National Academies Press: OpenBook

Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit (2013)

Chapter: APPENDIX C Total Annual Ridership for Each Responding Agency

« Previous: APPENDIX B List of Agencies Responding to The Survey
Page 99
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX C Total Annual Ridership for Each Responding Agency." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22568.
×
Page 99
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX C Total Annual Ridership for Each Responding Agency." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22568.
×
Page 100
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX C Total Annual Ridership for Each Responding Agency." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22568.
×
Page 101
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX C Total Annual Ridership for Each Responding Agency." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22568.
×
Page 102

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

99 APPENDIX C Total Annual Ridership For Each Responding Agency This section will contain the total annual ridership for each responding agency. Agency Name No. Indoor LED No. Out-door LED No. Indoor LCD No. Out-door LCD Ridership (2010 Annual Unlinked Trips)* Alameda–Contra Costa (AC) Transit 80 61,390,737 Agence métropolitaine de transport (AMT)** 55 50 20 200 1,590,000—bus 18,422,800—commuter rail Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) 148 248 108,297,950 Blacksburg Transit 3,363,824 Brampton Transit** 50 5 17,686,000 Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (CMTA) 18 34,814,353—bus 120,788—commuter rail Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority (a.k.a. LYNX) 1 3 24,780,704 Central New York Regional Transportation Authority 5 13 11,981,595 Centre Area Transportation Authority (CATA) 2 1 1 7,195,031 Charlotte Area Transit System 60 20,361,037—bus 3,250,020—light rail Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority (CARTA) 1 7 2,631,013 Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) 192 768 120 306,023,976—bus 210,849,074—subway City of San Luis Obispo Transit/SLO Transit 6 1,019,852* City of Wichita, KS 1 7 2,210,177 GO Transit** 17,012,400—bus 47,865,200—commuter rail Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART) 2 5 12,665,359—bus 501,959—light rail Ixxi—RATP Group (Paris) Not available Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (KCATA) 114 14,610,848 King County Metro 48 32,281,667—bus 2,903,718—trolleybus 59,964—light rail Madison Metro Transit 1 7 13,623,461 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) 350 363 1 108,128,006—bus 139,039,529—subway 36,909,924—commuter rail 65,471,593—light rail 3,124,729—trolleybus Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), New York City Transit (NYCT) 950 350 5 829,179,926—bus 2,439,158,966—subway Mobility Lab 4 Not applicable Monterey–Salinas Transit (MST) 30 3 4,249,622 Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd. 100 12 Not available Table continued on p.100

100 Agency Name No. Indoor LED No. Out-door LED No. Indoor LCD No. Out-door LCD Ridership (2010 Annual Unlinked Trips)* NJ Transit 50 100 200 400 162,224,375—bus 82,223,534—commuter rail 21,491,188—light rail Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) 25 12,811,835 rabbittransit 2 3 1,397,156 Region of Waterloo (Grand River Transit) 60 9 Not available Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County (RTC) 7,474,905 Société de transport de Laval 84 6 Not available South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive*** 180 220 21 110,809,000—bus 9,188,000—rail 14,931,000 - tram Transport For London (TfL)**** 2,500 2,344,000,000—bus 1,171,000,000—Under- ground 86,000,000—Docklands light rail 28,500,000—Tramlink 102,600,000—Over- ground Rail Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) 118 84 60,508,249—bus 42,452,640—light rail 306,228—commuter rail Urban Public Transport Organisation of Thessaloniki 1,200 220 20 Not available Utah Transit Authority (UTA) 80 130 21,716,864—bus 13,400,546—light rail 1,389,872—commuter rail Votran 3,235,767 *Unless indicated otherwise, figures come from the National Transit Database, Annual Transit Profiles (http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/data.htm). ** Derived from figures in American Public Transportation Association Transit Ridership Report, First Quarter 2012, http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/ Pages/ridershipreport.aspx. *** Obtained from http://www.sypte.co.uk/PublicTransportPerformance.aspx. **** Obtained from http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/Item15-TfL-Annual-Report.pdf. Table continued from p.99

NEED SPINE WIDTH

104+ pages; Perfect Bind with SPINE COPY = 14 pts Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMTCRP SYNTHESIS 104 TCR P SYN TH ESIS 104 Use of Electronic Passenger Inform ation Signage in Transit Job No. TRB58 Pantone 648 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 500 F ifth S treet, N .W . W ashing to n, D .C . 20001 A D D R ESS SER VICE R EQ UESTED TRB A Synthesis of Transit Practice Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration

Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit Get This Book
×
 Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Synthesis 104: Use of Electronic Passenger Information Signage in Transit documents U.S. and international use of electronic passenger information signage in terms of the underlying technology, sign technology, characteristics of the information, resources required, and decision processes used to determine its use.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!