Methodology to Predict the Safety Performance of Urban and Suburban Arterials (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

177 REFERENCES 1. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2000. 2. Hughes, W., K. Eccles, D. W. Harwood, I. B. Potts, and E. Hauer, Development of a Highway Safety Manual, NCHRP Web Document 62, Transportation Research Board, March 2004. 3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Washington, DC, 2001. 4. Hauer, E, Lane Width and Safety, March 2000. Available on http://www.roadsafetyresearch.com/ 5. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 1985. 6. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 1994. 7. Harwood, D. W., F. M. Council, E. Hauer, W. E. Hughes, and A. Vogt, Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways, Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-RD-99-207, December 2000. 8. Griffin, L. I., and K. K. Mak, The Benefits to Be Achieved From Widening Rural, Two-Lane Farm-to-Market Roads in Texas, Report No. IAC (86-87) - 1039, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, April 1987. 9. Zegeer, C. V., D. W. Reinfurt, J. Hummer, L. Herf, and W. Hunter, “Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads,” Transportation Research Record 1195, Transportation Research Board, 1988. 10. Harwood, D. W., E. R. Kohlman Rabbani, K. R. Richard, H. W. McGee, and G. L. Gittings, Systemwide Impact of Safety and Traffic Operations Design Decisions for Resurfacing, Restoration, or Rehabilitation (RRR) Projects, NCHRP Report 486, Transportation Research Board, 2003. 11. Hauer, E., “Safety Models for Urban Four-Lane Undivided Road Segments,” presented at the 83rd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, January 2004. 12. Strathman, J. G., K. J. Dueker, J. Zhang, and T. Williams, Analysis of Design Attributes and Crashes on the Oregon Highway System, Oregon Department of Transportation, Center for Urban Studies, Portland State University, June 2001. 13. Hadi, M. A., J. Aruldhas, L. F. Chow, and J. A. Wattleworth, “Estimating Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Various Highway Types Using Negative Binomial Regression,” Transportation Research Record 1500, Transportation Research Board, 1995. 14. Harwood, D. W., Effective Utilization of Street Width on Urban Arterials, NCHRP Report 330, Transportation Research Board, 1990.

178 15. Zegeer, C. V., H.F. Huang, J. C. Stutts, E. Rodgman, and J. E. Hummer, “Commercial Bus Accident Characteristics and Roadway Treatments,” Transportation Research Record 1467, Transportation Research Board, 1994. 16. Potts, I. B., D. W. Harwood, D. J. Torbic, K. M. Bauer, D. K. Gilmore, D. K. Lay, J. F. Ringert, J. D. Zegeer, D. L. Harkey, and J. M. Barlow, Lane Widths, Channelized Right Turns, and Right-Turn Deceleration Lanes in Urban and Suburban Areas, Final Report of NCHRP Project 3-72, Midwest Research Institute, 2006. 17. Chu, X., and M. R. Baltes, Pedestrian Mid-block Crossing Difficulty, Report NCTR-392-09, National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida, December 2001. 18. Zegeer, C. V., C. Tan Esse, J. R. Stewart, H. H. Huang, P. Lagerwey, “Safety Analysis of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks in 30 Cities,” ITE Journal, January 2004. 19. Landis, B. W., V. R. Vattikuti, R. M. Ottenberg, D. S. McLeod, and M. Guttenplan, “Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment – Pedestrian Level of Service,” Transportation Research Record 1773, Transportation Research Board, 2001. 20. Dixon, L. B., “Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems,” Transportation Research Record 1538, Transportation Research Board, 1996. 21. Harkey, D. L., J. R. Stewart, and E. A. Rodgman, Evaluation of Shared-Use Facilities for Bicycles and Motor Vehicles, University of North Carolina, Highway Safety Research Center, March 1996. 22. McHenry, S. R., and M. J. Wallace, Evaluation of Wide Curb Lanes as Shared Lane Bicycle Facilities, Report No. FHWA/MD-85/06, Maryland Department of Transportation, August 1985. 23. Jilla, R. J., Effects of Bicycle Lanes on Traffic Flow, Purdue University, School of Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, June 1974. 24. Kroll, B., and M. R. Ramey, “Effects of Bike Lanes on Driver and Bicyclist Behavior,” Transportation Engineering Journal, American Society of Civil Engineers, March 1977. 25. Hunter, W. W., J. R. Stewart, J. C. Stutts, H. H. Huang, and W. E. Pein, A Comparative Analysis of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes, Report No. FHWA-RD-98-034, Federal Highway Administration, 1999. 26. Davis, J, Bicycle Safety Evaluation, Auburn University, City of Chattanooga and Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission, Chattanooga, TN, 1987. 27. Landis, B. W., V. R. Vattikuti, and M. T. Brannick, “Real-Time Human Perceptions, Toward a Bicycle Level of Service,” Transportation Research Record 1578, Transportation Research Board, 1997.

179 28. Harkey, D. L., D. W. Reinfurt, M. Knuiman, J. R. Stewart, and A. Sorton, Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept, Final Report, Report FHWA-RD-98-072, Federal Highway Administration, December 1998. 29. Hauer, E., Shoulder Width, Shoulder Paving, and Safety, March 2000. Available on http://www.roadsafetyresearch.com/ 30. Hauer, E., and J. Lovell, Safety Measures Aimed at Reducing Accidents Occasioned by Vehicles Stopped on Freeway Shoulders, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 1984. 31. Zegeer, C. V., R. C. Deen, and J. G. Mayes, “Effect of Lane and Shoulder Width on Accident Reduction on Rural, Two-Lane Roads,” Transportation Research Record 806, Transportation Research Board, 1981. 32. Harwood, D. W., Multilane Design Alternatives for Improving Suburban Arterials, NCHRP Report 282, Transportation Research Board, 1986. 33. Reinfurt, D. W., C. V. Zegeer, B. J. Shelton, and T. R. Neuman, “Analysis of Vehicle Operations on Horizontal Curves,” Transportation Research Record 1318, Transportation Research Board, 1991. 34. Taylor, J. I., H. W. McGee, E. L. Sequin, and R. S. Hostetter, Roadway Delineation Systems, NCHRP Report 130, Highway Research Board, 1972. 35. Stimpson, W. A., H. W. McGee, W. K. Kittelson, and R. H. Ruddy, Field Evaluation of Selected Delineation Treatments for Two-Lane Rural Highways, FHWA-RD-77-118, Federal Highway Administration, 1977. 36. Datta, T. K., D. D. Perkins, J. I. Taylor, and H. T. Thompson, Accident Surrogates for Use in Analyzing Highway Safety Hazards, Volume II: Technical Report, Report No. FHWA-RD-82/103-105, Federal Highway Administration, 1983. 37. Terhune, K. W. and M. R. Parker, An Evaluation of Accident Surrogates for Safety Analysis of Rural Highways, Report No. FHWA-RD-86-127, Federal Highway Administration, 1986. 38. Zegeer, C., R. Stewart, D. Reinfurt, F. Council, T. Neuman, E. Hamilton, T. Miller, and W. Hunter, Cost Effective Geometric Improvements for Safety Upgrading of Horizontal Curves, Report No. FHWA-RD-90-021, Federal Highway Administration, 1990. 39. Anderson, I. B. and R. A. Krammes, “Speed Reduction as a Surrogate for Accident Experience at Horizontal Curves on Rural Two-Lane Highways,” Transportation Research Record 1701, Transportation Research Board, 2000. 40. Fitzpatrick, K., L. Elefteriadou, D. W. Harwood, J. M. Collins, J. McFadden, I. B. Anderson, R. A. Krammes, N. Irizarry, K. D. Parma, K. M. Bauer, K. Pasetti, Speed Prediction for Two-Lane Rural Highways, Report No. FHWA-RE-99-171, Federal Highway Administration, 2000.

180 41. Transportation Research Board Special Report 214: Designing Safety Roads: Practices for Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation, 1987. 42. Leisch, J. E. and J. P. Leisch, “New Concepts in Design Speed Application,” Transportation Research Record 631, Transportation Research Board, 1977. 43. Choueiri, E. M. and R. Lamm, Rural Roads Speed Inconsistencies Design Methods, Part 1. NTIS Report PB88-160460, 1987. 44. Glennon, J. C., T. R. Neuman, and J. E. Leisch, Safety and Operational Considerations for Design of Rural Highway Curves, Report No. FHWA-RD-86- 035, Federal Highway Administration, 1985. 45. Potts, I. B., D. W. Harwood, and K. M. Bauer, “Effect of Preceding Tangent Length on Safety for Horizontal Curves,” conference proceedings from the Second International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Mainz, Germany, 2000. 46. Brindle, R. “Relationship Between Accidents and Access Conditions,” ARRB Research Report No. 320, AARB Transport Research, Australia, 1998. 47. Colorado Department of Highways, Final Report of the Colorado Access Control Demonstration Project, June 1985. 48. Flora, J. W., and K. M. Keitt, Access Management for Streets and Highways, Report No. FHWA-IP-82-3, Federal Highway Administration, 1982. 49. Gattis, J. L., and D. Hutchison, Comparison of Delay and Accidents on Three Roadway Access Designs in Springfield, proceedings of the Fourth National Access Management Conference, Portland, Transportation Research Board, August 2000. 50. Levinson, H. S. and J. S. Gluck, Access Spacing and Safety: Recent Research Results, proceedings of the Fourth National Access Management Conference, Portland, Transportation Research Board, August 2000. 51. McMonagle, S. C., “Effect of Roadside Features in Traffic Accidents,” Traffic Quarterly, Eno Foundation for Traffic Control, April 1952. 52. Staffield, P. R., “Accident Rates Related to Access Points and Advertising Signs—Minnesota Highway Study,” Traffic Quarterly, Eno Foundation for Traffic Control, January 1953. 53. Schoppert, D. W., “Predicting Traffic Accidents from Roadway Elements of Rural-Two-Lane Highways with Gravel Shoulders,” Highway Research Record 158, Highway Research Board, 1957. 54. Head, S. A., “Predicting Traffic Accidents from Roadway Elements on Urban Extensions of State Highways,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 208, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, 1959. 55. Cribbins, P. D., J. M. Aray, and J. K. Donaldson, “Effects of Selected Roadway and Operational Characteristics on Accidents on Multi-lane Highways,” Highway Research Record 188, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, 1967.

181 56. Mullinazzi, T. C., and H. L. Michael, “Correlation of Design Characteristics and Operational Controls with Accident Rates on Urban Arterials,” Engineering Bulletin of Purdue University; proceedings, 53rd Annual Road School, March 1967. 57. Dart, O. K., and L. Mann, “Relationship of Rural Highway Geometry to Accident Rates in Louisiana,” Highway Research Record 312, Highway Research Board, 1970. 58. Cirillo, J. A. et al., Interstate System – Volume 1, Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, DC, 1970. 59. McGuirk, W. M., “Evaluation of Factors Influencing Driveway Accidents,” Joint Highway Research Project C-36-598, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 1973. 60. Uckotter, D. A., “Analysis of Motor Vehicle Accidents at Commercial Driveway Locations,” Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 1974. 61. Glennon, J. D., J. J. Valenta, B. B. Thorson, J. Azzeh, and C. J. Wilton, “Evaluation of Techniques for the Control of Direct Access to Arterial Highways,” Report No. FHWA-RD-76-85, Federal Highway Administration, 1975. 62. Glennon, J. D., J. J. Valenta, B. B. Thorson, J. Azzeh, and C. J. Wilton, “Technical Guidelines for the Control of Direct Access to Arterial Highways, Volume I: General Framework for Implementing Access Control Techniques,” Report No. FHWA-RD-76-86, Federal Highway Administration, 1975. 63. Glennon, J. D., J. J. Valenta, B. B. Thorson, J. Azzeh, and C. J. Wilton, “Volume II: Detailed Description of Access Control Techniques,” Report No. FHWA-RD- 76-87, Federal Highway Administration, 1975. 64. Waushara County Access Control Plan, East Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, 1986. 65. Sokolow, G., “Access Management and Its Role in Congestion Management,” Florida Department of Transportation, RA/International Conference Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 1992. 66. Long, G., C. Gan, and B. S. Morrison, Safety Impacts of Selected Median and Design Features—Final Report, Transportation Research Center, University of Florida, prepared in cooperation with Florida Department of Transportation, 1993. 67. Li, J., Study of Access and Accident Relationships, prepared for Highway Safety Branch, Ministry of Transportation and Highways, British Columbia, 1993. 68. Millard, W., “Accident Analysis Relating Crashes to Major Access Management Features—US 41,” Lee County, Florida, 1993. 69. Urbitran Associates, “Improvements Options,” prepared for Michigan Department of Transportation, 1994.

182 70. Fitzpatrick, K., and K. Balke, “An Evaluation of Flush Medians and Two-Way Left Turns on Rural Four-Lane Highways,” presented at the 74th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1995 71. Lall, B. K., et al., “Analysis of Traffic Accidents within the Functional Area of Intersections and Driveways,” Technical Report TRANS I-95, Portland State University, 1995. 72. Urbitran Associates with I. K. Chann Associates and H. S. Levinson, Route 7 Driveway and Access Management Plan—Final Report, prepared for Southwest Regional Planning Agency, Norwalk Connecticut, 1996. 73. Garber, N. J. and T. E. White, Guidelines for Commercial Driveway Spacing on Urban and Suburban Arterial Roads, University of Virginia, 1995. 74. McLean, J., “Practical Relationship for the Assessment of Road Feature Treatments—Summary Reports,” ARRB Transport Research Report 315, ARRB Transport Research, Australia, 1997. 75. Preston, H., R. Newton, D. Keltner, and C. Albrecht, Statistical Relationship Between Vehicular Crashes and Highway Access, Report No. MN/RC-1998-27, August 1998. 76. Gluck J., H. S. Levinson, and V. Stover, Impacts of Access Management Techniques, NCHRP Report 420, Transportation Research Board, 1999. 77. Hauer, E., Access and Safety, March 2000. Available on http:/www.roadsafetyresearch.com/. 78. Williams, K., Ten Ways to Manage Roadway Access in Your Community, proceedings of the Third National Access Management Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, Transportation Research Board, October 1998. 79. Box, P. C., Effect of Intersections on Driveway Accidents, proceedings of the Third National Access Management Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, Transportation Research Board, October 1998. 80. Guidelines for Driveway Location and Design: A Recommended Practice of the ITE, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987. 81. Harwood, D. W., K. M. Bauer, I. B. Potts, D. J. Torbic, K. R. Richard, E. R. Kohlman Rabbani, E. Hauer, and L. Elefteriadou. Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes, Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-RD-02-089, July 2002. 82. McCoy, P. T., and M. S. Malone, “Safety Effects of Left-Turn Lanes on Urban Four-Lane Roadways,” Transportation Research Record 1239, Transportation Research Board, 1989. 83. McFarland, W. F., et al., Assessment of Techniques for Cost-Effectiveness of Highway Accident Countermeasures, Report No. FHWA-RD-79-53, Federal Highway Administration, 1979.

183 84. Hauer, E., The Safety of Older Persons at Intersections, Transportation in an Aging Society: Improving Mobility and Safety of Older Persons, Vol. 2, Special Report 218, Transportation Research Board, 1988. 85. Lacy, J. D., “Traffic Operations Program to Increase Capacity and Safety,” Traffic Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 3, July 1972. 86. Bauer, K. M., and D. W. Harwood, Statistical Models of At Grade Intersection Accidents, Report No. FHWA-RD-96-125, Federal Highway Administration, 1996. 87. Bauer, K. M., and D. W. Harwood, Statistical Models of At-Grade Intersection Accidents - Addendum. Report No. FHWA-RD-99-094, Federal Highway Administration, 2000. 88. Poch, M., and F. L. Mannering, “Negative Binomial Analysis of Intersection Accident Frequencies,” presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 1996. 89. David, N. A., and J. R. Norman, Motor Vehicle Accidents in Relation to Geometric and Traffic Features of Highway Intersections: Vol II – Research Report, Report No. FHWA-RD-76-129, Federal Highway Administration, 1976. 90. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Route 130 Accident Study, 1993. 91. Greiwe, R. R., “Intersection Management Techniques for the Left-Turning Vehicle,” ITE Journal, June 1986. 92. Agent, K. R., “Warrants for Left-Turn Lanes,” Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, Eno Foundation for Transportation, Inc., 1983. 93. Ben-Yakov, Y., and J. Craus, Warrants for Left-Turn Lanes on Two-Lane Roads, Publication No. 80-28, Transportation Research Institute, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 1980. 94. Craus, J., and D. Mahalel, “Analysis of Operations and Safety Characteristics of Left-Turn Lanes,” ITE Journal, July 1986. 95. Tamburri, T. N., and C. G. Hammer, Evaluation of Minor Improvements: (Part 5) Left-Turn Channelization, State of California, Division of Highways, Traffic Department, 1968. 96. Wilson, J. C., et al., “Simple Types of Intersection Improvements,” in Improved Street Utilization Through Traffic Engineering, Special Report 93, Highway Research Board, 1967. 97. Maze, T. H., J. L. Henderson, and S. Sankar, Impacts of Safety on Left-Turn Treatment at High-Speed Signalized Intersections, Iowa Highway Research Board, Project HR-347, Iowa State University, January 1994. 98. Foody, T. J., and W. C. Richardson, Evaluation of Left Turn Lanes as a Traffic Control Device, Ohio Department of Transportation, 1973.

184 99. Harwood, D.W., M. T. Pietrucha, M.D. Wooldridge, R. E. Brydia, and K. Fitzpatrick, Median Intersection Design, NCHRP Report 375, Transportation Research Board, 1995. 100. McCoy, P. T., U. R. Navarro, and W. E. Witt, “Guidelines for Offsetting Opposing Left-Turn Lanes on Four-Lane Divided Roadways,” Transportation Research Record 1356, Transportation Research Board, 1992. 101. Joshua, S. C., and A. A. Saka, “Mitigation of Sight Distance Problem for Unprotected Left-Turning Traffic at Intersections,” Transportation Research Record 1356, Transportation Research Board, 1992. 102. Vogt, A., Crash Models for Rural Intersections: Four-Lane by Two-Lane Stop- Controlled and Two-Lane by Two-Lane Signalized, Report No. FHWA-RD-99- 128, Federal Highway Administration, October 1999. 103. Dale, C. W, Cost-Effectiveness of Safety Improvement Projects, Federal Highway Administration, May 1973. 104. Dixon, K. K., J. L. Hibbard, and H. Nyman, Right-Turn Treatment for Signalized Intersections, Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, TX, Transportation Research Circular E-C019, Transportation Research Board, 1999. 105. Vogt, A., and J. G. Bared, Accident Models for Two-Lane Rural Roads: Segments and Intersections, Report No. FHWA-RD-98-133, Federal Highway Administration, 1998. 106. McCoy, P. T., R. R Bishu, J. A. Bonneson, J. W. Fitts, M. D. Fowler, S. L. Gaber, M. E. Lutjeharms, B. A. Moen, and D. L. Sicking, Guidelines for Free Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on Rural Two-Lane Highways—Final Report, Report No. TRP-02-32-95, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, March 1995. 107. Staplin, L., D. L. Harkey, K. H. Lococo, and M. S. Tarawneh, Intersection Geometric Design and Operational Guidelines for Older Drivers and Pedestrians, Volume I: Final Report, Report No. FHWA-RD-96-132, Federal Highway Administration, June 1997. 108. Exnicios, H. F., “Accident Reduction Through Channelization of Complex Intersections,” Improved Street Utilization Through Traffic Engineering, Special Report 93, Highway Research Board, 1967. 109. Rowan, N. J., and T. G. Williams, Channelization, Report 19-4, Texas Transportation Institute, March 1966. 110. Washington, S. P., et al., Evaluation of High-Speed Isolated Intersections in California, Report No. FHWA/CA/TO/91-2, Federal Highway Administration, June 1991. 111. Forrestel, R. R. Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities, Prepared by ITE Technical Council Committee 5A-5, December 1994.

185 112. Templer, J. A., Provisions for Elderly and Handicapped Pedestrians, Volume 3: The Development and Evaluation of Countermeasures, Report No. FHWA-RD- 79/3, Federal Highway Administration, 1980. 113. McCoy, P. T., E. J. Tripi, and J. A. Bonneson, Guidelines for Realignment of Skewed Intersections, Nebraska Department of Roads Research Project Number RES1 (0099) P471, 1994. 114. Hanna, J. T., T. E. Flynn, and L. T. Webb, “Characteristics of Intersection Accidents in Rural Municipalities,” Transportation Research Record 601, Transportation Research Board, 1976. 115. Fambro, D. B., K. Fitzpatrick, and R. Koppa, Determination of Stopping Sight Distances, NCHRP Report 400, Transportation Research Board, 1997. 116. Priest, R. V., “Statistical Relationships between Traffic Volume, Median Width, and Accident Frequency on Divided Highway Grade Intersections,” Highway Research News, No. 13, Highway Research Board, June 1964. 117. Van Maren, P. A., Correlation of Design and Control Characteristics with Accidents at Rural Multi-Lane Highway Intersections, Purdue University and Indiana State Highway Commission, July 1980. 118. Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Pedestrian Planning and Design Hardbook, April 1999. 119. Pietrucha, M. T., and Opiela, K. S., “Safe Accommodation of Pedestrians at Intersections,” Transportation Research Record 1385, Transportation Research Board, 1993. 120. Hunter, W. W., “Evaluation of Innovative Bike-Box Application in Eugene, Oregon,” Transportation Research Record 1705, Transportation Research Board, 2000. 121. Hunter, W. W., J. R. Stewart, J. C. Stutts, H. H. Huang, and W. E. Pein, A Comparative Analysis of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-034, Federal Highway Administration, 1999. 122. SAS Institute, Inc., SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide, Cary, NC, 2004. 123. Magee, L., “Measures Based on Wald and Likelihood Ratio Joint Significance Tests,” The American Statistician, Vol. 44, No. 3, August 1990. 124. SAS Institute, Inc., The GLIMMIX Procedure for SAS 9.13 Release, Cary, NC, June 2006. 125. Hauer, E., Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety, Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, 1997. 126. Hauer, E., “Overdispersion in Modeling Accidents on Road Sections and in Empirical Bayes Estimation,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 6, November 2001, pp. 799-808, 2001. 127. Miaou, S-P., and D. Lord, “Modeling Traffic Crash-Flow Relationships for Intersections: Dispersion Parameter, Functional Form, and Bayes Versus

186 Empirical Bayes Methods,” Transportation Research Record 1840, Transportation Research Board, 2003. 128. Knuiman, M. W., F. M. Council, and D. W. Reinfurt, “Association of Median Width and Highway Accident Rates,” Transportation Research Record 1401, Transportation Research Board, 1993. 129. Bonneson, J. A., K. Zimmerman, And K. Fitzpatrick, Roadway Safety Design Synthesis, Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4703--1, Texas Department of Transportation, November 2005. 130. Zegeer, C. V., and M. J. Cynecki, “Determination of Cost-Effective Roadway Treatments for Utility Pole Accidents,” Transportation Research Record 970, Transportation Research Board, 1984. 131. Elvik, R. and T. Vaa, The Handbook of Road Safety Measures, Elsevier Science, 2004. 132. Hauer, E., Left-Turn Protection, Safety, Delay and Guidelines: A Literature Review, prepared for Federal Highway Administration, October 2004, www.roadsafetyresearch.com. 133. Lyon, C., A. Haq, B. Persaud, and S. T. Kodama, “Development of Safety Performance Functions for Signalized Intersections in a Large Urban Area and Application to Evaluation of Left-Turn Priority Treatment,” presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2005. 134. Clark, J. E., S. Maghsoodloo, and D. B. Brown, “Public Good Relative to Right- Turn-on-Red in South Carolina and Alabama,” Transportation Research Record 926, 1983. 135. Bahar, G., et al., Development of Parts I and II of the Highway Safety Manual, Interim Report of NCHRP Project 17-27, 2005. 136. Abdel-Aty, M., C. Lee, X. Wang, P. Nawathe, J. Keller, S. Kowdla, and H. Prasad, Identification of Intersections’ Crash Profiles Patterns, Final Report of Work Order #10, Contract No. BC-355, University of Central Florida, February 2006.