National Academies Press: OpenBook

Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects (2011)

Chapter: APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining

« Previous: APPENDIX F Applications of Federal Requirements for Contract Administration
Page 85
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 85
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 86
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 87
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 88
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 89
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 92
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 93
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 94
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 95
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 96
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 97
Page 98
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 98
Page 99
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 99
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 100
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 101
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 102
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 103
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 104
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 105
Page 106
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 106
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 107
Page 108
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 108
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 109
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 110
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 111
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 112
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 113
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 114
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 115
Page 116
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 116
Page 117
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 117
Page 118
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 118
Page 119
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 119
Page 120
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 120
Page 121
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 121
Page 122
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 122
Page 123
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 123
Page 124
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 124
Page 125
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 125
Page 126
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 126
Page 127
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 127
Page 128
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 128
Page 129
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 129
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 130
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 131
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 132
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 133
Page 134
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 134
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 135
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 136
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 137
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 138
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 139
Page 140
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 140
Page 141
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 141
Page 142
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 142
Page 143
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 143
Page 144
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 144
Page 145
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 145
Page 146
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 146
Page 147
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 147
Page 148
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 148
Page 149
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 149
Page 150
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 150
Page 151
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 151
Page 152
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 152
Page 153
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 153
Page 154
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 154
Page 155
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 155
Page 156
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 156
Page 157
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 157
Page 158
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 158
Page 159
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 159
Page 160
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 160
Page 161
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 161
Page 162
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 162
Page 163
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 163
Page 164
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 164
Page 165
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 165
Page 166
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 166
Page 167
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 167
Page 168
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 168
Page 169
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 169
Page 170
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 170
Page 171
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 171
Page 172
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 172
Page 173
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 173
Page 174
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 174
Page 175
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 175
Page 176
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 176
Page 177
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 177
Page 178
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 178
Page 179
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 179
Page 180
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 180
Page 181
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 181
Page 182
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 182
Page 183
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 183
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 184
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 185
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 186
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 187
Page 188
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 188
Page 189
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 189
Page 190
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 190
Page 191
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 191
Page 192
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 192
Page 193
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 193
Page 194
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 194
Page 195
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 195
Page 196
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 196
Page 197
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 197
Page 198
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 198
Page 199
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 199
Page 200
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 200
Page 201
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 201
Page 202
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 202
Page 203
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 203
Page 204
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 204
Page 205
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 205
Page 206
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 206
Page 207
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 207
Page 208
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 208
Page 209
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 209
Page 210
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 210
Page 211
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 211
Page 212
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 212
Page 213
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 213
Page 214
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 214
Page 215
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 215
Page 216
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 216
Page 217
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 217
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 218
Page 219
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 219
Page 220
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX G Sample Documents That Supp Ort Strea Mlining." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22883.
×
Page 220

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

83 APPENDIX E Sample Documents That Support Streamlining California Sampled Section from LPA Quality Assurance Manual Delaware Complete Streets Policy Joint Project Agreement between City of Dover and DelDOT LPA Project Checklist TE Program Guidelines Florida ARRA Tracker Tool LAP Certification Process LAP Certification Training Agenda LAP Construction Checklist Local Agency Program Information Tool (LAPIT) - Draft Local Agency Specification Landscaping – Section 580 Iowa Sampled Sections from Microsoft Access Database for Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (includes CMAQ), NSB, SRTS, and TE programs Supplemental Agreement for Qualifying Locally Procured Federal-aid Contracts Minnesota Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Approval Agreement Environmental Documentation for Federal Projects with Minor Impacts North Dakota Project Delivery System (PDS) report Ohio Participation Requirements Review Form LPA Project Evaluation Form Oregon Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Checklist for Certified Agencies Sampled Section from Local Governments Quick Reference Guide Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative Reimbursement Agreement - Construction Design Manual Bicycle/Pedestrian Checklist Publication 526 - Municipal-Sponsor Guidance Pamphlet Washington Local Agency General Specification – Asphalt Qualification Form for LPAs I G SAmPlE DocumENtS thAt SuPPort StrEAmlINING

84 California Department of Transportation Sampled Section from LPA Quality Assurance Manual

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93 Delaware Department of Transportation Complete Streets Policy REQUEST FOR POLICY IMPLEMENT STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.I. NUMBER: O-6 Complete Streets Policy References: Executive Order Number 6 Proposed Complete Street Act of 2009 Revised: N/A Primary Responsibility: Director: Transportation Solution TABLE OF CONTENTS Title of Policy Purpose Objectives Applicability Responsibility and Implementation Exemptions Waivers Justification Effective Date Purpose To ensure that the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) system modifications are routinely planned, designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a

94 way that enables safe and efficient access for all users. The result should be a system for all users that is comprehensive, integrated, connected, safe, and efficient allowing users to choose among different transportation modes, both motorized and non-motorized. Objectives 1. To define and implement changes to the project development process that will value all transportation modes during the project scoping phase and enhance currently used design practices through updates to DelDOT subdivision and design manuals, design memoranda, and policies. 2. To define roles and responsibilities through all phases of a project and implement strategies that will improve safety and convenience for all transit riders, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists using the Delaware transportation system. 3. To define an Exemption Process. 4. To define a Waiver Process. Applicability 1. All projects in the state right-of-way that are considered road reconstruction, widens the pavement width, or allows for the inclusion of facilities for all users, shall consider all transportation modes and accommodate accordingly; facility type shall be based on the project location and the needs of the community. 2. System maintenance projects are designed to keep what the State already owns in a good state of repair and are usually maintenance/pavement rehabilitation projects and require limited design and no right-of-way acquisition. While it is not the specific intent of these projects to expand existing facilities, opportunities to provide and improve safety for other modes shall be explored during the project development stage. Responsibility and Implementation 1. Planning, Maintenance & Operations, Transportation Solutions and Delaware Transit Corporation (DTC), as well as any professional services (consultants) working for DelDOT will have the responsibility for implementation of this policy. 2. Planning, in coordination with each applicable division, will be responsible for developing a Complete Streets Implementation Plan for DelDOT programs and projects. The implementation plan will have specific actions for each division, and be designed in a consistent and compatible format. The implementation plan should be adopted within twelve months of the effective date of this policy and include an annual review process. 3. Effectiveness of this policy may be reviewed from time to time at the request of the Secretary, the affected divisions within DelDOT, or the traveling public. Exemptions

95 Justification and documentation exists for a roadway project to be exempt from the requirements of this policy based upon one of the following circumstances: 1. Alteration and maintenance projects on an affected roadway that prohibits by law use of the roadway by specific users. (Example I-95). New construction would be exempt for facilities within the right-of-way. 2. If it is determined that a reasonable and equivalent alternative already exists for certain users or is programmed in the CTP/TIP as a separate project as determined by representatives of appropriate modes. (Example: transit planner representing bus service identifies project for new bus stop already programmed). 3. Ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep transportation facilities in serviceable condition that does not interfere with existing facilities for longer than the time needed to perform maintenance. 4. As of the effective date of this policy, projects that have been submitted by the applicant as Semi-Final or more advanced plans are exempt. Waivers It is recognized, in a built environment, that complexities and challenges exists and there is a need to avoid or mitigate impacts to natural and cultural resources. There may also be right-of-way and financial constraints associated with individual projects. In an effort to reconcile these constraints, DelDOT will include a waiver process, with appropriate time constraints, in each division implementation plan. The general waiver process concept is shown in the diagram below: Every effort should be made to identify constraints early in the project scoping phase. Therefore, Complete Street Waivers shall be initiated no later than the Semi-Final design phase of all projects.

96 Justification Complete Streets Defined The term ‘Complete Street’ means a roadway that accommodates all travelers, particularly public transit users, bicyclists, pedestrians (including individuals of all ages and individuals with mobility, sensory, neurological, or hidden disabilities), and motorists, to enable all travelers to use the roadway safely and efficiently. (HR 1443 IH) Creating complete streets means planning, designing, constructing, maintaining and operating streets and all directly related components for motorized and non-motorized modes of travel, as appropriate for the area. The most basic element of a complete streets policy is that it ensures that roads are planned and built to serve all users. National Movement The proposed Federal Complete Streets Act of 2009 defines effective complete streets policies that are flexible enough to use in daily transportation planning practice. It directs state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt such policies within two years of enactment and applies the policies to upcoming federally funded transportation projects. Delaware Accomplishments DelDOT has been working towards a transportation system that allows users to choose between various modes. In fact, even though the term “Complete Streets” is relatively new, many DelDOT projects have been planned, designed, and built as such. DelDOT has adopted a Statewide Bicycle Plan that authorizes DelDOT to plan and establish bikeways across the state for the use, enjoyment and participation of the public in non-motorized transportation. DelDOT is also currently working on a Statewide Pedestrian Action Plan that will ensure all pedestrian facilities are built to current ADA standards. The plan also includes a statewide sidewalk inventory that will identify gaps in the pedestrian network and enable DelDOT to create a prioritization plan for sidewalk installation. Additionally, pedestrian signals with countdowns modules and accessible pedestrian signals are being installed throughout the state. DTC has completed a statewide bus stop inventory and is currently working on a bus stop policy with the goal of enhancing accessibility, reliability, and customer convenience. Executive Order Number 6 On April 24, 2009, Governor Jack A. Markell signed into effect Executive Order No. 6. This Executive Order directed that a Statewide Complete Streets Policy be delivered to the Governor by September, 2009. This step toward creating a transportation system in Delaware that provides facilities for biking, walking, and transit, can increase safety, reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality. VIII. Effective Date

97 This policy shall become effective 30 day(s) after signature by the Secretary, or, if applicable, upon compliance with the regulatory process required by the Administrative Procedures Act (29 Del.C. Ch. 101).

98 Delaware Department of Transportation Joint Project Agreement between City of Dover and DelDOT

99

100

101

102 Delaware Department of Transportation LPA Project Checklist Project Check List Contract # 28-200-04 Title – Baynard Boulevard Utility Statement Drafted – December 14, 2009 Utility Statement Executed – December 23, 2009 Environmental Statement – January 15, 2010 Traffic Statement – March 11, 2010 SHPO Letter from DelDOT – September 28, 2009 SHPO Approval – January 27, 2010 Timing Statement – Specifications – January 28, 2010 Public Workshop – September 10, 2009 Right-of-Way Cert –

103 Delaware Department of Transportation TE Program Guidelines

104

105

106 Florida Department of Transportation ARRA Tracker Tool

107

108

109

110

111

112 Florida Department of Transportation LAP Certification Process

113

114

115

116

117 Florida Department of Transportation Local Agency Program Certification Training Agenda DRAFT LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM (LAP) TRAINING AGENDA July 13, 2010 Morning Sessions 8:-00 – 8:30 AM 8:00 – 8:30 Registration 8:30 – 10:00 AM 8:30 – 8:40 AM Welcome and Introductions – Stacy Miller and Gerry O’Reilly, FDOT District Four 8:40 – 8:50 AM Stewardship and Oversight Responsibilities, Monica Gourdine, FHWA Florida Division 8:50 – 10:00 AM Title VI Program – Nondiscrimination Agreement and Local Agencies – Charlotte Thomas, FDOT Central Office; Carey Shepherd, FHWA Florida Division; and Megan Francis, U.S. DOT OIG 10:00 – 10:15 AM Morning Break 10:15 – 11:45 AM 10:15 – 10:45 AM District Four LAP Overview – Leslie Wetherell and Barbara Handrahan, FDOT District Four 10:45 – 11:15 AM Environmental Review and NEPA Documentation Process – Ann Broadwell and/or environmental management staff, FDOT District Four 11:15 – 11:45 AM Local Agency Right of Way Requirements – Susan Day and/or right of way staff, FDOT District Four Right of Way Office and Brian Telfair, FHWA Florida Division 11:45 – 12:45 PM Lunch Break Afternoon Sessions 1:00 – 3:00 PM 1:00 – 1:45 PM ADA and Design Requirements LAP Projects – Dean Perkins and Frank Sullivan, FDOT Central Office 1:45 – 2:00 PM Drainage Requirements - Francis Lewis, FDOT District Four 2:00 – 2:30 PM Specification Requirements for LAP Projects – Duane Brautigam, FDOT Central Office 2:30 – 3:00 PM Contract Administration and Materials Certification – Roosevelt Petithomme, FDOT Central Office 3:00 – 3:15 PM Afternoon Break 3:15 – 4:15 PM 3:15 – 4:00 PM Contract Compliance Overview and Commercially – Usefully Function, Marty Anderson, FDOT District Four; Erica Miller, FDOT Central Office 4:00 – 4:15 PM Training Wrap Up Florida Department of Transportation

118 LAP Construction Checklist

119

120

121 Florida Department of Transportation Local Agency Program Information Tool (LAPIT) - Draft

122 Florida Department of Transportation Local Agency Specification Landscaping – Section 580 SECTION 580 LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION 580-1 Description. Plant trees and shrubs of the species, size, and quality indicated in the plans. The Engineer reserves the right to adjust the number and location of any of the designated types and species to be used at any of the locations shown, in order to provide for any unanticipated effects which might become apparent after the substantial completion of other phases of the project, or for other causes. 580-2 Materials. 580-2.1 Plants: 580-2.1.1 Authority for Nomenclature; Species, etc.: For the designated authority in the identification of all plant material, refer to two publications of L.H. Bailey: “Hortus III” and “Manual of Cultivated Plants,” and ensure that all specimens are true to type, name, etc., as described therein. For the standard nomenclature, refer to the publication of the American Joint Committee on Horticultural Nomenclature, “Standardized Plant Names.” 580-2.1.2 Grade Standards and Conformity with Type and Species: Only use nursery grown plant material except where specified as Collected Material. Use nursery grown plant material that complies with all required inspection, grading standards, and plant regulations in accordance with the latest edition of the Florida Department of Agriculture’s “Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants”. Except where a lesser grade might be specifically specified in the plans, ensure that the minimum grade for all trees and shrubs is Florida No. 1. Ensure that all plants are the proper size and grade at the time of delivery to the site, throughout the project construction period and during any designated plant establishment period. Ensure that plant materials are true to type and species and that any plant materials not specifically covered in Florida Department of Agriculture’s “Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants” conform in type and species with the standards and designations in general acceptance by Florida nurseries. Ensure that plant materials are shipped with tags stating the botanical and common name of the plant. 580-2.1.3 Inspection and Transporting: Move nursery stock in accordance with all Federal and State regulations therefor, and accompany each shipment with the required inspection certificates for filing with the Engineer. 580-2.2 Water: Water used in landscaping operations may be obtained from any approved source. Ensure that water is free of any substance which might be detrimental to plant growth.

123 The use of effluent water is subject to approval and must meet all Federal, State and Local requirements. 580-3 Specific Requirements for the Various Plant Designations. 580-3.1 Balled-and-Burlapped Plants (B&B), and Wired Balled-and-Burlapped (WB & B): 580-3.1.1 General: Properly protect the root ball of these plants until planting them. The Engineer may reject any plant which shows evidence of having been mishandled. Set the B&B and WB&B plants then remove the top 2/3 of all wire, rope, and binding surrounding the plant. Remove the burlap from the top 4 inches [100 mm] of the root ball. Do not disturb the root ball in any way. Bare root material is not allowed for substitution. At least 90 days before digging out B & B and WB & B plants, root-prune those 1 1/2 inches [38 mm] or greater in diameter and certify such fact on accompanying invoices. 580-3.1.2 Provisions for Wiring: For plants grown in soil of a loose texture, which does not readily adhere to the root system (and especially in the case of large plants or trees), the Engineer may require WB & B plants. For WB & B plants, before removing the plant from the excavated hole, place sound hog wire around the burlapped ball, and loop and tension it until the tightened wire netting substantially packages the burlapped ball such as to prevent disturbing of the loose soil around the roots during handling. 580-3.2 Container-Grown Plants (CG): The Engineer will not accept any CG plants with roots which have become pot-bound or for which the top system is too large for the size of the container. Fully cut and open all containers in a manner that will not damage the root system. Do not remove CG plants from the container until immediately before planting to prevent damage to the root system. 580-3.3 Collected Plants (Trees and Shrubs) (C): Use C plants which have a root ball according to “Florida Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants”. Do not plant any C plant before the Engineer’s inspection and acceptance at the planting site. 580-3.4 Collected Plants (Herbaceous) (HC): The root mass and vegetative portions of collected herbaceous plants shall be as large as the specified container-grown equivalent. Do not plant any collected plant before inspection and acceptance by the Engineer. 580-3.5 Specimen Plants (Special Grade): When Specimen (or Special Grade) plants are required, label them as such on the plant list, and tag the plant to be furnished. 580-3.6 Palms: Wrap the roots of all plants of the palm species before transporting, except if they are CG plants and ensure that they have an adequate root ball structure and mass for healthy transplantation as defined in “Florida Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants”. The Engineer will not require burlapping if the palm is carefully dug from marl or heavy soil that adheres to the roots and retains its shape without crumbling. During transporting and after arrival, carefully protect root balls of palms from wind and exposure to the sun. Muck grown palms are not allowed. After delivery to the job site, if not planting the palm within 24 hours, cover the root ball with a moist material. Plant all palms within 48 hours of delivery to the site.

124 Move sabal and coconut palms in accordance with the “Florida Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants.” 580-3.7 Substitution of Container-Grown (CG) Plants: With the Engineer’s approval, the Contractor may substitute CG plants for any other root classification types, if he has met all other requirements of the Contract Documents. 580-4 Planting Requirements. 580-4.1 Layout: Prior to any excavation or planting, mark all planting beds and individual locations of palms, trees, large shrubs and proposed art and architectural structures, as shown in the plans, on the ground with a common bright orange colored spray paint, or with other approved methods, within the project limits. Obtain the Engineer’s approval and make necessary utility clearance requests. 580-4.2 Excavation of Plant Holes: Excavate plant holes after an area around the plant three times the size of the root ball has been tilled to a depth of the root ball. Ensure that the plant hole is made in the center of the tilled area only to the depth of the plant root ball. Where excess material has been excavated from the plant hole, use the excavated material to backfill to proper level. 580-4.3 Setting of Plants: Center plants in the hole. Lower the plant into the hole so that it rests on a prepared hole bottom such that the roots are level with, or slightly above, the level of their previous growth and so oriented such as to present the best appearance. Backfill with native soil, unless otherwise specified on the plans. Firmly rod and water- in the backfill so that no air pockets remain. Apply a sufficient quantity of water immediately upon planting to thoroughly moisten all of the backfilled earth. Keep plants in a moistened condition for the duration of the planting period. When so directed, form a water ring 6 inches [150 mm] in width to make a water collecting basin with an inside diameter equal to the diameter of the excavated hole. Maintain the water ring in an acceptable condition. 580-4.4 Special Bed Preparation: Where multiple or mass plantings are to be made in extended bedding areas, and the plans specify Special Bed Preparation, prepare the planting beds as follows: Remove all vegetation from within the area of the planting bed and excavate the surface soil to a depth of 6 inches [150 mm]. Backfill the excavated area with peat, sand, finish soil layer material or other material to the elevation of the original surface. Till the entire area to provide a loose, friable mixture to a depth of at least 8 inches [200 mm]. Level the bed only slightly above the adjacent ground level. Then mulch the entire bedding area, in accordance with 580-8. 580-5 Staking and Guying. 580-5.1 General: When specified in the plans, or as directed by the Engineer, stake plants in accordance with the following. Use wide plastic, rubber or other flexible strapping materials to support the tree to stakes or ground anchors that will give as the tree moves in any direction up to 30 degrees. Do

125 not use rope or wire through a hose. Use guy chords, hose or any other thin bracing or anchorage material which has a minimum 12 inches [300 mm] length of high visibility flagging tape secured to guys, midway between the tree and stakes for safety. Stake trees larger than 1 inch [25 mm] diameter and smaller than 2 inches [50 mm] diameter with a 2 by 2 inch [50 by 50 mm] stake, set at least 2 feet [0.6 m] in the ground and extending to the crown of the plant. Firmly fasten the plant to the stake with flexible strapping materials as noted above. 580-5.2 Trees of 2 to 3 1/2 inches [50 to 90 mm] Caliper: Stake all trees, other than palm trees, larger than 2 inches [50 mm] caliper and smaller than 3 1/2 inches [90 mm] caliper with two 2 by 4 inch [50 by 100 mm] stakes, 8 feet [2.4 m] long, set 2 feet [0.6 m] in the ground. Place the tree midway between the stakes and hold it firmly in place by flexible strapping materials as noted above. 580-5.3 Large Trees: Guy all trees, other than palm trees, larger than 3 1/2 inches [90 mm] caliper, from at least three points, with flexible strapping materials as noted above. Anchor flexible strapping to 2 by 4 by 24 inch [50 by 100 by 600 mm] stakes, driven into the ground such that the top of the stake is at least 3 inches [75 mm] below the finished ground. 580-5.4 Special Requirements for Palm Trees: Brace palms which are to be staked with three 2 by 4 inch [50 by 100 mm] wood braces, toe-nailed to cleats which are securely banded at two points to the palm, at a point one third the height of the trunk. Pad the trunk with five layers of burlap under the cleats. Place braces approximately 120 degrees apart and secure them underground by 2 by 4 by 12 inch [50 by 100 by 300 mm] stake pads. 580-6 Tree Protection and Root Barriers. Install tree barricades when called for in the Contract Documents or by the Engineer to protect existing trees from damage during project construction. Place barricades at the drip line of the tree foliage or as far from the base of the tree trunk as possible. Barricades shall be able to withstand bumps by heavy equipment and trucks. Maintain barricades in good condition. When called for in the Contract Documents, install root barriers or fabrics in accordance with the details shown. 580-7 Pruning. Prune all broken or damaged roots and limbs in accordance with established arboriculture practices. When pruning is completed ensure that all remaining wood is alive. Do not reduce the size or quality of the plant below the minimum specified. 580-8 Mulching. Uniformly apply mulch material, consisting of wood chips (no Cypress Mulch is allowed), pine straw, compost, or other suitable material approved by the Engineer, to a minimum loose thickness of 3 inches [75 mm] over the entire area of the backfilled hole or bed within two days after the planting. Maintain the mulch continuously in place until the time of final inspection. 580-9 Disposal of Surplus Materials and Debris. Dispose of surplus excavated material from plant holes by scattering or otherwise as might be directed so that it is not readily visible or conspicuous to the passing motorist or pedestrian.

126 Remove all debris and other objectionable material from the site and clean up the entire area and leave it in neat condition. 580-10 Contractor’s Responsibility for Condition of the Plantings. Ensure that the plants are kept watered, that the staking and guying is kept adjusted as necessary, that all planting areas and beds are kept free of weeds and undesirable plant growth and that the plants are maintained so that they are healthy, vigorous, and undamaged at the time of acceptance. 580-11 Plant Establishment Period. If the Contract Documents designate a Plant Establishment Period, assume responsibility for the proper maintenance, survival and condition of all landscape items during such period at no additional cost. 580-12 Method of Measurement. The quantities to be paid for will be the items shown in the plans, completed and accepted. 580-13 Basis of Payment. Prices and payments will be full compensation for all work specified in this Section.

127 Iowa Department of Transportation Sampled sections from Microsoft Access Database for Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (includes CMAQ), NSB, SRTS, and TE programs

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137 Iowa Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement for Qualifying Locally Procured Federal-aid Contracts

138

139 Minnesota Department of Transportation Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Approval Agreement PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION APPROVAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Federal Highway Administration, Minnesota Division, hereinafter FHWA, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, hereinafter MnDOT, have developed this programmatic agreement to describe the policy and procedures for environmental processing of certain "Categorical Exclusion" (CE) actions as defined in section 23 CFR 771.117 which are normally found to have no significant social, economic, and environmental effects. MnDOT will act in place of the FHWA in determining that federal environmental requirements are met on the types of categorical exclusion actions identified in this agreement. The FHWA hereby concurs in advance, on a programmatic basis, with MnDOT's determination that those types of actions satisfying conditions and criteria in attachment "B" will not result in significant environmental impacts, either individually or cumulatively, and are therefore categorical exclusions and satisfy the requirements of Executive Order 12898, ”Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations”. These actions will not require individual documentation submitted to the FHWA. Examples of these actions are in 23 CFR Part 771.117(c) and Attachment "A". PROCESS - Where MnDOT determines the action may be processed as described in this Agreement, the determination shall be appropriately documented. “Documentation" as referred to in this agreement is the appropriate engineering and environmental documentation required for a federally funded highway project. MnDOT shall notify the FHWA that CE concurrence for the project was programmatically approved in accordance with this Agreement at the time authorization to proceed using Federal funds is requested. Documentation will be retained and accessible to authorized representatives of the FHWA and MnDOT for a minimum of 3 years following submittal of the final project voucher. Electronic files meeting Federal and State requirements may eventually replace "hard copy". AGREEMENT REVISIONS - This Agreement may be modified by mutual consent at any time. Attachments may be revised by mutual consent of the Division Administrator of the FHWA and the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation or designate. AGREEMENT TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated in writing by FHWA or MnDOT at any time.

140 APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT The undersigned have reviewed this Agreement and determined that it complies with the laws, regulations, and policies applicable to the FHWA and MnDOT. Accordingly, it is hereby approved and becomes effective on the last date noted below. 2/9/98 ___________________________________ Date James N. Denn Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation 2/18/98 ____________________________________ Date Alan R. Steger Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration ATTACHMENT "A" In addition to the actions covered under 23 CFR 771.117(c), the following actions that meet the criteria and conditions in Attachment "B" shall be processed by MnDOT under this programmatic categorical exclusion approval agreement: 1. Pavement resurfacing, restoration, or rehabilitation. *2. Junkyard screening. *3. Erosion and water pollution control work. 4. Acquisition and/or preservation of minor amounts of abandoned railroad right of way. 5. Architectural planning, research, and site investigations. 6. Anti-skid treatments. 7. Curb/gutter repairs or construction. 8. Repair or construction of sidewalks, ramps, or handrails as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. 9. Mechanical, electrical, lighting or traffic signal work. *10. Traffic detours. 11. Surfacing existing unpaved roadway or bikeways. 12. Impact attenuator and glare screen installation. 13. Retaining wall restoration, fencing, guardrail installation or replacement, intermittent resurfacing, restoration or replacement of drainage structures. 14. Shoulder resurfacing, restoration, or rehabilitation 15. Installation of turn lanes at roadway intersections. 16. Change of driveway/access configuration. 17. Upgrading safety features. 18. Traffic demand management activities (such as ramp metering and high occupancy vehicle ramp bypasses). 19. Improvements to existing waysides and scenic overlooks. 20. Disposal of excess right of way. *21. Bridge rehabilitation, deck replacement or painting. *22. Bridge replacement on existing alignment with minor impacts associated with placement of fill material. *23. Railroad crossing work outside of existing right of way. *24. Reconstruction and/or widening of roadway on existing alignment with NO additional through lanes, continuous turn lanes, or auxiliary lanes.

141 * ACTION WITH HIGHER POTENTIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1/30/98 ATTACHMENT "B" SECTION 4(f) or 6(f): The action does not use Section 4(f) property; OR the Negative Declaration/4(f) statement by the FHWA dated May 23, 1977 for bikeway/walkways applies to the action. HISTORIC / ARCHAEOLOGICAL: The provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied by no involvement as per the “Programmatic Agreement between FHWA, MnDOT, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Officer regarding implementation of the Federal Aid Highway Program in Minnesota”; OR the action does not occur within any areas of effect on properties eligible for, or listed on, the National Register of Historic Places as concurred by the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Officer's opinion. THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES: The action does not affect species or critical habitat protected by the Endangered Species Act; OR does not adversely affect species or critical habitat as per written correspondence with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. RIGHT OF WAY: The action requires no or minor amounts of new right of way or temporary easement, minor access change, no relocations, and has low risk of hazardous materials involvement. FARMLAND: The action will not involve the acquisition of farmland; OR form AD-1006 of the Farmland Protection Policy Act has been completed and provided to the Natural Resources Conservation Service. SECTION 404: The action does not involve placement of fill into Waters of the United States (33 CFR 328); OR a NATIONWIDE 404 Permit applies. FLOODPLAINS: The action does not encroach into a floodplain; OR the impact is not significant (Executive Order 11988; Federal Aid Policy Guide section 650.105.q). WETLANDS: The action does not impact or encroach into wetlands; OR documentation is available demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Executive Order 11990 and USDOT Order 5660.1A.7.g. NOISE: The action is not a type I action in accordance with Section 772 of the Federal Aid Policy Guide and will not significantly impact noise levels. AIR: The action will not significantly impact air quality. PUBLIC CONTROVERSY: The action is not controversial. 1/30/98

142 Minnesota Department of Transportation Environmental Documentation for Federal Projects with Minor Impacts

143

144 North Dakota Department of Transportation Project Delivery System (PDS) Report

145

146 Ohio Department of Transportation

147 Participation Requirements Review Form LPA Local-let Participation Requirement Review Form Local Public Agency (LPA) Project Name Upon receipt of an LPA’s initial request to use the Local-let process, the LPA will be required to complete and submit this LPA Local-let Participation Requirements Review Form. The District Office shall thoroughly review and evaluate the contents of this submittal as evidence of the LPA’s qualifications and ability to administer the project. Failure by the LPA to demonstrate a satisfactory status for any of these prerequisites shall result in the District denying the LPA the privilege of administering the delivery of a Local-let project. 1. The LPA agrees to adhere to the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) Locally Administered Transportation Projects Manual of Procedures. 2. The LPA’s Person in Responsible Charge accepts the following responsibilities: a. Ensure that all applicable Federal and State regulations are followed on the project and have the responsibility, authority and resources to manage it effectively. b. Serve as agency contact for issues or inquiries concerning the project. c. Be familiar with project progress, involved in decisions that require change orders, and visit the project on a frequency that is commensurate with the magnitude and complexity of the project. Person in Responsible Charge: Current Roles and Responsibilities within LPA: Statement of Qualifications: 3. Identify the LPA Designee to serve as the Construction Project Engineer (CPE), or if the CPE will be provided through contracted consultant services: 4. The LPA must have previously delivered and maintained successful capital improvement projects of a similar size, nature and complexity. Project Name: ODOT PID: Letting Agency Amount:: Funding Sources: If Applicable $ Scope: Issues / Comments: Project Name: ODOT PID: Letting Agency Amount:: Funding Sources: If Applicable $ Scope: Issues / Comments: Project Name: ODOT PID: Letting Agency Amount:: Funding Sources: Complete Date: If Applicable $ Scope:

148 5. Indicate for what project phases the LPA expects to contract consultant services. If function is performed by LPA staff, indicate the LPA Designee(s) responsible and date of applicable qualifications: Environmental: Design: PS&E (Including Bid Document) Right-of-Way Construction Administration & Inspection Sampling and Testing Note: Prequalification does not ensure that the LPA will be permitted by the ODOT District to perform the task on its’ own behalf. 6. The LPA has established and documented practices for each of the following project administration responsibilities, even if provided through consultant services. The LPA must indicate LPA support staff responsible for the management of these processes. Written processes should be attached separately to this form, or documented in the space provided (field will expand). a. Consultant Services Evaluation and Selection (If Federal / State funds involved): LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: b. Consultant Services Management: LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: c. Right-of-Way Design and Acquisition LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: d. Environmental: LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: e. Change Order Process: LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: f. Dispute Resolution / Claims Management Process Issues / Comments:

149 LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: g. Finance, Accounting and Record Keeping: LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilitiies: h. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) compliance: LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: i. Davis-Bacon and/or State Prevailing Wages Compliance: LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: j. Maintenance of Project Files: LPA Designee(s): Process Description / Designee Responsibilities: 7. The LPA must not be under fiscal watch or fiscal emergency for its most recently completed fiscal year. In the event the entity is emerging from fiscal watch or fiscal emergency, the entity must be able to clearly demonstrate that it has adequate financial resources to fund matching and/or cost overruns on the project. The LPA must submit a copy of its most recently completed audit and management letter. Both documents must support the entity’s ability to fiscally handle and administer the project. There should be no material or significant issues related to prior or current ODOT projects, by the entity as a whole, which would provide doubt regarding the LPA’s ability to administer an LPA project 8. The LPA has established authority in place for executing the project, and must be willing to provide a copy of approved legislation that provides the mayor, county engineer or other designated local official with clear authority to enter into a project agreement with ODOT. Signature: __________________________________________ _______________ (LPA Person in Responsible Charge) Date

150 Ohio LPA Project Evaluation Form LPA Local-let Project Evaluation Review Form LPA: PID #: Project Name: Primary Work Type: At the completion of each Local-let project, the District shall evaluate and document the LPA’s project management and delivery performance, as related to each phase throughout project development. Unsatisfactory or negligent performance in the management of a Local-let project can result in the denial of future requests by the LPA to utilize the Local-let process. All determinations require a comment. Completed forms must be copied to ODOT Office of Local Projects. District LPA Team Determination Required Comments LPA Coordinator: X _____________________ Satisfactory Comments: Satisfactory, with recommendations Unsatisfactory District Environmental Coordinator: X _____________________ Satisfactory Comments: Satisfactory, with recommendations Unsatisfactory District Real Estate Administrator: X _____________________ Satisfactory Comments: Satisfactory, with recommendations Unsatisfactory District Construction Monitor: X ______________________ Satisfactory Comments: Satisfactory, with recommendations Unsatisfactory District EEO / Prevailing Wage Monitor: X ______________________ Satisfactory Comments: Satisfactory, with recommendations Unsatisfactory Other(s): Satisfactory Comments:

151 X ______________________ X ______________________ Satisfactory, with recommendations Unsatisfactory cc: Office of Local Projects

152

153 Oregon Department of Transportation Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Checklist for Certified Agencies

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161 Oregon Department of Transportation Sampled Section from Local Program Quick Reference Guide

162

163

164

165

166

167

168 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Community Transportation Initiative Reimbursement Agreement – Construction EFFECTIVE DATE (DEPARTMENT will insert) FEDERAL ID NO. __________ SAP VENDOR NO. COUNTY______________ MUNICIPALITY________ MPMS NO.____________ PENNSYLVANIA COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT--CONSTRUCTION THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Transportation (“DEPARTMENT”), a n d _______, _______ County, a [political subdivision duly and properly formed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through its proper officials OR MPO/RPO OR private nonprofit corporation] ("SPONSOR"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT, as part of its “Smart Transportation” concept, consisting of efforts to link land use and transportation to create better communities, has developed the Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative (“PCTI”) to provide an incentive for projects that promote collaborative decision-making by local governments, planning organizations and the DEPARTMENT; that advance integrated land use and transportation decisions; and that further regional and multi-municipal cooperation throughout Pennsylvania; and, WHEREAS, the projects and activities that the DEPARTMENT intends to fund under PCTI fall into two general categories: (1) planning activities and (2) construction; and,

169 WHEREAS, in accordance with the authorizations conferred by the applicable provisions of Title 23, United States Code, in particular 23 U.S.C. §§ 104(b)(3) and 133, the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) has made available to the DEPARTMENT Federal-aid highway program funds through the Surface Transportation Program, to be spent by the DEPARTMENT for the purposes set forth in these statutory provisions; and, WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT will fund PCTI construction projects using Surface Transportation Program funding from the “Flexible” subcategory; and, WHEREAS, federal funding will cover one hundred percent (100%) of the total allowable costs of construction projects approved by the DEPARTMENT for participation in PCTI; and, WHEREAS, the SPONSOR will be financially responsible for any costs not eligible for Federal-aid participation; and, WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT, following review of the SPONSOR's application (“Application”), which is incorporated by reference as though physically attached to this Agreement, and after conferring with the associated metropolitan or regional planning organization, has approved its project, more fully described below in Paragraph 2 ("Project") and as further described in its Application, for participation in PCTI; and, WHEREAS, the SPONSOR has signified its willingness to participate in PCTI and proceed with the Project, in accordance with the terms, conditions and provisions set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual promises set forth below, the parties, with the intention of being legally bound, agree to the following: 1. RECITALS

170 The foregoing recitals are incorporated by reference as a material part of this Agreement. 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS The SPONSOR, subject to reimbursement or other payment procedures as provided in this Agreement, shall participate in the design and construction of the improvements constituting the Project at the following location in accordance with plans, policies, procedures and specifications prepared and/or approved by the DEPARTMENT and the FHWA, where applicable: Type of Improvement Location _______________________________ _______________________ _______________________________ _______________________ 3. DESIGN (a) The SPONSOR, with its own forces or by contract, shall design the proposed Project. The design shall be in accordance with plans, policies, procedures, criteria and specifications prepared or approved by the DEPARTMENT and the FHWA, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the current DEPARTMENT Design Manual; the DEPARTMENT Bureau of Design Specifications for Consultant Agreements, Form No. 442, ; the DEPARTMENT Procedures for the Administration of Consultant Agreements (Consultant Version), Publication 93-C; and the DEPARTMENT Specifications, Publication 408 Specifications (current edition), its amendments and supplements (collectively, "Publication 408 Specifications"). If there is Federal-aid participation in Project design activities, Exhibit “A” attached to and made part of the Agreement will so indicate, with the estimated cost and reimbursement percentage. (b) The SPONSOR shall secure all necessary approvals, permits and licenses from all other governmental agencies as may be required to complete the Project. This obligation shall include the responsibility for the preparation or revision of environmental impact statements, environmental assessments, categorical exclusions, environmental reports or other documents required by law and/or environmental litigation; and the defense of environmental litigation resulting from the planning, design and/or construction of the Project. At the DEPARTMENT’s

171 request, the SPONSOR shall furnish to the DEPARTMENT, prior to advertising and letting the Project, evidence of the approvals, permits, licenses and approved environmental documents. 4. UTILITY CONSIDERATIONS The SPONSOR shall furnish Project plans to utilities known to have facilities within the Project limits and to all other utilities discovered within the Project limits. (a) The SPONSOR shall arrange for any necessary relocation or adjustment for all utility facilities and notify each utility company to relocate any affected facilities to accommodate the construction of the Project. The SPONSOR, with the DEPARTMENT’s guidance, shall make these arrangements in accordance with FHWA requirements and/or DEPARTMENT requirements. If any affected utility claims that the SPONSOR is responsible for reimbursing the affected utility for its relocation costs under state or local laws in existence as of the effective date of this Agreement, the SPONSOR shall furnish the DEPARTMENT with a detailed cost estimate prepared by the utility and documentation justifying the SPONSOR's legal obligation to reimburse the utility for utility relocation costs actually incurred by the utility. The DEPARTMENT, after review and approval of the cost estimates and documentation, shall draft the necessary reimbursement agreement to be entered into between the SPONSOR and the utility. The DEPARTMENT shall submit the reimbursement agreement to the SPONSOR for execution by the parties. (b) Where the SPONSOR owns or operates the existing utility facilities, the SPONSOR shall prepare the standard document provided by the DEPARTMENT, which shall be submitted in addition to the above documentation. This document acknowledges that the utility facilities are located in the right-of-way and that the relocation costs are Project-eligible costs. If the SPONSOR-owned or -operated utility facilities are located within DEPARTMENT right-of-way, the DEPARTMENT will not share in the relocation costs pursuant to Section 412.1 of the State Highway Law, as amended, 36 P.S. Section 670-412.1. (c) Prior to advertising the Project for letting, the SPONSOR, on forms provided by the DEPARTMENT, shall furnish a utility clearance assurance statement attesting that all arrangements have been made for the relocation of all known facilities affected by the Project in

172 accordance with DEPARTMENT Design Manual Part V. The statement shall be supported by a description of the written arrangements made with the utilities for the relocation of facilities in a manner that will not impede Project construction. (d) The SPONSOR in conjunction with the DEPARTMENT agrees that all utility facilities transferred to or remaining at a location within the right-of-way of a federally-aided highway shall be accommodated in accordance with the provisions of the Federal-aid Policy Guide, Chapter I, Subchapter G, Part 645 and all amendments thereto. (e) If the Agreement terminates for lack of activity of failure to complete the Project, as provided in Paragraph 30, after any utility has been authorized to proceed with its relocation work, the SPONSOR, at its sole cost and expense, hereby agrees to reimburse the utility for its actual and related indirect costs and expense of work actually completed at the time of termination, plus any additional expenses incurred by the utility in restoring its system to normal operating conditions. 5. APPLICATION TO PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION The SPONSOR, as necessary, shall make such applications to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("Commission") as are required for the construction and completion of the Project and shall present this Agreement into evidence before the Commission with the request that the Commission allocate costs for said Project in accordance with this Agreement. If the Commission, by order, allocates costs to the DEPARTMENT as a result of such application, the SPONSOR agrees to reimburse the DEPARTMENT in full for the costs allocated to the DEPARTMENT. 6. CONTRACT DEVELOPMENT (a) The SPONSOR shall, by contract or with its own forces, be responsible for preparation of all plans, specifications and estimates ("P.S.&E.") for the Project. The DEPARTMENT's list of the essential documents to be prepared by the SPONSOR, entitled “Plans, Specifications, Estimates and Bid Proposal Package,” is incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached. All work shall be in conformance with applicable state and federal laws

173 and requirements, including, but not limited to, those outlined in the Federal-aid Policy Guide, Chapter I, Subchapter G and the DEPARTMENT's Exemption Document, as currently approved by the FHWA. (b) All bid documents shall require that the contractor be prequalified by the DEPARTMENT, unless the DEPARTMENT, in writing, waives prequalification. (c) Upon completion of all required bid documents, the SPONSOR shall submit them to the DEPARTMENT for review and approval. The DEPARTMENT, after FHWA authorization of the Project, approval of a right-of-way certification (if applicable), approval of a utility clearance assurance statement, completion of P.S.&E. review and satisfactory resolution of any comments, shall prepare the bid proposal documents required to bid the Project, subject to reimbursement by the SPONSOR for the costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT for preparation (except where the SPONSOR is allowed to handle bidding and award itself, as provided in Paragraph 9, in which case the SPONSOR shall be responsible for preparing all bid proposal documents), and then shall issue an authorization to advertise for bids. The DEPARTMENT must review and approve any addenda to the approved bid documents prior to their issuance to prospective bidders. Issuance of addenda shall occur no later than seven (7) calendar days before the proposed bid opening. 7. OCCUPANCY RIGHTS (a) The SPONSOR shall ensure that it has the right to occupy the area of the Project for purposes of constructing and maintaining the Project and that the public has a right to enter and use the area of the Project for a sufficient time after completion of construction to justify the expenditure of public funds on the Project. This right of occupancy by the SPONSOR and continued use by the public may be shown by deed of fee simple or easement; by right-of-way, lease or license agreement; or by any other means found acceptable to the DEPARTMENT. (b) Upon request from the DEPARTMENT, the SPONSOR shall provide information necessary to document the right to occupy the area of the Project for construction, maintenance and use. The SPONSOR shall also supply any additional information as deemed necessary by the DEPARTMENT for this purpose. This may include the creation of a plan showing all property

174 acquired by the SPONSOR's predecessors in title, including a designation of the nature of the predecessors' interests (i.e., whether in fee or easement) and a notation of where the instruments conveying those interests are located. The Project will not advance to the final design phase until the DEPARTMENT is satisfied that the SPONSOR has proven appropriate interest in all affected property. 8. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION [USE EITHER THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SPONSOR VERSION AS APPROPRIATE] [PUBLIC SPONSOR VERSION] (a) The SPONSOR shall ensure that all additional right-of-way necessary to construct this Project shall be acquired in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, policies and procedures, as detailed in the DEPARTMENT LPA Brochure: A Guide for Local Public Agency Acquisition of Right-of-Way, Publication No. 98, incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached. (b) The SPONSOR shall acquire all necessary right-of-way by gift, agreement, dedication, purchase and/or condemnation. The amount of right-of-way required for the Project shall be shown on a plan, which shall be prepared in accordance with policies, procedures, criteria and specifications prepared or approved by the DEPARTMENT and the FHWA, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the current DEPARTMENT Design Manual. (c) The SPONSOR, subject to possible reimbursement from the FHWA, shall be responsible for all negotiations, defense of all claims and initial payment of all property damages or right-of- way costs resulting from any acquisition and/or condemnation. The SPONSOR shall strictly comply with all applicable right-of-way acquisition procedures set forth in the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; the current DEPARTMENT Right-of-Way Manual and its amendments; and the Federal-aid Policy Guide. Acquisition costs shall include, but shall not be limited to, payment of claims of affected property owners; photographic, appraisal and engineering services; title reports; counsel fees; expert witness fees required for the adjudication of all property damage claims; transcripts of testimony before the board of view; and all record costs, including printing costs, in case of appeal to an appellate court.

175 (d) If the DEPARTMENT is reimbursing right-of-way acquisition and/or utility relocation activities for this Project, the estimated costs and reimbursement percentages are detailed in Exhibit "A." (e) The SPONSOR agrees that any real property acquired with funds provided under this Agreement shall be managed in accordance with the property management requirements provided in 23 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart D. Any use of the property for purposes other than that for which the funds were provided must be consistent with the continuation of the original use. If the original use of the real property is converted by sale or lease to another use inconsistent with the original use, the SPONSOR shall pay any amounts obtained for that conversion to the DEPARTMENT. [PRIVATE SPONSOR VERSION] (a) The SPONSOR shall ensure that all additional right-of-way necessary to construct this Project shall be acquired in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, policies and procedures. In particular, the SPONSOR shall comply with 49 C.F.R. Section 24.101(A)(2), which requires the SPONSOR, prior to making an offer for property, to advise the owner that it cannot acquire the property by condemnation in the event that negotiations fail to result in an amicable agreement and to inform the owner of what it believes to be the fair market value of the property. (b) The SPONSOR shall acquire all necessary right-of-way by gift, agreement, dedication and/or purchase. The amount of right-of-way required for the Project shall be shown on a plan, which shall be prepared in accordance with policies, procedures, criteria and specifications prepared or approved by the DEPARTMENT and the FHWA, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the current DEPARTMENT Design Manual. (c) The SPONSOR, subject to possible reimbursement from the FHWA, shall be responsible for all negotiations, defense of all claims and initial payment of all property damages or right-of- way costs resulting from any acquisition for the Project. Acquisition costs shall include, but

176 shall not be limited to, payment of claims of affected property owners; photographic, appraisal and engineering services; and title reports. (d) If the DEPARTMENT is reimbursing right-of-way acquisition activities for this Project, the estimated costs and reimbursement percentages are detailed in Exhibit "A." (e) The SPONSOR agrees that any real property acquired with funds provided under this Agreement shall be managed in accordance with the property management requirements provided in 23 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart D. Any use of the property for purposes other than that for which the funds were provided must be consistent with the continuation of the original use. If the original use of the real property is converted by sale or lease to another use inconsistent with the original use, the SPONSOR shall pay any amounts obtained for that conversion to the DEPARTMENT. 9. LETTING AND AWARD If the SPONSOR has in place procedures that the DEPARTMENT has previously approved, allowing the SPONSOR to handle the bidding and award itself, the SPONSOR shall advertise for bids, open bids and award the construction contract in its own name, in accordance with applicable state and federal laws and requirements, including, but not limited to, those outlined in the Federal-aid Policy Guide, Chapter I, Subchapter G, Part 630, Subpart B and the DEPARTMENT Procedures for the Administration of Federal-aid Municipal Contract Construction Projects. Otherwise, the DEPARTMENT shall advertise for bids, open bids and award the construction contract in the name of the SPONSOR, in accordance with the same state and federal laws and requirements. In either case, the SPONSOR shall execute the contract and issue the notice to proceed. 10. INSPECTION (a) The SPONSOR, with its own forces or by contract, shall provide staff to inspect and supervise all construction work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, including, but not limited to, the Publication 408 Specifications, and to assure that all work is in

177 accordance with the Federal-aid Policy Guide, Chapter I, Subchapter G, Part 635, entitled "Construction and Maintenance." (b) Allowable construction engineering costs may include such work items as inspection, certification, and test of materials and surveys in accordance with the Federal-aid Policy Guide, Chapter I, Subchapter B, Part 140, and 23 C.F.R. § 1.11. Such costs are eligible for federal participation only to the extent that they are directly attributable and properly allocable to the Project. 11. REIMBURSEMENT (a) Subject to the terms set forth in this Agreement and in conformance with the policies adopted by the DEPARTMENT, the DEPARTMENT, from funds allocated for this purpose by the FHWA, to the extent that such funds are first made available by the FHWA to the DEPARTMENT, shall make payment to the SPONSOR. The DEPARTMENT shall reimburse the SPONSOR for one hundred percent (100%) of the allowable costs of the Project. Exhibit "A" sets forth the activities or phases being reimbursed, the estimated costs and the reimbursement percentages. (b) The SPONSOR, by executing this Agreement, certifies (1) that it has on hand, or will obtain over the life of the Project, sufficient funds to meet all of its obligations under the terms of this Agreement, and (2) that it, and not the DEPARTMENT, shall provide all funds needed to pay any costs incurred in excess of those costs eligible for Federal-aid participation and shall bear all such excess costs. The SPONSOR shall be solely responsible for one hundred percent (100%) of this portion of the total Project costs. The SPONSOR may use any combination of funds from its own budget and/or outside sources, whether public or private. (c) The SPONSOR, for the purpose of reimbursement, shall submit to the DEPARTMENT on a monthly basis certified periodic (maximum of two (2) per month) invoices for: (1)Allowable costs for work performed by the SPONSOR's forces on the Project. (2) Work performed on the Project by the SPONSOR’s contractors(s) or consultant(s).

178 Following review and approval by the local Engineering District Office, the DEPARTMENT shall submit these certified invoices to the FHWA for payment. As FHWA funds are made available, the DEPARTMENT shall reimburse the SPONSOR for the proportionate share of the approved charges. (d) The SPONSOR is obligated to submit to the DEPARTMENT invoices from its consultant(s) and contractor(s) as it receives them, in accordance with the periodic schedule set forth above, to assure prompt payment of the consultant(s) and contractor(s) for work performed to date. (e) The SPONSOR shall pay the federal and the SPONSOR shares to its consultant(s) or contractor(s) within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the DEPARTMENT’s payment. The SPONSOR shall, as part of its record-keeping obligation, maintain records of receipt and payment of such funds. Failure to comply with this subparagraph or with the requirements of subparagraph (e) relating to submission of invoices shall be a default for purposes and the DEPARTMENT shall have the further right to change payment procedures unilaterally to a reimbursement basis. (f) If the DEPARTMENT changes payment procedures unilaterally to a reimbursement basis, as provided in subparagraph (e), the following procedures shall apply: (i) The SPONSOR, within seven (7) days of the established estimate dates, shall submit to the DEPARTMENT certified periodic (maximum of two (2) per month) invoices for reimbursement. (ii) The SPONSOR shall include with the invoices verification of payment of the consultant(s) or contractor(s) by means of a copy of the cancelled check or a certified letter from the consultant(s) or contractor(s) acknowledging payment. (iii) After reviewing the verification concerning payment of the consultant(s) or contractor(s) and material certifications and determining them to be

179 satisfactory, the Engineering District Office shall approve the invoices for payment. (iv) Following review and approval by the local Engineering District Office, the DEPARTMENT shall submit these certified invoices to the FHWA for payment of the federal share. As FHWA funds are made available, the DEPARTMENT shall reimburse the SPONSOR for the proportionate share of the approved charges. (g) The SPONSOR shall be responsible for all costs incurred in excess of those eligible for Federal-aid participation, including, but not limited to, any and all costs relating to or resulting from changes to the approved plans and/or specifications, time delays and extensions of time or termination of construction work, interest for late payments or for money borrowed to finance the Project (inasmuch as interest paid by the SPONSOR is not federally reimbursable), unforeseen right-of-way and other property damages and costs resulting from the acquisition and/or condemnation of lands for the Project and/or for the construction of the improvements, unforeseen utility relocation costs, unforeseen costs for environmental litigation and reports, and all other unforeseen costs and expenses not included in the estimates of design, utility relocation, construction and right-of-way acquisition costs, but which are directly related to or caused by the planning, design, and/or construction of the Project. This provision shall not preclude the SPONSOR from modifying the scope of the Project, with the approval of the DEPARTMENT, in the event that the costs exceed the available funds. (h) For those costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT, including, but not limited to, costs relating to administrative and oversight activities, which costs are the responsibility of the SPONSOR in accordance with subparagraph (b) above and appear as estimates on Exhibit "A," the DEPARTMENT shall invoice the SPONSOR on a monthly basis. Failure by the SPONSOR to reimburse the DEPARTMENT within thirty (30) days of receipt of the DEPARTMENT's invoice shall cause the SPONSOR to be in default of payment. In the event of such default, the DEPARTMENT may, in its sole discretion, consider the Project to be terminated, whereupon the

180 SPONSOR shall be obligated to reimburse all FHWA and DEPARTMENT funds in accordance with Paragraph 30. (i) The DEPARTMENT shall not reimburse any additional or extra work done or materials furnished, not specifically provided for in the approved plans and specifications, unless the DEPARTMENT has first approved such additional or extra work or materials in writing. Any such work done or materials furnished without such written approval first being given shall be at the SPONSOR's own risk, cost and expense. (j) The SPONSOR shall submit its final invoices for payment or reimbursement, as the case may be, of the items set forth in subparagraph (c) to the DEPARTMENT within one (1) year of the acceptance of the Project. If the SPONSOR fails to submit its final invoices within this one- (1-) year period, it may forfeit all remaining federal and state financial participation in the Project. (k) In accordance with Commonwealth Management Directive 310.30 Amended, issued May 22, 2009, relating to the Pennsylvania Electronic Payment Program and the establishment of the Automated Clearing House Network (“ACH”) as the Commonwealth’s preferred method of payment, the following provisions apply to the making of payments pursuant to this Agreement: 1.The DEPARTMENT will make payments to the SPONSOR through ACH. Within 10 days of executing this Agreement, the SPONSOR must submit or must have already submitted its ACH information on a ACH enrollment form (obtained at www.vendorregistration.state.pa.us/cvmu/paper/Forms/ACH- EFTenrollmentform.pdf) and electronic addenda information, if any, to the Commonwealth’s Payable Service Center, Vendor Data Management Unit at 717- 214-0140 (FAX) or by mail to the Office of Comptroller Operations, Bureau of Payable Services, Payable Service Center, Vendor Data Management Unit, 555 Walnut Street - 9th Floor, Harrisburg, PA 17101. 2. The SPONSOR must submit a unique invoice number with each invoice submitted. The unique invoice number will be listed on the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s ACH remittance advice to enable the SPONSOR to properly apply the state agency’s payment to the respective invoice or program.

181 3. It is the responsibility of the SPONSOR to ensure that the ACH information contained in the Commonwealth’s Central Vendor Master File is accurate and complete. Failure to maintain accurate and complete information may result in delays in payments. 12. SUPPLEMENTS AND AMENDMENTS (a) If the cost for any phase listed in Exhibit “A” is blank, or the cost of any phase increases, causing the overall Agreement cost to increase, the parties must execute a letter of amendment that will include a revised Exhibit “A.” The DEPARTMENT cannot reimburse the SPONSOR for the costs of these phases until the parties execute the letter of amendment. Adequate federal funds must be available before the parties may execute a letter of amendment, with a revised Exhibit “A” attached. A letter of amendment is not effective until duly authorized representatives of the DEPARTMENT, the SPONSOR, the Office of Chief Counsel and the Office of Comptroller Operations sign and date the letter of amendment. A sample letter of amendment is attached as Exhibit “D” and made a part of this Agreement. (b) If the parties determine that the cost for any phase listed in Exhibit “A” should be redistributed, and the redistribution does not result in an increase or decrease in the total Project costs or a change in the scope of work, the parties must execute a letter of adjustment that will include a revised Exhibit “A.” The DEPARTMENT cannot reimburse the SPONSOR for the costs of these phases until the parties execute the letter of adjustment. A letter of adjustment is not effective until duly authorized representatives of the DEPARTMENT, the SPONSOR and the Office of Comptroller Operations sign and date the letter of adjustment. A sample letter of adjustment is attached as Exhibit “C” and made a part of this Agreement. (c) All other changes to terms and conditions of this Agreement must be in the form of a fully executed supplemental agreement signed by the same entities that executed the original agreement.

182 13. RECORDS AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS (a) The SPONSOR shall maintain, and it shall require its consultants and contractors to maintain, all books, documents, papers, records, supporting cost proposals, accounting records, employees' time cards, payroll records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred in the Project and shall make such materials available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three (3) years from the date of submission of the final voucher to FHWA, for inspection and/or audit by the DEPARTMENT, the FHWA or any other authorized representatives of the state or federal government; and copies shall be furnished, if requested. Time records for personnel performing any work shall account for direct labor performed on the Project as well as the time of any personnel included in the computation of overhead costs. In addition, a complete record of time shall be kept for personnel assigned part-time to the Project. A record of time limited to only their work on this Project will not be acceptable. (b) As specified by the Federal Office of Management and Budget, the SPONSOR agrees to satisfy the audit requirements contained in the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended, 31 U.S.C. Section 7501 et seq., and, for this purpose, to comply with the Audit Clause to Be Used in Agreements with Entities Receiving Federal Awards from the Commonwealth, dated December 3, 2003, which is incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached. As used in the Audit Clause, the term "Subrecipient" means the SPONSOR. 14. 14. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF FACILITY [VERSION FOR PROJECTS WHERE FACILITY IS NOT WITHIN LOCAL OR STATE RIGHT OF WAY] (a) The SPONSOR shall operate and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, all of the completed Project improvements financed under this Agreement that fall within its jurisdiction. The SPONSOR shall establish a formalized maintenance program, to be performed by contract or with its own forces, to insure an acceptable level of physical integrity and operation

183 consistent with original design standards. This maintenance program, established in accordance with standards determined to be acceptable by the DEPARTMENT, shall include, but not be limited to, periodic inspections; appropriate preventative maintenance, which shall include, where applicable, cleaning, lubricating and refurbishing of electrical equipment; a systematic record-keeping system; and the means to handle notification and implementation of emergency repairs. The SPONSOR certifies that it shall make available sufficient funds to provide the maintenance program described herein. This provision shall not preclude the SPONSOR from making arrangements with other governmental bodies or instrumentalities or private parties for sharing the maintenance responsibilities. However, the SPONSOR shall retain primary responsibility pursuant to this subparagraph. (b) Failure by the SPONSOR to fulfill its maintenance responsibilities may result in the loss of future state and federal funds. (c) The SPONSOR shall have the right to transfer ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement, subject to prior approval by the DEPARTMENT. The SPONSOR shall submit a letter to the DEPARTMENT’s local Engineering District Office requesting approval to transfer ownership and maintenance and stating the name and address of the entity that will assume these responsibilities, which shall also sign the letter. The DEPARTMENT shall signify its approval, which it shall not unreasonably withhold, with the signature of its duly authorized representative on the letter. [VERSION FOR PROJECT IN SPONSOR’S ROAD OR RIGHT OF WAY] (a) The SPONSOR, at its sole cost and expense, shall operate and maintain all of the completed improvements financed under this Agreement that fall under its jurisdiction. The SPONSOR certifies that it shall make available sufficient funds to provide for the described maintenance program. Exhibit “E,” attached to and made a part of this Agreement, lists the minimum maintenance requirements that the SPONSOR must perform. (b) The DEPARTMENT, in concurrence with the FHWA, when applicable, shall determine the existence of acceptable methods of operation and maintenance. These operation and maintenance services shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

184 (i) Periodic inspections; (ii) Functional review of traffic operations; (iii) Appropriate preventative maintenance, which shall include cleaning, lubrication and refurbishing of all electrical equipment; (iv) A systematic record-keeping system; and (v) A means to handle the notification and implementation of emergency repairs. (c) The existence of functioning maintenance and operation services shall not exempt the SPONSOR from complying with the provisions of the Vehicle Code (75 Pa. C.S. § 101 et seq.), as amended, pertaining to traffic control devices, or with applicable provisions of the State Highway Law (36 P.S. § 670-101 et seq.), as amended. (d) The SPONSOR and the DEPARTMENT agree that each party shall administer, enforce and maintain any statutes, regulations or ordinances within its jurisdiction necessary for the operation of the improvements. The parties further agree that the enforcement obligations relating to the regulations are governed by the statutes of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and more particularly by those statutes relating to municipalities; the Vehicle Code, as amended; and the State Highway Law, as amended; as well as those ordinances, rules and regulations issued by appropriate governmental agencies in implementation of these statutes. (e) The SPONSOR acknowledges that the traffic controls and parking regulations necessary to be maintained on these improvements are shown on Exhibit “F,” attached to and made a part of this Agreement (f) The SPONSOR acknowledges that the DEPARTMENT may disqualify the SPONSOR from future Federal-aid or state participation on SPONSOR-maintained projects if the SPONSOR fails to: (i) Provide for the proper maintenance and operation of the completed improvements; or (ii) Maintain and enforce compliance with any statutes, regulations or ordinances under its jurisdiction necessary for the operation of the improvements.

185 (g) The SPONSOR agrees that the DEPARTMENT shall withhold Federal-aid or state funds, or both, until one or both of the following (as applicable) have taken place: (i) The SPONSOR has corrected the operation and maintenance services. (ii) The SPONSOR has brought traffic operations on the improvements, including enforcement of statutes, regulations or ordinances, up to a level satisfactory to the DEPARTMENT. (h) This Agreement is without prejudice to the right of the SPONSOR to receive reimbursement for maintenance costs from any railroad or party other than the DEPARTMENT, if so ordered by the PUC, where a rail-highway crossing is under the jurisdiction of the PUC. [VERSION FOR WHEN PROJECT IS IN DEPARTMENT’S RIGHT OF WAY] The DEPARTMENT, as the entity exercising authority and jurisdiction over the roads upon which the Project is being constructed, shall operate and maintain, all of the completed improvements financed with Federal-aid funds as part of the state highway system, consistent with the requirements of the Vehicle Code, State Highway Law of 1945, and Commonwealth regulations. If there is any signalization, it shall be operated by the SPONSOR, pursuant to a separate traffic signal maintenance agreement between the DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR and a traffic signal permit issued by the DEPARTMENT to the SPONSOR. 15. SAVE HARMLESS The SPONSOR shall indemnify, save harmless and (if requested) defend the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the DEPARTMENT, the FHWA and all of their officers, agents and employees from all suits, actions or claims of any character, name or description, including, but not limited to, those in eminent domain or otherwise relating to title to real property, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property, arising out of, resulting from or connected with the planning, development, design, acquisition, construction, completion, occupancy, use, operation and/or maintenance of the Project or the improvements that it comprises, and/or any other activities relating to the Project or the improvements that it comprises, by the SPONSOR and/or the SPONSOR's consultant(s)

186 and/or contractor(s) and their officers, agents and employees, whether the same be due to defective title, defective materials, defective workmanship, neglect in safeguarding the work, or by or on account of any act, omission, neglect or misconduct of the SPONSOR and/or the SPONSOR's consultant(s) and/or contractor(s), their officers, agents and employees, during the performance of the work or thereafter, or to any other cause whatever. 16. [USE ONLY WITH AGREEMENTS WITH MUNICIPALITIES] WITHHOLDING OF LIQUID FUELS FUNDS If the SPONSOR shall fail to perform any of the terms, conditions or provisions of the Agreement, including, but not limited to, any default of payment or reimbursement for a period of thirty (30) days, the SPONSOR authorizes the DEPARTMENT to withhold so much of the SPONSOR’s Liquid Fuels Tax Fund allocation as may be necessary to complete the Project or reimburse the DEPARTMENT in full for all costs due hereunder; and the SPONSOR does hereby and herewith authorize the DEPARTMENT to withhold such amount and to apply such funds, or portion thereof, to remedy such default. 17. REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS The parties agree, and the SPONSOR shall also provide in its contracts for the Project, that all design, plans, specifications, estimates of costs, construction, utility relocation work, right-of- way acquisition procedures, acceptance of the work and procedures in general shall, at all times, conform to all applicable federal and state laws, rules, regulations, orders and approvals, including specifically the procedures and requirements relating to labor standards, equal employment opportunity, nondiscrimination, anti-solicitation, information, auditing and reporting provisions. The SPONSOR shall comply, and shall cause its consultant(s) and contractor(s) to comply, with the conditions set forth in the Commonwealth Nondiscrimination/Sexual Harassment Clause, dated June 30, 1999, and the Federal Nondiscrimination Clauses, dated January 1976, which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached.

187 18. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE REGULATORY COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS The SPONSOR shall take the following steps, where applicable, in order to comply with the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ("DBE") requirements of federal transportation legislation and regulations adopted pursuant thereto: (a) For federally-assisted transportation-related projects, the DEPARTMENT may establish a percentage participation goal. The SPONSOR shall work with the DEPARTMENT's District PCTI Coordinator concerning the necessity of establishing a goal for this Project. If a DBE goal is not applicable, the SPONSOR shall comply with the "Disadvantaged Business Enterprise and Small Business Concern Involvement" provision, which is incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached to it. If a goal is established, this goal must be attained by the SPONSOR's contractor or, in the alternative, a showing of good faith effort must be made. Determination of good faith effort shall be made by the SPONSOR and is subject to the concurrence of the DEPARTMENT. The SPONSOR shall comply with the following provisions, as applicable: i. If the Project requires prequalification, the SPONSOR shall comply with "Designated Special Provision 7" of the Publication 408 Specifications, (current edition), which is incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached to it. ii. If the Project is prequalification exempt, the SPONSOR shall comply with the "Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Requirements—Prequalification Exempt," which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached to it. iii.If the Project includes a design component, the SPONSOR shall comply with the “DBE Special Requirements—Engineering” which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached to it.

188 (b) The SPONSOR must use the list of certified DBE's maintained by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. 19. REQUIRED DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ASSURANCE PROVISION (a) The SPONSOR shallnotdiscriminateon thebasisof race, color,nationaloriginor sex in the performanceofthisAgreement.TheSPONSORshallcarryoutapplicablerequirementsof49C.F.R.Part 26 intheawardandadministrationofUnitedStatesDepartmentofTransportationͲassistedcontracts. FailurebytheSPONSORtocarryouttheserequirementsisamaterialbreachofthisAgreement,which may result in the termination of thisAgreement or such other remedy as theDEPARTMENT deems appropriate.  (b) TheSPONSORmust includetheassurancecontained insubparagraph (a) ineachcontract into whichitenterstocarryouttheProject. 20. FHWA APPROVAL The parties fully understand and agree that their respective obligations under this Agreement shall be made contingent upon the approvals, prior to commencement of work, of the Project's eligibility for participation in federal funds to the extent of the proportionate share, detailed in Exhibit "A"; and, if the FHWA does not give such approval, neither of the parties shall be further obligated by the terms of this Agreement. 21. TERMINATION Because this Agreement is to be funded either partially or completely by federal funds, the DEPARTMENT may terminate it if federal funds are not provided to the DEPARTMENT for the purposes stated in the Agreement. The DEPARTMENT shall effect any such termination by delivery to the SPONSOR of a notice of termination specifying the reason for termination and its effective date. The DEPARTMENT shall compensate the SPONSOR for work performed or services provided in accordance with the terms of this Agreement prior to the date of the notice of termination or such other date as the notice of termination shall specify.

189 22. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The SPONSOR shall enact and/or adopt such ordinances and/or resolutions as may be necessary to effect the purposes of this Agreement. 23. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS All covenants and obligations of the parties under this Agreement shall bind their successors and assigns, whether or not expressly assumed by such successors and assigns. 24. OFFSET PROVISION The SPONSOR agrees that the Commonwealth may offset the amount of any state tax or Commonwealth liability of the SPONSOR or its affiliates and subsidiaries that is owed to the Commonwealth against any payments due the SPONSOR under this or any other contract with the Commonwealth. 25. CONTRACTOR INTEGRITY PROVISIONS The SPONSOR shall comply with the Commonwealth Contractor Integrity Provisions, dated December 20, 1991, which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached. 26. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT PROVISIONS The SPONSOR shall comply with the Commonwealth Provisions Concerning the Americans with Disabilities Act, dated January 16, 2001, which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached. 27. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY PROVISIONS

190 The SPONSOR shall comply with the Commonwealth Contractor Responsibility Provisions, dated April 16, 1999, which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though physically attached. 28. ANTI-LOBBYING REQUIREMENT Public Law 101-121, Section 319, 31 U.S. Code Section 1352, prohibits the recipient or any lower tier subrecipients of a federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement from expending federal funds to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence a federal agency or Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant or loan or the entering into of any cooperative agreement. The SPONSOR agrees to comply with the Lobbying Certification Form attached to, and made part of, this Agreement as Exhibit "B," which an authorized official of the SPONSOR has executed. 29. RIGHT TO KNOW LAW The Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law, 65 P.S. §§ 67.101—3104, applies to this Agreement. Therefore, this Agreement is subject to, and the SPONSOR shall comply with, the clause entitled Contract Provisions – Right to Know Law 8-K-1532, attached as Exhibit “__” and made a part of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, the term “Contractor” refers to the SPONSOR. 30. EFFECTIVE DATE AND DURATION OF AGREEMENT (a) This Agreement and the authorizations granted in it shall be effective only after full execution and approval by all necessary Commonwealth officials as required by law. Following full execution, the DEPARTMENT will insert the effective date at the top of Page 1. The authorizations granted by this Agreement shall be further contingent upon written approval of the FHWA, if necessary.

191 (b) This Agreement shall remain in effect for three (3) state fiscal years, beginning with the state fiscal year in which it takes effect and continuing for the two (2) succeeding fiscal years. The SPONSOR understands and agrees that it must proceed diligently to move the Project to completion. If no activity, “activity” consisting of the submission of at least one invoice from the SPONSOR by the DEPARTMENT, occurs prior to the end of the third fiscal year, the Agreement shall terminate on June 30 of the third fiscal year. However, if any activity occurs prior to the end of the third fiscal year, the Agreement shall be automatically extended for a fourth fiscal year; and the SPONSOR shall complete the Project by the end of that fourth fiscal year. If the SPONSOR has not completed the Project by June 30 of that fourth fiscal year, the Agreement shall then automatically terminate, unless the SPONSOR requests a time extension, providing detailed justification therefor, and the DEPARTMENT, in its discretion, through the local Engineering District Office, authorizes a time extension in writing. (c) If this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Subparagraph (b) above, the SPONSOR must reimburse any federal funds provided pursuant to this Agreement, because the FHWA will not participate in any costs of a project that is not completed. Furthermore, the SPONSOR must reimburse the DEPARTMENT for any costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT for the Project. Accordingly, the SPONSOR shall reimburse the DEPARTMENT, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a statement from the DEPARTMENT, in an amount equal to the sum of the following: (i) All FHWA funds received by the SPONSOR for return to the

192 FHWA; (ii) All FHWA funds paid to the SPONSOR for work performed under this Agreement for return to the FHWA; (iii) All costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT under this Agreement prior to the time of termination that the FHWA or the SPONSOR has not already reimbursed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the date first above written. ATTEST: ____________________________* (Name of SPONSOR) _________________________ ____________________________ Signature DATE Signature __________________________ _____________________________ Title Title * Unless the individuals signing this Agreement on behalf of the SPONSOR are authorized to do so by statute or regulation, the SPONSOR's resolution authorizing execution and attestation must accompany this Agreement; please indicate the signers’ titles in the blanks provided and date all signatures. ________________________________________________________________ DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE--FOR COMMONWEALTH USE ONLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District Executive DATE APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY FUNDS COMMITMENT DOC. NO. AND FORM UNDER SAP NO. SAP COST CENTER BY

193 GL. ACCOUNT for Chief Counsel Date AMOUNT BY________________________ BY ___________________________________ for Comptroller Operations Date Deputy General Counsel Date BY ___________________________________ Deputy Attorney General Date Agreement No. ___ is split 100%, expenditure amount of $_____, for federal funds and 0 %, expenditure amount of $ 0 , for state funds. The related federal assistance program name and number is _______ The state program name and SAP fund is N/A; N/A. This paragraph does not affect the costs to the SPONSOR. Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative EXHIBIT “A” Agreement No: _____ MPMS No: _____ County: Municipality: Project Name: Derivation of Project Costs = (Check One) 100__% Federal Aid for Construction in the amount of $___________ Participant Reimbursable Activity Federal Commonwealth Sponsor Department Incurred Cost (if any) Subtotal Design Right of Way Utilities Construction $ $ $ Construction Inspection Subtotal $ $ $ Total Project Cost $

194 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Design Manual Bicycle/Pedestrian Checklist How to Use the Bicycle and Pedestrian Checklist The Bicycle and Pedestrian Checklist is an evaluation tool that has three distinct sections that perform best when completed at the appropriate times in the planning and design processes. The guidance below assumes a collective effort to complete the document throughout the life of a project. The three sections correlate closely with certain volumes and chapters within the Design Manual Series: 1. Planning and Programming - DM 1, Chapter 2 “Planning and Prioritization & Programming Phases” 2. Scoping - DM 1A, Chapter 5 “Engineering and Environmental Scoping” 3. Final Design - DM 2, Chapters 1, 2, 6, & 16 as applicable Planning and Programming Section This Section is the research element of the evaluation of bicycle and pedestrian needs. It is suggested that the completion of this Section be a collaborative effort between the District Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator and the District Planning and Programming Manager. The Planning and Programming Section should be initiated when a project has been selected for inclusion on the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Coordinate the research with the MPO/RPO, project sponsor, and other agencies or stakeholder organizations. Transportation Master Plans, of which Bicycle and Pedestrian components are plan subsets, are stable, long range documents that reflect the transportation needs of a region, and as such, are applicable to the Department’s individual projects. The Planning and Programming Section is intended to be a filtering process, whereby the highest level of assessment would be completed at the MPO/RPO and county levels within a District only once per version of their respective Master Plans. When the Master Plans at the MPO/RPO and county levels undergo revision, then a reassessment of bicycle and pedestrian needs, as applied to this Section, would also be revised. Conversely, the demographics and dynamics of a municipality change much more quickly than the MPO/RPO or county-level, and therefore, municipal-level development will have a much greater real-time impact on Department projects. Each Project Manager should query the planning division of a municipality in order to assess the most current accommodations planned for cyclists and pedestrians. Such a query would also reveal omissions of accommodations. The Planning and Programming Section should summarize the accommodations for cyclists and pedestrians that are currently planned on paper by various governmental and private entities. This summary is a transition to the scoping phase of evaluation and implemented in the Scoping Field View. Scoping Section The Scoping Section is a real-time validation of plans that are summarized in the Planning and Programming Section, and equally important is the identification of latent needs that are observed in the field. In many ways, the Scoping section is a comparison of what is planned

195 versus what can practically be constructed, and further calibrated with the unplanned, but warranted, needs that you observe in the field. The Scoping Section should be completed by the Project Manager as part of the Engineering and Environmental (E&E) Scoping process. Coordination with the District Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator, the MPO/RPO, the project sponsor, and other agencies or organizations who participate in the field view will provide an appropriate level of evaluation. Final Design Section The Final Design Section should be used as a “cookbook-style” guideline of various design elements that are supportive or indigenous to bicycle and pedestrian transportation as it relates to a specific project. This section is intended to be completed throughout the Preliminary Engineering and the Final Design Engineering phases of a project. The Project Manager is responsible for the completion of this section. Planning and Programming Section Project______________________________________________________________________________________ SR_________________________ Segment__________________________ Offset_________________________ Team Members_______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ Date__________________________ Item 1. Consistency with Bicycle/Pedestrian Planning Documents Is the transportation facility included in or related to bicycle and pedestrian facilities identified in a master plan? x MPO/LDD bike/ped plan. x Local planning documents. x BicyclePA Routes. x Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Will the transportation facility provide continuity and linkages with existing or proposed bicycle/pedestrian facilities? Is the transportation facility included in or related to a regional/local recreational plan? x Rails-to-Trails. x Greenways. x Local, State, National Parks.

196 2. Existing and Future Usage Do bicycle/pedestrian groups regularly use the transportation facility? x Bike clubs. x Bicycle commuters. x Hiking, walking, or running clubs. x Skateboarding or rollerblading groups. x Bicycle touring groups. x General tourism/sightseeing. Does the existing transportation facility provide the only convenient transportation connection/linkage between land uses in the local area or region? Could the transportation facility have favorable or unfavorable impacts upon the bike tourism/economy of an area/ region? Consider: x Local businesses x Chamber of Commerce x Tourism Promotion Agencies. Are there physical or perceived impediments to bicycle or pedestrian use of the transportation facility? Is there a higher than normal incidence of bicycle/pedestrian crashes in the area? 3. Safety Is the transportation facility in a high- density land use area that has pedestrian/ bike/motor vehicle traffic? 3. Safety (continued) Is there a high amount of crossing activity at intersections? x Midblock x Night crossing activity x Adequate lighting. Would the transportation facility (and all users) benefit from widened or improved shoulders or improved markings (shoulders, crosswalks)? 4. Community and Land Use Is the transportation facility in a city, town, or village? Is the transportation facility within/near a community or neighborhood? Is the transportation facility the “main street” in a community or town?

197 Could bicycle or pedestrian usage impact economic development? Are sidewalks needed in the area? x Presence of worn paths along the facility. x Adjacent land uses generate pedestrian traffic. x Possible linkages/continuity with other pedestrian facilities. Is the transportation facility a link between complimentary land uses? x Residential and commercial. x Residential and business. Is the transportation facility in close proximity to hospitals, elderly care facilities, or the residences or businesses of persons with disabilities? Is the transportation facility within or near educational buildings? Is the transportation facility in close proximity to transit stops or multi- modal centers (including airports, rail stations, intercity bus terminals, and water ports)? 5. Transit Is the transportation facility on a transit route? Is the transportation facility near park-and-ride lots? Are there existing or proposed bicycle racks, shelters or parking available? Are there bike racks on buses? 6.Traffic Calming Is the community considering traffic calming as a possible solution to speeding and cut-through traffic?

198 Scoping Section Project______________________________________________________________________________________ SR_________________________ Segment__________________________ Offset_________________________ Team Members_______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ Date__________________________ Right-of-Way Needs Diagram Element Number Required Width Required Total Width Sidewalks Buffer Strips Shoulders Lanes Median Total Right-of-Way Required Shoulder /Bike Shoulder /Bike Lanes Lanes Sidewalks Sidewalks Planter/Buffer Planter/Buffer Media

199 Pedestrian Facilities Item 1. Sidewalks Sidewalks (cont’d) Appropriate width: x 1.5 m – 2.1 m (5’-7’) for residential, commercial, and industrial. x 2.5 m (8’) minimum for high use areas/CBD. x 2.1 m (7’) width for bridges. x 0.6 m (2’) shy distance for vertical barriers. x 1.2 m – 2.1 m barrier separating traffic from pedestrians on bridges. Applicability of planter or buffer strips. Connectivity with other pedestrian facilities. Proximity to transit bike/ped generators: x Transit stops. x Schools. x Park & rides. x Nursing homes. x Offices. x Business environments. x Athletic fields. x Recreation facilities. Observe pedestrian patterns for special needs such as: x Midblock crossings. x Islands and refuges. x Night crossing activity. ADA needs and concerns. 2. Signalized Intersections Crosswalks provided and marked. Intersection bike/ped crash history reviewed. Is there a dedicated pedestrian phase, if so how long? Crossing distance is minimized. Ped heads and ped pushbuttons provided. ADA needs and concerns. Retirement homes Schools

200 Medical facilities 3. Traffic Calming Is the community considering traffic calming as a means to curb speeding and cut-through traffic? Bicycle Facilities Item 1. Bikelanes/Paved Shoulders Appropriate width of bike lane: x 1.5m (5’) adjacent to curb x 1.8m (6’) standard. Connectivity with other facilities. x Bike lanes x Shared use trails x Trail heads/parking areas. Maximize width of shoulders and provide appropriate markings as per AASHTO Green Book. 3 m (10’) vertical clearance from fixed obstructions (excluding road signs). Angle and smoothness of railroad crossings. Avoid angles of incidence of <70 degrees or re- design. Bridge accesses provided/pinch points avoided. Parking parallel or angled. 2. Signalized intersections Inventory existing bicycle facilities. Intersection bike/ped crash history reviewed. Crossing distance is minimized. Considerations for bikes making turns. Bike detection. Elevated push buttons. 3. Traffic Calming Is the community considering traffic calming as a means to curb speeding and cut-through traffic?

201 Final Design Section Project______________________________________________________________________________________ SR_________________________ Segment__________________________ Offset_________________________ Team Members_______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ Date__________________________ Pedestrian Facilities Item 1. Sidewalks and Signalized Intersections Crosswalks are at least 3 m (10’) wide. Crosswalks are prominently marked using at least 6” line. Pedestrian signals are provided. Pushbuttons are provided and accessible. Minimize crossing distance. Maximize pedestrian visibility at crossings. Coordination of turn phases with walk/don’t walk signs. Proper lighting type and placement. 2. ADA Requirements Pushbuttons accessible. Pushbuttons height 1.0m – 1.1m (3.5’-4.0’). Large pushbuttons used. 1.5m (5’) recommended passage (sidewalks). 5% maximum grade recommended (sidewalks). 2% cross-slope maximum. Textured curb cuts. 2 curb cuts per corner at intersections. Curb cuts flush with street surface 0.6cm (1/4” tolerance). Running slope of new curb cuts 1 in 12 max. Longer signal cycles. Audible crossing signals. Level landings on perpendicular curb ramps. Proper head/shoulder clearance for visually impaired. Coordinate utilities with ADA requirements. Proper lighting. Analyze landscaping growth potential for future obstructions.

202 Any conflicts with minimal distance that should be included in the project. Coordinate and minimize signage conflicts. 3. Traffic Calming Consider traffic calming as a means to improve pedestrian and general traffic safety. Bicycle Facilities Item 1. Bikelanes/Bikeways Bicycle safe grates, RC-34, Sheet 3 of 9. Manhole covers flush with roadway surface. Inlets flush with roadway surface. Rumble strips type and placement. Driveway aprons. Conflicts eliminated with: x Turns at intersections. x Through movements. x Bicycle and pedestrian conflicts. x Parked cars, angled vs. parallel. x Driveway aprons. 2. Signage 3m (10’) vertical clearance from signs and structures. “Share the Road Signs.” “Wrong Way Signs.” Lane stenciling. Bike lane designation signs. No parking signs. Bike lane striped. Transition from bike lane to bikeway. Consistent width on roadways, bridges, and intersections. Overlap bike lane/shoulder stripe over pavement joints. Meet or exceed AASHTO criteria. 3. Traffic calming Consider traffic calming as a means to improve pedestrian and general traffic safety.

203 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Publication 526 – Municipal-Sponsor Guidance Pamphlet

204

205 Washington Department of Transportation Local Agency General Specification for Asphalt 5-04.3(7)A Mix Design (March 10, 2010 APWA GSP) Delete this section and replace it with the following; 1. General. Prior to the production of HMA, the Contractor shall determine a design aggregate structure and asphalt binder content in accordance with WSDOT Standard Operating Procedure 732. Once the design aggregate structure and asphalt binder content have been determined, the Contractor shall submit the HMA mix design on DOT form 350-042 demonstrating the design meets the requirements of Sections 9- 03.8(2) and 9-03.8(6). HMA accepted by nonstatistical evaluation requires a mix design verification. For HMA accepted by commercial evaluation only the first page of DOT form 350-042 and the percent of asphalt binder is required. In no case shall the paving begin before the determination of anti-strip requirements has been made. Anti- strip requirements will be determined by: a. Testing by WSDOT in accordance with TM 718. b. Testing by Contractor in accordance with WSDOT TM 718. c.Historical aggregate source ant-strip use provided by WDOT. The mix design will be the initial Job Mix Formula (JMF) for the HMA being produced. Any additional adjustments to the JMF will require the approval of the Project Engineer and may be made per Section 9-03.8(7). 2. Mix Design Verification. Verification shall be accomplished by one of the following processes: a. Submit samples to WSDOT State Materials Lab for WSDOT verification testing in accordance with WSDOT Standard Specifications. b. The contracting agency will perform tests to verify the mix design in accordance with the Field Verification Testing Process. c. Reference a mix design that has been previously verified by the Field Verification Testing Process or verified by WSDOT State Materials Lab on a previous project. d. Perform Field Verification Testing on a sample of HMA provided by the Contractor prior to paving. Mix design verification is valid for one year from the date of verification. At the discretion of the Engineer, agencies may accept mix designs verified beyond the verification year with certification from the Contractor that the materials and sources are the same as those shown on the original mix design. 3. Field Verification Testing Process. The Contracting agency will collect three Production Samples of HMA on the first day of paving per AASHTO T 168 sampling procedures.

206 a. The Contracting agency will test one Production Sample in accordance with section 5-04.3(8)A for field verification per the requirements of Section 9-03.8(7). b. If the test results from the first Production Sample are within the tolerances of section 9-03.8(7), the mix design will be considered verified and the test results will be used as acceptance sample number one. c. If the test results from the first Production Sample are outside the tolerances of section 9-03.8(7), the other two samples will be tested and the results of all three tests will be used for acceptance in accordance with Section 5-04.5(1) and will be used in the calculation of the CPF the maximum CPF shall be 1.00. 4. Prior to the first day of paving, six Ignition Furnace Calibration Samples shall be obtained to calibrate the Ignition Furnaces used for acceptance testing of the HMA. Calibration samples shall be provided by the Contractor when directed by the Engineer. Calibration samples shall be prepared in accordance with WSDOT SOP 728. 5-04.3(8)A1, General (March 10, 2010 APWA GSP) Delete these sections and replace them with the following: Acceptance of HMA shall be as defined under nonstatistical or commercial evaluation. Nonstatistical evaluation will be used for all HMA not designated as Commercial HMA in the contract documents. Commercial evaluation will be used for Commercial HMA and for other classes of HMA in the following applications: sidewalks, road approaches, ditches, slopes, paths, trails, gores, prelevel, and pavement repair. Other nonstructural applications of HMA accepted by commercial evaluation shall be as approved by the Project Engineer. Sampling and testing of HMA accepted by commercial evaluation will be at the option of the Project Engineer. Commercial HMA can be accepted by a contractor certification letter stating the material meets the HMA requirements defined in the contract. 5-04.3(8)A4, Definition of Sampling Lot and Sublot (March 10, 2010 APWA GSP) Delete this section and replace it with the following: For the purpose of acceptance sampling and testing, a lot is defined as the total quantity of material or work produced for each job mix formula (JMF) placed. Only one lot per mix design will be expected to occur. The initial JMF is defined in Section 5-04.3(7)A Mix Design. The Contractor may request a change in the JMF in accordance with Section 9- 03.8(7). If the request is approved, all of the material produced up to the time of the change will be evaluated on the basis of tests on samples taken from that material and a new lot will begin. For proposal quantities less then 2500 tons sampling and testing for evaluation shall be performed as described in 5-04.3(7)A, item 3, Field Verification Testing Process. The

207 verification sample referenced in item 3b may be used as an acceptance sample, additional testing will be at the discretion of the Engineer. When using a previously verified mix design, testing for volumetric properties may be waived at the engineer’s discretion. At least one acceptance sample is required when using this method of acceptance. For proposal quantities greater than 2500 tons sampling and testing for evaluation shall be performed as described in 5-04.3(7)A, item 3, Field Verification Testing Process, for the first 2500 tons of mix placed. The verification sample referenced in item 3b may be used as an acceptance sample for the first 2500 tons of mix placed. Additional testing will be at the rate of one sample per 800 tons of mix placed or as directed by the Engineer. When using a previously verified mix design, testing for volumetric properties may be waived at the engineer’s discretion. 5-04.3(8)A5, Test Results (March 10, 2010 APWA GSP) Delete this section and replace it with the following: The Engineer will furnish the Contractor with a copy of the results of all acceptance testing performed in the field at the beginning of the next paving shift. The Engineer will also provide the Composite Pay Factor (CPF) of the completed sublots after three sublots have been produced. The CPF will be provided by the midpoint of the next paving shift after sampling. Sublot sample test results (gradation and asphalt binder content) may be challenged by the Contractor. For HMA mixture accepted by statistical evaluation with a mix design that did not meet the verification tolerances, the test results in the test section including the percent air voids (Va) may be challenged. To challenge test results, the Contractor shall submit a written challenge within 7-calendar days after receipt of the specific test results. A split of the original acceptance sample will be sent for testing to either the Region Materials Laboratory or the State Materials Laboratory as determined by the Project Engineer. The split of the sample with challenged results will not be tested with the same equipment or by the same tester that ran the original acceptance test. The challenge sample will be tested for a complete gradation analysis and for asphalt binder content. The results of the challenge sample will be compared to the original results of the acceptance sample test and evaluated according to the following criteria: Deviation U.S. No. 4 sieve and larger Percent passing ±4.0 U.S. No. 8 sieve Percent passing ±2.0 U.S. No. 200 sieve Percent passing ±0.4 Asphalt binder Percent binder content ±0.3 Va Percent Va ±0.7 If the results of the challenge sample testing are within the allowable deviation established above for each parameter, the acceptance sample test results will be used for acceptance of the HMA. The cost of testing will be deducted from any monies due or that may come due the Contractor under the Contract at the rate of $250 per challenge sample. If the results of the challenge sample testing are outside of any one parameter established above, the challenge sample will be used for acceptance of the HMA and the cost of testing will be the Contracting Agency’s responsibility. 5-04.3(8)A7 Test Section – HMA Mixtures (March 10, 2010 APWA GSP)

208 Delete this section. 5-04.5(1)A Price Adjustments for Quality of HMA Mixture (March 10, 2010 APWA GSP) Delete the first paragraph and table and replaced them with the following: Statistical analysis of quality of gradation and asphalt content will be performed based on Section 1-06.2 using the following price adjustment factors: Table of Price Adjustment Factors Constituent Factor “f” All aggregate passing: 1 ½”, 1”, ¾”, ½”, 3/8” and No. 4 sieves 2 All aggregate passing No. 8 15 All aggregate passing No. 200 sieve 20 Asphalt binder 52 Delete items 1-3 in Paragraph two and replaced with the following: A pay factor will be calculated for sieves listed in Section 9-03.8(7) for the class of HMA and for the asphalt binder. 1. Nonstatistical Evaluation. Each lot of HMA produced under Nonstatisical Evaluation and having all constituents falling within the tolerance limits of the job mix formula shall be accepted at the unit contract price with no further evaluation. When one or more constituents fall outside the nonstatistical acceptance tolerance limits in Section 9-03.8(7), the lot shall be evaluated in accordance with Section 1-06.2 to determine the appropriate CPF. The nonstatistical tolerance limits will be used in the calculation of the CPF and the maximum CPF shall be 1.00. When less than three sublots exist, backup samples of the existing sublots or samples from the street shall be tested to provide a minimum of three sets of results for evaluation. 2. Commercial Evaluation. If sampled and tested, HMA produced under Commercial Evaluation and having all constituents falling within the tolerance limits of the job mix formula shall be accepted at the unit contract price with no further evaluation. When one or more constituents fall outside the commercial acceptance tolerance limits in Section 9-03.8(7), the lot shall be evaluated to determine the appropriate CPF. The commercial tolerance limits will be used in the calculation of the CPF and the maximum CPF shall be 1.00. When less than three sublots exist, backup samples of the existing sublots or samples from the street shall be tested to provide a minimum of three sets of results for evaluation. For each lot of HMA produced under Nonstatistical or Commercial Evaluation when the calculated CPF is less than 1.00, a Nonconforming Mix factor (NCMF) will be determined. The NCMF equals the algebraic difference of CPF minus 1.00 multiplied by 60 percent. The Job Mix Compliance Price Adjustment will be calculated as the product of the NCMF, the quantity of HMA in the lot in tons, and the unit contract price per ton of the mix.

209 If a constituent is not measured in accordance with these Specifications, its individual pay factor will be considered 1.00 in calculating the composite pay factor. 5-04.5(1)B Price Adjustments for Quality of HMA Compaction (March 10, 2010 APWA GSP) Delete this section and replace it with the following: The maximum CPF of a compaction lot is 1.00 For each compaction lot of HMA when the CPF is less than 1.00, a Nonconforming Compaction Factor (NCCF) will be determined. THE NCCF equals the algebraic difference of CPF minus 1.00 multiplied by 40 percent. The Compaction Price Adjustment will be calculated as the product of the NCCF, the quantity of HMA in the lot in tons and the unit contract price per ton of the mix.

210 Washington State Department of Transportation Qualification Form for LPAs

211

212

213

214

215

216

need SPine Width Abbreviations used without definition in TRB Publications: AAAE American Association of Airport Executives AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program ADA Americans with Disabilities Act APTA American Public Transportation Association ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials ATA Air Transport Association ATA American Trucking Associations CTAA Community Transportation Association of America CTBSSP Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program DHS Department of Homeland Security DOE Department of Energy EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FHWA Federal Highway Administration FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASAO National Association of State Aviation Officials NCFRP National Cooperative Freight Research Program NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NTSB National Transportation Safety Board SAE Society of Automotive Engineers SAFETY-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (2005) TCRP Transit Cooperative Research Program TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (1998) TRB Transportation Research Board TSA Transportation Security Administration U.S.DOT United States Department of Transportation TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2011 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* OFFICERS Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Vice Chair: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS J. BARRY BARKER, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY DEBORAH H. BUTLER, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, VA WILLIAM A.V. CLARK, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles EUGENE A. CONTI, JR., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh JAMES M. CRITES, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, TX PAULA J. HAMMOND, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley SUSAN MARTINOVICH, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City MICHAEL R. MORRIS, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington TRACY L. ROSSER, Vice President, Regional General Manager, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Mandeville, LA STEVEN T. SCALZO, Chief Operating Officer, Marine Resources Group, Seattle, WA HENRY G. (GERRY) SCHWARTZ, JR., Chairman (retired), Jacobs/Sverdrup Civil, Inc., St. Louis, MO BEVERLY A. SCOTT, General Manager and CEO, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Atlanta, GA DAVID SELTZER, Principal, Mercator Advisors LLC, Philadelphia, PA LAWRENCE A. SELZER, President and CEO, The Conservation Fund, Arlington, VA KUMARES C. SINHA, Olson Distinguished Professor of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN DANIEL SPERLING, Professor of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science and Policy; Director, Institute of Transportation Studies; and Interim Director, Energy Efficiency Center, University of California, Davis KIRK T. STEUDLE, Director, Michigan DOT, Lansing DOUGLAS W. STOTLAR, President and CEO, Con-Way, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI C. MICHAEL WALTON, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin EX OFFICIO MEMBERS PETER H. APPEL, Administrator, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S.DOT J. RANDOLPH BABBITT, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S.DOT REBECCA M. BREWSTER, President and COO, American Transportation Research Institute, Smyrna, GA ANNE S. FERRO, Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S.DOT JOHN T. GRAY, Senior Vice President, Policy and Economics, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC JOHN C. HORSLEY, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC DAVID T. MATSUDA, Deputy Administrator, Maritime Administration, U.S.DOT VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, U.S.DOT WILLIAM W. MILLAR, President, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC TARA O’TOOLE, Under Secretary for Science and Technology, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC ROBERT J. PAPP (Adm., U.S. Coast Guard), Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC CYNTHIA L. QUARTERMAN, Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S.DOT PETER M. ROGOFF, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, U.S.DOT DAVID L. STRICKLAND, Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S.DOT JOSEPH C. SZABO, Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration, U.S.DOT POLLY TROTTENBERG, Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, U.S.DOT ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP (Lt. Gen., U.S. Army), Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC BARRY R. WALLERSTEIN, Executive Officer, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA *Membership as of March 2011.

92+ pages; Perfect Bind with SPine COPY = 14 pts Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM NCHRP SYNTHESIS 414 N CH R P SyN tH eSiS 414 effective Delivery of Sm all-Scale Federal-Aid Projects need SPine Width Job no. XXXX Pantone 202 C tRANSPORtAtiON ReSeARCH BOARD 500 F ifth S treet, n .W . W ashing to n, d .C . 20001 A D D R eSS SeR ViCe R eQ UeSteD tRB A Synthesis of Highway Practice Sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration

Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects Get This Book
×
 Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 414: Effective Delivery of Small-Scale Federal-Aid Projects examines streamlined methods for meeting federal funding requirements for small-scale highway projects.

The report explores ways that state departments of transportation work with local agencies to implement small projects eligible for federal funding.

Appendix G to NCHRP Synthesis 414 is available only in the pdf version of the report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!