Operational and Institutional Agreements That Facilitate Regional Traffic Signal Operations (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

54 1. Koonce, P., K. Lee, and T. Urbanik, Regional Traffic Signal Operations Programs: An Overview, Report No. FHWA-HOP-09-007, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2009. 2. Federal Transportation Legislation, 23 USC 134, Metro- politan Transportation Planning. 3. Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, Department of Public Works, Los Angeles County [Online]. Available: http://dpwprod2.co.la.ca.us/Traffic/TSSP.cfm. 4. Administering and Maintaining a Good Traffic Signal Maintenance Management Program, North Carolina Department of Transportation Traffic Signal Opera- tions and Maintenance Practices Report, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, Sep. 2001. 5. “Metropolitan Transportation Commission: Arterial Oper- ations,” MTC, Oakland, Calif. [Online]. Available: http:// www.mtc.ca.gov/services/arterial_operations/. 6. “Regional Signal Timing Program Project Adminis- tration,” Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oak- land, Calif. [Online]. Available: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/ services/arterial_operations/downloads/RSTP_Admin.pdf. 7. Traffic Signal Optimization Program, Maricopa Associa- tion of Governments, Phoenix, Ariz. [Online]. Available: http://www.mag.maricopa.gov/project.cms?item=3059. 8. Thoroughfare Assessment Program (TAP)/Traffic Signal Integration and Monitoring Program, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington [Online]. Available: http://www.nctcog.org/trans/tsm/. 9. Regional Traffic Signal Program, Southwestern Pennsyl- vania Commission, Pittsburgh [Online]. Available: Avail- able at http://www.spcregion.org/trans_ops_traff.shtml. 10. “Los Angeles Countywide Information Exchange Net- work (IEN)” [Online]. Available: http://dpw.lacounty. gov/tnl/its/IENWeb/documents/TransCore-IENposter- LTR1_FINAL.pdf. 11. “Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation (FAST),” Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas [Online]. Available: http:// www.nvfast.org/. 12. Operation Green Light, Mid-America Regional Council, Kansas City, Mo. [Online]. Available: Available at http:// www.marc.org/transportation/ogl/about.htm. 13. Operation Green Light Concept of Operations: Roles and Responsibilities, Mid-America Regional Council, Kansas City, Mo. [Online]. Available: http://www.marc. org/transportation/ogl/pdfs/rolesresponsibilities.pdf. 14. Cooperative Agreement for the Las Vegas Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation, June 2004. 15. “Traffic Light Synchronization Program First Step Toward “Countywide Improvements,” Orange County Trans- portation Authority, Orange, Calif. [Online]. Available: http://www.octa.net/signal_overview.aspx [accessed Apr. 5, 2010]. 16. Thoroughfare Assessment Program Phase 2.0, Executive Summary, prepared for the North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., July 2009. 17. “Traffic Signal Program,” Denver Regional Council of Governments, Denver, Colo. [Online]. Available: http:// www.drcog.org/index.cfm?page=TrafficSignalProgram. 18. Traffic Signal System Improvement Program, 2007 Update Summary Report, Denver Regional Council of Governments, Denver, Colo. [Online]. Available: http:// www.drcog.org/documents/TSSIP%202007%20 Summary%20Report.pdf. 19. Evans City (SR 68/528) SINC-UP Project Before and After Study, Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission, Pittsburgh [Online]. Available: http://www.spcregion.org/ pdf/signals/EvansCity_SINCUP_BeforeAfter_FINAL forweb.pdf. 20. “Niagara International Transportation Technology Coa- lition” [Online]. Available: http://www.nittec.org/index. aspx. 21. 2009 Call for Projects (Draft) Application Package, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, Calif. [Online]. Available: http://www. metro.net/projects_studies/call_projects/images/2009%20 Call%20for%20Projects%20app-appxs.pdf. 22. Regional Traffic Signal Operations Improvement—2007 Fact Sheet, Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County, Nevada [Online]. Available: http:// www.rtcwashoe.com/trafficsignals/documents/Traffic signalFactSheet_March2007.pdf. 23. Traffic Signalization, Regional Transportation Commis- sion of Washoe County, Nevada [Online]. Available: http://www.rtcwashoe.com/streets-highways-31. 24. RTC Traffic Signal Demonstration Video, Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County, Nevada. 25. Signal Timing Brief: SH 119 (Diagonal Highway), 63rd Street, Jay Road, and Lookout Road, Denver Regional Council of Governments, Denver, Colo., 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.drcog.org/documents/T09-11% 20SH%20119%20%2063rd%20st.pdf. 26. “Why Is the Signal Always Red?” Denver Regional Council of Governments, Denver, Colo., 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.drcog.org/documents/Why%20 Signal%20Red.pdf. 27. MAG Traffic Signal Optimization Program, Request of Projects, Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, Ariz. [Online]. Available: http://www.mag.maricopa. gov/pdf/cms.resource/FY2010_TSOP_Request_for_ Projects30270.pdf. 28. Signal Synchronization Training, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.metro.net/projects/signal-synch/ REFERENCES