Multimodal Freight Transportation Within the Great Lakes--Saint Lawrence Basin (2012)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

80 A P P E N D I X A Selection of Literature Reviewed Study Team Reference # Reference 1 Ontario Ministry of Transportation and NYSDOT, “Bi-National Transportation Strategy for the Niagara Frontier,” December 2005. 2 Jennifer S. Vey, John C. Austin, and Jennifer Bradley, “The Next Economy: Economic Recovery and Transformation in the Great Lakes Region,” Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institu- tion, September 2010. 3 Wilbur Smith Associates, in partnership with SRF Consulting Group, Inc., C.J. Petersen and As- sociates, and the University of Toledo, “Northern Minnesota / Northwestern Wisconsin Regional Freight Plan,” Prepared for the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Wisconsin Department of Transportation and Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Council, November, 2009. 4 Transportation Research Board, “Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Planning Practice,” Circular Number E-C073, 2005, Washington, D.C. 5 A Profile of Marine Freight Transportation and Trade on the GLSLSS, Innovation Maritime, 2006. 6 Battelle, “The Strategic Multimodal Analysis TASK 3: CHICAGO-NEW YORK CITY CORRI- DOR ANALYSIS,” prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006, Washington, D.C. 7 Cambridge Systematics, “National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study,” prepared for the Association of American Railroads, September 2007. 8 CanAm Connections Study, WSA, 2008. 10 Congressional Budget Office,”Freight Rail Transportation: Long-Term Issues”, January 2006. 11 Detroit River International Crossing Study, URS, 2008 [website: http://www.partnershipborderstudy.com/]. 12 Ontario Chamber of Commerce, “Easing the Chokepoints: A Plan for an Efficient Canada-US Border,” 2007. 13 EBTC Study of Freight Rail Crossing the Canada-US Border, Cambridge Systematics, 2004. 14 Freight Performance Measurement: Travel Time in Freight-Significant Corridors, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Freight Management and Op- erations, 2006, Washington, D.C. 15 Future Competitiveness of the St. Lawrence Seaway System, TAF Consultants, 2004 16 General Accounting Office, “Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate; Freight Transportation: National Policy and Strategies Can Help Im- prove Freight Mobility,” January 2008. 17 Great Lakes Coastal Needs Survey Results. 18 Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study (Main Report and Appendix), 2007–08. 19 Greater Toronto Hamilton Area Urban Freight Study, for MetroLinx, HDRiTrans with Sustaina- ble Ports, completion 2011. 20 Hub & Spoke Container Transshipment Operations for the Marine Movement of Freight in East- ern Canada, CPCS, 2008.

Selection of Literature Reviewed 81 Study Team Reference # Reference 21 Ken Winter, “Performance Measures Correlating Investment In Transportation w ith Economic Vitality,” Virginia Department of Transportation, 2007. 22 Liberalization in Maritime Transport, Brooks, 2009. 23 Maine and Michigan State Rail Plan 2009 and 2010. Web: http://www.maine.gov/mdot/railplan/index.htm. 24 Marine Industry Economic Impact Study, LECG Economics and Finance, 2004. 25 Mariport Group Inc., “Short Sea Shipping and the Supply Chain: A Review of Cross Lake Ferry Economics and Benefits,” Canadian Transportation Research Forum, May 2005. 26 Minnesota Department of Transportation, “Adequacy of Freight Connectors to Interregional Corridors and Major Highways,” June 2003. 27 Mohawk Erie Multimodal Corridor Study for NYSDOT, WSA with Sustainable Ports, in production for 2011 completion. 28 29 New Cargoes/New Vessels Market Assessment Studies, TEMS & Rand Corporation, 2007. 30 Niagara Frontier Urban Freight Study for the Greater Buffalo–Niagara Regional Transportation Council (MPO), WSA with Sustainable Ports, in production. 31 Northern Minnesota and Northwest Wisconsin Regional Freight Plan. 32 Ohio-Ontario Lake Erie International Freight Ferry Feasibly Study, CPCS, 2009. 33 Ontario Marine Transportation Study, MariNova (CPCS Company), 2008–09. 34 Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, “Analysis of the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence River Navigation System’s Role in U.S. Ocean Container Trade,” August 2003. 35 Richard Stewart, Pasi Lautala, William Sproule, Libby Ogard, “Evaluation of Shipper Requirements and Rail Service for Northern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan,” USDOT, 2005. 36 Short Sea Shipping Market Study, MariNova, 2005. 37 Short Sea Shipping on the East Coast of North America, Dalhousie University, 2006. 38 Short Sea Shipping Opportunities in the Lower St. Lawrence Region, Institut Maritime du Quebec, 2004. 39 St. Lawrence and Great Lakes Trade Corridor Study, IBI, 2008. 40 Study of Inbound and Outbound Goods Flows through Durham Region (Lake Ontario) and Opportunity for Integration of Marine Mode into Regional Multimodal Transportation Network, Durham Region (Lake Ontario), CPCS, 2010. 41 TEMS, “Impact of High Oil Prices on Freight Transportation: Modal Shift Potential in Five Corridors: Technical Report,” prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration, October 2008. 42 TEMS, “Midwest Regional Rail System,” September 2004. 43 Teresa M. Adams, Mary Ebeling, Raine Gardner, Peter Lindquist, Richard Stewart, Todd Szymkowski, Sam Van Hecke, Mark Vonderembse, “Upper Midwest Freight Corridor Study-Phase II”, Volumes I & 2, July 1, 2006, Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 44 The Great Lakes: A World-Leading Bi-National Economic Region, Brookings Institution, Great Lakes Economic Initiative, 2007. 45 The Vital Connection: Reclaiming Great Lakes Economic Leadership in the Bi-National US-Canadian Region, Brookings Institution, 2008. 46 Transport Canada, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. U.S. Department of Transportation, The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation, Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, Environment Canada, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, ”Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study, Final Report,” Fall, 2007. NCHRP Report 594: Guidebook for Integrating Freight into Transportation Planning and Project Selection Processes, 2007. 47 TranSystems, “Cleveland-Trans-Erie Ferry Service Feasibility Study: Summary of Service Findings,” May 2004. 48 Twin Ports Intermodal Feasibility Study 2002. 49 US Department of Agriculture, “Transportation of U.S. Grains A Modal Share Analysis, 1978-2000,” October 2004. 50 US Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Transportation, “Study of Rural Transportation Issues,” April 2010, Washington D.C.

82 Multimodal Freight Transportation Within the Great Lakes–Saint Lawrence Basin Study Team Reference # Reference 51 US Department of Transportation, “Transportation’s Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Volume 1: Synthesis Report,” Report to Congress, April 2010. 52 US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, “Freight Story 2008.” N o- vember 2008, Washington D . C. 53 William R. Black, “ Freight Flows o f Indiana ,” p repared in cooperation with the Indiana Depart- ment of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation. 54 Wisconsin Connections 2030 final plan. http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/projects/state/2030 - background.htm. 55 Wisconsin Department of Transportation, “Wisconsin Rail Issues and Opport unities Report,” 2004. 56 Wisconsin Truck Size and Weight Study 2008. 57 Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Special Report 291: Great Lakes Shipping, Trade, and Aquatic Invasive Species, 2008. 58 America’s Deep Blue Highway — Instit ute for Global Studies — Tufts University. 59 Texas A&M study on modal impact.