Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Findings and Key Considerations .......................................................................................C-8 Appendix C-2. Regulatory Compliance Costs and the Impact on Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field â A Case Study ..............................................................................................................................C-10 Introduction .......................................................................................................................C-10 Airport Characteristics ......................................................................................................C-10 General Observations ........................................................................................................C-12 FAA/DOT Requirements ..................................................................................................C-13 Environmental Requirements............................................................................................C-15 Security Requirements ......................................................................................................C-16 Occupational Safety and Health Requirements ................................................................C-17 Findings and Key Considerations .....................................................................................C-17 Appendix C-3. Regulatory Compliance Costs and the Impact on Stewart International Airport â A Case Study .......................................................................................................................................C-19 Introduction .......................................................................................................................C-19 Airport Characteristics ......................................................................................................C-19 General Observations ........................................................................................................C-23 FAA/DOT Requirements ..................................................................................................C-23 Environmental Requirements............................................................................................C-25 Security Requirements ......................................................................................................C-26 Occupational Safety and Health Requirements ................................................................C-27 Findings and Key Considerations .....................................................................................C-27 Appendix C-4. Regulatory Compliance Costs and the Impact on Santa Barbara Municipal Airport â A Case Study ..............................................................................................................................C-29 Introduction .......................................................................................................................C-29 Airport Characteristics ......................................................................................................C-29 General Observations ........................................................................................................C-33 FAA/DOT Requirements ..................................................................................................C-33 Environmental Requirements............................................................................................C-35 Security Requirements ......................................................................................................C-37 Occupational Safety and Health Requirements ................................................................C-37 Findings and Key Considerations .....................................................................................C-38 Appendix C-5. Regulatory Compliance Costs and the Impact on Huntsville International Airport â A Case Study ..............................................................................................................................C-40 Introduction .......................................................................................................................C-40 Airport Characteristics ......................................................................................................C-40 General Observations ........................................................................................................C-44 FAA/DOT Requirements ..................................................................................................C-44 Environmental Requirements............................................................................................C-46 Security Requirements ......................................................................................................C-48 Occupational Safety and Health Requirements ................................................................C-49 Other Compliance Requirements ......................................................................................C-49 Findings and Key Considerations .....................................................................................C-49 ii
ACRP 03-25, REGULATORY COMPLIANCE COSTS AND THE IMPACT ON SMALL AIRPORTS APPENDIX A SUMMARIES OF REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE ACTIONS AND PUBLISHED COST DATA
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 1 FAA Cert Alert #00-01, Public Safety Personnel Operating in the Movement Area http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0001.pdf New Cert Alert The cert alert outlines requirements for operating in the movement area. It includes a request for airport operators to provide a copy of the Cert Alert to public safety providers operating on the airport and those located adjacent to the airport. The Cert Alert is advisory in nature 3/30/2000 ___ No published cost estimate. This Cert Alert would not cause a cost impact to airports. N/A 2 FAA 14 CFR Part 158, Passenger Facility Charge Progam, 65 Fed. Reg. 34536 http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/federal_register_notices/media/pfc _65fr34536.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 158 governs passenger facility charge program, including project eligibility, application procedures, project implementation and record-keeping and reporting. The amendment implments various statutory and administrative changes to the program including: Prohibition on PFC collection for frequent flyer redemption tickets Exception to collection requirements for flights to small isolated communities Standards for approval of collection at $4 or $4.50 Competition Plan filing requirements for certain medium and large hub airports Protection of former small hub airports from net losses of combined PFC and passenger entitlement funds due to passenger entitlement turn-back requirement. The changes are mandatory for airports imposing PFCs. 5/30/2000 $0 Costs of compliance listed as de minimis. Further, costs are recoverable with PFC revenue as administrative costs Final Regulatory Evaluation, Final Regulatory Flexibility Determination, and Trade Impact Assessment, FAA Docket 2000-7402 (May 2000), p. 9 3 FAA 14 CFR Part 158, Passenger Facility Charge Program, 69 Fed. Reg. 12940 http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/federal_register_notices/media/pfc _69fr18Mr0415.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 158 establishes requirements and procedures for imposition and use of PFCs by airports, including requirements for compensation of air carriers for collection of PFCs on behalf of airports. This amendment increases the required compensation to 11 cents per PFC collected. 3/18/2004 $0 Increase in collection compensation rate redistributes $21 million in PFC revenue annually from airports to carriers, but does not increase costs to airports, because approved amounts are net of collection compensation. An airport that collected at a rate of $1 million per year at the prior compnesation level would need 3.3 additional days of collection under the new compensation level, 69 Fed. Reg. 12947 (03/18/2004) 4 FAA 14 CFR Part 158, Passenger Facility Charge Program, 70 Fed. Reg. 14928 http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/federal_register_notices/media/pfc _70fr14928.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 158 governs the PFC program. This amendment implements the non-hub pilot program, which provides for streamlined application and review procedures for requests to collect PFCs submitted by non-hub airports. Revisions to streamline application and amendment procedures for other categories of airports are also included. 3/23/2005 -$9,500 Projected average annual cost reduction per small airport 2004 dollars 70 Fed. Reg. 14933 (03/25/2005) 5 FAA 14 CFR Part 158, Passenger Facility Charge Program, 72 Fed. Reg. 28837 http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/federal_register_notices/media/pfc _72fr28837.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 158 governs passenger facility charge program. This amendment implements the following statutory changes to the PFC program adopted in Vision 100, Pub. L. 108-176 (December 12, 2003): PFC eligibility of low emission airport vehicles and ground support equipment Use of PFCs to pay debt service on otherwise ineligible projects based on the financial need of the airport Prohibiting collection of PFCs on military charter flights PFC account requirements for carriers in bankruptcy PFC eligibility for local match of projects under the Air Traffic Modernization Program 5/23/2007 $0 FAA estimated total cost of rule to all airports at $17,000 (over 10 years) and cost savings of $1.6 million Cost estimates are based on discretionary provisions of the rule. Costs associated with statutory requiremjents were considered non- discretionary and not included in the estimate 2006 dollars Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 71 Fed. Reg. 5188, 5194 (02/01/2006) 6 FAA Cert Alert #00-02, NOTAM Procedural Changes: Snow Notices to Airmen http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0002.pdf New Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides notice of new procedures for issuing snow NOTAMS, base on Air Traffic Policy and Procedures Notice N7930.63. Per the latter notice, "Upon publication of this NOTICE, all snow NOTAMâs and friction measurements will be issued in accordance with these new NOTAM formats." 7/7/2000 ___ No published cost estimate. It is unlikely that this Cert Alert would cause a cost impact to airports. N/A 7 FAA Order 5100.39A, Airports Capital Improvement Plan http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/orders/media/AIP_5100_39A.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Order The Order prescribes the development of the national Airports Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP), which serves as the primary planning tool for systematically identifying, prioritizing, and assigning funds to critical airport development and associated capital needs. This reissuance changes the process through which the FAA formulates the ACIP. 8/22/2000 ___ No published cost estimate N/A FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS AND PUBLISHED COSTS TABLE A-1 Page Aâ1
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 8 FAA AC 150/5100-19B, Guide for Airport Financial Reports Filed by Sponsors Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides airport sponsors with guidance for complying with statutory airport financial reporting requirements. This reissuance incorporates public comments, and it incorporates changes to statutes and the FAA's airport revenue diversion policy. Specifically, this reissuance accomplishes the following: Reduces the cost of reporting Standardizes the reporting of revenue and expense Incorporates revised information from the policy Provides for the gathering of information pertaining to the single audit. Per the AC, it "does not impose new obligations on airport sponsors." 4/20/2001 $0 No published cost impact. Per the AC, this reissuance reduces reporting rcosts. AC 150/5100-19B, p. 1 (04/21/2001) 9 FAA AC 150/5100-19B, Change 2 Guide for Airport Financial Reports Filed by Sponsors, http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidanc e_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/8e17c23e 2f26e8018625726d006ce776/b4abec0938 94311f86256d0f006f764a/$FILE/150-5100- 19b%20change%202.pdf Change to Existing AC The AC provides airport sponsors with guidance for complying with statutory airport financial reporting requirements. Per the AC, "it does not impose new obligatoins" on airports. This change announces procedures for submitting financial reports through FAA's newly activated web-site. 1/15/2003 $0 Per the AC, this change does not initiate new obligations on airports and therefore, would not result in any new costs. FAA projects that by enabling web-based filing, the AC will reduce airports' compliance costs. AC 150-5100-19B, Change 2, pp. 1-2 (01- 17-2003) 10 FAA AC 150/5100-19C, Guide for Airport Financial Reports Filed by Airport Sponsors http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5100- 19C/150_5100_19C.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance on compliance with statutory financial reporting requirements for commercial service airports that have accepted grants. This reissuance implements the following changes: Provides for a separate listing of amounts received as reimbursement of security costs Provides for FAA to input enplanement data into FAA financial reporting form data-base Eliminates automatic acceptance of hard copy filings Unless a waiver is granted, airports will have to enter data electronically through the airport financial reporting web-site. 4/19/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. This AC requires minimal changes in the financial reporting requirement and should not have any cost impacts. N/A 11 FAA Order 5500.1, Passenger Facility Charges http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Order/PFC_55001.pdf New Order The Order provides guidance and procedures to be used in administering the PFC Program. The Order applies indirectly to airports to the extent that the guidance or procedures affect actions to be taken by airports in seeking PFC approval or administering PFC projects. 8/9/2001 ___ No published cost estimate. Costs to airports of meeting requirements of the Order are reimbursable with PFCs as PFC program administrative costs N/A 12 FAA Cert Alert #02-01, Aircraft Departing/Landing on Closed Runways http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ New Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides guidance on procedures and marking of closed runways to reduce risk of use of closed runways by air carriers. The Cert Alert was issued as a "as a reminder to airport operators of requirements for marking and lighting a closed runway and procedures for coordinating and notifying airport users of such closures. " 1/8/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert was a reminder to airports of existing requirements and should not have a cost impact. N/A 13 FAA Cert Alert #02-03, Air Carrier Accident Critique http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ New Cert Alert The Cert Alert encourages Part 139 certificated airports to conduct an aircraft accident critique within 60 days, pending action by the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee. The Cert Alert is advisory per its terms. 4/25/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. This Cert Alert encourages airports to complete accident critiques withing 60 days and should not cause a cost impact to airports. N/A 14 FAA AC 150/5190-5, Exclusive Rights and Minimum Standards for Commercial Service Airports http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidanc e_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/49e2daf 545cd691b86256c75007071fe/$FILE/150- 5190-5.pdf New AC cancels other Acs addressing same topics The AC provides information on the the FAAâs exclusive rights and minimum standards policies, which, in part, describe the contractual grant obligations assumed by the operators of public airports. Topics addressed include the following: FAA policy on exclusive rights In-depth discussion of minimum standards Guidance on developing minimum standards in question and answer format FAA enforcement process Airports that have accepted Federal assistance must comply with the statutory prohibition on exclusive rights. Advice provided with respect to minimum standards is optional but highly recommended. 6/10/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC did not initiate any new requirements upon airports and it is unlikely to cause a cost impact. N/A Page Aâ2
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 15 FAA AC 150/5210-20, Ground Vehicle Operations on Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 20/150_5210_20.pdf New AC The AC provides guidance on vehicle operations on aircraft movement areas. The AC addresses the following: Vehicle access Vehicle inspection and marking Driver training curriculum Emergency operations Enforcement and control Following the AC may materially assist airport operators in complying with applicable requirements of Part 139 and AIP grant assurances. 6/21/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC could potentially cause a cost impact to those airports that choose to implement a driver training program in accordance with the recommendations. N/A 16 FAA AC 150/5210-20, Ground Vehicle Operations on Airports, Change 1 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5210_20_chg1.pdf Change to existing AC The AC and the attached appendixes provide guidance to airport operators in developing training programs for safe ground vehicle operations and pedestrian control on the airside of an airport. This change addresses driver training and specifies that initial and recurrent driver training is required for airport personnel. Only initial training is required for tenants and contractors, but recurrent training is strongly recommended Following the AC may materially assist airport operators in complying with applicable requirements of Part 139 and AIP grant assurances. 3/31/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC requires recurrent driver training for airport personnel which could have a minor cost impact for airports that currently do not require recurrent training. N/A 17 FAA Cert Alert #02-04, Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) Concentrations, Restrictions and Other User Guidelines http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ New Cert Alert The Cert Alert states that AFFF in less than 3% concentration is not acceptable. Use of alcohol foams (in lieu of AFFF) in ARFF vehicles is not approved for Part 139 airports.The FAA does not recommend foaming of runways in an emergency and advises against using anything other than a "Protein" foam. 7/11/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert could cause a cost impact to those airports that were using AFFF in the wrong concentrations or did not have protein foam for runway emergencies. N/A 18 FAA Cer Alert #02-07, Air Show Event Ground Operations Plan http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ New Cert Alert The Cert Alert notes that a prerequisite for an airport waiver to conduct an air-show is the approval by the FAA Regional Airports Division of an air show events ground operations plan. The issues to be addressed in the plan are listed. The Cert Alert characterizes its contents as a guide to airports. 10/18/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert could cause a cost impact to airports that want to host an air show but have not created and had the appropriate plan approved by the FAA. N/A 19 FAA Cert Alert #02-08, PAPI Operation http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ New Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides FAA recommendations for operation of pilot activated PAPIs to address potential of condensation or frost during periods of inactivity. PAPIs should be operated at reduce power at all times. References to PAPIs in facility directories should be changed. The actions listed in the cert alert are identified as recommendations. 12/12/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. Continuous operation at reduced power would lead to increased electric utility costs and possibly more frequent replacement of lighting elements. N/A 20 FAA AC 150/5370-2E, Operational Safety on Airports During Construction http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5370- 2E/150_5370_2e.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC sets forth guidelines for operational safety on airports during construction. This reissuance contains major changes to the guidance for the following areas: Runway Safety Area Taxiway Safety Areas/Object-Free Areas Marking guidelines for temporary thresholds Hazard marking and lighting The guidance assists Part 139 airports in complying with certificate requirements and assists airports in complying with construction requirements for AIP funded projects. 1/17/2003 ___ No published cost estimate. A change in requirements for supplemental hazard lighting noted in the AC may result in added replacement or retrofitting costs for airports. N/A 21 FAA AC 150/5380-6A, Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidanc e_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/d64e80 527a2b7c3f86256d640063b59a/$FILE/150- 5380-6A.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidelines and procedures for maintaining rigid and flexible airport pavements. This reissuance provides updated guidance, including information on systematic pavement maintenance. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. 7/14/2003 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is recommended but not mandatory. It could potentially have a cost impact on airports that follow the recommendations. N/A 22 FAA AC 150/5380-6B, Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5380- 6B/150_5380_6b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC This AC provides guidelines and procedures for maintaining rigid and flexible airport pavements. principal changes in this reissuance include: Adding distress types and information on distress types Adding a specification for maintenance products Addiing information on installation of materials and repair procedures The guidance in the AC is a recommended practice only. 9/28/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is not mandatory but could have a cost impact upon airports that chose to implement the recommendations. N/A Page Aâ3
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 23 FAA PGL 03-2, Determining Justification of Projects for the Noise Set-Aside Based on Currency of Noise Exposure Maps http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_03-02.pdf Cancellation and revision of PGL The PGL addresses the use of Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) to determine priority of funding for noise compatibility projects. This PGL reflects the results of 2002 report by the FAA Office of Airport Planning and Policy evaluating the AIP Noise Set Aside. The revised PGL requires FAA to make funding decisions for Part 150 noise grants based on either a noise exposure map (NEM) that is less than 5 years old or a determination that the older NEM still reflects current conditions. 8/4/2003 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL requires FAA to make funding decisions on NEMs less than 5 years old or those that reflect current conditions. This could have a cost impact on airports if they are required to update their NEMs. N/A 24 FAA Cert Alert #03-07, Personnel and Equipment in the Runway Safety Area http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ Cancellation and reissuance of Cert Alert The Cert Alert addresses the presence of personnel and equipment in runway safety areas (RSAs). By its terms, the Cert Alert "reinforces the requirements of 14 CFR Part 139.309(b)(4)." 11/12/2003 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert addresses existing regulation and should not have a cost impact to airports. N/A 25 FAA 14 CFR Parts 121 and 139, 69 Fed. Reg. 6380, Certification of Airports, http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/p art139_cert/media/part139_final_rule.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 139 implements the statutory requirement for airports serving passenger air carrier flights to hold airport operating certificates. This amendment implements the requirement for airports receiving scheduled passenger service with 10-30 seat aircraft to hold an airport operating certificate. Issues addressed in the regulation and the amendment include, but are not limited to the following: Preparing and maintaining the Airport Certification Manual Preparing and updating the Airport Emergency Plan Aircraft rescue and fire fighting requirements Snow and ice control Safety areas Wildlife hazard management The regulation is mandatory for Part 139 certificated airports. 2/10/2004 Class I Airports Initial costs -- $1,360 Recurring costs -- $8,479 Class II Airports Initial costs -- $8,370 Recurring costs -- $15,509 Class IV Airports Initial costs -- $1,791 Recurring costs -- $911 Class III Airports Initial costs -- $97,634 Recurring costs -- $118,734 Average cost per airport Class I, II and IV airports were current certificate holders. Class III airports were required to obtain certificates under the rule. Class I airports ranged in size from Chicago O'Hare to Cortez, CO Municipal Airport 2001 dollars Final Regulatory Evaluation, Final Regulatory Flexibility Determination, and Trade Impact Assessment, FAA Docket 2000-7479 (November 21, 2001), Tables V-1 through V-6 26 FAA Order 5200.9, Financial Feasibility and Equivalincy of Runway Safety Area Improvements and Engineered Material Arresting Systems http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/orders/media/Construction_5200_9 .pdf New Order The Order provides guidance for (a) comparing runway safety area (RSA) improvement alternatives with improvements that use Engineered Material Arresting Systems (EMAS); and (b) determining the maximum financially feasible cost for RSA improvements, whether they involve EMAS or not. This guidance is intended to help airport sponsors develop a sound proposed action for environmental review purposes. 3/15/2004 ___ No published cost estimate AC provides a cost standard for financial feasibility. This cost standard may enable some airports to avoid the cost of implementing a full standard RSA or EMAS installation N/A 27 FAA AC 150/5210-13B, Airport Water Rescue Plans and Equipment http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 13B/150_5210_13b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides general guidance on Airport Water Rescue Plans. This reissuance states that Part 139 certificated airports "are to include in their airport emergency plans provisions for the rescue of aircraft accident victims from significant bodies of water or marshland situated adjacent to the airport and beneath the departure and approach flight paths of air carriers. The AC applies to civil airports where aeronautical activity is conducted near significant bodies of water. Certificated airports may use the guidance to comply with Part 139. 4/15/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. Depending on role in rescue plan, there could be a cost impact for rescue equipment and personnel training. N/A 28 FAA AC 150/5210-13C, Airport Water Rescue Plans and Equipment http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w eb&cd=1&ved=0CBYQFjAA&url=http%3A% 2F%2Fwww.faa.gov%2FdocumentLibrary% 2Fmedia%2FAdvisory_Circular%2F150_52 10_13C.doc&rct=j&q=AC%20150%2F5210- 13C&ei=coRCTpynIoWutwf46Nm- CQ&usg=AFQjCNFNAGYhZNT_x8XxCbeR W0GC33HfWQ&sig2=ekh11znjN- YrbfYwAb5jOA&cad=rja Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance to assist airport operators in preparing for water rescue operations. This reissuance adds information on swift water rescues, sample aircraft water rescue plan and sample water rescue checklist. It also adds references to National Fire Prevention (NFPA) documents, and an ACRP Research Report. The AC appears to require preparation of a water rescue plan for the first time. The requireuirement is limited to airports with a significant body of water or marshland (at least 1/4 square mile) adjacent to the airport or under departure and approach flight paths of air carriers. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. In addition, the AC is mandatory for Part 139 certificated airports. The standards must be used to develop new Airport Water Rescue Plans and are to be implemented at all Part 139 certificated airports within one year of issuance. 9/29/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and airport water rescue equipment and plans funded with AIP or PFC grants. It could potentially have a cost impact on some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ4
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 29 FAA Cert Alert #04-03, Part Time ARFF Coverage and Air Carriers Operating Outside Scheduled Arrival and Departure Times http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ New Cert Alert The cert alert directs Airport Certification Safety Inspectors to advise airports with part-time ARFF service to include a notice in their airport facilities directory advising carriers to coordinate in advance with the airport for early or late arrivals or departures. 4/21/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The cert alert requires aircraft to notify airports of early and late arrivals and departures and would not have a cost impact. N/A 30 FAA AC 150/5200-18C, Airport Safety Self- Inspection http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5200- 18C/150_5200_18C.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides information on airport safety self-inspection programs and identifies the items airports should include in such programs. The AC includes information on the following: Inspection frequency Inspection records Followup Inspection techniques Knowledge and equipment for self-inspection Components of a self-inspection program Use of Guidance in the AC is an acceptable means of compliance with Part 139. 4/23/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC provides suggestions to airports to enhance or improve their existing airport safety self-inspections. N/A 31 FAA PFC Update 45-04 New PFC Update This PFC Update addresses the following issues: Status of rulemaking to implement statutory changes in Vision 100, Pub. L. 108-176 (December 12, 2003) Procedures for reviewing applications to use PFCs for debt service on otherwise ineligible projects due to financial need of airport Statutory prohibition on collection of PFCs on military charter flights PFC eligibility of low emission vehicles Electronic transmission procedures for PFC documents 4/27/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The PFC Update reflects completed or pending rulemakings and does not independently affect airport practices in administering PFCs. N/A 32 FAA Order 5200.10, Procedures for Conducting Investigations of Vehicle/Pedestrian Deviations http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/orders/media/Safety_5200_10.pdf New Order The Order establishes procedures for and provides information on conducting investigations of vehicle/pedestrian deviations and completing FAA Form 8020-25 The Order is addressed to FAA personnel conducting the investigations. However, airports will be required to submit information to FAA personnel as part of the investigation. 4/28/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. This AC establishes reporting proceedures and should not have any cost impacts. N/A 33 FAA AC 150/5200-35, Submitting the Airport Master Record in Order to Activate a New Airport http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5200- 35/150_5200_35.pdf New AC. The AC provides guidance on completing forms FAA requires to compile safety data on proposed new airports. The AC includes instructions and blank forms. The AC applies to proponents of new public-use and private-use airports. The guidance is not written to suggest it is mandatory. The AC is organized to minimize the information a proponent needs to correctly complete the forms. 5/20/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. This AC provides guidance on the completion of forms required for a new airport and should not have any cost impacts. N/A 34 FAA AC 150/5200-35A, Submitting the Airport Master Record in Order to Activate a New Airport http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5200_35a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidelines on supplying airport data to the FAA using FAA Forms 5010-3 and 5010-5. This reissuance reorganizes the guidance to reduce the effort needed to correctly completing FAA forms required when a new airport is established. The AC applies to proponents of new public-use and private-use airports. 9/23/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is is limited to newly established airports and could potentially lower the cost associated with filing paperwork for those airports. N/A 35 FAA PGL 04-03, Weather Support to Deicing Decision-Making (WSDDM) http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_04-03.pdf New PGL The PGL limits AIP eligibility of WSDDM equipment to instances when the equipment is included in an FAA approved snow plan. If FAA issues a grant for WSDDM equipment that is not in an approved snow plan, the grant must include a special condition requiring the airport sponsor to prepare or update a snow plan that incorporates the WSDDM. 6/9/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. There should be minimal cost impact since the sponsor can continue to obtain grant funding in the same federal share by adding the equipment into its existing snow plan. N/A 36 FAA AC 150/5230-4A, Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling and Dispensing on Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5230- 4A/150_5230_4a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides standards and procedures for storage, handling and dispensing of aviation fuel on airports. This reissuance incorporates current published guidance. The AC is one means of compliance with Part 139 requirements for fire safety in storage, handling and dispensing of aircraft fuel, but not for quality control. The AC is recommended for other airports. 6/18/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. This AC could have a cost impact if the airport's policies and proceedures for stoing, handling and dispensing of fuel are not in accordance with the currently published guidance. N/A Page Aâ5
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 37 FAA AC 150/5210-6D, Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 6D/150_5210_6d.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance for reference material covering Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents. This reissuance includes the following: Listing of the types of acceptable foaming agents and characteristics Performance and testing standards Recommended quantities of agents for various categories of airports The AC is recommended practice. The AC provides one means of compliance with applicable Part 139 requirements. 7/8/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. This AC is unlikely to have a cost impact since it is not mandatory and does not constitute a regulation. N/A 38 FAA AC 150/5345-44G, Specification for Runway and Taxiway Signs http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidanc e_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/8ce3f88c0 34ae31a85256981007848e7/8ccd7b7ace6 a2ec386256efa0066eed3/$FILE/150-5345- 44G.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of of AC The AC contains the FAA specifications for unlighted and lighted signs to be used on taxiways and runways. Principal changes address the following: Alternate light sources such as fiber optics and light emitting diodes Standards for lighted signs located in areas of significant jet blast The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the guidance is mandatory for projects with AIP grant funds or PFCs 7/8/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for airport projects receiving Federal funds under the airport grant assistance or the passenger facility charge programs. Cost impact would be limited to the local matching share of any incremental costs of meeting the AC's standards. It could have a greater cost impact at airports that want to meet the standards of the AC without using AIP or PFC funds. N/A 39 FAA AC 150/5345-44H, Specification for Runway and Taxiway Signs http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5345- 44H/150_5345_44h.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC contains the FAA specifications for unlighted and lighted signs to be used on taxiways and runways. This reissuance lists 20 principal changes The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the guidance is mandatory for projects with AIP grant funds or PFCs 9/28/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for airport projects receiving Federal funds under the airport grant assistance or the passenger facility charge programs. Cost impact would be limited to the local matching share of any incremental costs of meeting the AC's standards. It could have a greater cost impact at airports that want to meet the standards of the AC without using AIP or PFC funds. N/A 40 FAA AC 150/5345-44J, Specificatons for Runway and Taxiway Signs http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5345_44j.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC contains the FAA specifications for unlighted and lighted signs to be used on taxiways and runways. Forty-two "principal changes" are listed in the reissuance. Changes range from clarifications of standards for sign size, borders, lettering and characters to clarification of standards for luminance levels to discussion of wind tunnel testing. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the ACis mandatory for projects funded with AIP grant funds or PFCs. In addition, the lighting designs contained in the standard are the only means to meet the lighting requirements of 14 CFR §139.311. However, retrofitting of signs to meet the changes in this AC is not required. 9/29/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for signage projects funded with AIP or PFC grants. It is also the only way to meet the lighting requirements of 14 CFR §139.311. It could potentially have a cost impact on some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 41 FAA AC 150/5200-33A, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidanc e_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/51eb9a b12a224e8586256f160052c678/$FILE/150- 5200-33A.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance on certain land uses that have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. It also discusses airport development projects affecting aircraft movement near hazardous wildlife attractants. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for airports that have received FAA grants. Part 139 certificated airports may use the AC to comply with wildlife hazard management requirements of Part 139. 7/27/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC has the potential to have a cost impact on airports that need to remove hazardous wildlife attractants. It is mandatory for airports that have received FAA grants. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds N/A 42 FAA AC 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5200- 33B/150_5200_33b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance on certain land uses that have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. It also discusses airport development projects (including airport construction, expansion, and renovation) affecting aircraft movement near hazardous wildlife attractants. The principal change in this reissuance is to modify guidance on storm water detention ponds. AC is recommended practice. However, recipients of federal financial assistance must follow the AC. Part 139 certificated airports may use the AC to comply with wildlife hazard requirements of Part 139. 8/28/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC has the potential to have a cost impact on airports that need to remove hazardous wildlife attractants. Some or all of the costs may be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ6
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 43 FAA AC 150/5210-22, Airport Certification Manual (ACM) http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 22/150_5210_22.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides acceptable methods for showing compliance with the Airport Certification Manual requirements of Part 139. The AC is being reissued to help airports in complying with the new requirements of Part 139 adopted in February 2004. The AC addresses the following: ACM function and form ACM overview ACM review and revision Tchnical resources and limits of authority ACM contents 8/26/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC presents acceptable methods for showing compliance with the Airport Certification Manual requirements of Part 139 and should not have a cost impact. N/A 44 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 8 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_13_chg8.pdf AC change The AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change accomplishes the following: Revises RSA standards for engineered material arresting systems (EMS) Removes precision object free area (POFA) and establishes precision object free zone (POFZ) Allows more flexibility in threshold siting criteria The AC (including Change 8) is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 9/30/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC has the potential to have a cost impact for airports that want to adhere to the recommendation. It is mandatory for airports that have received FAA grants. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 45 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 9 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_13_chg9.pdf AC Change The AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change includes new standards for runway end siting requirements and eliminates a previously deleted requirement to increase RSA width at higher altitudes that was inadvertently reinstated. The AC (including Change 9) is recommended practice. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 9/26/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC includes new standards for runway end siting requirements which could have a cost impact at some airports (which could be defrayed by AIP and PFC funds). The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. N/A 46 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 10 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_13_chg10.pdf AC Change The AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change accomplishes the following: Adds information on tail height and table specifying tail height and wing span for each aircraft design group Adds taxiway and taxilane centerline separation standards for Aircraft Design Group VI Adds separation standards between certain airport features and on-airport agricultural crops The giudance in the AC (including Change 10) is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 9/29/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. Compliance with the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and/or PFCs. It may have a cost impact on some airports if changes need to be made to get in compliance with the standards. Costs of compliance could be defrayed with AIP and PFC funds. N/A 47 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 11 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_13_chg11.pdf AC Change The AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change clarifies standards for RPZ's to explictly prohibit automobile parking in Central Portion of the RPZ. Automobile parking is discouraged elsewhere in the RPZ, but permitted if specified conditions are met The AC (including Change 11) is recommended practice. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 3/28/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC could have a cost impact to airports that are required to relocate prohibited items from within the RPZ. A portion of these costs could be defrayed with AIP or PFC funds. N/A 48 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 12 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_13_chg12.pdf AC Change This AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change includes the following actions: Delays implementation date of OEI procedures Requires FAA HQ approval of end-around taxiway projects Other technical revisions The AC (including Change 12) is recommended practice. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 1/3/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP or PFCs. The AC could potentially create a cost impact for some airports to revise and implement design standards. The incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ7
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 49 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 13 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_13_chg13.pdf AC change This AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change clarifies standards for runway hold lines. The AC (including Change 13) is recommended practice. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 6/19/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. Compliance with the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and/or PFCs. It may have a cost impact on some airports if changes need to be made to get in compliance with the regulations. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 50 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 14 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_13_chg14.pdf AC change This AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change postpones the effective date of new One Engine Inoperative standards. The AC (including Change 14) is recommended practice. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 11/1/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. This change postpones the effectivve date of new standards, and thus delays the imposition of any potential costs of compliance. N/A 51 FAA AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design Standards, Change 15 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ 150_5300_13_chg15.pdf AC Change The AC contains the FAA standards and recommendations for airport design. This change includes the following modifications: Delays implementation date of One Engine Inoperative (OEI) procedures Corrects references to RSA dimension for upgrades to aircraft approach categories Adjusts runway separation requirements table to reflect a change in Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) Modifies requirements for use of declared distances and inclusion of information on same in NOTAMS The guidance in the AC (including Change 15) is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. The AC may be used to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 12/21/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. Compliance with the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and/or PFCs. It may have a cost impact on some airports if changes need to be made to get in compliance with the regulations. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 52 FAA AC 150/5345-56, Specification for L-890 Airport Lighting Control and Monitoring System (ALCMS) http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5345- 56/150_5345_56.pdf New AC The AC establishes spefications for touch screen control and monitoring systems for airport lighting. The AC is recommended practice. However, use of the AC is mandatory for projects receiving federal assistance funds. 9/30/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is unlikely to have a cost impact. It provides the specifications that must be used if an airport decides to install a touchscreen for ALCMS but it does not require a touchscreen. N/A 53 FAA Cert Alert #04-12, Dry Chemical Systems Inspection and Maintenance http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ New Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides recommendations for inspection and maintenance of dry chemical systems. Use of a contractor to perform maintenance is recommended if ARFF personnel have not been certificated to perform maintenance. The Cert Alert is labelled cautionary and non-directive. 10/22/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert. Alert could potentially have a cost impact associated with inspecting the dry chemical system if the airport does not have maintenance certified ARFF personnel. N/A 54 FAA AC 150/5340-18D, Standards for Airport Sign Systems http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidanc e_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/8ce3f88c0 34ae31a85256981007848e7/27274540e3a 4f16c86256fda006ae564/$FILE/150-5340- 18D.pdf Cancellation and Reissuance of AC The AC incorporates new mandatory hold signs that reflect changed standards for the Precision Obstacle Free Zone (POFZ) and Category (CAT II/III) operations. The AC also incorporates new standards for low visibility operations and tunway taxiway separation standards for Cat II/III operations.. This reissuance includes 19 principal changes to standards for sign system to reflect the changed airport design standards discussed above. 12/6/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC will likely have a cost impact on some airports because it requires new signage. N/A 55 FAA AC 150/5340-18E, Standards for Airport Sign Systems http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5340- 18E/150_5340_18e.pdf Cancellation and Reissuance of AC The AC contains the FAA standards for the siting and installation of signs on airport runways and taxiways. This reissuance incorporates mandatory hold signs that reflect changed standards for the POFZ and CAT II and III operations. These changes correspond to revisions to AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design, that change the Precision Object Free Area (POFA) to the POFZ and incorporate new separation standards for taxiways that parallel runways used for certain low visibility operations. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 certificated airports. AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. 9/12/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and projects funded with AIP and PFC. The AC would likely have a cost impact at some airports to bring their signage into compliance. Incremental costs could be defrayed by a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ8
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 56 FAA AC 150/5340-18F, Standards for Airport Sign Systems http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5340_18f.pdf Cancellation and Reissuance of AC The AC contains the Federal Aviation Administration standards for the siting and installation of signs on airport runways and taxiways. This reissuance incorporates mandatory hold signs for PrecisionObsatacle Free Zone and CAT. II and III operations Incorporates new requirements for low visibility operations procedures Revised sign standards are intended to assure that airports and operators using the airport comply with new standards. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 certificated airports The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. 8/16/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and for signage projects funded with AIP or PFCs. It could potentially have a cost impact for some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds N/A 57 FAA Cert Alert #04-16, Deer Hazard to Aircraft and Deer Fencing http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/ Cancellation and reissuance of Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides guidance on acceptable deer fencing and installation requirements.The Cert Alert is labelled cautionary and non-directive. 12/14/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert is non-directive and is unlikely to have a cost impact. N/A 58 FAA AC 150/5370-11A, Use of Nondestructive Testing in the Evaluation of Airport Pavements http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5370- 11A/150_5370_11a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC focuses on nondestructive testing (NDT) equipment that measures pavement surface deflections after applying a static or dynamic load to the pavement. The AC is recommended practice. Other pavement testing methods may be used with FAA approval. 12/29/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC provides guidance and recommendations on data collection equipment and methods of data analysis. It would only have cost impacts if an airport decided to implement the recommendations. N/A 59 FAA AC 150/5340-26A, Maintenance of Airport Visual Aid Facilities http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5340- 26A/150_5340_26a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides recommended guidelines for maintenance of airport visual aid facilities. This reissuance updates guidance in the following areas: Series circuitry Maintenance management and preventive maintenance Preventative maintenance Airfield lighted guidance signs, precision approach path indicators (PAPIs) and airport lighting control and monitoring systems (ALCMs) The AC is recommended practice 4/4/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The A/C expands upon and revises certain requirements which could have a cost impact on some airports. N/A 60 FAA AC 150/5340-26B, Maintenance of Airport Visual Aid Facilities http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5340_26b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides recommended guidelines for maintenance of airport visual aid facilities. This reissuance incorporates maintenance methodology for Runway Status Light Systems. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/30/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for projects airport visual aid projects funded with AIP or PFCs and could potentially have a cost impact for some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed by a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 61 FAA AC 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5340- 1J/150_5340_1j.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC contains the FAA standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons. This revision adopts new standards for taxiway centerline markings. The new standards are required to be implemented by all commercial service airports with at least 1.5 million passengers. Per the AC, the standards are to be used on all new projects that are under development and are to be implemented at all Part 139 certificated airports no later than one year from the date of the AC. 4/29/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The A/C standards are mandatory for Part 139 airports and for airports that receive federal grants or are a part of the PFC program. It will likely have a cost impact on airports that revise markings to comply with the standards. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds N/A 62 FAA AC 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings, Change 1 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5340- 1J/150_5340_1j.pdf Change to existing AC The AC contains the FAA standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons. This change adopts firm compliance dates for taxiway centerline marking standards (1 year after issuance for airports with 370,000 to 1.5 million passengers and 2 years from issuances for airports with less than 370,000 passengers). A new standard for painted holding position signs will become mandatory two years after issuance of Change 1 for all Part 139 airports. 3/31/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC impements new standards for runway, taxiway and apron markings and will eventually have a cost impact on all Part 139 airports. The incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ9
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 63 FAA AC 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Marking, Change 2 http://www.airspacecoordination.org/coord/ 150_5340_1j.pdf Change to existing AC The AC contains the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons. This change clarifies Change 1, which adopts three new surface painted markings to reduce runway incursions. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However the guidance is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. Also, the AC is the only means of compliance with Part 139 requirements for runway and taxiway marking. Certain revised Part 139 marking requirements have a compliance date of December 31, 2010. 6/6/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC clarifies the current standards for runway, taxiway and apron markings and should have no cost impact. N/A 64 FAA AC 150/5340-1K, Standards For Airport Markings http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5340_1k_consolida ted.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC contains the FAA standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons. This reissuance includes 29 "principal changes." The changes for the most part address the problem of pilots confusing taxiways for runways when landing. The AC also incorporates guidance from other documents The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, guidance is mandatory for Part 139 certificated airports and mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/3/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and for projects funded with AIP or PFCs. It could potentially have a cost impact for some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds 65 FAA AC 150/5340-1K, Standards For Airport Markings, Change 1 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ 150_5340_1K_change1.pdf Change to existing AC. The AC contains the FAA standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons. This change corrects text and formatting errors, clarifies instructions and marking characteristics, and incorporates the corrections noted in the errata sheet for AC 150/5340-1K. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 Airports and for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. Per the AC, the standards "are to be used on all new airport projects that are under development and are to be implemented at all Part 139 certificated airports." 11/17/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and for runway, taxiway and apron markings funded with AIP or PFC grants. It could have a cost impact on airports that are required to revise markings to comply with the AC. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds N/A 66 FAA PFC Update 49-05 New PFC Update The PFC Update provides guidance on implementing the amendments to 14 CFR Part 158 adopted in 2005 and discussed above (non-hub pilot program and other changes to application procedures). 4/29/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The PFC Update interprets amendments to the PFC regulation and does not itself require public agencies to modify administration of their PFC programs. N/A 67 FAA PGL 05-03, Updated Grant Assurances http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_05-03.pdf New PGL The PGL adds two new grant assurances required by Vision 100, Pub. L. 108-176 (December 12, 2003). Only one assurance affects small airports. This assurance (Assurance No. 38) requires airport sponsors to grant long-term leases to aircraft owners that want to construct a hangar at the owners' expense. The lease is subject to the terms and conditions that the sponsor may adopt. 6/3/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The updated grant assurances in the PGL are unlikely to have a cost impact. N/A 68 FAA Order 5100.38C, Airport Improvement Program Handbook http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/orders/media/aip_5100_38c.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Order The Order provides guidance and sets forth policy and procedures to be used in the administration of the Airport Improvement Program. The order addresses the following, among other things: Funding levels and formulas Project and sponsor eligibility Project formulation Application procedures Project implementation Project record-keeping and oversight Project close-out. This reissuance incorporates changes to the AIP included in Vision 100, Pub. L. 108-176 (December 12, 2003), as well as other policy changes adopted by the FAA since the prior version of the Order. 6/28/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. Cost impacts for changes to grant application or administration requirements may be recoverable up to the standard federal share as project admiinistration costs N/A 69 FAA Order 5100.37B, Land Acquisition and Relocation Assistance for Airport Projects http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/orders/media/environmental_5100_ 37b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Order The Order provides guidelines and identifies responsibilities for FAA acceptance and monitoring of airport sponsor compliance with provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act. Compliance is required on airport projects involving land acquisition receiving Federal financial assistance. This reissuance incorprates changes to DOT's implementing regulation 49 CFR Part 24 issued in 2005 and discussed above. 8/1/2005 ___ No published cost estimate The Order implements regulatory changes and provides guidance to FAA staff. The Order itself, therefore is unlikely to have a cost impact on airports. N/A Page Aâ10
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 70 FAA AC 150/5220-22A, Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS) for Aircraft Overruns http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5220- 22A/150_5220_22a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC contains standards for the planning, design, installation, and maintenance of EMAS in runway safety areas. This reissuance reflects the results of testing and field experience with aircraft overruns where EMAS was installed. the guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the guidance is mandatory for airports installing EMAS using AIP grant funds and is mandatory for Part 139 certificated airports. 9/30/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and those receiving AIP grants for an EMAS project. The AC would likely have a cost impact at those airports (which could be defrayed by AIP and PFC funds). N/A 71 FAA AC 150/5100-14D, Architectural, Engineering, and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant Projects http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5100_14d.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance for airport sponsors in the selection and engagement of architectural, engineering, and planning consultants. It also discusses contract types, format and provisions, and guidelines for determining the reasonableness of consultant fees. Principal changes in this reissuance include the following: Clarification of Broad Form Indemnification Expansion of selection criteria and method of evalutating potential consultants Expansion of Contractor Contractual Requirements section and new information on Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs. Increase in the limit for use of informal procedures from $25,000 to $100,000 Clarification of Independent Fee Estimates and addition of methods of determining fair and reasonable fees Addition of discussion of Alternative Delivery Methods Update of discussion of contract provisions consistent with current laws and regulations. The guidelines in the AC are recommended for consultant selection process to comply with requirements of 49 CFR Part 18 when airport sponsors are selecting consultants for project funded with AIP grants. The AC does not apply to projects that are fully funded with PFCs or a combination of PFCs and airport revenue. 9/30/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The changes provided in the AC are unlikely to increase costs but could potentially lower the cost of selecting and engaging consultants. N/A 72 FAA AC 150/5100-17, Land Acquisition and Relocation Assistance for Airport Improvement Program Assisted Projects, Change 6 http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5100- 17/150_5100_17_chg6.pdf Revision to AC The AC provides guidance to sponsors of AIP assisted projects to develop their land acquisition and relocation assistance procedures in conformance to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. This revision incorporates changes to the DOT implementing regulation 49 CFR Part 24, discussed previously. The FAA shall monitor sponsor compliance with the provisions of 49 CFR Part 24, and the sponsor shall take whatever corrective action necessary to comply with the Uniform Act and 49 CFR Part 24. 11/7/2005 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC implements regulatory changes and provides guidance to FAA staff. The AC itself, therefore is unlikely to have a cost impact on airports. N/A 73 FAA Cer Alert #06-02, Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) meeting MIL-F-24385 http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0602.pdf New Cert Alert The Cert Alert clarifies a recent AC and specifies that any AFFF purchased after July 1, 2006 by a Part 139 airport must meet the referenced military specification. 2/8/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. This AC is not mandatory but all future purchases of AFFF must conform to MIL-F- 24385 which may have a minor cost impact at some airports. N/A 74 FAA Cert Alert #06-05, Stop Runway Incursions & Surface Incedents Now http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0605.pdf New Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides recommended practices for airports to reduce the frequency of runway incursion incidents involving vehiclular traffic. Recommendations include (but are not limited to) the following: Audit vehicle operating permits Update driver training programs Require "practical" testing excercises involving driving on the airfield Employ airport operations officers to monitor vehicle operations Establish and enforce consequences for violations of procedures for vehicle operation on the airfield 4/18/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. An airport could face a minor cost impact if it chooses to implement the recommendations of the Cert Alert. N/A 75 FAA AC 150/5210-17A, Programs for Training of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Personnel http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 17A/150_5210_17a.pdf AC cancellation and reissuance The AC provides information on courses and reference materials for training of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) personnel. This reissuance provides guidance on frequency and content of ARFF training. The AC is one means of compliance with ARFF personnel training requirements for Part 139 certificated airports. The AC is applicable to all airports, but does not specify that it is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs 4/28/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. An airport could face a cost impact if it chooses to implement the recommendations of the AC. N/A Page Aâ11
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 76 FAA AC 150/5210-17B, Programs for Training of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Personnel http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5210_17b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance on frequency and content of training for ARFF personnel. This reissuance updates the list of training and reference material as well as training standards. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However the AC is mandatory for all projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/23/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is required for ARFF training programs funded with AIP or PFCs. It could have a cost impact on airports that wish to comply with the recommendations. N/A 77 FAA AC 150/5200-34A, Construction or Establishment of Landfills near Public Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5200- 34A/150_5200_34a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC contains guidance on complying with Federal statutory requirements regarding the construction or establishment of landfills near public airports. This reissuance updates the guidance to reflect changes to statutory requirements adopted in the Air-21 legislation, Pub. L. No. 106-181 (April 5, 2000). Per the AC, the guidance "should be used to comply with" statutory limitations on siting landfills near airports. Per the statute, the site limitations are not applicable in Alaska. No substantive changes to prior AC 6/26/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. There are no cost impacts as a result of this AC. There are no substantive changes to the prior AC, and it applies to the builder of a landfill, not the airport. N/A 78 FAA AC 150/5200-28C, Notices to Airmen (NOTAMS) For Airport Operators http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5200_28c_cancelle d.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance on using the NOTAM system for airport condition reporting. This reissuance provides updated guidance on the NOTAM system and its function, guidance on preparing NOTAMS, and sample forms. 7/24/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. There should be no cost impacts associated with this AC. N/A 79 FAA AC 150/5200-28D, Notices to Airmen (NOTAMS) For Airport Operators http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5200- 28D/150_5200_28d.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC This AC provides guidance on using the NOTAM system for airport condition reporting. This reissuance provides updated guidance on preparing and issuing NOTAMS and revises formating and nomenclature. 1/28/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC should have no cost impact to airports. N/A 80 FAA AC 150/5190-7, Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5190- 7/150_5190_7.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides information on the FAAâs recommendations on commercial minimum standards and related policies. Although minimum standards are optional, the FAA highly recommends their use and implementation as a means to minimize the potential for violations of Federal obligations at federally obligated airports. This reissuance provides updated guidance on the sponsor's prerogative to establish minimum standards for commercial aeronautical service providers. It also guidance for self-service operations and self-service rules and regulation of other aeronautical activities. 8/28/2006 ___ No published cost iestimate. The AC is not mandatory but could have a cost impact upon airports that chose to develop minimum standards based upon the AC. N/A 81 FAA PFC Update 50-06, Detailed Basis of Cost Information http://www.faa.gov/airports/pfc/pfc_updates /media/pfc_50_06_basis_cost.pdf New PFC Update The PFC update provides new documentation requirements for certain PFC projects. Among other things, the update makes the following modifications: Requires submission of additional cost justification information and data for projects over $10 million in value Adds a new required determination in the "For FAA Use" portion of Attachment B Adds new required finding to FAA recommendation form Adds new standard language to final agency decision (FAD template) All changes are the result of an adverse court decision, finding that FAA had not adequately documented or supported its finding that $110 million was not an excessive cost to complete an Environmental Impact Statement. 9/8/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. Additional documentation requirements could increase the cost of submitting PFC applications with projects over $10 million in value. This cost can be defrayed with PFC funds. 82 FAA AC 150/5370-13A, Off-Peak Construction of Airport Pavements Using Hot-Mix Asphalt http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5370- 13A/150_5370_13a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance for the planning, coordination, management, design, testing, inspection, and execution of off-peak construction of airport pavements using hot-mix asphalt (HMA) paving materials. This reissuance updates the guidance to reflect current developments. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. 9/26/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is unlikely to have a cost impact to airports. N/A 83 FAA AC 150/5335-5A, Standardized Method of Reporting Airport Pavement Strength PCN http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5335- 5A/150_5335_5a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance on new standardized method for reporting pavement strength.The new standard was adopted by ICAO 9/28/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is unlikely to have a cost impact to airports. N/A Page Aâ12
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 84 FAA Order 5280.5C, Airport Certification Handbook http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Order/ND/5280.5.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Order The Order provides FAA personnel with the policies, standards, and procedures by which to conduct the Airport Certification Program. The Order helps ensure standardization and uniformity in the application of the program and in enforcing 14 CFR Part 139, Certification of Airports. The order is directed at airport certification safety inspectors, rather than at airports. 9/28/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. The Order is directed at certification safety inspectors. The Order is unlikely to have a cost impact to airports, unless an airport is required to incur costs to address an inspector's finding or recommendation based on the order. 85 FAA PGL 07-03, Revised and Updated Requirements for Letter of Intent (LOI) Requsts http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_07_03.pdf New PGL, revises AIP Order 5100.38C The PGL specifies revised and updated guidance for submission and evaluation of LOI requests. Among other things, the PGL addresses the following issues: Eligibility and administrative requirements The LOI request process Evaluation criteria and decision process Administration of LOIs Amendments to LOIs LOI Finance Plan Template 11/20/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL provides guidance related to the submission and evaluation of LOI requests. The PGL could increae the coss of preparing a LOI application. However, a portion of these costs could be defrayed with AIP funds as a project formulation cost. N/A 86 FAA AC 150/5220-9A, Aircraft Arresting Systems on Civil Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5220- 9A/150_5220_9a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides standards for installation, signage and marking for permanent and temporary aircraft arresting systems at joint use airports. This reissuance provides FAA's current guidance on the subject. Among other things, the AC specifies that: Arresting systems must be installed according to current military standards. The FAA must determine that the installation will not adversely affect safety and meets, to the extent practicable, FAA airport design standards. The arresting system must be noted in the Airport Data System and/or NOTAMS. The AC is mandatory for federally obligated airports. The AC is one means of compliance for Part 139 certificated airport 12/20/2006 ___ No published cost iestimate. The AC is mandatory for federally obligated airports and could have a cost impact for those airports serving military aircraft. N/A 87 FAA AC 150/5190-6, Exclusive Rights at Federally-Obligated Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5190- 6/150_5190_6.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides information on FAA's prohibition on the grant of exclusive rights at federally obligated airports. The prohibition applies to airports that have accepted federal grants or donation of federal property. This reissuance provides FAA's current guidance on the subject. The AC contains a discussion of FAA's policy on exclusive rights, exceptions to the policy and FAA methods to assure compliance. 1/4/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is unlikely to have a cost impact to airports. N/A 88 FAA Cert Alert #07-03, Part 139 Airport Inactive Status http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0703.pdf New cert alert The cert alert announces the Inactive certificate program. Airports without recent passenger flight activity subject to Part 139 may go on incactive status. Inactive status relieves the airport of the annual inspection requirement Inactive status airports must give FAA 90 days notice before Part 139 passenger flights resume. 2/2/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is unlikely to have a cost impact to airports. N/A 89 FAA Cert Alert #07-10, Vehicle Pedestrian Deviation Runway Incursions http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0710.pdf New Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides guidance on strategies to reduce Vehicle Pedestrian Deviation (VPD) runway incursions. The cert alert appears to summarize and highlight existing guidance and requirements. 8/10/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. An airport could face a minor cost impact if it chooses to implement the recommendations of the Cert Alert. N/A 90 FAA AC 150/5210-5C, Painting, Marking, and Lighting of Vehicles Used on an Airport http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 5C/150_5210_5c.pdf Cancellation and Reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance, specifications, and standards for painting, marking, and lighting of vehicles operating in the airport air operations area (AOA). This reissuance deletes and adds references to various specifications and standards, including EB #67 The AC is recommended practice. The AC is mandatory for vehicles funded with AIP grants and PFCs 8/31/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for vehicles funded with AIP grants and PFCs and could have a cost impact to certain airports. N/A 91 FAA AC 150/5210-5D, Painting, Marking, and Lighting of Vehicles Used on an Airport http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5210_5d.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance, specifications, and standards for painting, marking, and lighting of vehicles operating in the airport air operations area (AOA). This reissuance contains new specifications and recommendations for the painting, marking, and lighting of Towbarless Tow Vehicles (TLTVs). The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for vehicles funded with AIP grants and PFCs. Any repainting required by the AC must be completed by 12/31/2010. 4/1/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for vehicles puchased with AIP or PFCs and could potentially have a cost impact for some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ13
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 92 FAA AC 150/5300-16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys: Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5300- 16A/150_5300_16a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC explains the specifications for establishing geodetic control on or near an airport. It also describes how to submit the information to the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) for approval and inclusion in the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) in support of aeronautical information surveys. The AC supports FAA initiative to convert to Geospatial Information System (GIS) and Electronic Airport Layout Plan (E-ALP) The AC is recommended practice. However, it is mandatory for surveys funded under federal assistance programs. The AC provides one, but not the only, means of complying with 14 CFR Part 139. 9/15/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for surverys funded with AIP grants and PFCs and could have a cost impact to certain airports. However, incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 93 FAA AC 150/5300-18A, General Guidance and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards Cancellation and reissuance of AC This AC provides the specifications for the collection of airport survey data through field and office methodologies in support of aeronautical information and airport engineering surveys. It also explains how to submit data to the FAA, which will forward the data to the NGS for quality control purposes. The primary purpose of these guidelines and specifications is to list the requirements for aeronautical surveys conducted at airports in support of the FAA Airport SurveyingâGIS Program. This reissuance supports implementation of Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Lateral Performance With Visual Guidance (LPV) approaches. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice for submitting airport survey and GIS data. However, it is mandatory for surveys funded with AIP grants or PFCs 9/15/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for surverys funded with AIP grants and PFCs and could have a cost impact to certain airports. However, incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 94 FAA AC 150/5300-18B, General Guidance and Specifications For Submission of Aeronautical Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_18b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC provides the specifications for the collection of airport data through field and office methodologies in support of the FAA's GIS Program. It also explains how to submit data to the FAA, who will forward the safety critical data to the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) for independent verification and validation. This reissuance modifies the specifications for data collection. In particular, the AC incorporates new standards addressing the collection of a greater spectrum of airport related data. The AC is recommended practice. However, according to the AC, the guidance is "mandatory for the collection of geospatial airport and aeronautical data funded under Federal grant assistance programs. It also provides one, but not the only, acceptable means of meeting the requirements of 14 CFR Part 139 for the collection of geospatial airport and aeronautical data. 5/17/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC provides the specifications for the collection of data in support of the FAA Airport Surveying â Geographic Information System (GIS) Program. It is required for projects funded with AIP or PFCs and could have a cost impact for some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 95 FAA AC 150/5300-14A, Design of Aircraft Deicing Facilities http://rgl.faa.gov/REGULATORY_AND_GUI DANCE_LIBRARY%5CRGADVISORYCIR CULAR.NSF/0/FBA78D44CD44A12086257 364006879D6?OpenDocument Cancellation and reissuance of AC This AC provides standards, specifications, and guidance for designing aircraft deicing facilities This reissuance incorporates the following principal changes for off-gate deicing zones: New marking requirements Marking of vehicle safety zones and incorporation of vehicle safety zones in separation standards Recommended standards for electronic message boards. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice.. However, the AC is mandatory for aircraft deicing facilities funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/18/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for aircraft deicing facilities funded with AIP grants and PFCs and could have a minor cost impact to certain airports. N/A 96 FAA AC 150/5300-14B, Design of Aircraft Deicing Facilities http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5300- 14B/150_5300_14b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides standards, specifications, and guidance for designing aircraft deicing facilities. This reissuance includes the following: Revised separation standards for off-gate facilities Revised tables The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for aircraft deicing facility projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 2/5/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for deicing projects funded with AIP or PFC and could have a cost impact for those airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ14
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 97 FAA AC 150/5340-30C, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidanc e_Library%5CrgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/983 2A31E47465E7486257375006F8860?Ope nDocument Cancellation and reissuance of AC This AC provides guidance and recommendations on the installation of airport visual aids. This reissuance includes the following principal changes: Revised PAPI siting methods Clarification to standards on lighting system protection Addition of standards for Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System (ODALS) Addition of drawings throughout AC The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for visual aids purchased with AIP grants or PFCs. Also, the lighting standards in the AC are the only means to comply with the lighting requirements of Part 139. 9/20/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC could have cost impacts on some airports. The lighting requirements are necessary to comply with Part 139 and the other standards are mandatory for visual aids purchased with AIP grants or PFCs. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 98 FAA AC 150/5340-30D, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5340_30d.pdf Candellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance and recommendations on the installation of airport visual aids. This reissuance includes the following changes: Modifies the standards for design and installation of airport visual aids Adds Appendix 7, containing standards for Runway Status Lights (RWSL) Adds a new standard for Stopway Edge Lights Updates the standard for Beacon Towers Updates the standard for Wind Cones The AC is recommended practice. However, the guidance is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. In addition, "All lighting configurations contained in this standard are the only means acceptable to the Administrator to meet the lighting requirements of Title 14 CFR Part 139, Certification of Airports, Section 139.311, Marking, Signs and Lighting." 9/30/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and airport visual aid projects funded with AIP and PFC. The changes and recommendations of the AC would likely have a cost impact at some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 99 FAA AC 150/5340-30E, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5340_30e.pdf Candellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance and recommendations on the installation of airport visual aids. This reissuance lists 24 specific "principal changes" including: Revisions and clarifications to guidance on color coded taxiway centerline lights Addition of exothermic weld requirements for zinc coated light bases Update of standards for light-base ground Updates, corrections to various figures and tables The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the guidance is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. In addition, "All lighting configurations contained in this standard are the only means acceptable to the Administrator to meet the lighting requirements" of 14 CFR §139.311, Marking, Signs and Lighting. 9/29/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and for visual aid projects funded with AIP or PFC grants. It could have cost impacts on some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 100 FAA AC 150/5370-12A, Quality Control of Construction for Airport Grant Projects http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5370- 12A/150_5370_12a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC This AC provides information to ensure the quality of construction accomplished under the AIP. The reissuance specifies quality control responsibilities for the sponsor, the project engineer and the FAA project manager. Use of the AC is not mandatory. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants. 9/29/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP and could create a small cost impact. The incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 101 FAA PGL 08-02, Management of Acquired Noise Land, Inventory, Reuse, Disposal http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_08_02.pdf New PGL The PGL implements the grant assurance requiring airports to dispose of noise land acquired with AIP grants promptly after the land is no longer needed for noise compatibility (Noise Land Assurance). Under the Noise Land Assurance, the federal share of the proceeds of disposal must be applied to noise compatibility projects or returned to the FAA. Among other things, the PGL: Requires development of a noise land inventory and noise land reuse plan Discusses the criteria for determining when land is needed for noise compatibility Discusses acceptable methods of disposal Discusses acceptable methods of accounting for and applying the federal share of disposal proceeds. 2/1/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL requires a noise land inventory and noise land reuse plan. This will have a minor cost impact to those airports with noise land. Development of the noise land reuse plan as a component of a master plan update project may be eligible for AIP funding. N/A Page Aâ15
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 102 FAA PGL 08-03, Compliance with Trafficing Victims Protection Act http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_08_03.pdf New PGL The PGL adopts a special condition requiring compliance with provisions of Trafficking Victims Protection Act related to the use of federal funds. The special condition applies to funds granted directly to private entities and funds originally granted to public agencies that are redistributed to private entities, including funds paid to contractors. The special condition is mandatory upon execution of a grant agreement. 2/20/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. This PGL is unlikely to have a cost impact. N/A 103 FAA Program Information Memorandum (PIM) #1, Acquiring Paint Striping Machines to Complete Enhanced Centerline Markings http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/pim_1_force_account.pdf New PIM The PIM establishes partial eligibility for costs of paint striping machines when they are used in "force account" work on an AIP-eligible marking project. The guidance on eligibility in the PIM is mandatory for review of AIP funding requests that include the costs of paint-striping machines. 3/8/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. This PGL could create a minimal cost savings to some airports. N/A 104 FAA AC 150/5210-7D, Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Communications http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 7D/150_5210_7d.pdf AC cancellation and reissuance The AC provides guidance to assist airport operators in preparing for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) communications. The reissuance provides current guidance on the following: ARFF communications systems Initial notification and communication of alarm to first responders Communications between ARFF responders and others Lost communications Radio call signs and discipline Part 139 certificated airports may use the guidance to comply with applicable Part 139 requirements. 4/14/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC provides current guidance on ARFF communications. It could have a cost impact on airport if its communication system is not in compliance with Part 139. Some or all of incremental costs for communications systems could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 105 FAA Cert Alert #08-07, Guidance on the High- Reach Extendable Turret (HRET) http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0807.pdf New Cert Alert The Cert Alert encourages airports to provide hands-on training for HRET operation and clarifies AIP eligibility for training. Training aids are authorized for purchase as part of an AIP funded vehicle purchase. 7/18/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert could have a cost impact if airports choose to follow the recommendations to provide hands-on-training for HRET operation. A portion of training costs (attributable to purchase of training aids) may be defrayed by a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 106 FAA PGL 08-06, Public Access to Airport Planning and Environmental Documents http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_08_06.pdf New PGL The PGL prohibits access restrictions, registration requirements or requirements for personal information for public internet access access to planning and environmental documents prepared with AIP funds 7/21/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL can have a cost impact for those airports that have documents posted that have restricted access. N/A 107 FAA AC 150/5210-15A, Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Station Building Design http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 15A/150_5210_15a.pdf AC cancellation and reissuance Updates accident site distribution Incorporates specific NFPA standards Expands ARFF project phases Furrther defines station site selection criteria Expands station elements and facility requirements to meet current standards Expands and incorporates detailed hazard and safety features Provides new table on ARFF vehicle dimensions and thresholds Revises typical station furnishings and equipment requirements Revises station design checklist The AC is not mandatory. However the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/10/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is required for ARFF stations funded with AIP or PFC and could have a cost impact on some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed by a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 108 FAA AC 150/5210-18A, Systems for Interactive Training of Airport Personnel http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 18A/150_5210_18a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance in the design of systems for interactive training of airport personnel. This reissuance specifies current FAA standards for interactive airport personnel training systems to qualify for funding. The guidance in this AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/28/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is required for projects funded with AIP or PFCs. It could have a cost impact for airports that wish to implement the recommendations of the AC. Incremental costs could be defrayed by a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ16
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 109 FAA AC 150/5300-17B, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5300- 17B/150_5300_17b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC provides the specifications for Airport Imagery acquisition and how to submit the imagery for review and approval in support of aeronautical information and airport engineering surveys. This reissuance includes the following changes: Updates standards for imagery acquisition for geodedic surveys Adds requirement for submission and approval of an imagery plan prior to imagery acquisition Eliminates requirement for a final report unless there is a change from the provided plan or an unusual circumstance was encountered during the collection effort Adds a requirement for development and delivery to FAA of digital orthoimagery. Adds a requirement for the use of the Airports GIS to submit and track project requirements such as the plan and deliverables Changes the exterior orientation reporting units for omega, phi, kappa, from radians to decimal degrees Allows the use of state plane coordinates, reported in meters The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/29/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC provides the specifications for imagery acquisition and submission in support of engineering surveys. It is required for projects funded with AIP or PFCs and could have a cost impact for those airports. N/A 110 FAA AC 150/5210-14B, Aircraft Rescue Fir Fight Equipment, Tools and Clothing http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 14B/150_5210_14b.pdf AC cancellation and reiussance. The AC contains references to the minimum requirements for the selection and performance of aircraft rescue and firefighting personal protective equipment (PPE), self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and powered rescue tools. This reissuance makes the following changes: Incorporates by reference certain NFPA standards Adds standards for SCBA and powered rescue tools The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the standards for PPE, SCBA and powered rescue tools are the minimum acceptable for federally funded projects. Part 139 airports may use the AC as one means of compliance with applicable Part 139 requirements. 9/30/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC stipulates the minimum standards of compliance for federally funded projects. The AC could potentially have a cost impact at some airports if they want their equipment procurement specifications to comply with the AC. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 111 FAA AC 150/5300-15A, Use of Value Engineering for Engineering and Design of Airport Grant Projects http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5300- 15A/150_5300_15a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC provides guidance on using value engineering (VE) in AIP funded airport projects. This reissuannce provides current information on the benefits of value engineering and the currently required steps in the VE process. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants of PFCs. 9/30/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is required for projects funded with AIP or PFCs. It could potentially lower the cost of projects at airports that implement the recommendations. N/A 112 FAA Cert Alert #08-12, Safety Risks for Operating Supertugs (TLTV) in the Movement Area and Air Operations Area (AOA) when Towing Large Air Carrier Aircraft. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0812.pdf New Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides instructions to airports on requirements for operators of towbarless tow vehicles (TLTVs), especially during night operations. 11/25/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert will likey have no cost impact for airports. N/A 113 FAA AC 150/5200-30C, Airport Winter Safety and Operations http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5200- 30C/150_5200_30C.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance to assist airport operators in developing a snow and ice control plan, conducting and reporting runway friction surveys, and establishing snow removal and control procedures. This reissuance accomplishes the following: Requires Part 139 airports to submit revised Snow and Ice Control Plans to the FAA by April 30, 2009 Establishes winter-related conditions that require closure of a runway The AC is mandatory for Part 139 certificated airports. 12/9/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and could potentially have a cost impact for airports to bring their snow plan into compliance. 114 FAA AC 150/5210-19A, Driver's Enhanced Vision System (DEVS) http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5210- 19A/150_5210_19a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC contains performance standards, specifications, and recommendations for DEVS. This reissuance provides current guidance on the following: DEVS system components Performance standards for DEVS and individual system components The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for all projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 6/12/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is required for DEVS projects funded with AIP or PFCs and could potentially have a slight cost impact on some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A Page Aâ17
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 115 FAA Cert Alert #09-11, Safety During Construction and Reducing Runway Incursions http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0911.pdf New Cert Alert The Cert Alert contains recommendations for actions to reduce frequency of construction related vehicle/pedestrian deviations (V/PD). The actions listed in the Cert Alert are characterized as recommendations. 7/1/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert Alert could have a minor cost impact if airports choose to follow all of the recommendations provided. N/A 116 FAA Cert Alert #09-12, Airport Planning for Pandemic Flu Including H1N1(Swine Flu) Update http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0912.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides information on addressing the threat of pandemic flu outbreaks. This reissuance encourages airports to develop or modify pandemic flu plans to include business continuity and operations response plans. 7/16/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 117 FAA Cert Alert #09-13, Aircraft Surface Excursions During Winter Operations Update http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert0913.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Cert Alert The Cert Alert provides updated winter opertion information. The guidance addresses implementation of snow removal plans and notification of pilots. The focus of this cert alert is on freezeover following snow removal operations. 7/17/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 118 FAA PFC Update 59-09, Completion of "For FAA Use" portions of Attachment Bs http://www.faa.gov/airports/pfc/pfc_updates /media/pfc_59_09_attachb.pdf PFC Update The PFC udate requires FAA staff to make additional findings and add documentation to the" For FAA Use" portions of Attachment Bs. The requirements indirectly affect airports to the extent that FAA staff require public agencies to supply additional information to support FAA findings or new documentation requirements. 7/30/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The PFC Update may increase the cost of preparing and submitting PFC application if FAA staff require public agencies to supply additional information to comply with the update. Incremental costs could be defrayed with PFC funds 119 FAA PGL 09-02, Oversight, Inspection of Projects Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_09_02.pdf New PGL The PGL provides instruction on inspection and oversight of airport development projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Airport sponsors are to document their oversight by photographs and completion of FAA Form 5370-1. Davis Bacon Act and Department of Labor Equal Opportunity Employment signs are to be prominently displayed. The PGL applies to all ARRA financed projects initiated after issuance date of the PGL. 8/31/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL should have at most a nominal cost impact. N/A 120 FAA PIM #3, Use of USDA for Wildlife Hazard Assessments http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/pim_3_wildlife.pdf New PIM The PIM describes requirements for airports that select Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services (WS) to perform a Wildlife Hazard Assessment after completing a private sector selection process The WS is not to be considered during the qualifications based selection process. If an airport selects the WS, the airport must provide a written certification that "the private enterprise system cannot reasonably and expeditiously provide these services through ordinary business channels." 9/14/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL should not have a cost impact. N/A 121 FAA AC 150/5370-10E, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ advisory_circular/150-5370- 10E/150_5370_10e.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides standards for the construction of airports. This reissuance revises the requirements for runway and taxiway painting to: Add standards for preformed Thermoplastic Airport Pavement Markings Add standards for application of the above markings Clarify limits on the use of prohibited materials This version also includes a standard for saw-cut grooves. The AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. 9/20/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC updates construction standards, is required for projects funded with AIP or PFCs, and could have a cost impact on some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 122 FAA AC 150/5200-12C, First Responders Responsibility For Protecting Evidence At the Scene of an Aircraft Accident/Incident http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5200_12c.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC furnishes guidance for airport employees, airport management, and first responders at the scene of an aircraft accident on the proper preservation of evidence. This reissuance adds new related reading material; revises the title of AC; and adds illustrative pictures of flight data and cockpit voice recorders. The guidancde in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for AIP/PFC funded projects. 9/28/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is required for projects funded with AIP or PFCs and is unlikely to have a cost impact. N/A 123 FAA AC 150/5380-9, Guidelines and Procedures for Measuring Airfield Pavement Roughness http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5380_9.pdf New AC The AC provides guidelines and procedures for measuring and evaluating runway roughness as identified by surface profile data of rigid and flexible airport pavements. The guidance in this AC provides technical procedures to quantify surface irregularities and to determine how surface irregularities may affect specific categories of airplanes. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, use of the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs 9/30/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP or PFCs and could potentially have a cost impact for some airports. N/A Page Aâ18
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 124 FAA 150/5370-15A, Airside Applications for Aritificial Turf http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5370_15a.pdf New AC The AC provides guidance on planning, design, installation, and maintenance of aviation grade artificial turf in areas adjacent to the operational areas of an airport. Artificial turf systems that meet the requirements of this AC can be used at locations adjacent to taxiway and apron pavement where the use of natural turf has resulted in repeated soil erosion, where natural turf is impractical (e.g. paved islands), or where natural turf has unusually high costs associated with its maintenance. Design requirements for aritificial turf systems are specified. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, use of the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs 9/30/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for artificial turf projects funded with AIP or PFCs and could potentially have a minor cost impact for some airports. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 125 FAA AC 150/5300-9B, Predesign, Prebid, and Preconstruction Conferences for Airport Grant Projects http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5300_9b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance for conducting predesign, prebid, and preconstruction conferences for projects funded under the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport grant program. This reissuance accomplishes the following: Updates references to DBE programs Adds quality acceptance as a topic for pre-construction conference Adds items to be addressed in engineer's report during design phase Adds details to phasing plan requirements for construction conference Adds requirement for discussion of construction management The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/30/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP or PFCs. It is unlikely to have a cost impact. N/A 126 FAA Order 5190.6B, FAA Airport Compliance Manual http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publi cations/orders/compliance_5190_6/media/ 5190_6b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Order The order sets forth policies and procedures for the FAA Airport Compliance Program. It provides basic guidance for FAA personnel in interpreting and administering the various continuing commitments airport owners make to the United States as a condition for the grant of federal funds or the conveyance of federal property for airport purposes. The order discusses the obligations set forth in the standard airport sponsor assurances, addresses the application of the assurances in the operation of public-use airports, and facilitates interpretation of the assurances by FAA personnel. This reissuance is a comprehensive update of compliance guidance, replacing the prior version of the order published in 1989. The order provides guidance to FAA personnel. It's provisions are applied on a case-by-case basis to specific airport compliance questions. 9/30/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The Order itself does not require any change in airport practices or procedures. Any change to airport practice or procedure would be the result of a specific FAA inquiry or investigation into a particular practice. N/A 127 FAA PGL 10-01, Federal Financial Report SF 425 http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_10_01.pdf New PGL The PGL is issued to comply with a requirement of the Office of Management and Budget that all federal agencies begin using a new financial reporting form (SF-425) for federally assisted projects. Existing federal financial reporting forms are being replaced and references to those forms in other FAA guidance should be read to refer to SF-425. 10/7/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL should not have a cost impact. N/A 128 FAA PFC Update 61-10, Common Use Terminal Equipment http://www.faa.gov/airports/pfc/pfc_updates /media/pfc_61_10_terminal_equipment.pdf New PFC Update The PFC Update revises an earlier determination that common use terminal equipment is ineligible for PFCs. Equipment is PFC eligible, as a project for gates and related areas. 12/1/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. The PFC Update rescinds an earlier update that specified certain common-use equipment to be ineligible for PFC funding. By restoring PFC eligibility, this PFC Update permits airports to acquire the equipment without using rates and charges or airport discretionary funds or other airport revenue. N/A 129 FAA PGL 10-02, Buy American Requirements http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/guidance_le tters/media/PGL_10_02.pdf New PGL The PGL provides guidance on Buy American requirements applicable to projects funded with AIP grants and ARRA grants. The PGL discusses each element of the requirement and each condition required to obtain a waiver. 2/24/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The PGL is required for projects funded with AIP and ARRA grants. It could potenially have a cost impact. Incremental costs could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 130 FAA Cert. Alert #10-01, Clarification of term "consecutive calendar months" http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/c ertalerts/media/cert1001.pdf New Cert. Alert The Cert. Alert clarifes meaning of twelve consecutive calendar months to specify the end-date for 12 consecutive months is January 31, 2011 for any Part 139 airport that was subject to periodic inspections in January 2010. The interpretation applies to any requirements for training, exercises, testing required during a period of twelve consecutive calendar months. 4/26/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The Cert. Alert should not have a cost impact. N/A Page Aâ19
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 131 FAA AC 150/5200-31B, Airport Emergency Plans http://www.aci- na.org/static/entransit/draft_150_5200_31b .pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC provides guidance to the airport operator in the development and implementation of an Airport Emergency Plan (AEP). This reissuance incorporates two Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPD-5 and HSPD-8). The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the airport's AEP must follow the general guidances contained in the HSPDs. An airport may follow an alternative method, if FAA finds the alternative complies with applicable Part 139 certification requirements. Draft ___ No published cost estimate. The AC could have a cost impact for airports with existing AEPs that are not in compliance with HSPD-5 and HSPD-8. N/A 132 FAA AC 150/5200-31C, Airport Emergency Plans http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5200_31c_consolid ated.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC provides guidance to the airport operator in the development and implementation of an Airport Emergency Plan (AEP). This reissuance includes the following provisions: Requires certificated airports to develop an airport emergency plan Incorporates updated referencing documents Incorporates by reference the National Incident Management System and Incident Command System Incorporates Essential Response Actions into Hazard Specific Details The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and recommended practice for others. 5/21/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for Part 139 airports and could potentially have a cost impact for airports that need to revise their AEP. N/A 133 FAA 14 CFR Part 77, 75 Fed, Reg. 44296, Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of Navigable Airspace http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-07- 21/pdf/2010-17767.pdf Amendment to regulations The regulation establishes requirements for notification to the FAA of proposed construction that may result in obstructions to air navigation and standards for reviewing proposed construction and determining whether proposals would result in an obstruction. This amendment updates the regulations to reflect changes in statutes, regulations and policies since the prior update. 7/21/2010 $0 Per the supplementary information, the impact of the rule will be on proponents of certain projects near airports, rather than airports themselves. Therefore, there should be no cost impact to airports Initial Regulatory Evaluation, Initial Regulatory Flexibility Determination, Initermational Trade Assessment, Unfunded Mandates Assessment, p. I (12/12/2004) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 71 Fed. Reg. 34028, 34038 (June 13, 206) 134 FAA PFC Update 64-10, OMB Approval of PFC Application Forms http://www.faa.gov/airports/pfc/pfc_updates /media/pfc_64_10_forms.pdf PFC Update The PFC Update announces OMB approval of revised PFC application forms. OMB approval means FAA can require the use of the forms. Form changes are the subject of a separate PFC Update. 9/15/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. This update does not itself modify forms. It should not have any cost impacts on airports. 135 FAA Air Carrier Incentive Program Guidebook http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_complia nce/media/air_carrier_incentive_2010.pdf Guidebook The Guidebook states that it is a summary and compendium of existing guidance and case-by- case determinations. It provides guidance on structuring air carrier incentive programs to comply with AIP grant assurances. 9/15/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The Guidebook explains existing policies and requirements and should not have a cost impact to airports. N/A 136 FAA PFC Update 63-10, Air Carrier Reporting Module http://www.faa.gov/airports/pfc/pfc_updates /media/pfc_63_10_air_carrier_reporting.pdf PFC Update The PFC Update announces availability of Air Carrier Reporting Module for inputting PFC data in SOAR. With implementation of Air Carrier Module, public agencies using SOAR will no longer need to submit quarterly reports to individual carriers. 9/17/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. Elimination of quarterly PFC reporting to individual carriers could reduce airport costs. N/A 137 FAA AC 150/5220-17B Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Training http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5220_17b.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC. The AC provides guidance on the design, construction, and operation of aircraft rescue and fire fighting (ARFF) training facilities. This reissuance focuses on to permanent and mobile ARFF training facilities that use flammable liquified hydrocarbon (FLH) or propane. Required elements for the mobile ARFF trainer have been modified to improve safety, reduce costs, and improve overall ease of use. The alternate sizing provisions (using agent application and apparatus discharge rates) have been removed. The AC is recommended practice. However, the guidance is mandatory for the design, construction and operation of projects funded with AIP grants or PFCs. 9/30/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP or PFC grants. It could potentially have a cost impact on some airports. N/A 138 FAA AC 150/5210-23, ARFF Vehicle and High Reach Extendable Turret (HRET) Operation, Training and Qualifications http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5210_24.pdf New AC The AC contains the FAA's standards, and recommendations for the training of airport firefighting and rescue personnel in the proper operation and tactical use of ARFF vehicles and ARFF Vehicles equipped with HRETs. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP grants and PFCs. Further, "The training and qualification guidance provided may be adopted or amended by the airport based on their specific circumstances, but the ARFF program must meet the intent of the guidance." 9/30/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for ARFF vehicles funded with AIP or PFC grants. It could potentially have a cost impact on some airports. N/A Page Aâ20
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 139 FAA AC 150/5210-24, Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Management http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5210_24.pdf New AC The AC provides guidance for developing and managing an airport foreign object debris (FOD) program. In addition, this AC provides specifications for the equipment used in FOD removal operations. The AC addresses the following areas: Prevention Detection Removal Evaluation The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for acquisition of FOD removal equipment with AIP grant funds or PFCs. 9/30/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for FOD equipment purchased with AIP or PFC grants. It could potentially have a minor cost impact on some airports. Incremental costs of FOD removal equipment could be defrayed with a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 140 FAA AC 150/5220-25, Airport Avian Radar Systems http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/150_5220_25.pdf New AC. The AC provides guidance on the use of avian radar systems to supplement an airportâs Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) and reduce the potential avian threats to aircraft. Specifically, the AC sets forth standards for selection, procurement, deployment, performance specifications, operations and management of Airport Avian Radar System. The AC notes that observation of birds is required for Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Wildlife Management Plans. The AC does not specify that an Avian Radar System is the only means of compliance. The guidance in the AC is recommended practice. However, the AC is mandatory for projects funded with AIP or PFC funds. 11/23/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. The AC is mandatory for avian radar systems funded with AIP or PFCs. It could have a cost impact on airports that attempt to design their WHMP to the standards of the AC. Incremental costs of avian radar equipment could be defrayed by a combination of AIP and PFC funds. N/A 141 DOT 49 CFR Part 26, Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs, 65 Fed. Reg. 68951 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2000-11- 15/pdf/00-29100.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 26 establishes the requirements for participation by disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs) in projects funded with federal assistance administered by the DOT. The amendment implements the following changes (among others): Revises the threshold for the requirement to develop a DBE participation plan for airports to $250,00 in potential AIP funded contracting opportunities (excluding land acquisition). Exempts airports from annual goal setting requirements for any year they anticipate having less than $250,000 in eligible prime contracts Clarifies requirements for developing and using bidders lists Clarifies requirement to monitor actual DBE participation in contracts Clarifies obligation to use certain information in goal setting process The amendment is mandatory for airports accepting AIP funds. 11/15/2000 ___ No published cost estimate Supplemental Information states that the amendments will reduce the costs to some small entities, but does not specify which entities Exemption from goal setting requirements for airports with less than $250,000 in eligible prime contracts may reduce costs for qualifying small airports. 65 Fed. Reg. 68950 (11/15/2000) 142 DOT 49 CFR Part 26, Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs, 68 Fed. Reg. 35553 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-06- 16/pdf/03-14989.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 26 establishes requirements for assuring DBE participation in contracts funded by DOT assistance programs including the AIP. This amendment modifies provisions of the the rule in addressing the following areas (among others): Uniform reporting and application forms Personal net worth, retainage, size standards, ethnicity and proof of disadvantage Eligibility of firms owned by Alaska Native Corporations Multi-year project goals 6/16/2003 $0 Per the final rule supplemental information, the rule will not add new costs to grantees. 68 Fed. Reg. 35553 (06/16/2003) 143 DOT 49 CFR Part 27, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance, 66 Fed. Reg. 22115 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2001-05- 03/pdf/01-11201.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 27 carries out the intent of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prevent any individual from being denied participation in or the benefits of any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance soley by reason of the individual's disability This amendment requires airports in cooperation with air carriers to provide ramps, lifts or other mechanical assistance for individuals with disabilities boarding aircraft with 31 or more seats if level entry boarding is not available. The requirement applies to all primary airports 5/3/2001 $0 Per the regulatory evaluation for the rule, the rule will have only incidental financial impact on airports because few, if any new lifts will need to be acquired Costs of lifts acquired by airports for common use could be paid with a combination of AIP and PFC funds ------------------------------------------------------------- Per comment from a small airport, compliance costs will include cost of lift, maintenance, insurance and training Regulatory Evaluation: Analysis of the Impact of Requiring Lifts on Aircraft With Seating Capacity of 31 or More Seats, Docket OST-1999-6159, pg. 10 ---------------------------------------------------- Comments of City of Billings, Aviation and Transit Department, Docket OST -1999- 6159 (11/18/1999) Page Aâ21
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 144 DOT 49 CFR Part 27, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance, 68 Fed. Reg. 51390 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-08- 26/pdf/03-21140.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 27 is the DOT version of the joint government-wide rule implementing prohibitions on discrimination on the basis of disability in federally assisted programs or activities. This amendment modifies the regulation to implement provisions of the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, by revising language on "program or activity" to conform to that legislation. Many agencies had been following the legislation in administering their programs, but had not revised regulatory language, which led to confusion. 8/26/2003 $0 Per the final rule supplemental information there will probably be no cost impacts because the final rule reflects long-standing policies of the agencies' and does not affect agencies' practices. 68 Fed. Reg. 51339 (08/26/2003) 145 DOT 49 CFR Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation -- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 68 Fed. Reg. 51390 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-08- 26/pdf/03-21140.pdf Amendmemt to regulations Part 21 implements Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for programs or activities receiving federal assistance from DOT and its modal administrations. This amendment modifies the regulation to implement provisions of the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, by revising language on "program or activity" to conform to that legislation. Many agencies had been following the legislation in administering their programs, but had not revised regulatory language, which led to confusion. 8/26/2003 $0 Per the final rule supplemental information, there will be no cost impacts because the final rule clarifies longstanding policies and does not change agency practice 68 Fed. Reg. 51339 (08/26/2003) 146 DOT 49 CFR Part 29, Government Wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) 68 Fed. Reg. 66534, 66644 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-11- 26/pdf/03-28454.pdf Revision and reissuance of rule Part 29 implements for DOT and its modal administrations the government-wide requirements for suspension or disbarment of contractors from federally funded projects implemented by grants or cooperative agreement. The reissuance provides for the following: Reconciling technical differences in policies and procedures for procurement and nonprocurement suspension and debarment Restating the regulations in plain language Making other improvements to the common rule consistent with the purpose of the suspension and debarment system Separating rules implementing the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 into a separate regulation 11/26/2003 ___ No published cost estimate Per supplementary information, the participating agencies (including DOT) certified that the rule would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities 68 Fed. Reg. 66544 (11/26/2003) 147 DOT 49 CFR Part 32, Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free WorkPlace (Financial Assistance), 68 Fed. Reg. 66534, 66645 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-11- 26/pdf/03-28454.pdf Revision and reissuance of rule Part 32 is the DOT's version of the government-wide rule implementing the provisions of the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 applicable to federally assisted programs and activities. The revision separates the rules implementing the Drug Free Work Place Act into a separate regulation from the suspension and debarment rules. The revision restates the regulations in plain English. 11/26/2003 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 148 DOT 49 CFR Part 24, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally-Assisted Programs, 70 Fed. Reg. 611 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2005-01- 04/pdf/05-6.pdf Revision, reissuance of regulations Part 24 establishes government-wide requirements for implementation of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act. This revision clarifies present requirements, meets modern needs and improves the service to individuals and businesses affected by Federal or federally-assisted projects. At the same time the revision reduces the impacts of government regulations. 1/4/2005 ___ Supplementary information states that the rule made only nominal adjustments and that costs of increased benefits will continue to be funded through federal and federally-assisted projects. The rule applies to 13 federal agencies and total costs for state, local tribal and private entities for programs administered by all 13 agencies is less than $120.7 million Incremental costs to airports could be defrayed with AIP and PFC funds 70 Fed. Reg. 610-611 (01/04/2005) 149 DOT 49 CFR Part 23, Participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in Airport Concessions, 70 Fed. Reg. 14508 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2005-03- 22/pdf/05-5530.pdf Revision, reissuance of regulations Part 23 implements the requirement for participation by airport concessionaire disadvantaged business enterprises (ACDBEs) in airport concession programs. This revision makes the ACDBE rule parellel to the rule for DBE participation in federally funded contracts. It also addresses the following issues, among others: Goal-setting Personal net worth and business size standards Counting ACDBE participation by car rental companies 3/22/2005 ___ No published cost estimte. Supplementary information estimates that information collection requirements of the rule will total 41,000 hours annually for recipients and contractors combined. A breakdown of hours between the two groups and a dollar estimate was not provided. A one time burden of 44,000 hours for recipients was also projected for development of new airport concession disadvantaged business enterprise participation plans. 70 Fed. Reg. 14507 (03/22/2005) 150 DOT Policy Statement on Airport Rates and Charges, 73 FR 40430 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2008-07- 14/pdf/08-1430.pdf Amendment to Policy Statement The Policy Statement provides guidance on federal requirements for reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory fees and charges for aeronautical use. This amendment includes revisions and clarifications to the policy to provide more flexibility to operators of congested airports to adjust their fee structures to encourage users to shift their operations from congested to uncongested periods. The amendment also permits the use of fees at congested airports to encourage greater use of secondary airports in the local airport system. 7/14/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. An airport taking advantage of the amendment may face additional costs to develop justification for revised rates and fees, but there is no obligation to implement the amendment. N/A 1 If published source indicates "no cost" or "de minimis cost", zero value entered Annual costs per airport unless otherwise noted Page Aâ22
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 1 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 40 CFR Parts 261 and 268 - Hazardous Waste Identification Rule: Revisions to the Mixture and Derived-From Rules, 66 Fed. Reg. 27266 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_register&d ocid=01-11408-filed.pdf Amendment to regulations Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), land disposal units, such as landfills and surface impoundments, must comply with stringent requirements for liners, leak detection systems, and groundwater monitoring. The land disposal restrictions (LDR) provide a second measure of protection from threats posed by hazardous waste disposal. The LDR program ensures that hazardous waste cannot be placed on the land until the waste meets specific treatment standards to reduce the mobility or toxicity of the hazardous constituents in the waste. This amendment revises the RCRA mixture rule (i.e., mixtures of solid waste with listed hazardous waste) and the derived-from rule (i.e., solid waste generated from the treatment, storage, or disposal of a listed hazardous waste remains regulated as a hazardous waste). The revision applicable to airports is an expanded exclusion for mixtures and/or derivatives of wastes listed solely for the ignitability, corrosivity, and/or reactivity characteristics which no longer exhibit any characteristic of hazardous waste. 5/16/2001 Cost savings: $80/ton Manifest preparation: $159 Based on information collected from a USEPA database of hazardous waste generators and surveys Cost savings are provided for non-airport SIC sectors Cost includes average truck shipment to disposal site 1.3 hours needed for manifest preparation and $122 loaded wage rate Need typical waste tonnage from small airports to estimate costs. U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste. 2001. Economic Assessment of the USEPA's 2001 Final Rule Revising the RCRA "Mixture and Derived-from" Rules: Estimate of National Cost Savings for the Expanded Exemption of "Decharacterized" Hazardous Wastes from These Rules. 2 EPA 40 CFR Parts 261 and 279 - Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Recycled Used Oil Management Standards, 68 Fed. Reg. 44659 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/pdf/0 3-19275.pdf Revision to regulations Used oil is excluded from the hazardous waste regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) provided it is recycled properly and not intentionally mixed with hazardous wastes. Part 279 incorporates used oil management standards to encourage used oil recycling. This revision clarifies the used oil management standards. Those changes applicable to airports include rules for when PCB-contaminated used oil is regulated under the RCRA and that mixtures of CESQG waste and used oil are subject to the RCRA used oil management standards irrespective of how that mixture is to be recycled. 7/30/2003 $0 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Management of used oil will vary depending on the concentration of PCBs in the used oil (i.e., can be recycled or cannot be burned). Clarification may result in reduced costs to CESQGs for used oil disposal since mixtures can be managed under the used oil standards instead of the hazardous waste standards. 68 Fed. Reg. 44663 (07/30/2003) 3 EPA 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, and 271 - Hazardous Waste Management System; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Manifest System, 70 Fed. Reg. 10775 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/0 5-1966.pdf Revision to regulations Regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) include appropriate documentation of wastes from "cradle to grave" to protect human health and the environment from the dangers associated with generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. This amendment revises the following: Content and standardization of the hazardous waste manifest form and continuation sheet (Forms 8700-22 and 22a) Availability of forms Procedures for tracking certain types of waste shipments with the manifest. 3/4/2005 Cost savings for preparing initial manifest form: $4 Cost savings for preparing continuation sheet: $3 Training: $64 Costs are based on average labor wage and time reduction from manifest revision for SQGs Training is based on the average annualized costs and number of SQGs 2004 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste. 2004. Economic Analysis of the EPA's Final Rule Revisions to the RCRA Hazardous Waste Management Form. 4 EPA 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 264, 265, 268, 270, and 273 - Hazardous Waste Management System; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Program; Mercury Containing Equipment, 70 Fed. Reg. 45507 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/0 5-15437.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 273 was promulgated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) to reduce the hazardous waste management requirements for certain commonly generated hazardous wastes, defined as universal wastes, to encourage recycling and to prevent disposal with municipal solid waste. Handlers of universal wastes are subject to less stringent standards for storing, transporting, and collecting these wastes. This amendment adds mercury-containing equipment to the federal list of universal wastes. 8/5/2005 Cost savings:$106 Costs were provided from a BRS analysis, which included information for two- and four- digit SIC codes, assumed annual MCE generation rate, status as an LQG or SQG in the baseline, and status as an LQHUW or SQHUW in the post rule scenario. Costs for generators were developed based in number of shipments, shipment size, and MCE generation rate. U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste. 2005. Economic Analysis of Including Mercury Containing Equipment in the Universal Waste System: Final Rule. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS ADOPTED DURING STUDY PERIOD AND PUBLISHED COSTS TABLE A-2 Page Aâ23
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 5 EPA 40 CFR Part 261 - Expansion of RCRA Comparable Fuel Exclusion, 73 Fed. Reg. 77953 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ E8-29956.pdf Amendment to regulations A portion of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) applies to comparable fuels, which are hazardous secondary materials which have fuel value and whose hazardous constituent levels are comparable to those found in fuel oil that could be burned in their place. These materials are not solid wastes, and hence not hazardous wastes. This amendment excludes emission-comparable fuel (ECF) that, when generated, is handled in such a way that it is not discarded in any phase of management, but used as a commodity (i.e., burning for heat). The rule specifies conditions on burning to assure emissions from industrial boilers are comparable to those burning fuel oil. The exclusion also includes conditions for tanks and containers storing ECF to assure that discard does not occur. 12/19/2008 Cost savings:$20,300 Cost savings reflect estimate of total annual cost savings for affected entities. This rule was withdrawn on June 6, 2010, meaning the cost savings are no longer being realized. 73 Fed. Reg. 77995 (12/19/2008) Unison calculations) 6 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) AC - 150/5320-15A Management Of Airport Industrial Waste http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/med ia/advisory_circular/150-5320- 15A/150_5320_15a.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC The AC includes basic information on the characteristics, management, and regulations of industrial wastes generated at airports. The AC also provides guidance for the development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that applies best management practices to eliminate, prevent, or reduce pollutants in storm water runoff associated with particular airport industrial activities. This reissuance include the following: Incorporating by reference ACRP document #02-02, Planning Guidelines and Best Management Practices for Aircraft and Airfield Deicing Storm water Management Systems Identifying waste minimization and recycling deicing fluids Adding supplementary Pollution Prevention techniques at airports Distinguishing between hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste 9/8/2008 ___ No published cost estimate. Reference to ACRP #02-02 includes consideration of managing airport and aircraft deicing storm water. Costs vary depending on management technology chosen. Waste minimization and recycling and pollution prevention should decrease compliance costs. N/A 7 Department of Transportation (DOT) 49 CFR Parts 172, 174, 175, 176, and 177 - Hazardous Materials: Retention of Shipping Papers, 67 Fed. Reg. 46123 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&d ocid=02-17566-filed.pdf Amendment to regulations The Hazardous Materials Regulations establish requirements for the safe transport of hazardous materials in commerce (e.g., by air, highway, rail, or water). This amendment requires shippers of hazardous materials to retain a copy of each hazardous material shipping paper, or an electronic image for a period of 375 days after the date the hazardous material is accepted by a carrier. 7/12/2002 $0 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Rule is not expected to result in significant changes to existing recordkeeping practices. 67 Fed. Reg. 46126 (07/12/2002) 8 DOT 49 CFR Parts 171, 172, 173, 177, and 178 - Hazardous Materials: Revision to Standards for Infectious Substances, 67 Fed. Reg. 53118 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&d ocid=02-20118-filed.pdf Amendment to regulations The Hazardous Materials Regulations establish requirements for the safe transport of hazardous materials in commerce (e.g., by air, highway, rail, or water). This amendment revises transportation requirements for infectious substances. Most of the regulatory changes do not apply to airports, but those that do include bulk packaging for regulated medical waste. 8/14/2002 Initial cost: $33,332 Annual cost: $28,351 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Costs represent total costs for all affected entities. Costs are not expected to result in significant compliance costs for airports. 67 Fed. Reg. 53131 (08/14/2002) 9 DOT 49 CFR 171 - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations to a "Person Who Offers" a Hazardous Material for Transportation in Commerce, 70 Fed. Reg. 43638 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/0 5-14912.pdf Amendment to regulations The Hazardous Materials Regulations establishes requirements for the safe transport of hazardous materials in commerce (e.g., by air, highway, rail, or water). This amendment adds a definition for a "person who offers or offeror,'' to clarify applicability. 7/28/2005 $0 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. This clarification should not result in additional compliance costs. 70 Fed. Reg. 43642 (07/28/2005) Page Aâ24
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source Turbidity provision: installation of treatment measures: $11,000,000-$13,000,000 Turbidity monitoring: $4,500,000-$4,700,000/year Treatment measures: $16,000,000-$19,000,000 Exceedance reporting: $600,000/year A final economic impact analysis was prepared, but could not be located. Costs presented are national costs annualized over 20 years $27.1 million annual cost for rule. 41% of total cost is for capital costs and 59% of the total cost is for O&M 3 and 7% discount rate 1999 dollars 67 Fed. Reg. 1822-1823 (01/14/2002) Disinfection benchmarking start-up: $200,000-$300,000/year Benchmarking and profiling: $400,000-$500,000/year Assume small airport drinking water systems typically obtain water from ground water sources and service less than 1,000 people. Need to identify typically treatment measures, monitoring, reporting practices, etc. Costs presented are national costs annualized over 20 years 1999 dollars 67 Fed. Reg. 1822-1823 (01/14/2002) Installation of covered finish water: $800,000 Costs presented are national costs annualized over 20 years Includes 1 year O&M costs 1999 dollars 67 Fed. Reg. 1822-1823 (01/14/2002) Non-treatment: read and understand the rule: $1,120,000-$1,040,000 Bi-weekly E. Coli monitoring for 1 year: $20,881-$284,722 (NTNCWS) $26,659-$1,301,202 (TNCWS) Additional monitoring costs are associated with Cryptosporidium if E. Coli levels are exceeded. Profiling and benchmarking costs are not provided for systems proposing to change its disinfection process. Costs presented are national costs Costs are based on wage rates, laboratory fees, and estimated hours to conduct task Costs are annualized over 25 years Costs are presented as ranges for systems serving 0-10,000 people 2003 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2005. Economic Analysis for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. Treatment: $39,710,000-$53,770,000 (filtered systems) $4,200,000-$5,690,000 (unfiltered systems) Uncovered finish water reservoirs: $10,000 Operational costs for treatment: $2,420,000-$2,940,000 (filtered systems) $230,000-$280,000 (unfiltered systems) Costs are not presented for systems proposing to change their disinfection process. All systems with uncovered finished reservoirs must cover their reservoir or treat the effluent. Costs are mean values for systems serving less than 10,000 people O&M costs are annualized over 25 years Costs are discounted at 3 and 7% U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2005. Economic Analysis for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. 1/5/2006 EPA EPA Promulgation of regulations 40 CFR Parts 9, 141, and 142 - National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, 67 Fed. Reg. 1811 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&d ocid=02-409-filed.pdf The regulations promulgate the Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule under the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations to improve control of microbial pathogens (i.e., Cryptosporidium) in drinking water and address risk trade-offs with disinfection byproducts. The rule requires public water systems that use surface water or ground water under the direct influence of surface water and serve fewer than 10,000 persons to meet strengthened filtration requirements as well as to calculate levels of microbial inactivation to ensure that microbial protection is not jeopardized if systems make changes to comply with disinfection requirements of the Stage 1 Disinfection and Disinfection Byproducts Rule. 1/14/2002 The regulations promulgate the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule under the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for public water systems (including small water systems) to protect public health from illness due to Cryptosporidium and other microbial pathogens in drinking water and to address risk-risk trade-offs with the control of disinfection byproducts. Key provisions include the following: Source water monitoring Risk-targeted treatment Inactivation of Cryptosporidium by unfiltered systems Criteria for the use of Cryptosporidium treatment and control processes Covering or treating uncovered finished water storage facilities. 40 CFR Parts 9, 141, and 142 - National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, 71 Fed. Reg. 653 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/0 6-4.pdf 10 11 Promulgation of regulations Page Aâ25
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 12 EPA 40 CFR Parts 9, 141, and 142 - National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule, 71 Fed. Reg. 387 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/0 6-3.pdf New regulations The regulations promulgate the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule under the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for increased protection against disinfection byproducts. The rule applies to public water systems that are community water systems or non-transient non-community water systems that add a primary or residual disinfectant other than ultraviolet light or deliver water that has been treated with a primary or residual disinfectant other than ultraviolet light. The rule incorporates the following: Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for chloroform, monochloroacetic acid and trichloroacetic acid MCLs and monitoring, reporting, and public notification requirements for total trihalomethanes and halo acetic acids Revisions to the reduced monitoring requirements for bromate Best available technologies for final MCLs Analytical methods for determination of disinfectants and byproducts in drinking water. 1/4/2006 Non-treatment: read and understand the rule: $6,591-$63,891 Prepare Monitoring Plan: $1,216-$5,245 Annual cost for routine monitoring and operational evaluations: $25,473/year Treatment costs for NTNCWS are not presented in the text. The report identifies these costs can be calculated using Appendix I and estimated plant flow rates. Costs are presented as ranges for NTNCWS that serve 0-10,000 people Costs presented are based on estimated number of plants making changes, labor hours, laboratory fees, and weighted labor rates 2003 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2005. Economic Analysis for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. 13 EPA 40 CFR Parts 141 and 143 - National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Minor Correction to Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule and Changes in References to Analytical Methods, 74 Fed. Reg. 30953 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/ E9-14598.pdf Amendment to regulations Parts 141 and 142 established the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for public water systems to protect public health through regulation of drinking water supplies and sources. This amendment corrects the final Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule by including ground water systems serving 500 to 9,999 people in the rule. 6/29/2009 $0 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Rule correction requires systems serving 500- 9,999 people to monitor for both total trihalomethanes (TTHM) and halo acetic acids (HAA5) concentrations at two locations. Due to the error, they were only required to monitor for either TTHM or HAA5 at two locations. This changes the number of samples from 2 to 4 samples. This error is already accounted for in the costs presented for the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (1/4/2006). 74 Fed. Reg. 30995 (06/29/2009) Page Aâ26
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source Read and understand the rule: $107-$153 (NTNCWS and TNCWS) Prepare Corrective Action Plan: $257-$1,769 (NTNCWS and TNCWS) State notification and disinfection reports: $54-$76 Costs based on labor rates, laboratory fees, different technologies to achieve MCL Costs are presented based on size of system served Costs presented are based on labor rates and estimated number of hours to complete task Cost ranges presented are for systems serving 0-10,000 people 2003 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2006. Economic Impact Analysis for the Final Ground Water Rule. $87-$188 (NTNCWS with treatment) $ 59-$147 (TNCWS with treatment) $70-$142 (NTNCWS without treatment) $46-$107 (TNCWS without treatment) Costs on performing incremental surveys is also provided Costs presented are based on labor rates and estimated number of hours to complete task Cost ranges presented are for systems serving 0-10,000 people 2003 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2006. Economic Impact Analysis for the Final Ground Water Rule. Source water monitoring: $54-$76 (NTNCWS and TNCWS) Compliance monitoring for systems serving >3,300: $4,042-$4,645 Compliance monitoring for systems serving >3,300: $3,094-$3,100 Operational cost for compliance monitoring for systems serving >3,300: $2,470-$2,527 Costs presented are based on estimated number of samples, labor rates and estimated number of hours to complete task Cost ranges presented are for systems serving 0-10,000 people 2003 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2006. Economic Impact Analysis for the Final Ground Water Rule. Rehabilitate existing well: $11,986 Drill a new well: $30,172 Purchase water: $173,180-$242,618 Operational cost for purchase water: $0.63-$2.09/kgal. Costs presented are based on number of sources requiring corrective action Cost ranges presented are for systems serving 0-10,000 people 2003 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2006. Economic Impact Analysis for the Final Ground Water Rule. Chlorine gas feed: $29,868 Chlorine gas feed and storage: $31,216-$46,039 Hypochlorite feed: $8,970-$24,402 Hypochlorite feed and storage: $10,318-$60,593 Chloride dioxide: $35,011-$42,363 Chloride dioxide and storage: $46,196-$89,439 Anodic: $47,219-$151,129 Anodic and storage: $48,568-$187,320 Ozone: $347,027-$622,023 Nano: $62,691-$573,460 System upgrade: $1,349-$36,191 Operational costs: Chlorine gas feed, Chlorine gas feed and storage: $6,192-$6,857 Hypochlorite feed, Hypochlorite feed and storage: $1,585- $7,326 Chloride dioxide: $15,261-$117,901 Chloride dioxide and storage: $16,251-$18,733 Anodic: $2,911-$12,855 Ozone: $55,668-$60,789 Nano: $7,250-$63,670 System upgrade: $72-$470 Costs presented are based on number of sources requiring corrective action Cost ranges presented are for systems serving 0-10,000 people 2003 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2006. Economic Impact Analysis for the Final Ground Water Rule. 14 EPA New regulations 11/8/2006 40 CFR Parts 9, 141, and 142 - National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Ground Water Rule, 71 Fed. Reg. 65573 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/0 6-8763.pdf The regulations promulgate the Ground Water Rule under the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations to provide for increased protection against microbial pathogens in public water systems that use ground water sources susceptible to fecal contamination. The rule requires these systems to take corrective action to reduce cases of illnesses and deaths due to exposure to microbial pathogens. Page Aâ27
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source State notifications for treatment changes or new sources: $506,000-$765,000 Operational costs: reporting: $61,000 Public notifications/per system: $450-$2,400 Costs presented are totals for all systems nationally unless specified. Costs presented are for NTNCWS and are based on estimated number of systems 2006 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2007. Economic and Supporting Analyses: Short-Term Regulatory Changes to the Lead and Copper Rule. Sampling: $104,000 Monitoring: $2,635,000 Costs presented are totals for all systems nationally unless specified. Costs presented are for NTNCWS and are based on estimated number of systems 2006 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2007. Economic and Supporting Analyses: Short-Term Regulatory Changes to the Lead and Copper Rule. EPA15 10/10/2007 Parts 141 and 142 established the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for public water systems to protect public health through regulation of drinking water supplies and sources. This amendment applies to community water systems or non-transient non- community water systems. The rule finalizes the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for lead and copper in the following areas: monitoring, treatment processes, public education, customer awareness, and lead service line replacement to reduce exposure to lead in drinking water. 40 CFR Parts 141 and 142 - National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Short-Term Regulatory Revisions and Clarifications, 72 Fed. Reg. 57781 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/ E7-19432.pdf Amendment to regulations Page Aâ28
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source Read/understand the rule: $130 Costs for small airports should be categorized based on typical airport operations, i.e., airport operates as FBO, airport has own FBO, etc. Cost based on other information collection requests of similar magnitude 3.5 total hours of review time 2001 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 2002. Economic Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulation (40 CFR Part 112). Regulatory cross reference: $16 Facility diagram: $34 Cost savings for 5-year reviews compared to 3-year reviews: $23-$57/year Costs presented are for small storage facilities Small facilities include those with a total aboveground storage capacity >1,320 gallons of oil but less than or equal to 42,000 gallons. Facilities are equipped with 2 containers. Costs presented weighted based on estimated hourly burden per task and hourly rates Recordkeeping costs for small facilities are negligible 2001 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 2002. Economic Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulation (40 CFR Part 112). Maintenance, drainage system upkeep, and training: $191/year (existing facilities) $3,136/year (new facilities) Costs were provided from a 1997 screening analysis for impacts on small entities 2001 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 2002. Economic Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulation (40 CFR Part 112). New facilities : $4,230-$8,740 (in-house labor) $6,520-$13,000 (professional labor) Existing facilities: $3,020-$6,050 (in-house labor) $4,000-$8,800 (professional labor) 5-year reviews: $981-$1,790 (in-house labor) $2,410-$4,210 (professional labor) Recordkeeping and discharge reporting: $536 (new facilities) $263-$290 (existing facilities) Costs presented are for category 1 and II storage facilities Category I: total aboveground storage capacity 1,320-10,000 gallons Category II: total aboveground storage capacity 10,001-42,000 gallons. Costs presented are weighted based on the estimated hourly burden per task and hourly rates 2007 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2008. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112). Secondary containment: $25,700-$42,700 Concrete containment: $3,300-$19,800 (Cat I) $23,000-$38,300 (Cat II) Anti-corrosive measures: $6,150-$7,470 Installation of drainage measures: $5,240-$9,400 Security: $7,100-$7,710 Unspecified other capital costs: $1,240-$12,000 Install liquid level sensing devices: $12,000 Install diversion systems: $1,240 Vehicle warnings: $2,600 Integrity testing: $500-$955 Inspections: $3,060-$6,780/year $643 (Cat I) Liquid level sensing testing: $1,290-$2,570 (Cat II) Training: $1,930-$3,650/year More detailed information on cost range is provided in text. Costs are based on estimates from EPA, PEs, consulting firms, and interviews 2007 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2008. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112). 7/22/2002 Part 112 is the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule, which includes requirements for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response to prevent oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. The rule requires specific facilities to prepare, amend, and implement an SPCC Plan. This amendment accomplishes the following: Outlines requirements for various classes of oil Revises applicability of the regulation Amends requirements for completing SPCC Plans The amendment also contains provisions designed to decrease regulatory impact on facility owners or operators. 40 CFR Part 112 - Oil Pollution Prevention and Response; Non- Transportation-Related Onshore and Offshore Facilities, 67 Fed. Reg. 47041 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&d ocid=page+47041-47090.pdf http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&d ocid=page+47091-47140.pdf http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&d ocid=page+47141-47152.pdf EPA Amendment to regulations16 Page Aâ29
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source Modify existing plan: $991 New plan: $3,360 5-year review with no amendments: $188 5-year review with amendments: $1,190 Oil discharge reporting: $114 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) Recordkeeping: $108 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) Costs for 2002 SPCC amendments also provided in the 2006 economic analysis. Costs presented are for category 1 and II facilities Category I: total aboveground storage capacity is 1,320-10,000 gallons Category II: total aboveground storage capacity is 10,001-42,000 gallons. Costs are weighted based estimated hourly burden per task and hourly rates 2005 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2006. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112). Modify existing plan for qualified facilities: $22 New plan: $1,520 5-year review: $42 Oil discharge reporting: $1 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) Recordkeeping: $90-$130 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) No PE certification 2005 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2006. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112). Prepare oil spill contingency plan for qualified facility: $815 Upgrade communication equipment: $300 Provide response equipment $2,120 Cost savings for not requiring secondary containment for Equipment: $11,000 Training: $240 Costs are based on information obtained from the 2005 Information Collection Request 2005 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2006. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112). Construction of new containment systems: $14,800-$63,800 Installation of valves on existing diked areas: $56 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) Cost savings for not requiring sized secondary containment for mobile refuelers: $13,000 Cost savings for motive power exemption: $28 (existing) $563 (new) Integrity testing: $170 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) Spill prevention briefings: $154 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) Estimates provided by the EPA, GE interviews, and comments received during draft rule Sized secondary containment for mobile refuelers cost $6,500 Airports have an average of 2 mobile refuelers 2005 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2006. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112). Unspecified other capital costs: $206 (existing) $3,590 (new) Integrity testing: $119 (not a rule change, but cost estimates provided) Does not specify what "other capital costs" include 2005 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2006. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112). 12/26/2006 40 CFR Part 112 - Oil Pollution Prevention; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan Requirements-- Amendments, 71 Fed. Reg. 77266 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/ E6-21509.pdf Part 112 is the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule, which includes requirements for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response to prevent oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. The rule requires specific facilities to prepare, amend, and implement an SPCC Plan. This amendment includes: Optional self-certification of SPCC plans by owners and operators of facilities that store 10,000 gallons of oil or less and meet other qualifying criteria Alternatives to the general secondary containment requirements without requiring a determination of impracticability for facilities that have particular types of oil-filled equipment Exemption of particular vehicle fuel tanks and other on-board bulk oil storage containers used for motive power Exemption of mobile refuelers from the sized secondary containment requirements for bulk storage containers. EPA Amendment to regulation17 Page Aâ30
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source Facility diagram updates: $144-$288 Regulatory revisions to the requirements for hot mix asphalt, farms, and residential heating oil are not expected to apply to small airport operations. Information on loading/unloading racks are only provided for farms and production facilities. Based on: category 1 and II facilities, and definition of "facility" Category I: total aboveground storage capacity 1,320-10,000 gallons Category II: total aboveground storage capacity 10,001-42,000 gallons. 2007 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2008. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112), Volumes I and II. Amend/develop SPCC plan for Tier I qualified facilities: $154 Costs for 2002 SPCC amendments also provided in the 2006 economic analysis. Costs presented are based on estimates provided by PEs, industry, and consulting firms Costs are for storage facilities Costs provided are to assess potential for a discharge, overfill systems, integrity testing program, and completing template 2007 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2008. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112), Volumes I and II. Cost savings for demonstrating environmental equivalence for security: $1,230-$1,840 Cost savings for demonstrating environmental equivalence for integrity testing: $1,230 Costs presented are based on estimates provided by PEs, industry, and consulting firms 2007 dollars U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2008. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112), Volumes I and II. 19 EPA 40 CFR Part 112 - Oil Pollution Prevention; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule; Revisions to the Regulatory Definition of "Navigable Waters", 73 Fed. Reg. 71941 http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedr eg/a081211c.html Amendment to regulations Part 112 is the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule, which includes requirements for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response to prevent oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. The rule requires specific facilities to prepare, amend, and implement an SPCC Plan. This amendment updates the term ``navigable waters'' to restore the regulatory definition as promulgated by EPA in 1973. The 2002 amendments broadened the definition of a navigable water to include waters in the contiguous zone and those covered under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Deepwater Port Act, and Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act. This rule repeals the broadened definition to only include all navigable waters of the United States, as defined in judicial decisions prior to passage of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) and tributaries, interstate waters, intrastate lakes, rivers, and streams which are utilized by interstate travelers for recreational or other purposes, and intrastate lakes, rivers, and streams from which fish or shellfish are taken and sold in interstate commerce. 12/11/2008 $0 According to the supplementary information, this is a correction to the rule. An economic analysis was not completed. Restoring the definition of "navigable waters" to the 1973 definition should result in decreased compliance costs. Costs based on the curtailed definition are not quantifiable. 73 Fed. Reg. 71943 (11/26/2003) Part 112 is the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule, which includes requirements for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response to prevent oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. The rule requires specific facilities to prepare, amend, and implement an SPCC Plan. This amendment includes: An exemption for hot-mix asphalt, pesticide application equipment and related mix containers and non-transportation-related tank trucks from the sized secondary containment requirements Amends the definition of ``facility'' and "loading/unloading rack" Amends the requirements for facility diagrams, loading/unloading racks, qualified facilities, general secondary containment, security, and integrity testing. Amendment to regulations 40 CFR Part 112 - Oil Pollution Prevention; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule Requirements-- Amendments, 73 Fed. Reg. 74235 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ E8-28159.pdf EPA18 12/5/2008 Page Aâ31
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 20 EPA 40 CFR Part 112 - Oil Pollution Prevention; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule-- Amendments, 74 Fed. Reg. 58783 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/ E9-27156.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 112 is the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule, which includes requirements for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response to prevent oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. The rule requires specific facilities to prepare, amend, and implement an SPCC Plan. This amendment allows owners or operators of Tier I qualified facilities to complete a self-certified SPCC Plan template in lieu of a full SPCC Plan. 11/13/2009 $0 An economic analysis was conducted as part of the 2008 rule change. This rule change was finalized with no additional economic analyses. U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management. 2009. Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis for the 2008 and 2009 Final Amendments to the Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR 112), Volumes I and II. 21 EPA 40 CFR Part 312 - Clarification to Interim Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry Under CERCLA, 68 Fed. Reg. 24888 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/pdf/0 3-11473.pdf Revision to regulations Part 312 establishes procedures to protect potential property purchasers from buying property that may have existing environmental contamination under the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The rule includes criteria for innocent landowner defense through conduct of âall appropriate inquiriesâ into the previous ownership and uses of the property. This revision provides clarification of the requirements for conducting ``All Appropriate Inquiry,'' for property purchased on or after 5/31/1997, to permit the use of ASTM Standard E1527-00, entitled ``Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process'' to qualify as a bona fide prospective purchaser and establish an innocent landowner defense. Also, recipients of Brownfields site assessment grants will be in compliance with the "All Appropriate Inquiry" requirements if they comply with either the ASTM Standard E1527-97 or E1527-00. 5/9/2003 $0 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Clarification to the rule is not anticipated to result in significant changes to existing practices, and therefore will not likely result in significant compliance costs. 68 Fed. Reg. 24890 (05/09/2003) 22 EPA 40 CFR Part 312 - Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, 70 Fed. Reg. 66069 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/0 5-21455.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 312 establishes procedures to protect potential property purchasers from buying property that may have existing environmental contamination under the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The rule includes criteria for innocent landowner defense through conduct of âAll Appropriate Inquiriesâ into the previous ownership and uses of the property. This amendment establishes regulatory requirements and standards for conducting all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of a property. 11/1/2005 Prepare Phase I: $2,185-$2,190/per Phase I (increase of $52-$58/per Phase I) In addition to the regulation, FAA Order 1050.19B (2007) presents the FAA policy for Environmental Due Diligence Audits in the Conduct of Real Property Transactions. The Order specifies an EDDA is always required for the purchase or sale of FAA property, which affects airport costs. An EDDA waiver must be included in property transfer documents if an EDDA is not conducted. Average cost per Phase I ESA Costs are based on property type, size, and weighted hourly burden per task 2003 dollars ICF Consulting. 2004. Economic Impact Analysis for the All Appropriate Inquiries Final Rule. Addendum to Economic Impact Analysis for the All Appropriate Inquiries Final Rule 23 EPA 40 CFR Part 312 - Amendment to Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries Under CERCLA, 73 Fed. Reg. 78651 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ E8-30536.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 312 establishes procedures to protect potential property purchasers from buying property that may have existing environmental contamination under CERCLA. The rule includes criteria for innocent landowner defense through conduct of âall appropriate inquiriesâ into the previous ownership and uses of the property. This amendment modifies the "All Appropriate Inquiries" Rule to reference ASTM Standard E2247-08 ``Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property'' and allow for its use to satisfy the statutory requirements for conducting all appropriate inquiries under CERCLA. 12/23/2008 $0 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. No additional cost. This provides the option to use ASTM E2247-8 for forestland or rural property, but does not require it. 73 Fed. Reg. 78654 (12/23/2008) Page Aâ32
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 24 FAA Order 1050.1E - Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidan ce_Library/rgOrders.nsf/786843013bf2d0 49852569810075c599/9552db552fd4495 b862570660068adb1/$FILE/Order1050- 1E.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Order The Order provides the FAA policy and procedures to ensure agency compliance with the requirements set forth in the Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508; Department of Transportation Order DOT 5610.1C, Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts; and other related statutes and directives. This reissuance updates the policies and procedures for compliance with NEPA and implementing regulations issued by the Council on Environmental Quality. The update includes the following: New and modified categorical exclusions and guidance regarding applicability Addition of Tribes to the list of government agencies consulted and guidance on required consultations Revisions to criteria for extraordinary circumstances and procedures for approval. An appendix for Analyses of Environmental Impact Categories, which contains an overview of procedures for implementing other applicable environmental laws, regulations, and executive orders in the course of NEPA compliance, adds a significant threshold paragraph where thresholds have been established, and provides guidance on identifying impacts. Additional appendixes for contract coordination and environmental stewardship and streamlining. 6/8/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. An economic analysis was not conducted as part of this Order update. Previous Order was 1050.1D, Policies and Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts, dated December 5, 1986. Clarification on policies and procedures will likely reduce compliance costs in some areas (e.g., expanded categorical exclusions) and increase costs in others (agency coordination, impact analyses). N/A 25 FAA Order 1050.1E - Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, Change 1 http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidan ce_Library/rgOrders.nsf/0/2bb5c3876ba3 1261862571810047a403/$FILE/Order10 50.1ECHG1.pdf Order Change The Order provides the FAA policy and procedures to ensure agency compliance with the requirements set forth in the Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508; Department of Transportation Order DOT 5610.1C, Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts; and other related statutes and directives. This change incorporates revisions resulting from public comments on the 2004 publication and from internal review. 17 separate revisions are included in the change 3/20/2006 ___ No published cost estimate The revision includes changes for clarification; consistency; addition of information; corrections; and editorial changes. Clarification on information updated in the order could reduce compliance costs in some areas and increase costs in others (e.g., T&E, DOT). N/A 26 FAA Order 5050.4B - National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Projects, http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/pu blications/orders/environmental_5050_4/ media/5050-4B_complete.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of Order The Order provides information to FAA Office of Airports personnel and others interested in fulfilling National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements for airport actions under FAAâs authority. This Order supplements 1050.1E and is part of FAA's effort to ensure its personnel have clear instructions to address potential environmental effects resulting from major airport actions. This reissuance replaces Order 5050.4A, based on the changes in Federal laws and regulations, FAA policies and procedures (i.e., Order 1050.1E), and evolving environmental processing and evaluation for airports occurring since 1985. 4/28/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. An economic analysis was not conducted as part of this Order update. Previous Order was 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, dated October 8, 1985. Clarification on policies and procedures will likely reduce compliance costs in some areas (e.g., expanded categorical exclusions) and increase costs in others (agency coordination, impact analyses). N/A Page Aâ33
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 27 FAA 14 CFR Part 150 - Airport Noise and Compatibility Planning, 69 Fed. Reg 57621 http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/pu blications/federal_register_notices/media /environmental_69fr57622.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 150 prescribes requirements for airport operators who choose to develop airport planning compatibility programs and establishes a system of measuring airport noise and determining the exposure of individuals to airport noise under the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. This amendment implements new requirements for airport noise compatibility planning found in Vision 100 Pub. L. 108-176 (December 12, 2003), including noise exposure map criteria and public coordination. 9/24/2004 $0 According to the supplementary information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Costs from the rule add minor additional costs to airports that submit airport noise compatibility plans (i.e., new requirement for enlarged minimal map scales on submitted noise expose maps). 69 Fed. Reg. 57624 28 EPA 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93 - PM-2.5 De Minimis Emission Levels for General Conformity Applicability, 71 Fed. Reg. 40420 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/ E6-11241.pdf Amendment to regulations The regulations comprise the General Conformity Rule under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The General Conformity Rule dictates that all reasonably foreseeable direct and indirect air emissions caused or contributed by federal actions in National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) non- attainment and maintenance areas, of which the responsible federal agency can feasibly control, conform to the applicable State Implementation Plan. This amendment adds de minimis emissions levels for PM2.5 NAAQS and its precursors to the rule. 7/17/2006 $0 According to the supplemental information, this rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Identification of de minimis levels clarify applicability for general conformity, which may reduce compliance costs for some projects (e.g., projects that do not exceed de minimis levels) and increase costs for others (e.g., projects expected to exceed de minimum levels). 71 Fed. Reg. 40424 (07/17/2006) 29 EPA 10 CFR Parts 490 - Alternative Fuel Transport Program; Private and Local Government Fleet Determination, 73 Fed. Reg. 13729 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ E8-5143.pdf Revision to regulations Part 490 implements the Department of Energy's (DOE) alternative fuel transportation program through rulemakings for state government fleets and alternative fuel providers. This revision provides a determination that DOE cannot issue a requirement for certain private and local government fleets to acquire alternative fueled vehicles. 3/14/2008 ___ According to the supplementary information, this rule change was considered significant under Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. However, economic analysis information could not be located. Costs are not provided in the FR but identifies the rule will not result in compliance costs for small entities. The rule does not include requirements for private and local government fleets. 73 Fed. Reg. 13739 30 EPA 40 CFR Part 82 - Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Alternatives for the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy Program, 73 Fed. Reg. 33304 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ E8-13086.pdf Amendment to regulations Title VI of the Clean Air Act (CAA) allows EPA to regulate air pollutants that can have a damaging effect on the ozone layer, including many compounds commonly used as refrigerants or propellants. Title VI also allows EPA to set up monitoring and reporting requirements for sources emitting, producing, exporting, or otherwise transferring these compounds. Part 82 implements this authority. This amendment expands the list of acceptable substitutes for ozone- depleting substances, R-152a, for the motor vehicle air conditioning end- use, under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. 6/12/2008 ___ According to the supplementary information, this rule change was considered significant under Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. However, economic analysis information could not be located. Costs are not provided in the FR. Expanding the list of allowable substances to R- 152a should result in decreased compliance costs for small airports since they would have additional options for servicing MVAC systems. In general, availability of additional acceptable refrigerants should lower costs, but not significantly. 73 Fed. Reg. 33308 (6/12/2008) Page Aâ34
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 31 EPA 40 CFR Part 63 - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, 73 Fed. Reg. 35939 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ E8-14377.pdf Amendment to regulations Part 63 under the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) includes a series of emissions standards set by EPA describing the maximum levels of pollutants for specific source categories. Operators of hazardous air pollutant emission sources must apply control technologies to ensure that emission levels do not exceed the NESHAP. This amendment revises the pressure and vacuum vent valve cracking pressure and leak rate requirements for vapor balance systems used to control emissions from gasoline storage tanks at gasoline dispensing facilities with a monthly throughput of 100,000 gallons of gasoline or more. Newly constructed or reconstructed gasoline dispensing facilities must comply with the amendments by the effective date, or upon start-up, whichever is later. 6/25/2008 $0 According to the supplemental information, this rule change is not a significant regulatory action, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. Costs would include installing vapor recovery systems on tanks. 73 Fed. 35942-35943 (6/25/2008) 32 EPA 40 CFR Part 122 - Application of Pesticides to Waters of the United States in Compliance With FIFRA, 71 Fed. Reg. 68483 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/ E6-20002.pdf Revision to regulations Part 122 establishes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), which regulates direct discharges of pollutants into waters of the U.S. through effluent limitations. This revision clarifies that application of a pesticide in compliance with Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1947 (FIFRA) does not require a NPDES permit when application is made directly to waters of the United States to control pests that are present in the water or when the application is made to control pests that are over, including near, waters of the United States. 11/27/2006 ___ According to the supplementary information, supplementary information, this rule change is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. However, economic analysis information could not be located. Costs are not provided in the FR. Because the rule identifies two circumstances in which pesticides may be discharged without a NPDES permit under the Clean Water Act, the rule does not add new requirements to small entities 71 Fed. Reg. 68490-68491 33 EPA 40 CFR Parts 355 and 370 - EPCRA; Amendments to Emergency Planning and Notification; Emergency Release Notification and Hazardous Chemical Reporting, 73 Fed. Reg. 65452 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ E8-25329.pdf Amendment to regulations Parts 355 and 370 implements the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA), which established emergency planning and reporting requirements and community right-to-know requirements for facilities storing hazardous materials and substances to protect workers, public, environment, and emergency responders. This rule finalizes changes to the emergency planning notification, release notification, and hazardous chemical reporting regulations proposed on June 8, 1998. Major changes applicable to airports include threshold quantities and reporting of mixtures. 11/3/2008 ___ No published cost estimates. According to the supplemental information, this rule change is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. However, economic analysis information could not be located. Costs are not provided in the FR. The rule change includes only minor modifications to Parts 355 and 370. It codifies statutory changes and clarifies certain policy statements and interpretations. The rule change does not add new reporting or recordkeeping costs 73 Fed. Reg. 65460 34 EPA 40 CFR Parts 355 and 370 - EPCRA; Guidance on Reporting Options for Sections 311 and 312 and Interpretations, 75 Fed. Reg. 39852 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2 010-17031.pdf Notice of availability Parts 355 and 370 establish emergency planning and reporting requirements and community right-to-know requirements for facilities storing hazardous materials and substances to protect workers, public, environment, and emergency responders. This notice identifies availability of a guidance document to assist with implementation of sections 311 and 312 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). The document provides guidance on various reporting options that States and local agencies may choose in implementing EPCRA. 7/13/2010 ___ No published cost estimates. Costs savings for some of the interpretations may be able to be estimated (e.g., electronic submissions, forms. etc.) U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste. 2010. Guidance on Reporting Options for Sections 311 and 312 and Some Interpretations.. Page Aâ35
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 35 EPA 40 CFR Part 450 - Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Point Source Category, 74 Fed. Reg. 62995 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/ E9-28446.pdf Promulgation of regulations This rule promulgates regulations under the Clean Water Act (CWA) establishing technology-based Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the Construction and Development point sources. 12/1/2009 ___ The economic analysis identifies total compliance costs for the construction industry. Construction activities at airports would be affected by increased project costs as a result of contractors meeting compliance requirements, i.e., cost pass-through. Cost pass-through is analyzed by number of affected entities. The dollar amount for cost pass- through is not provided. Small airports would be required to implement erosion and sediment control measures and pollution prevention practices to control pollutants in discharges from construction sites. The economic analysis provides benefit costs for sediment and erosion control, but does not provide costs for controls themselves. U.S. EPA, Office of Water. 2009. Economic Analysis of Final Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Industry. 36 EPA 40 CFR 450 - Direct Final Rule Staying Numeric Limitation for the Construction and Development Point Source Category, 75 Fed. Reg. 68215 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2 010-28033.pdf Revision to regulations Part 450 regulates storm water discharges from construction sites under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Recently, the EPA published Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs) to further control construction storm water discharges to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants typically discharged from construction sites. The regulation also requires construction sites to implement a range of erosion and sediment control BMPs. This amendment stays the numeric effluent limitation of 280 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) and associated monitoring requirements for the Construction and Development Point Source Category. 11/5/2010 $0 This rule change does not result in a significant economic impact, as defined by Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, an economic analysis was not conducted. No costs are associated with this rule since it stays the implementation of the 280 NTU requirement. 75 Fed. Reg. 68216 (11/15/2010) 37 FAA AC 150/5370-10B-E - Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports (5370- 10F is current, but was issued after the Study Period) http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/med ia/advisory_circular/150-5370- 10E/150_5370_10e.pdf Cancellation and reissuance of AC This AC incorporates standards when performing earthwork activities, including temporary air and water pollution, soil erosion, and siltation controls. 4/5/2005 9/29/2007 9/30/2008 9/30/2009 ___ No published cost information. Costs are associated with installation or implementation of air, water, soil erosion and siltation controls during earthwork activities. N/A 38 Office of the Executive Marine Protected Areas (E.O. 13158), 65 Fed. Reg. 34909 http://www.mpa.gov/pdf/eo/execordermp a.pdf New Executive Order The Executive Order is intended to protect the significant natural and cultural resources within the marine environment through the following: Strengthening management, protection, and conservation of existing marine protected areas (MPAs) and establishing new or expanded MPAs Developing a scientifically based, comprehensive national system of MPAs representing diverse U.S. marine ecosystems, and the Nation's natural and cultural resources Avoiding causing harm to MPAs through federally conducted, approved, or funded activities. 5/26/2000 ___ No published cost estimate. Typically, there are not economic analyses conducted for Executive Orders. Costs to small airports would be related to coordination with state and local resource agencies responsible for managing MPAs. N/A 39 FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5200-36 - Qualifications for Wildlife Biologist Conducting Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Training Curriculums for Airport Personnel Involved in Controlling Wildlife Hazards on Airports http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/med ia/advisory_circular/150-5200- 36/150_5200_36.pdf New AC The new advisory circular describes the qualifications for wildlife biologists who conduct Wildlife Hazard Assessments for Part 139-certified airports. The circular addresses the minimum wildlife hazard management curriculum for the initial and recurrent training of airport personnel involved in implementing an FAA-approved Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. 6/28/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. Costs include initial and continuing training of wildlife biologists. N/A 1 If published source indicates "no cost" or "de minimis cost", zero value entered Costs are annual costs per entity unless otherwise noted Page Aâ36
Page A-37 TABLE A-3 Typical Small Airport Activities and the Associated Environmental Regulatory Topics and Programs A i r c r a f t D e i c i n g / A n t i - i c i n g A i r c r a f t O p e r a t i o n A i r c r a f t L a v a t o r y S e r v i c e A i r p o r t L a y o u t P l a n ( A L P ) C h a n g e s A u x i l i a r y P o w e r U n i t O p e r a t i o n B u i l d i n g O p e r a t i o n / M a i n t e n a n c e B u l k F u e l a n d O i l S t o r a g e / H a n d l i n g C a r g o H a n d l i n g C h e m i c a l S t o r a g e / H a n d l i n g D e g r e a s i n g D e m o l i t i o n / C o n s t r u c t i o n / D e v e l o p m e n t F i r e F i g h t i n g T r a i n i n g / T e s t i n g / F l u s h i n g G r o u n d S e r v i c e E q u i p m e n t O p e r a t i o n G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e / L a n d s c a p i n g I n c i n e r a t o r O p e r a t i o n M o t o r V e h i c l e O p e r a t i o n O n - a i r p o r t P o w e r G e n e r a t i o n P a i n t i n g P a v e m e n t D e i c i n g P r o p e r t y A c q u i s i t i o n R e f u e l i n g R u n w a y R u b b e r R e m o v a l S p i l l R e s p o n s e V e h i c l e / E q u i p m e n t / A i r c r a f t M a i n t e n a n c e W a s h i n g W a s t e G e n e r a t i o n / D i s p o s a l Air Quality Jurisdictional Authority General Regulations ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Air Pollutant Regulationsï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· General Conformity Regulationsï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Mobile Source Regulations ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Stationary Source Regulations ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Regulations on Ozone Depleting Substancesï¼ ï· ï· ï· Airports and Greenhouse Gases ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Airports and Ultrafine Particulate Matter ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Emergency Planning and Response Community Emergency Planning, Storage and Release Reportingï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï·
Page A-38 A i r c r a f t D e i c i n g / A n t i - i c i n g A i r c r a f t O p e r a t i o n A i r c r a f t L a v a t o r y S e r v i c e A i r p o r t L a y o u t P l a n ( A L P ) C h a n g e s A u x i l i a r y P o w e r U n i t O p e r a t i o n B u i l d i n g O p e r a t i o n / M a i n t e n a n c e B u l k F u e l a n d O i l S t o r a g e / H a n d l i n g C a r g o H a n d l i n g C h e m i c a l S t o r a g e / H a n d l i n g D e g r e a s i n g D e m o l i t i o n / C o n s t r u c t i o n / D e v e l o p m e n t F i r e F i g h t i n g T r a i n i n g / T e s t i n g / F l u s h i n g G r o u n d S e r v i c e E q u i p m e n t O p e r a t i o n G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e / L a n d s c a p i n g I n c i n e r a t o r O p e r a t i o n M o t o r V e h i c l e O p e r a t i o n O n - a i r p o r t P o w e r G e n e r a t i o n P a i n t i n g P a v e m e n t D e i c i n g P r o p e r t y A c q u i s i t i o n R e f u e l i n g R u n w a y R u b b e r R e m o v a l S p i l l R e s p o n s e V e h i c l e / E q u i p m e n t / A i r c r a f t M a i n t e n a n c e W a s h i n g W a s t e G e n e r a t i o n / D i s p o s a l Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasureï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Pesticide Application, Certification, and Disposal ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Underground Storage Tanks ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Hazardous Material Transportï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Noise Part 150 Programsï¼ ï· ï· Part 161 Access Restrictions ï· Planning and Development Historic, Archaeological, and Ethnological Resources ï· ï· Environmental Protectionï¼ ï· ï· Property Transferï¼ ï· ï· ï· Public Involvement ï· ï· Fish, Wildlife and Plants ï· ï· ï· ï· Waste Management Hazardous Waste Regulationsï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï·
Page A-39 A i r c r a f t D e i c i n g / A n t i - i c i n g A i r c r a f t O p e r a t i o n A i r c r a f t L a v a t o r y S e r v i c e A i r p o r t L a y o u t P l a n ( A L P ) C h a n g e s A u x i l i a r y P o w e r U n i t O p e r a t i o n B u i l d i n g O p e r a t i o n / M a i n t e n a n c e B u l k F u e l a n d O i l S t o r a g e / H a n d l i n g C a r g o H a n d l i n g C h e m i c a l S t o r a g e / H a n d l i n g D e g r e a s i n g D e m o l i t i o n / C o n s t r u c t i o n / D e v e l o p m e n t F i r e F i g h t i n g T r a i n i n g / T e s t i n g / F l u s h i n g G r o u n d S e r v i c e E q u i p m e n t O p e r a t i o n G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e / L a n d s c a p i n g I n c i n e r a t o r O p e r a t i o n M o t o r V e h i c l e O p e r a t i o n O n - a i r p o r t P o w e r G e n e r a t i o n P a i n t i n g P a v e m e n t D e i c i n g P r o p e r t y A c q u i s i t i o n R e f u e l i n g R u n w a y R u b b e r R e m o v a l S p i l l R e s p o n s e V e h i c l e / E q u i p m e n t / A i r c r a f t M a i n t e n a n c e W a s h i n g W a s t e G e n e r a t i o n / D i s p o s a l Universal Waste Requirementsï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Used Oil and Used Oil Filtersï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· PCB Waste ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Asbestos Containing Material Management ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Lead-based Paint ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Water Resources Drinking Waterï¼ ï· Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activitiesï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activitiesï¼ ï· ï· ï· ï· Storm Water Discharges Associated with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· ï· Surface Waters and Wetlands ï· ï· ï·
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs Notes on Published Costs Source 1 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport (AP) 00-01 Section C, Past Employment Checks Amendment to airport security plan (ASP) requirements This document required mandatory audits of past employment checks on employees 5/31/2000 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 2 FAA EA 107-00-01, Additional Security Procedures for US Airports New Emergency Amendment Security-sensitive information (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 6/8/2000 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 3 FAA EA 107-00-01A, Additional Security Procedures for US Airports New Emergency Amendment Security-sensitive information (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 6/23/2000 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 4 FAA EA 107-00-01B, Additional Security Procedures for US Airports New Emergency Amendment Security-sensitive information (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 8/21/2000 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 5 FAA AP 01-01, Airport Categorization for Security Amendment to ASP requirements The AP updates category qualifications and law enforcement officer (LEO) response times.The guidance is mandatory 2001 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 6 FAA EA 107-00-0lC, Additional Security Procedures for US Airports New Emergency Amendment Security-sensitive information (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 1/24/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 7 FAA EA 107-00-0lD, Additional Security Procedures for US Airports New Emergency Amendment 7/27/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 8 FAA EA 107-00-01E, Additional Security Procedures for US Airports New Emergency Amendment 9/27/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 9 FAA EA 107-01-01, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 9/12/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 10 FAA EA 107-01-01A, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 9/20/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 11 FAA EA 107-01-06, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 9/18/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 12 FAA EA 107-01-06A, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 9/19/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 13 FAA EA 107-01-06B, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 9/21/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 14 FAA EA 107-01-06C, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 9/27/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 15 FAA EA 107-01-07, Theat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 9/26/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 16 FAA EA 107-01-07A, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 10/8/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 17 FAA EA 107-01-07B, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 10/24/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 18 FAA EA 107-01-07C, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment 11/2/2001 ____ No pblished cost estimate. N/A 19 FAA EA 107-01-08, Threat to/from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) New Emergency Amendment Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 10/3/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 20 Transportation Security Administration (TSA) EA 107-01-07D, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New Emergency Amendment Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 3/19/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 21 FAA EA 107-01-08A, Threat to/from DCA New Emergency Amendment 10/24/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 22 TSA EA 107-01-08B, Threat to/from DCA New Emergency Amendment Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 12/28/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A AIRPORT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AND PUBLISHED COSTS TABLE A-4 Page Aâ40
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Adoption Date Published Costs Notes on Published Costs Source 23 TSA EA 107-01-08C, Threat to/from DCA New Emergency Amendment 1/28/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 24 TSA EA 107-01-08D, Threat to/from DCA New Emergency Amendment Summary of Action Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The EA is mandatory. 2/2/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 25 FAA 14 CFR Parts 107 and 108, Criminal History Records Checks, 66 Fed. Reg. 63474 http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=7sv3b7/0/2/0&W AISaction=retrieve Amendment to regulations Parts 107 established security program requirements for airport operators and aircraft operators, respectively. This amendment requires Criminal History Records Check (CHRC) all airport employees eliminating "grandfather" exceptions for certain employees in the prior rules. 12/6/2001 $2,783,353 annually This rule will constitute an additional recordkeeping requirement for certificate holders since all personnel will need to be fingerprinted. Published costs are total annual costs for all entities subject to Parts 107 and 108 66 Fed. Reg. 63480 (12/06/2001) 26 TSA SD 107-01-10, Name comparison New SD 12/18/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 27 TSA SD 107-01-10A, No Fly and Selectee Lists New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 12/18/2001 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 28 FAA and TSA 14 CFR Parts 91, 107-109, 121, 129, 135, 139, 191 49 CFR Parts 1500, 1510, 1520, 1540, 1542, 1544, 1546, 1548, 1550, Civil Aviation Security Rules, 67 Fed. Reg. 8340 http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=7HzgCZ/0/2/0& WAISaction=retrieve Cancellation and revision of regulations Issuance of new regulations The rulemaking implemented the transfer of aviation security jurisdiction from FAA to TSA. The regulatory change required a complete update of airport security plans (ASPs) to reflect the terms in the new TSA regulations. 2/22/2002 ___ No published cost estimate. TSA recognizes that this rule may add significant costs to aircraft operators and foreign air carriers. An assessment will be conducted in the future. 67 Fed. Reg. 8349 (02/22/2002) 29 TSA SD 1542-01-08E, Threat to/from DCA New SD 2/27/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 30 TSA SD 1542-01-08F, Threat to/from DCA New SD ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 31 TSA SD 1542-02-01, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 4/2/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 32 TSA SD 1542-01-07E, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 4/26/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 33 TSA SD 1542-01-07F, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 5/7/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 34 TSA SD 1542-01-07G, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 10/1/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 35 TSA SD 1542-01-07H, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 12/9/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 36 TSA SD 1542-01-07I, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 2/8/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 37 TSA SD 1542-01-07J, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 2/27/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 38 TSA SD 1542-01-07K, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 4/9/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 39 TSA SD 1542-01-07L, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 5/27/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 40 TSA SD 1542-01-07M, Threat to US Airports-multiple security requirements New SD 6/2/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 41 TSA SD 1542-01-08G, Threat to/from DCA New SD 6/6/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 42 TSA SD 1542-01-08H, Threat to/from DCA New SD 4/15/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 43 TSA SD 1542-01-08I, Threat to/from DCA New SD 3/29/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 44 TSA SD 1542-00-01F, Additional Security Procedures New SD 10/1/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 45 TSA SD 1542-00-01G, Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) verification New SD 4/15/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 46 TSA SD 1542-02-03, Background checks-Sterile Area New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 10/29/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A Page Aâ41
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs Notes on Published Costs Source 47 TSA SD 1542-02-03A, Background checks-Sterile Area New SD 11/8/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 48 TSA SD 1542-02-03B, Background checks-Sterile Area New SD 12/20/2002 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 49 TSA SD 1542-03-04, Threats to US Airports (Orange) New SD 3/18/2003 ____ No published cost estimte. N/A 50 TSA SD 1542-01-10B, Threat to US Airports-No Fly and Selectee List Procedures New SD 4/22/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 51 TSA SD 1542-01-10C, Threat to US Airports-No Fly and Selectee List Procedures New SD ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 52 TSA SD 1542-03-08, Threat to US Airports (Orange) New SD 5/20/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 53 TSA SD 1542-03-12, Threat to US Airports (Orange) New SD 12/21/2003 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 54 TSA SD 1542-04-08, Background Checks-Sterile Area/SIDA New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 7/6/2004 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 55 TSA SD 1542-04-08A, Background Checks-Sterile Area/SIDA New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 11/5/2004 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 56 TSA SD 1542-04-08B, Security Threat Assessment and Reporting Requirements Related to Individuals with Airport-issued Identification Media New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 9/20/2006 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 57 TSA SD 1542-04-08C, Security Threat Assessment and Reporting Requirements Related to Individuals with Airport-issued Identification Media New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 11/3/2006 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 58 TSA SD 1542-04-08D, Security Threat Assessment and Reporting Requirements Related to Individuals with Airport-issued Identification Media New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 1/31/2007 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 59 TSA SD 1542-04-08E, Security Threat Assessment and Reporting Requirements Related to Individuals with Airport-issued Identification Media New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 3/30/2007 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 60 TSA SD 1542-04-08F, Security Threat Assessment and Reporting Requirements Related to Individuals with Airport-issued Identification Media New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 12/10/2008 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 61 TSA SD 1542-04-08G, Security Threat Assessment and Reporting Requirements Related to Individuals with Airport-issued Identification Media New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 5/28/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 62 TSA SD 1542-04-09, Enhanced Security Measures for Secured Areas and Security Identification Areas (SIDA) New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 7/6/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 63 TSA SD 1542-04-10, Airport Tenant Access to Sterile Areas New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 7/6/2004 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 64 TSA SD 1542-01-10D, Threat to US Airports-No Fly and Selectee List Procedures New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 7/8/2004 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A Page Aâ42
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Adoption Date Published Costs Notes on Published Costs Source 65 TSA SD 1542-01-10E, Threat to US Airports-No Fly and Selectee List Procedures New SD Summary of Action Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 8/13/2008 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 66 TSA SD 1542-01-10F, Threat to US Airports-No Fly and Selectee List Procedures New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 10/28/2008 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 67 TSA SD 1542-01-10G, Threat to US Airports-No Fly and Selectee List Procedures New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 2/9/2009 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 68 TSA SD 1542-04-11, Incidents and Suspicious Activity Reporting New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 11/24/2004 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 69 TSA SD 1542-04-11A, Incidents and Suspicious Activity Reporting New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 11/26/2004 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 70 TSA SD 1542-04-11B, Incidents and Suspicious Activity Reporting New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 12/8/2004 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 71 TSA 49 CFR Parts 1520, 1540, 1542, 1544, 1546, 1548, Air Cargo Security Requirements, 71 Fed. Reg. 30478 Amendment to regulations The amendment requires airport operators, aircraft operators, foreign air carriers and indirect air carriers to implement security measures in the air cargo supply chain as directed by TSA. The amendment also revises certain regulations to apply to aircraft of more than 12,500 pounds, rather than aircraft of 12,500 pounds or more 5/26/2006 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 72 TSA SD 1542-06-01, Homeland Security Advisory System Threat Condition Orange Security Measures-US Airports New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 8/10/2006 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 73 TSA SD 1542-06-01A, Homeland Security Advisory System Threat Condition Orange Security Measures-US Airports New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 8/12/2006 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 74 TSA SD 1542-06-01B, Homeland Security Advisory System Threat Condition Orange Security Measuers-US Airports New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 8/16/2006 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 75 TSA SD 1542-06-01C, Homeland Security Advisory Ssystem Threat Condition Orange Security Measure-US Airports New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 9/25/2006 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 76 TSA SD 1542-06-01D, Homeland Security Advisory System Threat Condition Orange Security Measures-US Airports New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 11/9/2006 ____ No published cost estimate. N/A 77 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Airport Technical Design Standards Passenger Processing Facilities (ATDS) New guidance and standards The ATDS reflects the unification of Customs and Border Protection Functions in a single agency. The ATDS reflects current national policy procedures and standards for design and construction of CBP facilities at airports, preclearance facilities and general aviation airports. Specific issues addressed include the following: Facility planning and procedures Design and construction requirements Signage Security Data processing and telecommunications The ATDS is to serve as the primary reference documents for municipal airport authorities, architects and engineers and airport owners and operators. The standards are intended to establish minimum facility design requirements Aug-06 ___ No published cost estimate N/A 78 TSA Fuel farm guidance New guidance in response to JFK threat 6/18/2007 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 79 TSA SD 1542-10-01, Sale and Business use of Toner and Ink Cartridges in the Sterile Area New SD The guidance document requires airports to review and ensure adequate security controls exist for their fuel farms. Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 11/8/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A 80 TSA SD 1542-10-01A, Sale and Business use of Toner and Ink Cartridges in the Sterile Area New SD Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 12/8/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A Page Aâ43
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Adoption Date Published Costs Notes on Published Costs Source 81 TSA SD 1542-10-01B, Sale and Business use of Toner and Ink Cartridges in the Sterile Area New SD Summary of Action Sensitive-security informaiton (SSI) which cannot be publicly disclosed. The SD is mandatory. 12/9/2010 ___ No published cost estimate. N/A Page Aâ44
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP) Revision 65 Fed. Reg. 45650 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FRâ2000â07â 24/pdf/00â18605.pdf 29 CFR Part 1926, Subparts M and R, Steel Erection Standard 66 Fed. Reg. 5196 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FRâ2001â01â 18/pdf/01â979.pdf 29 CFR Part 1926 Subpart G, Safety Standards for Signs, Signals, Barricades, 67 Fed. Reg. 57722 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2002-09- 12/pdf/02-23142.pdf 29 CFR Part 1904, Occupational Injury and Illness Recording and Reporting Requirements 67 Fed. Reg. 44037 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2002-07- 01/pdf/02-16392.pdf 29 CFR Part 1904 Occupational Injury and Illness Recording and Reporting Requirements 68 Fed. Reg. 38601 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-06- 30/pdf/03-16482.pdf eTool for Airline Baggage Handling http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_d ocument?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&p_id=1041 8 OSHA Form OSHA 300, Log of Work Related Illnesses and Injuries http://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/newâ osha300form1â1â04.pdf Hazard Communication Initiative http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show _document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&p_id=1073 4 REDON Fit Testing Protocol 69 Fed. Reg. 46986 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2004-08- 04/pdf/04-17765.pdf TABLE A-5 Annual cost per small firm involved in highway and road construction Average cost for all firms not included in source document Costs would be allocated among all projects undertaken by firm Published costs may understate costs if equipment purchase or rental is required 67 Fed. Reg. 57730, 57734-57735, Table 5 (09/12/2002) ___ $98 per construction firm N/A Annual cost per firm in construction and related trades Cost would be allocated among all projects undertaken by firm 1998 dollars 66 Fed. Reg. 5254, Table 1; 56 Fed. Reg. 5256- 5257, Table 4 (01/18/2001) Unison calculations $996,064 total Maximum per small firm -- $2.00 Total cost is estimate for all firms required to maintain hearing loss records. Maximum per small firm assumes all reporting costs born by small firms. 2000 dollars 67 Fed. Reg. 44046-44047 (07/01/2002) ___ The guidance appears to be advisory in nature and does not require any changes to practices ___ No publised cost estimate N/A N/A $0 Per the supplementary information the rule provides a new option for testing. The existing testing protocol may continue to be used 69 Fed. Reg. 49661 (08/04/2004) OSHA New regulation This new regulation provides protection for iron workers that work along side steel erectors. Regulations have been developed to protect workers against the most common hazards working under loads; hoisting, landing and placing decking; column stability; double connections; landing and placing steel joints; and falls to lower levels. Amendment to regulation The regulation provides enhanced protection for roadside construction. It addresses the types of signs, signals, and barricades that must be used to protect construction employees from traffic hazards This amendment includes requirements for the following: Retro-reflective and illuminated devices at intermediate and long-term stationary temporary traffic control zones Warning devices for mobile operations at speeds above 20 mph Advance warning signs for certain closed paved shoulders Temporary traffic barriers separating opposing traffic on a two-way roadway OSHA $308 per small firm OSHA Amendment to regulation The regulation governs the recording and reporting of occupational injury and illness. This amendment eliminated a requirement for separate reporting of musculoskeletal disorders adopted in 2001. The separate reporting requirement was never implemented. OSHA Amendment to regulation The regulation governs the recording and reporting of occupational injury and illness. This amendment adopts revised standards for reporting worker hearing loss. The new standard requires recording 10-decibel shifts from the employee's initial hearing test when they also result in an overall hearing level of 25 decibels. OSHA 7/1/2002 9/12/2002 This notice provided updated copies of the form to reflect regulatory changes discussed previously in this table. Information, if available, on published costs is available in these entries. N/A New guidance The guidance document is aimed at improving the quality of hazard communication and helping employers and employees comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). The new guidance consists of compliance assistance and enforcement components. Compliance assistance includes the following: Guidance on hazard determination Model training program Guidance on preparing material safety data sheets (MSDSs). The enforcement component consists of sampling of hazard information in MSDSs. OSHA Amendment to regulation The regulation establishes fit testing protocols and standards for controlled negative pressure (CNP) REDON breathing devices. This amendment includes testing for head shaking as well as redonning of respirator during fit test procedure. OSHA Revised guidance This is a guidance tool for airline baggage handling. A new eTool will provide additional training for airline baggage handling. OSHA Notice of revision to form OSHA Form 300 provides a standard format for reporting work-related injuries and illnesses. This revision makes modifications to the structure of the form to facilitate completion and reporting of work related injuries and illness. This notice provided updated copies of the form to reflect regulatory changes discussed previously in this table. 8/4/2004 ___ ___ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1/18/2001 7/24/2000 3/16/2004 10/2/2003 9/12/2003 6/30/2003 SUMMARY OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) REQUIREMENTS AND PUBLISHED COSTS OSHA Revised guidance The guidance document Increases the number of worksites eligible for VPP status It Implements new illness reporting requirement for VPP and improved requirements for contractor worker health & safety. N/ANo published cost estimate Page Aâ44
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source 29 CFR Part 1910, Updating OSHA Standards Based On National Consensus Standards 70 Fed. Reg. 53925 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2005-09- 13/pdf/05-17688.pdf 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart R Slip Resistance of Skeletal Structural Steel, 71 Fed. Reg. 2879 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2006-01- 18/pdf/06-374.pdf 29 CFR Part 1910, 1915 and 1926, New Assigned Protection Factors for respiratory protection 71 Fed. Reg. 50122 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2006-08- 24/pdf/06-6942.pdf 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915 and 1926, Revising the Notification Requirements in the Exposure Determination Provisions of the Hexavalent Chromium Standards 75 Fed. Reg. 12681 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010- 5734.pdf 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918. Updating OSHA Standards Based on National Consensus Standards; Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 74 Fed. Reg. 46350 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9â 21360.pdf OSHA Instruction CPL 02-02-074, Inspection Procedures for the Chromium (VI) Standards http://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_ 02â02â074.pdf 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, 1925, Clarification of Employer Duty to Provide Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Train Each Employee 73 Fed. Reg. 75568 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8- 29122.pdf $0 73 Fed. Reg. 75581 (12/12/2008) Per the supplemental information the rule does not introduce new obligations but explicitly states current OSHA policy. For an airport required to provide PPE for the first time, costs could reach $200 per employee $0 Per the supplementary information, the final rule will add no additional costs to any employer. The rule simply deletes or revises outdated standards The three regulations establish, respectively, occupational safety and health standards for the following: General industry Shipyards Construction. This amendment revises the Respiratory Protection Standard to introduce more stringent standards for assigned protection factors (APFs) and maximum use concentrations (MUCs). Amendment to regulation OSHA The regulation contains various OSHA standards that are based on national consensus standards. This amendment eliminates references to five outdated standards. According to the final rule document, elimination of these references will not reduce employee protections. Amendment to regulation 70 Fed. Reg. 53928 (09/13/2005) OSHA The Compliance Directive provides guidance on enforcement of new Hexavalent Chromium standards that became effective in 2006 New Compliance Directive OSHA The four regulations establish respectively occupational safety and health standards for the following: General industry Shipyards Longshoring Marine terminals This amendment updates standards for PPE (eye, face, head and foot protection) to reflect current national consensus standards Amendment to regulation OSHA The regulation establishes requirements to protect employees from hazards of steel erection activities in construction. This amendment revokes the standard for slip resistant skeletal steel due to a lack of reliable testing methods. Amendment to regulation OSHA The three regulations establish, respectively, occupational safety and health standards for the following: General industry Shipyards Construction. This amendment requires employers to inform employee of any hexavalent chromium exposure whether above or below the exposure limit. Amendment to regulation OSHA OSHA The five regulations establish respectively occupational safety and health standards for the following: General industry Shipyards Longshoring Marine terminals Construction This guidance establishes that the obligation to provide PPE and training applies to each employee individually and that non-compliance may cause liability on a per employee basis. Amendment to regulation 8/24/2006 1/18/2006 9/13/2005 1/24/2008 12/12/2008 9/9/2009 3/17/2010 $0 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 Per the Compliance Directive, it establishes no requirements independently of requirements established by statute or regulations. CPL 02-02-074, Abstract 1 $1,526,731 Figure is total cost for all impacted firms Construction firms and other firms performing work for airports under contract would allocate costs among all their projects 75 Fed. Reg. 12684 $0 74 Fed. Reg. 46354 (09/09/2009) Per the supplementary information, the rule adds no additional costs to any employer. The rule gives employers greater flexibility in choosing PPE for their employees ($29,500,000) Per the supplementary information, the final rule imposing the standard would have cost all affected firms $29.5 million annually. The revocation of the rule means those costs will not be incurred. Figure is the total annualized costs for all affected firms. Affected firms are in the construction and related industries costs savings would be allocated among each firm's customers. 1998 dollars 71 Fed. Reg. 2884(01/06/2004) 66 Fed. Reg. 5256-5257, Table 4 (01/18/2001) 71 Fed. Reg. 50149, Table V-3B, 5051, Table V-4 (08/24/2006) Unison calculations $16 per impacted firm Figure is cost per firms for all firms that are subject to requirement for respirators. Construction firms and other firms performing work for airports under contract would allocate costs among all their projects Page Aâ45
Item No. Agency Action Type of Action Summary of Action Adoption Date Published Costs1 Notes on Published Costs Source Revisions to the Voluntary Protection Program to Provide Safe and Healthful Working Conditions 74 Fed. Reg. 927 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FRâ2009â01â 09/pdf/E9â165.pdf 29 CFR Part 1910, Revising Standards Referenced in the Acetylene Standard 74 Fed. Reg. 40442 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-08- 11/pdf/E9-18644.pdf 29 CFR Part 1926, Cranes and Derricks in Construction 75 Fed. Reg. 47906 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FRâ2010â08â 09/pdf/2010â17818.pdf Compliance Directive STD-03-00-002, Fall Protection in Residential Construction, 75 Fed. Reg. 80315 http://69.175.53.6/register/2010/dec/22/2010- 32154.pdf Recommendations for Workplace Violence Prevention Programs in Late-Night Retail Establishments, OSHA 3153-12R 2009 http://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3153.pdf N/A N/A 8/9/2010 12/22/2010 1/27/2010 1If published source indicates "no cost" or "de minimis cost", zero value entered Annual costs per affected firm unless otherwise noted ___ No published cost information N/A $0 Per the supplemental information, the rule updates the Acetylene Standard to reflect current SDO standards. OSHA considers SDO standards to reflect usual and customary practices in the industry 74 Fed. Reg. 404458/11/2009 19 20 21 Affected firms include construction related firms and crane rental firms. Firms performing work or providing equipment to airports would allocate costs among their customers 2010 dollars $577 per affected firm 75 Fed. Reg. 48079-48082, Tables B-1, B-2 (08/09/2011) Unison calculations ___ The compliance directive would have a potential impact on airport operators only in the context of residential noise mitigation projects. Any costs born by construction firms would be allocated among all the firms customers. N/A ___ OSHA Part 1910 establishes occupational safety and health standards for general industry. This amendment revises the Acetylene Standard to reflect new standards developed by standard developing organizations (SDOs) Amendment to regulation OSHA The Voluntary Protection Program encourages improvements to work-place safety and health through voluntary cooperation between industry, labor and government. This revision establishes guidance on new options for construction employers to participate in VPP through a mobile work-site program or a corporate program programs and makes the application process simpler. Revision to program OSHA New guidance Guidance from OSHA is provided to protect late-night retail workers from workplace violence. OSHA New Compliance Directive The Compliance Directive rescinds an earlier Directive that permitted residential construction firms to use alternative methods of compliance with fall protection requirements included in 29 CFR Part 1926 OSHA Amendment to regulation Part 1926 establishes occupational safety and health standards for the construction industry. This amendment updates the Cranes and Derricks Standard and related sections in the Construction Standard to reflect current industry practices and modern equipment design.. 1/9/200917 18 Page Aâ46
