Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
ConTenTs (contâd) CONTENTS Introduction, 3 Case Law Analysis, 3 Ridley v. Massachusetts Bay Transp. Authority, 4 Lehman v. Shaker Heights, 6 New York Magazine v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 7 Christâs Bride Ministries, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 7 United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 8 Children of the Rosary v. City of Phoenix, 9 Planned Parenthood Assoc. v. Chicago Transit Authority, 10 American Civil Liberties Union v. Mineta, 10 Advertisement Policy Survey, 11 Overview, 11 Milwaukee County Transit System, 13 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, 14 New Jersey Transit Authority, 14 Los Angeles Department of Transportation, 14 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 14 Chicago Transit Authority, 15 Current Practices, 15 Framework of a Nonpublic and Designated Public Forum, 16 Benefit of Limiting a Space as a Nonpublic Forum, 16 Benefit of Creating a Designated Public Forum, 16 Points on Vagueness and Overly Broad Restrictions, 17 Points on Viewpoint Discrimination, 17 Contractors, 17 Final Considerations, 18 Appendix A: Advertisement Policy Survey, 19 Appendix B: New Jersey Advertising Standards, 24 Appendix C: Advertising Examples, 26
