National Academies Press: OpenBook

Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods (2009)

Chapter: Appendix A - References

« Previous: Chapter 10 Summary
Page 183
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23043.
×
Page 183
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23043.
×
Page 184
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23043.
×
Page 185
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23043.
×
Page 186
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23043.
×
Page 187
Page 188
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23043.
×
Page 188

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

TCRP G-08 – Project Delivery Methods Appendix A - References APPENDIX A - REFERENCES Northeastern University The Research Report 175

TCRP G-08 – Project Delivery Methods Appendix A - References REFERENCES 3D/International, Inc. (2005). “CM at Risk” [WWW document]. URL http://www.3di.com/toolbox/cmatrisk.pdf (visited 2005, April 1) ______ (2000). “CM/GC Whitepaper, Public Contracting Coalition”, Oregon. ______ (2002). “Design-Build Whitepaper, Public Contracting Coalition”, Oregon. American Institute of Architects (AIA) (2005) “Construction Manager at-Risk State Statute Compendium,” AIA Government Affairs, American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC, pp. 125-129. AIA Minnesota (2006). “Understanding Project Delivery for the Design and Construction of Public Buildings”, AIA Minnesota. Allen, L.N., D.D. Gransberg, and K.R. Molenaar, (2002). “Partnering Successful Design- Build Contracts in the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest Division,” The Military Engineer, SAME, Vol., 94 (616), pp.47-48. Associated General Contractors (2004). Project Delivery Systems for Construction, Associated General Contractors of America. A/E/C Training Technologies (2005). Construction Project Delivery Systems: Evaluating the Owner’s Alternatives, Reston, VA. [WWW document] URL http://www.aectraining.com (Viewed March 1, 2006). Bearup, W, Kenig, M. and O’Donnell, J. (2007), “Alternative Delivery Methods, A Primer” Proceedings, Airport Board Members and Commissioners Annual Conference, Airports Council International - North America, Chicago, Illinois. Beard, J., Loulakis, M. and Wundram, E. (2001). Design-Build: Planning Through Development. RR Donnelley & Sons Company. Chan, A., Yung, K., Lam, P., Tam, C., Cheung, S. (2001). “Application of Delphi Method in Selection of Procurement Systems for Construction Projects”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 699-718. Chang, K. (2004). “Multiattribute Weighting Models for Best-Value Selection in Public Sector Design-Build Projects”, PhD thesis, University of Colorado. Construction Industry Institute (1997). “Project Delivery Systems: CM at Risk, Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build,” Research Summary RS 133-1, CII, Austin, Texas. Northeastern University The Research Report 176

TCRP G-08 – Project Delivery Methods Appendix A - References Construction Industry Institute (2003). “Owner’s Tool for Project Delivery and Contract Strategy Selection,” Research Summary 165, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX. C & S Companies (2005). “Construction Management At Risk” [WWW document]. URL http://www.cscos.com/services/CMatRisk/index.cfm (visited 2005, January 31) Debella, D.C. Ries ,R. (2006). “Construction Delivery Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Their Performance within School Districts”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11). El Wardani, M., Messner, J., Horman, M. (2006). Comparing Procurement Methods for Design-Build Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(3). Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2006), Design-Build Effectiveness Study – As Required by TEA-21 Section 1307(f): Final Report, USDOT Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., January 2006, 215pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/designbuild/designbuild0.htm (visited August 30, 2006). Federal Transit Administration (2006). “Annual Report on New Starts: Proposed Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007”, FTA, U. S. D. o. T., Washington, D.C. Garvin, M (2003). “Role of Project Delivery Systems in Infrastructure Improvement,” Proc., Construction Research Congress, ASCE. Ghavamifar, K. and A. Touran (2008), “Alternative Project Delivery Systems: Applications and Legal Limits in Transportation Projects,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 134 (1), January, 106-111. Gordon, C. M. (1994). “Choosing Appropriate Construction Contracting Method,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 120(1), 196-210. Gordon & REES LLP. (2005). “The Basics of Design Build,” Construction Group Newsletter, Gordon & REES LLP. Graham, P. (2001). “Evaluation of Design-Build Practice in Colorado IR(CX) 70-4(143),” Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colorado. Gransberg, D.D. and Barton, R.F. (2007). "Analysis of Federal Design-Build Request for Proposal Evaluation Criteria," Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 23 (2), April 2007, pp. 105-111. Gransberg, D. and Molenaar, K.R. (2007). “The Impacts of Design-Build on the Public Workforce”, Research Paper 07-01, USC Keston Institute for Public Finance and Infrastructure Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, April 2007. Northeastern University The Research Report 177

TCRP G-08 – Project Delivery Methods Appendix A - References Gransberg, D.D. and Molenaar, K.R. (2004). Analysis of Owner’s Design and Construction Quality Management Approaches in Design/Build Projects, Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(4). Halpin, D.W. (2006). Construction Management, 3rd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York. Ibbs, C.W., Kwak, Y., Odabasi, A. (2003). “Project Delivery System and Project Change: A Quantitative Analysis,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE 129(4). 382- 387. Irwin, D. (2003). "Developing the design and construction contracting plan for a major light rail extension project," Transportation Research Circular No. E-C058, TRB, Washington, D.C., 557-575. Kessler, F., Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliot LLP (2005). “Managing Your Money: Project Delivery Methods,” [WWW document] URL http://www.nossaman.com/db30/cgi- bin/news/FWK_MassTransit_04.05.pdf (visited March 20, 2007) Kumaraswamy, M. M. & Dissanayaka, S. M. (1998). “Linking Procurement Systems to Project Priorities,” Building Research and Information, 26(4), 223-238. Konchar, M. and V. Sanvido (1998). “Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems,” Journal of Construction Engineering. and Management, ASCE, 124(6), 435-444. Loulakis, M. (2000). Project Delivery Systems: Evaluating Owner's Alternatives. A/E/C Training Technologies. Mahdi, I.M., Alreshaid, K. (2005). “Decision Support System for Selecting the Proper Project Delivery Method Using Analytical Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of Project Management, 23, 564-572. Mitchell, B.P. (1999). “The Applicability of the Spearin Doctrine: Do Owners Warrant Plans and Specifications?” Find Law for Legal Professionals, http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Aug/1/128038.html (March 24, 2007). Minchin, E., Thakkar, K., Ellis, R. (2007). “Miami Intermodal Center-Introducing CM-At- Risk to Transportation Construction”, in Innovative Project Delivery Systems, Molenaar, K.R. and Yakowenko, G. (Eds), ASCE Press, pp 46-59. Molenaar, K. R., A.D. Songer, and M. Barash (1999), “Public-sector Design/Build Evolution and Performance,” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 15(2), March/April, 54-62. Northeastern University The Research Report 178

TCRP G-08 – Project Delivery Methods Appendix A - References Molenaar, K.R. (2005). “Programmatic Cost Risk Analysis for Highway Megaprojects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE Vol. 131(3), pp. 343-353. Molenaar, K.R., and Scott, S. (2003). Book chapter "Examining the Performance of Design- Build in the Public Sector," Design-Build for the Public Sector, Edited by Michael Loulakis, ISBN 0-7355-3011-4, Aspen Business and Law, Aspen Publishers, 71-112. Molenaar, K.R., et al. (2005). “Recommended AASHTO Design-Build Procurement Guide”, NCHRP 20-7(172), National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, June 2005, 182 pp. North Carolina State Construction Office (2005). “Construction Management-At-Risk Selection Procedures” [WWW document]. URL http://interscope2.doa.state.nc.us/Guidelines/CM@RISK%20SELECTION%20PROCED URES.pdf (visited 2005, January 31) Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott. (2006). “50 state survey of transportation agency design-build authority.” {http://www.nossaman.com} (visited Dec. 12, 2006). Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, Continuum, London. Oyetunji, A.A, Anderson, S.D., (2006). “Relative Effectiveness of Project Delivery and Contract Strategies,” Journal of Construction Engineering. and Management, ASCE, 132(1), 3-13. Parsons, Touran, A., and Golder Assoc. (2004). “Risk Analysis Methodologies and Procedures,” Federal Transit Administration. Riley, D., Diller, B., Ken, D. (2005). “Effects of Delivery Systems on Change Order Size and Frequency in Mechanical Construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 131(9). Saaty, T.L. (1990), Multicriteria Decision Making: the Analytical Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA. Scott, S. Molenaar, K., Gransberg, D, Smith, N. (2006). “Best Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects”, National Cooperative Highway Research Programs (NCHRP), Report 561, Washington, D.C. Skitmore, R. M. & Marsden, D. E. (1988). “Which Procurement System? Towards a Universal Procurement Selection Technique”, Construction Management and Economics, E.F. Spon, Ltd., 6, 71-89. Northeastern University The Research Report 179

TCRP G-08 – Project Delivery Methods Appendix A - References Northeastern University The Research Report 180 Temesi, J. (2006). “Consistency of decision maker in pairwise comparisons”, Int. J. of Management and Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 2/3, pp. 267-274. Touran, A., P. Bolster, and S. Thayer (1994), “Risk Assessment in Fixed Guideway Construction,” Report No. FTA-MA-26-0022, U.S. D.o.T., Washington, D.C. Transit Cooperative Research Program (2002). “Design-Build Transit Infrastructure Projects in Asia and Australia”, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C. Transit Cooperative Research Program (1995). “Transit Labor Protection-A Guide to Section 13(c)”, Legal Research Digest, number 4, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C. Walewski, J. Gibson, G., Jasper, J. (2001). “Project Delivery Methods and Contracting Approaches Available for Implementation by the Texas Department of Transportation”, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 116 pages. Wiss, R., Roberts, R., Phraner, S. (2000). “Beyond Design-Build-Operate-Maintain,” Transportation Research Record, Paper No. 00-0675, 13-18. Weber, M., Borcherding, K. (1993). “Behavioral Influences on Weight Judgments in Multi- attribute Decision Making”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 67, pp. 1-12. Yin, R.K. (2004). “Conducting Case Studies: Collecting the Evidence” [WWW document]. URL http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:jHb6y55UFJ8J:www.idt.mdh.se/ phd/courses/fallstudie/slides%2520-%2520seminarie%25202/Yin%2520- %2520kapitel%25204%2520Rev%25203.ppt+conducting+case+studies&hl=en&gl=us&ct= clnk&cd=1 (visited 2006, March 13).

Next: Appendix B Annotated Bibliography »
Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods Get This Book
×
 Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Transit Cooperative Highway Research Program (TCRP) Web-Only Document 41: Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods explores pertinent literature and research findings related to various project delivery methods for transit projects. The report also includes definitions of project delivery methods and highlights the existing selection approaches commonly used by transit agencies.

A companion publication to TCRP Web-Only Document 41 is TCRP Report 131: A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods, which examines various project delivery methods for major transit capital projects. The report also explores the impacts, advantages, and disadvantages of including operations and maintenance as a component of a contract for a project delivery method.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!