Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
45 1. Eger, R. J., III, D. A. Knudson, J. Marlowe, and L. Ogard. Evaluation of Transportation Organization Outsourcing: Decision Making Cri- teria for Outsourcing Opportunities. Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, University of WisconsinâMadison, 2002. 2. Warne, T. R. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice No. 313: State DOT Outsourcing and Private-Sector Utilization. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 3. Public Financial Management. Outsourcing Methods and Case Studies. City of Colorado Springs Sustainable Funding Committee, 2009. www.springsgov.com/units/. . ./Report_Outsourcing_04_ 2009.pdf. Accessed October 2010. 4. Chang, H.-C., Y. Itou, V. Kabakchieva, L. Lozowy, R. Munoz- Raskin, R. Ramos, M. Seaman, and Y. Tugce Turner. Managed Competition in Indianapolis: The Case of Indianapolis Fleet Services. Columbia University, New York, 2005. 5. Privatization: Lessons Learned by State and Local Governments. Report to the Chairman, House Republican Task Force on Priva- tization, United States General Accounting Office, March 1997. 6. Kim, D. S., J. D. Porter, P. Kriett, W. Mbugua, and T. Wagner. Fleet Replacement Modeling. School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, July 2009. 7. Maintenance Division, Montana Department of Transportation, http://www.mdt.mt.gov/mdt/organization/maint.shtml. Accessed December 2010. 8. TransTech Management. Final Report on the Fleet Maintenance Pilot Project, Virginia Department of Transportation, January 2006. 9. Based on correction made by NCHRP 13-03A Project Panel mem- ber to the contractorâs Preliminary Draft Final Report. 10. Fleet Maintenance Operations Guide: A Comprehensive Reference for In-House & Outsourced Maintenance Operations. NAFA, National Association of Fleet Administrators. 11. Martin, L. How to Compare Costs Between In-house and Con- tracted Services. Reason Foundation, 1993. http://reason.org/news/ show/123968.html. Accessed October 2010. 12. Office of Management and Budget. Circular No. A-76. Revised, May 2003. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a076_a76_ incl_tech_correction. Accessed October 2010. 13. Kehoe J., W. Dodson, R. Reeve, and G. Plato. Activity-Based Man- agement in Government. Coopers & Lybrand, 1995, p. 26. 14. Young, R. D. On Cost Analysis Comparisons: Government In- House Provision vs. Contracting Out. Institute of Public Service and Policy Research, University of South Carolina, http://www. ipspr.sc.edu/publication/FINAL%20On%20Cost%20Analysis%20 Comparisons.pdf. Accessed October 2010. 15. Deis, D. R., E. Watson, and C. G. Wilmot. Designing a Compre- hensive Model to Evaluate Outsourcing of Louisiana DOTD Func- tions and Activities. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, June 2002. References
