Maintaining Transit Effectiveness Under Major Financial Constraints (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

90 The following 40 transit agencies participated in TCRP project SA-30, Maintaining Transit Effectiveness under Tight Financial Constraints, by responding to the survey either through the web-based instrument or by submitting a Word version. The systems are categorized by size and listed alphabetically. Small Transit System Respondents 1. Arlington Transit (ART)—Arlington County, Virginia 2. Capitol Area Transportation Authority (CATA)—Lansing, Michigan 3. Centre Area Transportation Authority (CATA)—State College, Pennsylvania 4. Everett Transit—Everett, Washington 5. Fort Wayne Public Transit (Citilink)—Fort Wayne, Indiana 6. Galveston Island Transit—Galveston, Texas 7. Go West Transit—Western Illinois University/Quad Cities, Moline, Illinois 8. Northern Arizona Intergovernmental Public Transportation Authority—Flagstaff, Arizona 9. Salem-Keizer Transit (Cherriots)—Salem, Oregon 10. Stark Area Regional Transit Authority (STARK)—Canton, Ohio 11. Star Metro—Tallahassee, Florida 12. UMASS—Amherst, Massachusetts 13. Yuma County Intergovernmental Public Transportation Authority—Yuma, Arizona Medium Transit System Respondents 1. Akron Metro—Akron, Ohio 2. Capital District Transit Authority (CDTA)—Albany, New York 3. Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority (LYNX)—Orlando, Florida 4. Community Transit—Snohomish County, Washington 5. Foothill Transit—West Covina, California 6. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART)—Tampa, Florida 7. Long Beach Transit (LBT)—Long Beach, California 8. Nashville Metropolitan Transit Authority—Nashville, Tennessee 9. North County Transit District (NCTD)—Oceanside, California APPENDIX B Survey Respondents

91 10. Omnitrans—San Bernardino, California 11. Palm Tran—West Palm Beach, Florida 12. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA)—St. Petersburg, Florida 13. Regional Transit System (RTS)—Gainesville, Florida 14. San Joaquin Regional Transit District (SJRTD)—Stockton, California 15. Samtrans—San Carlos, California 16. Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority (TARTA)—Toledo, Ohio 17. Valley Metro—Phoenix, Arizona Large Transit System Respondents 1. Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)—Chicago, Illinois (response prepared by the Chicago Regional Transportation Authority) 2. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA)—Cleveland, Ohio 3. King County Metro Transit—Seattle, Washington 4. New York City Transit (NYCT)—New York, New York 5. Pace—Arlington Heights, Illinois (response prepared by the Chicago Regional Transportation Authority) 6. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (SCVTA)—San Jose, California 7. The Bus—City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii 8. TriMet—Portland, Oregon 9. Utah Transit Authority (UTA)—Salt Lake City, Utah 10. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)—Washington, DC