Long-Distance and Rural Travel Transferable Parameters for Statewide Travel Forecasting Models (2012)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

84 Airsage Inc. (2011). Airsage’s WiSE Technology. http://www.airsage.com/site/index.cfm?id_art=46598&actMenu ItemID=21674&vsprache/EN/AIRSAGE___WiSE_TECHNOLOGY__L.cfm (as of May 5, 2011). Amtrak Media Relations (2010). Amtrak FY 2010 National Fact Sheet. http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ ContentServer?c=AM_Content_C&pagename=am%2FLayout&cid=1241267290796. Bob and Amy Cox. Long-Distance Train Fact Sheet. http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable= MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1249222525867&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheaderna me1=Content-disposition&blobheadervalue1=attachment;filename=Amtrak_Long_Distance_Trains.pdf Atkins (2011). Development of Statewide Model Draft Report. Prepared for Georgia Department of Transportation. BCC Engineering (2011). 2005 Florida Statewide Model, Model Development Documentation: Enhancement of FLSWM for SIS 2040 Needs Plan Development. Prepared for Florida Department of Transportation. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates, Inc. and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2004). Indiana Statewide Travel Demand Model Upgrade—Technical Memorandum: Model Update and Validation. Prepared for Indiana Department of Transportation. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2011). U.S. Air Carrier Traffic Statistics Through December 2010, http://www .bts.gov/data_and_statistics/ Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Commodity Flow Survey, http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/index.html Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2005). Transportation Research Circular E-C075, Statewide Travel Demand Modeling: A Peer Exchange, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2007). Scoping Study for Statewide Travel Forecasting National Model, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 8-36, Task 70. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2010a). Final Report: NCHRP Project 836-B Task 91, Validation and Sensitivity Considerations for Statewide Models. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2010b). NCFRP Report 8: Freight-Demand Modeling to Support Public-Sector Decision- Making, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2010c). Travel Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual, Second Edition. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Travel Model Improvement Program, Washington, D.C. http:// tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/clearinghouse/1397 (as of July 7, 2011). Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2010d). Validation and Sensitivity Considerations for Statewide Models, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 8-36, Task 91. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and HNTB (2006). Wisconsin Statewide Model—Passenger and Freight Models. Prepared for Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and Mark Bradley Research and Consulting (2007). Bay Area/California High- Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Study—Statewide Model Validation. Prepared for Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. et al. (2012). NCHRP Report 716—Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Corey, Canapary and Galanis Research (2005). High Speed Rail Study Survey Documentation. Prepared for Cambridge Systematics and Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Department of City and Regional Planning Center for Urban and Regional Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2011). Impacts of Land Use on Travel Behavior in Small Communities and Rural Areas Task 1 Technical Memorandum. Federal Aviation Administration. Terminal Area Forecast Summary Fiscal Years 2009–2030, http://www.faa.gov/ about/office_org/headquarters_offices/apl/aviation_forecasts/taf_reports/ References

References 85 Federal Highway Administration (underway). Traffic Analysis Framework Part IIA—Establishing Multimodal Interregional Passenger Travel Origin-Destination Data (Contract No. DTFH61-07-D-00011). Florida Department of Transportation and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2010). 2009 NHTS User Guide: Guidebook for Florida Modelers. Frandberg, L. (2006). “International Mobility Biographies: A Means to Capture the Institutionalization of Long- Distance Travel?” Current Issues in Tourism, Vol. 9, No. 4 and 5, pp 320–334. Kuhnimhof, T., et al. (2009). “Generating Internationally Comparable Figures on Long-Distance Travel for Europe.” Transportation Research Record 2105, pp 18–27. Lapham, Susan (undated WEBREADY document). 1995 American Travel Survey: An Overview of the Survey Design and Methodology, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. DOT. BTS web site no longer provides ATS data or documentation. McGuckin, N., Zmud, J. and Nakamoto, Y. (2005). “Trip Chaining Trends in the U.S.—Understanding Travel Behavior for Policy Making,” Transportation Research Record 1917. McKercher, B. and B. D. Guillet (2011). “Are Tourists or Markets Destination Loyal?” Journal of Travel Research, 50(2) 121–132. Oak Ridge National Laboratories (2010). The American Long-Distance Personal Travel Data and Modeling Program: A Roadmap. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2006). Trends in New York State Long-Distance Travel. Ohio Department of Transportation. Report-Ohio-LongDistanceTravelModule-Extracted.pdf (Section 4.7, LDT). Parsons Brinckerhoff (2009). Maryland Statewide Transportation Model MSTM Model User’s Guide Draft Report. Submitted to Maryland DOT State Highway Administration. Parsons Brinckerhoff (2011). Development of the Arizona Statewide Travel Demand Model: Phase 2 (AZTDM2). Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation. Parsons Brinckerhoff (date unknown). Extracted Excerpt from Ohio Long-Distance Travel Module. Prepared for Ohio Department of Transportation. Schuessler, N., K. W. Axhausen (2009). “Processing Raw Data from Global Positioning Systems without Addi- tional Information.” Transportation Research Record 2105, 28–36. Stopher, P., et al. (2008). Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data. Working Paper of the Australian Key Centre in Transport and Logistics. University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Texas Transportation Institute (2001). 2001 Texas Border Crossing Travel Surveys: Executive Summary. Texas Department of Transportation. Texas Transportation Institute (2008). 2007 Texas Border Crossing Surveys: Executive Summary. Texas Department of Transportation. Transportation Consulting Group (1992). Statewide Travel Forecasting Model Data Collection Program. Florida Department of Transportation. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transporta- tion Statistics (2006). America on the Go, Findings from the National Household Travel Survey. Wilbur Smith Associates (2002). Multiplan Statewide Model Methodology. Prepared for Mississippi Department of Transportation. Wilbur Smith Associates (2004). Louisiana Statewide Traffic Model—Methodology Report. Prepared for Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. Wilbur Smith Associates (2004). Virginia Multimodal Statewide Transportation Model. Prepared for Virginia Department of Transportation. Wilbur Smith Associates (2009). Utah Statewide Travel Model Final Model Validation Report. Prepared for Utah Department of Transportation. Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc. (2008). Statewide Model Application Using Texas SAM. Texas Department of Transportation. Presentation at TRB Statewide Planning Conference. Wolf, J., Guensler, R., Bachman, W. (2001). “Elimination of the Travel Diary: An Experiment to Derive Trip Purpose from GPS Travel Data,” in 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, p 24. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.