Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Sample PSIC table ...........................................................................................................14 Table 2. Locations responding to the survey .................................................................................25 Table 3. Performance measures and performance levels...............................................................32 Table 4. Minnesota DOT Pavement Regain Time by Roadway Class ..........................................50 Table 5. Finnish Road Network (Finnish Road Maintenance 2001) .............................................56 Table 6. Quality standards and friction indicators (Finnish Road Maintenance 2001) .................57 Table 7. Friction indicators and driving conditions (Finnish Road Maintenance 2001) ...............57 Table 8. Quality standards for snow removal (Finnish Road Maintenance 2001) ........................58 Table 9. Japanese road management performance plan.................................................................61 Table 10. Snow and ice operations for Sapporo, Japan .................................................................62 Table 11. Winter road standards and LOS for Sapporo, Japan (PIARC 2006) .............................63 Table 12. Summary of snow and ice control performance measures by category ........................65 Table 13. Agencies using various performance measures .............................................................66 Table 14. Outcome measures and approaches used by responding agencies ................................69 Table 15. Linking program activities and outputs to strategic objectives .....................................78 Table 16. Identifying the key program activities and outputs .......................................................79 Table 17. Identifying key snow and ice control issues and affected stakeholder groups ..............80 Table 18. Defining results..............................................................................................................81 Table 19. Performance requirements relative to responses and results .........................................82 Table 20. Establishing potential performance measures ...............................................................83 Table 21. Establishing baselines for measures ..............................................................................83 Table 22. Quality criteria for performance measures ....................................................................84 Table 23. Mn/DOT ranges for bare pavement regain time............................................................85 Table 24. A screening tool for quality considerations ...................................................................85 Table 25. Establishing accountability for implementation ............................................................86 Table 26. Identifying resource requirements for implementation .................................................86
v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS T.H. Maze is a professor of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at Iowa State University. Chris Albrecht is an Assistant Scientist at the Center for Transportation Research and Education at Iowa State University. Dennis Kroeger is an Assistant Scientist at the Center for Transportation Research and Education at Iowa State University. Jonathan Wiegand is a graduate research assistant in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at Iowa State University. The authors would like to thank Wilfrid Nixon, professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Iowa, for his contributions to this project, especially in the areas of snow and ice control procedures and winter weather indices. The authors would also like to thank Stephen Andrle, former director of the Center for Transportation Research and Education at Iowa State University, for his contributions to this project.
