Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
63 1. Quiroga, C., D. Ford, T. Taylor, S. Kranc, E. Kraus, and E. S. Park. Specification Framework for Communication Utilities and Estimation of Utility Adjustment Costs. Publication FHWA/TX-08/0-4998-3. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2007. 2. A Policy on the Accommodation of Utilities Within Freeway Right-of-Way, 5th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. 3. A Guide for Accommodating Utilities Within Highway Right-of-Way, 4th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. 4. Guidance on Sharing Freeway and Highway Rights-of-Way for Tele- communications. Task Force on Fiber Optics on Transportation Rights-of-Way, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1996. 5. Utility Adjustments and Accommodation on Federal-Aid Highway Projects, 4th ed. Federal Aid and Design Division, Federal Highway Administration, 1998. 6. Program Guide: Utility Relocation and Accommodation on Federal- Aid Highway Projects, 6th ed. Office of Program Administration, Federal Highway Administration, 2003. 7. Ellis, R., and H. Thomas. The Root Causes of Delays in Highway Con- struction. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. 8. Right of Way and Utilities Guidelines and Best Practices. Strategic Plan Strategy 4-4, Subcommittee on Right of Way and Utilities, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways, and Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2004. 9. Quiroga, C., Y. Li, E. Kraus, and J. Le. Utility Installation Review SystemâImplementation Report. Report FHWA/TX-08/5-2110-03-2. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2009. 10. Avoiding Utility Relocations. Publication FHWA-IF-02-049. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, Federal Highway Administration, 2002. 11. Ellis, R., M. Venner, C. Paulsen, J. Anspach, G. Adams, and K. Vanden- bergh. SHRP 2 Report S2-R15-RW: Integrating the Priorities of Trans- portation Agencies and Utility Companies. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. 12. Kraus, E., C. Quiroga, N. Koncz, and H. Dawood. Development of a Utility Conflict Management System. Report FHWA/TX-09/0-5475-4. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2009. 13. Quiroga, C., E. Kraus, J. Overman, and N. Koncz. Integration of Utility and Environmental Activities in the Project Development Process. Report FHWA/TX-10/0-6065-1. Texas Department of Transporta- tion, Austin, 2010. 14. Campbell, J., G. Solomon, G. Fawver, R. Lorello, D. Mathis, C. Quiroga, B. Rhinehart, B. Ward, J. Zaharewicz, and N. Zembillas. Streamlining and Integrating Right-of-Way and Utility Processes with Planning, Environmental, and Design Processes in Australia and Canada. Report FHWA-PL-09-011. Office of International Programs, Federal High- way Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, and Ameri- can Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2009. 15. Data Architecture. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2010. References
