Implementation of the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide and Software (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

46 REFERENCES Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF), Alaska Flexible Pavement Design Man- ual, FHWA-AK-RD-03-01, ADOT&PF, Anchorage, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwddes/ desmaterials/pop_flexpaveman.shtml [accessed June 2013]. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Interim Guide for Design of Pave- ment Structures, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1972. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for Design of Pavement Struc- tures, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1986. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures, 4th ed., AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures, 4th ed. with 1998 Supplement, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1998. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice, AASHTO, Washing- ton, D.C., 2008. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for the Local Calibration of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2010. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials (AASHTO), Software Help System DARWin- ME Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Software, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2011. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design User™ Manual, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2013. American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA), WinPAS 12 software, ACPA, Rosemont, Ill., 2012. Asphalt Institute (AI), Thickness Design-Highways & Streets, MS-1, Lexington, Ky., 1999. Bayomy, F., Winflex 2006, Idaho Transportation Depart- ment, Boise, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://itd.idaho. gov/highways/research/archived/reports/RP121%20 WINFLEX%202006%20Technical%20Background.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Bayomy, F., S. El Badawy, and A. Awed, Implementation of the MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in Idaho, RP 193, Idaho Transportation Department, Boise, 2012. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), State Transporta- tion Statistics 2011, BTS, Washington, D.C., 2011. Coree, B., H. Ceylan, and D. Harrington, Implementing the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: Imple- mentation Plan, IHRB Project TR-509, Iowa Highway Research Board, Ames, 2005 [Online]. Available: http:// www.intrans.iastate.edu/reports/mepdg_implementation. pdf [accessed June 2013]. Elkins, L. and C. Higgins, Development of Truck Axle Spectra from Oregon Weigh-In-Motion Data for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis, FHWA-OR-RD-08-06, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://library.state.or.us/repository/2008/ 200802060930423/index.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Ha, S., J. Yeon, B. Choi, Y. Jung, D.G. Zollinger, A. Wimsatt, and M.C. Won, Develop Mechanistic-Empirical Design for CRCP, Report No. 0-5832-1, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2012 [Online]. Available: http:// www.depts.ttu.edu/techmrtweb/Reports/Complete%20 Reports/0-5832-1.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Havens, J.H., R.C. Deen, and H.F. Southgate, Design Guide for Bituminous Concrete Pavement Structures, Research Report UKTRP-81-17, Kentucky Transporta- tion Cabinet, Frankfort, 1981 [Online]. Available: http:// transportation.ky.gov/Highway-Design/Pavement%20 Design/UKTRP-81-17.PDF [accessed June 2013]. Highway Research Board (HRB), Special Report 61A: The AASHO Road Test, History and Description of Project, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1961. Hoerner, T.E., K.A. Zimmerman, K.D. Smith, and L.A. Cooley, Jr., Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Implementation Plan, Report No. SD2005-01, South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, 2007. Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), Bureau of Design and Environment Manual, Chapter Fifty-Four, Pavement Design, IDOT, Springfield, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.il.gov/desenv/BDE%20Manual/ BDE/pdf/Chapter%2054%20Pavement%20Design.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), MEPDG Implementation Plan, Design Memorandum No. 09-06, Policy Change, INDOT, Indianapolis, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.in.gov/dot/div/contracts/standards/ memos/deleted/2009/0906-pc.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), “Pavement and Underdrain Design Elements,” Chapter 52, Indiana DOT Design Manual, INDOT, Indianapolis, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.in.gov/indot/design_manual/files/ Ch52_2013.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Kim, D. and N.Z. Siddiki, Simplification of Resilient Modu- lus Testing for Subgrades, FHWA-IN-JTRP-2005/23, Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, 2006. Liu, W. and T. Scullion, Flexible Pavement Design System FPS 21: User’s Manual, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://pavementdesign. tamu.edu/manuals/FPS21.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Lundy, J.R., J. Sandoval-Gil, A. Brickman, and B. Patterson, Asphalt Mix Characterization Using Dynamic Modulus and APA Testing, FHWA-OR-RD-06-09, Oregon Department

47 of Transportation, Salem, 2005 [Online]. Available: http:// www.oregon.gov/ODOT/td/tp_res/docs/reports/dynamic modulus.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Lytton, R.L., F.L. Tsai, S.I. Lee, R. Luo, S. Hu, and F. Zhou, NCHRP Report 669: Models for Predicting Reflection Cracking of Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlays, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_669.pdf [accessed Aug. 2013]. Mahoney, J.P., S.W. Lee, N.C. Jackson, and D.E. Newcomb, Mechanistic Based Overlay Design Procedure for Wash- ington State Flexible Pavements, WA-RD 170.1, Wash- ington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://itd.idaho.gov/highways/research/ archived/reports/RP121%20WINFLEX%202006%20 Technical%20Background.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Mallela, J., L. Titus-Glover, H. Von Quintus, M.I. Darter, M. Stanley, C. Rao, and S. Sadasivam, Implementing the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide in Missouri, Volume I: Study Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations, MODOT Study RI04-002, Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, 2009. Michigan Department of Transportation (MIDOT), Plan for ME Oversight Committee, Draft document, MIDOT, Lansing, 2012. Miller, J.S. and W.Y. Bellinger, Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program, Fourth Revised Edition, FHWA-RD-03-031, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2003. Missouri Department of Transportation (MODOT), ME Design Manual, MODOT, Jefferson City, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://design.transportation.org/Documents/missouri_plan. pdf [accessed June 2013]. Missouri Department of Transportation (MODOT), Practical Design, MODOT, Jefferson City, 2006 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.modot.org/business/PracticalDesign.htm [accessed June 2013]. Missouri Department of Transportation (MODOT), ME Design Manual—Volume II, MODOT, Jefferson City, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://design.transportation. org/Documents/missouri_plan.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Nantung, T.E., “Implementing the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Cost Savings in Indiana,” TR News, No. 271, Nov.–Dec. 2010, p. 34. Nantung, T., G. Chehab, S. Newbolds, K. Galal, S, Li, and D.H. Kim, “Implementation Initiatives of the Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design Guides in Indiana,” Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1919, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 142–151. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Pavement Design Guide, ODOT, Salem, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/CONSTRUCTION/ docs/pavement/pavement_design_guide.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Pierce, L.M., K.A. Zimmerman, K. Galal, M. Gardner, and T. Freeman, Local Calibration of the Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) Using Pave- ment Management Systems, FHWA-HIF-11-026, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011. Schroer, J., Local Calibration of the MEPDG for HMA Pave- ments in Missouri, Presentation, 2012 North Central Asphalt User-Producer Group Annual Meeting, Missouri Depart- ment of Transportation, Jefferson City, 2012 [Online]. Avail- able: https://engineering.purdue.edu/~ncaupg/Activities/ 2012/presentation%202012/Schroer%20-%20Missouri %20HMA-MEPDG%20Calibration.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Schwartz, C.W., Implementation of the NCHRP 1-37A Design Guide, Final Report, Volume 1: Summary of Findings and Implementation Plan, Maryland State Highway Admin - istration, Hanover, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://design. transportation.org/Documents/MDSHASummaryof FindingsandImplementationPlan-Volume1.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Tarr, S.M., M.J. Sheehan, and P.A. Okamoto, Guidelines for the Thickness Design of Bonded Whitetopping Pave- ment in the State of Colorado, Report No. CDOT-DTD- R-98-10, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.coloradodot.info/ programs/research/pdfs/1998/whitetopping.pdf/at_down load/file [accessed June 2013]. Timm, D.H., R.E. Turochy, and K.P. Davis, Guidance for M-E Pavement Design Implementation, Final Report, Proj- ect 930-685, Alabama Department of Transportation, Mont- gomery, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.eng.auburn. edu/files/centers/hrc/930-685.pdf [accessed June 2013]. Titus-Glover, L. and J. Mallela, Guidelines for Implementing NCHRP 1-37A M-E Design Procedures in Ohio: Volume 4— MEPDG Models Validation and Recalibration, Report No. FHWA/OH-2009/9D, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, 2009, 87 pp. Ullidtz, P., J. Harvey, I. Basheer, R. Wu., and J. Lea, “Process of Developing a Mechanistic-Empirical Asphalt Pavement Design System for California,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Nagoya, Japan, International Society of Asphalt Pavements, Lino Lakes, Minn., 2010. Von Quintus, H.L., J. Mallela, R. Bonaquist, C.W. Schwartz, and R.L. Carvalho, NCHRP Report 719: Calibration of Rutting Models for Structural and Mix Design, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012. Williams, R.C. and R. Shaidur, Mechanistic-Empirical Pave- ment Design Guide Calibration for Pavement Rehabilita- tion, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2013.