable Message Board Highway Lighting

76 A-33 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Si gn al ”) 38 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Si gn al - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Si gn al ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Si gn al - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Po st da m ag e V is ib ili ty B ul bs bu rn ed ou t Si gn al or ie nt at io n Si gn al [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

77 A-34 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Si gn ”) 39 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Si gn - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Si gn ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Si gn - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Pa ne ls da m ag ed R et ro - re fle ct iv ity a t st an da rd d is ta nc e V is ib ili ty a t st an da rd di st an ce St an da rd he ig ht Po st da m ag e L eg ib ili ty Si gn or ie nt at io n O bs tr uc tio ns Si gn [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

78 A-35 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Pa ve m en t M ar ki ng (e .g ., ce nt er lin e or e dg el in e) ”) 40 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Pa ve m en t M ar ki ng (e .g ., ce nt er lin e or e dg el in e) M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Pa ve m en t M ar ki ng ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pa ve m en t M ar ki ng - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er D ay vi si bi lit y N ig ht re tr or ef le ct iv ity M is si ng / da m ag ed Pa ve m en t M ar ki ng [ ] [ ] [ ]

79 A-36 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Pa ve m en t M ar ke r” ) 41 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Pa ve m en t M ar ke r ( sp ec ia l p av em en t m ar ki ng s, e. g. , o nl y, a rr ow , e tc .) M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Pa ve m en t M ar ke r ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pa ve m en t M ar ke r - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er N um be r m is si ng , da m ag ed , o r ob st ru ct ed O th er Pa ve m en t M ar ke r [ ] [ ]

80 A-37 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ G ua rd ra il E nd T re at m en t” ) 42 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . G ua rd ra il En d Tr ea tm en t - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry o th er ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r G ua rd ra il En d Tr ea tm en t ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) G ua rd ra il En d Tr ea tm en t - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er E nd tr ea tm en t da m ag e E nd tr ea tm en t al ig nm en t Po st da m ag e Fu nc tio na lit y G ua rd ra il En d Tr ea tm en t [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

81 A-38 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ O ve rh ea d Si gn S tr uc tu re ”) 43 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . O ve rh ea d Si gn S tru ct ur e - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r O ve rh ea d Si gn St ru ct ur e ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) O ve rh ea d Si gn S tru ct ur e - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er St ru ct ur al in te gr ity A nc ho r bo lts c le ar o f d eb ri s O ve rh ea d Si gn St ru ct ur e [ ] [ ]

82 A-39 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Im pa ct A tte nu at or ”) 44 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Im pa ct A tte nu at or - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Im pa ct A tte nu at or ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Im pa ct A tte nu at or - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er M is al ig ne d St ru ct ur al ly da m ag ed Fu nc tio na lit y Im pa ct A tte nu at or [ ] [ ] [ ]

83 A-40 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ Pr ot ec tiv e B ar ri er s… ”) 45 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Pr ot ec tiv e Ba rr ie rs (e .g ., be am g ua rd , c ab le g ua rd , a nd c on cr et e ba rr ie rs ) M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Pr ot ec tiv e B ar rie rs ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Pr ot ec tiv e Ba rr ie rs - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er M is al ig ne d St ru ct ur al ly da m ag ed Fu nc tio na lit y Pr ot ec tiv e B ar rie rs [ ] [ ] [ ]

84 A-41 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ V ar ia bl e M es sa ge B oa rd ”) 46 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Va ria bl e M es sa ge B oa rd - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry o th er ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r V ar ia bl e M es sa ge B oa rd ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Va ria bl e M es sa ge B oa rd - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Pe rc en t op er at io na l St ru ct ur al in te gr ity V ar ia bl e M es sa ge B oa rd [ ] [ ]

85 A-42 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #3 7 co nt ai ns a ny (“ H ig hw ay L ig ht in g” ) 47 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . H ig hw ay L ig ht in g - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r H ig hw ay Li gh tin g ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) H ig hw ay L ig ht in g - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Pe rc en t op er at io na l St ru ct ur al in te gr ity A nc ho r as se m bl y cl ea r of d eb ri s an d al l w ir in g en cl os ed H ig hw ay Li gh tin g [ ] [ ] [ ]

86 Condition Assessment Activities—Special Facilities 48) Indicate if Special Facilities system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Rest Areas ( ) ( ) ( ) Tunnels ( ) ( ) ( ) Weigh Stations ( ) ( ) ( ) Traffic Monitoring Systems ( ) ( ) ( ) 49) Select all Special Facilities System Attributes that are rated. …… Rest Areas …… Tunnels …… Weigh Stations …… Traffic Monitoring Systems A-43 Condition Assessment Activities—Special Facilities 48) Indicate if Special Facilities system assets inventory (e.g., location, number) is complete, partially complete, or if there is no inventory available. Complete Partially complete No inventory available Rest Areas ( ) ( ) ( ) Tunnels ( ) ( ) ( ) Weigh Stations ( ) ( ) ( ) Traffic Monitoring Systems ( ) ( ) ( ) 49) Select all Special Facilities System Attributes that are rated. Rest Areas Tunnels Weigh Stations Traffic Monitoring Systems

87 A-44 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #4 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ R es t A re as ”) 50 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Re st Ar ea s - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r R es t A re as ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Re st Ar ea s - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er G ra ffi ti Fa ci lit ie s w or ki ng pr op er ly A pp ea ra nc e M ow in g L an ds ca pi ng O do r C le an lin es s R es t A re as [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

88 A-45 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #4 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ T un ne ls ”) 51 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Tu nn el s - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Tu nn el s ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Tu nn el s - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er L ig ht in g D eb ri s D ra in ag e Tu nn el s [ ] [ ] [ ]

89 A-46 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #4 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ W ei gh S ta tio ns ”) 52 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . W ei gh S ta tio ns - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r W ei gh St at io ns ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) W ei gh S ta tio ns - Co nd iti on A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Fu nc tio na lit y A pp ea ra nc e W ei gh St at io ns [ ] [ ]

90 A-47 NCHRP Synthesis Topic 45-13 Draft Synthesis L og ic : H id de n un le ss : Q ue st io n #4 9 co nt ai ns a ny (“ T ra ffi c M on ito ri ng S ys te m s” ) 53 ) Y ou in di ca te d th at y ou r at e th is a ss et . P le as e co m pl et e th e as so ci at ed ta bl es . Tr af fic M on ito rin g Sy ste m s - M et ho d an d Fr eq ue nc y (a s p ar t o f t he M Q A pr og ra m ) M et ho d of C ol le ct io n M et ho d of C ol le ct io n (O th er ) Sa m pl in g U se d? Fr eq ue nc y of S ur ve y Fr eq ue nc y of Su rv ey (O th er ) A ut o- m at ed M an ua l W in ds hi el d M an ua l W al ki ng Y es N o A nn ua l E ve ry ot he r ye ar M or e th an on ce /y r Tr af fic M on ito rin g Sy st em s ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Tr af fic M on ito rin g Sy ste m s - C on di tio n As se ss m en t A ttr ib ut es Se le ct o ne o r m or e at tr ib ut es . C on di tio n A ss es sm en t A ttr ib ut es O th er Fu nc tio na lit y O th er Tr af fic M on ito rin g Sy st em s [ ] [ ]

91 Condition Assessment Activities—Questions 54) Which of the following best describes the rating method used to assess the performance of maintenance activities? …… Raters determine whether an asset passes or fails based on predefined criteria. …… The number of performance deficiencies are recorded for each asset inspected. …… A combination of the two approaches is used, depending on the type of asset. …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 55) Who conducts your maintenance condition assessment surveys? …… Central office maintenance personnel …… District/region personnel …… Consultant or vendor …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 56) Approximately how many roadway segments are evaluated as part of a complete survey cycle? ______________________________________________________________________________ 57) Please mark each type of equipment used during the conduct of the condition assessment surveys. …… Pen/pencil/paper …… Handheld computers …… GPS equipment …… Vans with cameras and lasers …… LiDAR …… Voice recording devices …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 58) Does your agency use sampling to collect condition information on any assets? …… Yes …… No A-49 IF: (Question #58 = (“No”) OR Question #58 is not answered) THEN: Jump to page 51. Sampling Details Please select the length of your sample size. 0.10 mile 0.20 mile 0.50 mile Other: _____________________________________________________________________ At which of the following levels do you consider your MQA results to be a statistically valid representation of system conditions? At a statewide level At the region level At the county level At the roadway corridor level Not at any level At some other level Does the sample include both directions for divided highways? Yes No How is the number of samples determined? Statistical formula based on an inventory, current condition, confidence interval, etc. Specified number or percent of inventory Other: _____________________________________________________________________ If sampling is based on a confidence interval, what interval is used? 95% ± 5 90% ± 5 85% ± 5 Other: _____________________________________________________________________ A-48 Condition Assessment Activities—Questions 54) Which of the following best describes the rating method used to assess the performance of maintenance activities? Raters determine whether an asset passes or fails based on predefined criteria. The number of performan ficiencies are recor ed for each asset inspected. A combination of the two approaches is used, depending on the type of asset. Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 55) Who conducts your maintenance condition assessment surveys? Central office mainte ance personnel District/region personnel Consultant or vendor Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 56) Approximately how many roadway segments are evaluated as part of a complete survey cycle? ______________________________________________________________________________ 57) Please mark each type of equipment used during the conduct of the condition assessment surveys. Pen/pencil/paper Handheld computers GPS equipment Vans with cameras and lasers LiDAR Voice recording devices Other: _____________________________________________________________________ 58) Does your agency use sampling to collect condition information on any assets? Yes No

92 A-49 IF: (Question #58 = (“No”) OR Question #58 is not answered) THEN: Jump to page 51. Sampling Details Please select the length of your sample size. 0.10 mile 0.20 mile 0.50 mile Other: _____________________________________________________________________ At which of the following levels do you consider your MQA results to be a statistically valid representation of system conditions? At a statewide level At the region level At the county level At the roadway corridor level Not at any level At some other level Does the sample include both directions for divided highways? Yes No How is the number of samples determined? Statistical formula based on an inventory, current condition, confidence interval, etc. Specified number or percent of inventory Other: _____________________________________________________________________ If sampling is based on a confidence interval, what interval is used? 95% ± 5 90% ± 5 85% ± 5 Other: _____________________________________________________________________ Sampling Details Please select the length of your sample size. …… 0.10 mile …… 0.20 mile …… 0.50 mile …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ At which of the following levels do you consider your MQA results to be a statistically valid representation of system conditions? …… At a statewide level …… At the region evel …… At the county level …… At the roa way corridor level …… Not at any level …… At some other level Does the sample include b th irections for divided highways? …… Yes …… No How is the number of samples determined? …… Statistical formula based on an inventory, current condition, confidence interval, etc. …… Specified number or percent of inventory …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ If sampling is based on a confidence interval, what interval is used? …… 95% ± 5 …… 90% ± 5 …… 85% ± 5 …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________

93 How often are raters certified or recertified? …… Annually …… Every 2 years …… Other: _______________________________________________________________ 60) Approximately how many equivalent person-months are spent collecting this condition information in your agency (assume 20 days in a month)? …… Less than 1 person-month …… 1 to 2 person-months …… 2 to 3 person-months …… 3 to 4 person-months …… 4 to 5 person-months …… 5 to 6 person-months …… More than 6 person-months A-50 Condition Assessment Activities—Questions (continued) 59) How do you ensure the quality of the data you receive from the surveys? Select all that apply. Our agency does not check the quality of the data from the surveys. Our agency conducts training classes for the raters before each survey. Our agency has a rating manual to assist the raters. Our agency conducts independent checks of data from representative samples. Approximately how many samples are checked? (%):______________________________ Raters do not inspect assets they are responsible for maintaining. A team of raters is used to reduce bias. Ratings are compared to previous surveys. Equipment checks and calibration are performed. Test sites are used to verify quality. We conduct checks of data reasonableness upon submittal. Other: _____________________________________________________________________ IF: (Question #59 indicates raters are used/trained) THEN: Answer below. How often are raters certified or recertified? Annually Every 2 years Other: _______________________________________________________________ 60) Approximately how many equivalent person-months are spent collecting this condition inform tion in your agency (assume 20 days in a month)? Less than 1 person-month 1 to 2 person-months 2 to 3 person-months 3 to 4 person-months 4 to 5 person-months 5 to 6 p rso -months More than 6 person-months Condition Assessment Activities—Questions (continued) 59) How do you ensure the quality of the data you receive from the surveys? Select all that apply. …… Our agency does not check the quality of the data from the surveys. …… Our agency conducts training classes for the raters before each survey. …… Our agency has a rating manual to assist the raters. …… Our agency conducts independent checks of data from representative samples. Approximately how many samples are checked? (%):______________________________ …… Raters do not inspect assets they are responsible for maintaining. …… A team of rater is used to reduce bi …… Ratings are compared to previous surve s. …… Equipment checks and calibration are performed. …… Test sites are used to verify quality. …… We conduct checks of data reasonableness upon submittal. …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ A-50 Condition Assessment Activities—Questions (continued) 59) How do you ensure the quality of the data you receive from the surveys? Select all that apply. Our agency does not check the quality of the data from the surveys. Our agency conducts training classes for the raters before each survey. Our agency has a rating anual to assist the raters. Our agency conducts ind t checks of d ta from representative samples. Approximately how many samples are checked? (%):______________________________ Raters do not inspect assets they are responsible for maintaining. A team of raters is used to reduce bias. Ratings are compared to previous surveys. Equipment checks and calibration are performed. Test sites are used to verify quality. We conduct checks of data reasonableness upon submittal. Other: _____________________________________________________________________ IF: (Question #59 indicates raters are used/trained) THEN: Answer below. How often are raters certifi or recertified? Annually Every 2 years Other: _______________________________________________________________ 60) Approximately how many equivalent person-months are spent collecting this condition information in your agency (assume 20 days in a month)? Less than 1 person-month 1 to 2 person-months 2 to 3 person-months 3 to 4 person-months 4 to 5 person-months 5 to 6 person-months More than 6 person-months

94 Use of MQA Data 61) Are the results of your condition assessment surveys used to establish levels of service? …… Yes …… No A-51 Use of MQA Data 61) Are the results of your condition assessment surveys used to establish levels of service? Yes No IF: (Question #61 = (“No”) THEN: Skip to page 53. Use of MQA Data 62) If you have established levels of service, please indicate the scale that is used. Percent passing or percent failing A, B, C, D, F 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 A combination of (a) and (b) or (a) and (c), depending on the type of asset Other: _____________________________________________________________________ Use of MQA Data 62) If you have established levels of service, please indicate the scale that is used. …… Percent passing or percent failing …… A, B, C, D, F …… 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 …… A combination of (a) and (b) or (a) and (c), depending on the type of asset …… Other: _____________________________________________________________________ A-51 Use of MQA Data 61) Are the results of your condition a se sment surveys used to establish levels of service? Yes No IF: (Question #61 = (“No”) THEN: Skip to page 53. Use of MQA Data 62) If you have established levels of service, please indicate the scale that is used. Percent pa sing or percent failing A, B, C, D, F 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 A combination of (a) and (b) or (a) and (c), depending on the type of a set Other: _

95 Use of MQA Data (continued) 63) Have you established performance targets? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but they are under development 64) Have you established links between performance targets and the resources needed to provide that level of service? For instance, do you know what resources would be required to move from an LOS B to an LOS A? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but the links are under development 65) Is your performance information used as part of the budgeting process to determine funding needed to meet LOS targets? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but this is under development A-52 Use of MQA Data (continued) 63) Have you established performance targets? Yes No Not yet, but they are under development 64) Have you established links between performance targets and the resources needed to provide that level of service? For instance, do you know what resources would be required to move from an LOS B to an LOS A? Yes No Not yet, but the links are under dev lop e t 65) Is your performance information used as part of the budgeting process to determine funding needed to meet LOS targets? Yes No Not yet, but this is under development IF: (Question #65 = (“No” or “Not yet…”) THEN: Skip to page 54. If the performance measures are used to develop budget needs, do you apply weights to any category of assets to place more priority on some assets over others? Yes—what assets have the highest weight? _______________________________________ No Not yet, but this is under development If the performance measures are used to develop budget needs, do you apply weights to any category of assets to place more priority on some assets over others? …… Yes—what assets have the highest weight? _______________________________________ …… No …… Not yet, but this is under development A-52 Use of MQA Data (continued) 63) Have you established performance targets? Yes No Not yet, but they are under development 64) Have you established links between performance targets and the resources needed to provide that level of service? For instance, do you know what resources would be required to move from an LOS B to an LOS A? Yes No Not yet, but the links are under development 65) Is your performance information used as part of the budgeting process to determine funding needed to meet LOS targets? Yes No Not yet, but this is under development IF: (Question #65 = (“No” or “Not yet…”) THEN: Skip to page 54. If the performance measures are used to develop budget needs, do you apply weights to any category of assets to place more priority on some assets over others? Yes—what assets have the highest weight? _______________________________________ No Not yet, but this is under development

96 Use of MQA Data (continued) 66) Are the results of the condition assessment used to program and schedule work activities? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but this is under development 67) Are the results of the condition assessment used to determine compliance on maintenance contracts? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but this is under development 68) Do you have a computerized maintenance management system (MMS) in place? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but this is under development A-53 Use of MQA Data (continued) 66) Are the results of the condition assessment used to program and schedule work activities? Yes No Not yet, but this is under develop ent 67) Are the results of the condition assessment used to determine compliance on maintenance contracts? Yes No Not yet, but his is under lopment 68) Do you have a computerized maintenance management system (MMS) in place? Yes No Not yet, but this is under development A-54 IF: (Question #68 = (“No” or “Not yet…”) THEN: Jump to page 56. Computerized MMS Details Does your MMS use the results of the condition assessment to estimate budget needs and/or provide th information eeded to evaluate different strategies? Yes No Not yet, but this is under development Does your MMS use the results of the condition assessment to schedule work activities? Yes No Not yet, but this is under development Is the MMS integrated with your pavement and/or bridge management systems? Yes No Partially Not yet, but this is under development

97 Computerized MMS Details Does your MMS use the results of the condition assessment to estimate budget needs and/or provide the information needed to evaluate different strategies? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but this is under development Does your MMS use the results of the condition assessment to schedule work activities? …… Yes …… No …… Not yet, but this is under development Is the MMS integrated with your pavement and/or bridge management systems? …… Yes …… No …… Partially …… Not yet, but this is under development A-54 IF: (Question #68 = (“No” or “Not yet…”) THEN: Jump to page 56. Computerized MMS Details Does your MMS use the results of the condition assessment to estimate budget needs and/or provide the information needed to evaluate different strategies? Yes No Not yet, but this is under development Does your MMS use the results of the condition assessment to schedule work activities? Yes No Not yet, but this is under develop ent Is the MMS integrated with your pavement and/or bridge management systems? Yes No Partially Not yet, but this is under development

98 A-55 Use of MQA Data (continued) 69) Who has access to MQA results? Maintenance personnel in the central office Maintenance personnel in field offices Other agency personnel Public (through a website, for example) Elected officials Other 70) Which of the following are used to present MQA results? Website Dashboard GIS Publicly available reports Internal-only reports Press releases Other Use of MQA Data (continued) 69) Who has access to MQA results? …… Maintenance perso nel in t tr l office …… Maintenance personnel in field offices …… Other agency personnel …… Public (through a website, for example) …… Elected officials …… Other 70) Which of the following are used to present MQA results? …… Website …… Dashboard …… GIS …… Publicly available reports …… Internal-only reports …… Press releases …… Other

99 Impact of the MQA Program 71) Has your MQA program helped your agency to achieve more consistent conditions on a statewide basis? …… Yes …… No 72) Has your MQA program helped your agency to identify maintenance priorities on a statewide basis? …… Yes …… No 73) Which response best describes your agency’s level of success with its MQA program? …… Our MQA program has accomplished all of the goals we established for it. …… We have had a high degree of success with our MQA program. …… We have had some success, but there is room for improvement in some areas. …… We have had some success, but it is early in the development process. …… We have had little success. 74) Which of the following factors most contributed to the success of your program? Choose all that apply. …… Upper-management support …… Buy-in from field personnel …… Simplicity of the MQA program …… Complexity of the MQA program …… Degree of confidence in data …… Ease of use …… Training …… Staffing levels …… Having a project champion …… Involvement of field personnel in developing the program …… Other A-56 Impact of the MQA Program 71) Has your MQA program helped your agency to achieve more consistent conditions on a statewide basis? Yes No 72) Has your MQA program helped your agency to identify maintenance priorities on a statewide basis? Yes No 73) Which response best describes your agency’s level of success with its MQA program? Our MQA program has accomplished all of the goals we established for it. We have had a high degree of success with our MQA program. We have had some success, but there is room for improvement in some areas. We have had some success, but it is early in the development process. We have had little success. 74) Which of the following factors most contributed to the success of your program? Choose all that apply. Upper-management support Buy-in from field personnel Simplicity of the MQA program Complexity of the MQA program Degree of confidence in data Ease f use Training Staffing levels Having a project champion Involvement of field personnel in developing the program Other

100 75) What new initiatives and/or technologies are you considering for your MQA program in the future? …… New computer software …… Handheld data collection devices …… Automated surveys …… GPS …… LiDAR …… Other A-57 75) What new initiatives and/or technologies are you considering for your MQA program in the future? New computer software Handheld data collection devices Automated surveys GPS LiDAR Other

101 Case Study Inclusion 76) The synthesis will include three to five case studies to illustrate different methodologies being used. Would your agency be interested in being considered as a case study? …… Yes …… No Contact Information Please provide your contact information. Name: Agency: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: E-mail: Thank You! Thank you for taking our survey. Your response is very important to us. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Kathryn A. Zimmerman at: • E-mail: kzimmerman@appliedpavement.com • Phone: (217) 398-3977 • Mailing Address: 115 West Main Street, Suite 400, Urbana, IL 61801 A-58 Case Study Inclusion 76) The synthesis will include three to five case studies to illustrate different methodologies being used. Would your agency be interested in being considered as a case study? Yes No IF: (Question #76 = (“No”) THEN: Skip to page 60. Contact Information Please provide your contact information. Name: ________________________________________________________________________ Agency: ______________________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________________ ity, S ate, Zip: ________________________________________________________________ hone: _______________________________________________________________________ E-mail: ________________________________________________________________________ Thank You! Thank you for taking our survey. Your response is very important to us. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Kathryn A. Zimmerman at: • E-mail: kzimmerman@appliedpavement.com • Phone: (217) 398-3977 • Mailing Address: 115 West Main Street, Suite 400, Urbana, IL 61801 A-58 Case Study Inclusion 76) The synthesis will include three to five case studies to illustrate differ nt methodol gies being used. Would your agency be inter sted in being consider d as a case study? Yes No IF: (Question #76 = (“No”) THEN: Skip to page 60. Contact Information Please provide your contact information. Name: __ Agency: __ Address: __ City, St , ip: __ Phone: __ E-mail: __ Thank You! Thank you for taking our survey. Your esponse is very important to us. If you have any questions or com ents, please feel free to contact Kathryn A. Zim erman at: • E-mail: kzim erman@appliedpavement.com • Phone: (217) 398-3977 • Mailing Address: 115 West Main Street, Suite 400, Urbana, IL 61801

Next: APPENDIX B Survey Responses »
Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices Get This Book
×
 Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 470: Maintenance Quality Assurance Field Inspection Practices summarizes practices used by state transportation agencies to support maintenance investments. Appendices A and B are only available through the online PDF document.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!