National Academies Press: OpenBook

Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion (2008)

Chapter: Appendix C - Bibliography of Alternative Contracting Methods

« Previous: Appendix B - State Contacts and Alternative Contracting Methods Used
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Bibliography of Alternative Contracting Methods ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23075.
×
Page 57
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Bibliography of Alternative Contracting Methods ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23075.
×
Page 58
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Bibliography of Alternative Contracting Methods ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23075.
×
Page 59

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

57 APPENDIX C Bibliography of Alternative Contracting Methods Methods References Cost-Plus-Time Bidding Minnesota Department of Transportation (2007) Shr et al. (2004) El-Rayes (2001) Herbsman (1995) Herbsman and Ellis (1995) Design–Build Minnesota Department of Transportation (2007) El-Wardani et al. (2006) Ling et al. (2004) Chan et al. (2002) Palaneeswaran and Kumaraswamy (2000) Gransberg and Senadherra (1999) Sanvido and Konchar (1999) Molenaar and Songer (1998) Songer and Molenaar (1997) Songer and Molenaar (1996) Paek et al. (1992) Incentives/Disincentives El-Rayes and Kandil (2005) Lee et al. (2005a) Shr et al. (2004) Shr and Chen (2004) Arditi and Yasamis (1998) Arditi et al. (1997) Jaraiedi et al. (1995) Interim Completion Dates Washington State Dept. of Transportation (2007a) Lane Rental Minnesota Department of Transportation (2007) Lee et al. (2005b) Herbsman and Glagola (1998) Herbsman and Ellis (1995) Multi-Parameter Bidding Scott (2006) Anderson and Russell (2001) Herbsman and Ellis (1992) No-Excuse Incentives Primer on Contracting . . . (2006) Minnesota Department of Transportation (2005) Early Contractor Involvement Molenaar et al. (2007) Swainston (2006) Alliancing “Grafton Gully Project” (2006) Sakal (2005) Rowlinson et al. (2006) Construction Manager at Risk Sanvido and Konchar (1999) The American Institute of Architects and The Associated General Contractors of America (2004) Yakowenko (2004) 3D/International (2004) Public–Private Partnerships KCI Technologies (2005) The National Council for Public–Private Partnerships (2008) Federal Highway Administration (2005) Flexible Notice to Proceed Federal Highway Administration (2005); American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2000) Anderson and Ullman (2000) Washington State Department of Transportation (2007b)

58 REFERENCES 3D/International, Inc., “CM at Risk” [Online]. Available: http://www.3di.com/toolbox/cmatrisk.pdf [accessed June 2007]. Arditi, D. and F. Yasamis, “Incentive/Disincentive Contracts: Perceptions of Owners and Contractors,” Journal of Con- struction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 5, 1998, pp. 361–373. Arditi, D., C.J. Khisty, and F. Yasamis, “Incentive/Disincentive Provisions in Highway Contracts,” Journal of Construc- tion Engineering and Management, Vol. 123, No. 3, 1997, pp. 302–307. Anderson, S.D. and J.S. Russell, NCHRP Report 451: Guide- lines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. Anderson, S.D. and G.L. Ullman, NCHRP Synthesis 293: Reducing and Mitigating Impacts of Lane Occupancy During Construction and Maintenance, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, 66 pp. Battelle, “Performance-Based Contracting for the Highway Construction Industry,” Prepared for Koch Industries, Inc., 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.battelle.org/ transportation/final-report.pdf. California Department of Transportation, “Construction Program Procedure Bulletin: CPB 00-8 Contract Admin- istration of Time Related Overhead (TRO),” 2000 [On- line]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/construc/cpb/ CPB008.pdf. Chan, A.P.C., D. Scott, and E.W.M. Lam, “Framework of Suc- cess Criteria for Design/Build Projects,” Journal of Man- agement in Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2002, pp. 120–128. “Design Sequencing,” National Association of State High- way and Transportation Unions, Sacramento, Calif., 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.nashtu.us/Design- Sequencing.htm [accessed June 25, 2008]. El-Rayes, K., “Optimum Planning of Highway Construction under A+B Bidding Method,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 127, No. 4, 2001, pp. 261–269. El-Rayes, K. and A. Kandil, “Time-Cost-Quality Trade-Off Analysis for Highway Construction,” Journal of Con- struction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 4, 2005, pp. 477–486. El-Wardani, M., J.I. Messner, and M.J. Horman, “Compar- ing Procurement Methods for Design–build Projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 3, 2006, pp. 230–238. Federal Highway Administration and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “Best Practice/Policy, Florida,” In Workzone Best Practices Guidebook, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://ops.fhwa. dot.gov/wz/practices/best/view_document.asp?id=89. “Grafton Gully Project,” Transit New Zealand, Wellington [Online]. Available: http://cmi.transit.govt.nz/html/ggp/ intro.htm [accessed June 2007]. Gransberg, D.D. and S.P. Senadheera, “Design-Build Contract Award Methods for Transportation Projects,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 6, 1999, pp. 565–567. Jaraiedi, M., R.W. Plummer, and M.S. Aber, “Incentive/ Disincentive Guidelines for Highway Construction Con- tracts,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Man- agement, Vol. 121, No. 1, 1995, pp. 112–120. Herbsman, Z.J., “A+B Bidding Method—Hidden Success Story for Highway Construction,” Journal of Construc- tion Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 4, 1995, pp. 430–437. Herbsman, Z.J. and R. Ellis, Determination of Contract Time for Highway Construction Projects, Transportation Re- search Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995. Herbsman, Z.J. and C.R. Glagola, “Lane Rental—Innovative Way to Reduce Road Construction Time,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 5, 1998, pp. 411–417. Lee, E.-B., D. Thomas, and L. Bloomberg, “Planning Urban Highway Reconstruction with Traffic Demand Affected by Construction Schedule,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 10, 2005a, pp. 752–761. Lee, E.-B., J.T. Harvey, and D. Thomas, “Integrated Design/ Construction/Operations Analysis for Fast-Track Urban Methods References Design–Build–Warrant Battelle, prepared for Koch Industries, Inc. (2003) Anderson and Russell (2001) Active Management Payment Primer on Contracting . . . (2006) Practical Methods for Paying for UHOOC California Department of Transportation (2000) Design–Build–Maintain Quality Factors Design Sequencing “Design Sequencing” (2007) California Performance Review (n.d.) Liquidated Savings Minnesota Department of Transportation (2007)

59 Freeway Reconstruction,” Journal of Construction En- gineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 12, 2005b, pp. 1283–1291. Ling, F.Y.Y., S.L. Chan, E. Chong, and L.P. Ping, “Predict- ing Performance of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build Projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Man- agement, Vol. 130, No. 1, 2004, pp. 75–83. KCI Technologies, Inc., Prepared for the Maryland State Highway Administration, “Current Practices in Public- Private Partnerships for Highways,” 2005 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.mdta.state.md.us/mdta/servlet/dispatch Servlet?url=/About/currentpractise.pdf. Minnesota Department of Transportation, “Performance Ef- fectiveness of Design–build, Lane Rental, and A+B Con- tracting Techniques,” 2007 [Online]. Available: www. lrrb.org/pdf/200609.pdf. Molenaar, K.R. and A.D. Songer, “Model for Public Sector Design–build Project Selection,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 6, 1998, pp. 467–479. Molenaar, K.R., J.E. Triplett, J.C. Porter, S.D. DeWitt, and G. Yakowenko, “Early Contractor Involvement and Target Pricing in U.S. and UK Highways,” Transportation Re- search Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2040, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 3–10. Paek, J.H., Y.W. Lee, and T.R. Napier, “Selection of Design/ Build Proposal Using Fuzzy-Logic System,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 118, No. 2, 1992, pp. 303–317. Palaneeswaran, E. and M.M. Kumaraswamy, “Contractor Selection for Design/Build Projects,” Journal of Con- struction Engineering and Management, Vol. 126, No. 5, 2000, pp. 331–339. Primer on Contracting for the Twenty-first Century, 5th ed., American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2006 [Online]. Available: www.transportation.org/sites/construction/docs/ Primer%20on%20Contracting%202006.pdf [accessed Apr. 1, 2008]. Sakal, M.W., “Project Alliancing: A Relational Contracting Mechanism for Dynamic Projects,” Lean Construction Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2005. Sanvido, V. and M. Konchar, Selecting Project Delivery Sys- tems: Comparing Design–Bid–Build, Design–Build, and Construction Management at Risk, The Project Delivery Institute, State College, Pa., 1999. Scott, S., III, NCHRP Report No. 561: Best-Value Procure- ment Methods for Highway Construction Projects, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. Shr, J.-F. and W.T. Chen, “Setting Maximum Incentive for Incentive/Disincentive Contracts for Highway Projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 1, 2004, pp. 84–93. Shr, J.-F. B. Ran, and C.W. Sung, “Method to Determine Minimum Contract Bid for A+B+I /D Highway Projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 4, 2004, pp. 509–516. Songer, A.D. and K.R. Molenaar, “Selecting Design–Build: Public and Private Sector Owner Attitudes,” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 6, 1996, pp. 47–53. Songer, A.D. and K.R. Molenaar, “Project Characteristics for Successful Public-Sector Design–build,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 123, No. 1, 1997, pp. 34–40. Swainston, “Early Contractor Involvement,” Queensland Roads, Vol. 2, Sep. 2006, pp. 42–47. Washington State Department of Transportation, “Alternative Project Delivery, Interim Completion Date,” 2007a [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/ delivery/alternative/InterimCompletion.htm [accessed June 2007]. Washington State Department of Transportation, “Alterna- tive Project Delivery, Flexible Start Date,” 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/delivery/ alternative/FlexibleStart.htm [accessed June 2007]. Yakowenko, G., “Megaproject Procurement: Breaking from Tradition,” Public Roads, Vol. 68, No.1, 2004.

Next: Appendix D - States with Legislation for Public Private Partnerships and Design Build »
Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion Get This Book
×
 Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 379: Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion explores the process for selection of alternative contracting methods that can potentially accelerate project completion. The report also examines factors associated with selecting one type of alternative contracting technique over another.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!