Alternate Design/Alternate Bid Process for Pavement-Type Selection (2017)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

56 REFERENCES Ahlvers, D., “MoDOT Alternate Pavement Approach,” unpublished presentation to the 2010 North Central Asphalt User/Pro- ducer Group, Overland Park, Kans., Feb. 3, 2010, 28 pp. [Online]. Available: https://engineering.purdue.edu/~ncaupg/ Activities/2010/Presentation/Ahlvers%20MODOT%20Alternate%20Pavement%20Approach.pdf [accessed May 1, 2016]. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Subcommittee on Construction, Contract Administration Section, Survey on the Use of Price Adjustment Clauses, FHWA Contract Administration, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2009. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Subcommittee on Maintenance, FHWA 2, Definitions [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation/091205.cfm [accessed Nov. 12, 2015]. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), “2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure,” ASCE, Reston, Va., 2013, pp. 75–106. Anderson, S.D. and J.S. Russell, NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting, NCHRP Report 451 Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division, Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Struc- tures, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 1-37, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. Ashley, D., R. Bauman, J. Carroll, J. Diekmann, and F. Finlayson, “Evaluating Viability of Privatized Transportation Proj- ects,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1998, p. 106. Asphalt Pavement Alliance (APA), America Rides on US Asphalt, APA, Lenham, Md., 2010. Brown, D., “Inside Alternate Bidding,” Highway Contractor, Apr. 1, 2010, p. 3. [Online]. Available: http://www.equipmentworld. com/highway-contractor-2-2/ [accessed Nov. 12, 2015]. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Life Cycle Cost Analysis Procedures Manual—Appendix 4: Typical Pavement M&R Schedules for California, Office of Pavement Engineering, Caltrans, Sacramento, Calif., Aug. 2013. Corotis, R.B. and Gransberg, D.D., “Adding Social Discount Rate to the Life Cycle Cost Decision-making Algorithm,” Jour- nal of Reliability of Structures and Materials, Vol. 2, No. 1, Dec. 2005, pp. 13–24. Crawford, G., “Pavement-Type Selection—Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding,” FHWA presentation at the Vir- ginia Concrete Conference, Richmond, Va., 2014. Cross, S.A. and R.L. Parsons, “Evaluation of Expenditures On Rural Interstate Pavements in Kansas: Executive Summary,” Kansas University Transportation Center, Lawrence, 2001. CTC & Associates, Best Practices in Pavement Design for Design-Build Projects, Report No. TRS1402, Minnesota Depart- ment of Transportation, St. Paul, Feb. 2014. De Jarnette, V., L.M. McCarthy, T. Bennert, and M.C. Guercio, “Use of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Principles to Assign Asphalt Pavement Pay Factor Adjustments,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 139, No. 11, 2013. Duncan, T.L. and D.B. Holtz, “Alternate Bidding History and Requirements,” presentation, 2012, 27 pp. [Online]. Available: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1231&context=roadschool [accessed May 20, 2016]. Ellis, P., “NC Experience with MEPDG, LCCA, and Alternate Bidding for Pavements,” presentation to 2012 Carolina Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting, Raleigh, N.C., Jan. 2012, 21 pp. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Life Cycle Cost Analysis. Summary of Proceedings, FHWA Life Cycle Cost Sym- posium, Washington, D.C., 1993. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Asset Management Primer, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/amprimer.pdf. pp-30 [accessed June 2, 2016].

57 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer,” Office of Asset Management, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Aug. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/lcca/010621.pdf [accessed May 26, 2016]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Design-Build Effectiveness Study, Final Report to Congress as required by TEA-21, 2006, 259 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/designbuild/designbuild0.htm [accessed Apr. 30, 2016]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Clarification of FHWA Policy for Bidding Alternate Pavement Type on the National Highway System,” FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ pavement/081113.cfm. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Technical Advisory T 5040.39 Use of Alternate Bidding for Pavement-Type Selection,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2012. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Special Experimental Projects No. 14- Alternative Contracting,” FHWA, Wash- ington, D.C., updated Oct. 2015. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Pavement-Type Selection Manual, Office of Roadway Design, Office of Pave- ment Management, FDOT, Tallahassee, Oct. 2013. Fuerst, A., “MoDOT Alternate Pavement-Type Selection,” unpublished presentation to the American Concrete Pavement Association, Southeast Chapter, Nashville, Tenn., Jan. 31, 2014, 37 pp. [Online]. Available: http://acpa-se.org/wp-content/ uploads/2015/01/2014_TN_MODOT-I-64-Project-Specifics-A_Fuerst_s.pdf [accessed May 1, 2016]. Gad, G.M., D.D. Gransberg, and M.C. Loulakis, “Policies and Procedures for Successfully Implementing Alternative Techni- cal Concepts,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2504, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 78–86. Gisi, A., Special Experimental Project (SEP-14) Alternate Surfacing Bidding, Report No. FHWA-KS-09-1, Kansas Depart- ment of Transportation, Topeka, Mar. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/ sep14ks2009.pdf. Government Accountability Office (GAO), “Using Structured Interviewing Techniques,” GAO/PEMD-10.1.5, GAO, Wash- ington, D.C., June 1991, 91 pp. Gransberg, D.D. and E. Scheepbouwer, “Infrastructure Asset Life Cycle Cost Analysis Issues,” 2010 Transactions, AACE Int’l, Atlanta, Ga., June 2010, pp. CSC.03.01– CSC.03.8. Gransberg, D.D. and E.J. Kelly, “Quantifying the Uncertainty Due to Construction Material Price Volatility Using Monte Carlo Simulation,” Cost Engineering, AACE, Vol. 50, No. 6, June 2008, pp. 14–21. Gransberg, D.D. and K.R. Molenaar, “Life Cycle Cost Award Algorithms for Design-Build Highway Pavement Projects,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, Vol. 10, No. 4, Dec. 2004, pp. 167–175. Gransberg, D.D., “Life Cycle Evaluation Criteria for Design-Build Highway Pavement Projects,” PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, 2004, 234 pp. Hall, K.T., C.E. Correa, S.H. Carpenter, and R.P. Elliott, “Guidelines for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies,” Proceedings, 2007 Transportation Research Board, Paper #07-0131, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2007, 19 pp. Hallin, J.P., S. Sadasivam, J. Mallela, D.K. Hein, M.I. Darter, and H.L. Von Quintus, NCHRP Report 703: Guide for Pave- ment-Type Selection, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. Hicks, R.G. and J.A. Epps, “Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Asphalt-Rubber Paving Materials,” Proceedings of Asphalt Rub- ber-2000, Rubber Pavements Association, Tempe, Ariz., 2000, pp. 569–590. Holt, A., S. Sullivan, and D.K. Hein, “Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Municipal Pavements in Southern and Eastern Ontario,” Proceedings, 2011 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Edmonton, Alberta, ON, Canada, Sept. 2011, 16 pp. Huang, Y.H., Pavement Design and Analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, Saddle River, N.J., 2004. Ilbeigi, M., B. Ashuri, and S. Shayegh, “A Data Mining Approach for Analyzing the Effects of Price Adjustment Clauses on Bid Prices Considering Material Quantity and Projects Size,” Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting (No. 15-5489), 2015, p. 11.

58 Ilbeigi, M., B. Ashuri, and S. Shayegh, “Empirical Study of Effects of Price Adjustment 41 Clauses (PACs) on Highway Con- struction Bid,” Construction Research Congress 2014, 2014, pp. 1093–1102. Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), “Initial Evaluation Report, SEP-14, Alternate Bids on Pavement Type Con- tract No. R-30106 & R-31948, US 31,” INDOT, Indianapolis, 2009, 5 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ programadmin/contracts/sep14in2009eval.pdf [accessed May 20, 2016]. Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), 2010 Annual Report for Alternate Bid Process on Pavement-Type Selection, INDOT, Indianapolis, Mar. 11, 2011, 6 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/ sep14in2011/sep14in2011.pdf [accessed May 20, 2016]. Jeong, D. and S. Abdollahipour, Alternate Bidding Strategies for Asphalt and Concrete Pavement Projects Utilizing Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA), Report Number: OTCREOS10.1-20-F, Oklahoma Transportation Center, Midwest City, 2012. Koch, J.E., D.D. Gransberg, and K.R. Molenaar, Project Administration for Design-Build: A Primer for Owners, Engineers, and Contractors, ASCE, Reston, Va., 2010, 286 pp. Kohn, L.T., “Methods in Case Study Analysis,” The Center for Studying Health System Change, Technical Publication No. 2, June 1997. Kufner, C., “Innovative Pavement Design on TH 610,” Presentation, 19th Annual TERRA Pavement Conference, St. Paul, Minn., 2015, 29 pp. Lenz, R., “TxDOT’s Alternate Pavement Design and Bid Policy,” presentation at the 2010 Texas Asphalt Paving Association Annual Meeting, Austin, Tex., 2010, 17 pp. Lopez, H., “The Social Discount Rate: Estimates for Nine Latin American Countries,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, Vol. 1, 2008. Luhr, D.R. and B.F. McCullough, “Economic Evaluation of Pavement Design Alternatives for Low-Volume Roads,” No. N908, Third International Conference on Low-Volume Roads, Tempe, Ariz., July 24–28, 1983. Mack, J.W., P.A. Thiel, and J. Reece, “An Industry Perspective on Elements Required to Create Competition in Alternate Pavement-Type Selection: A Case Study for North Carolina,” 10th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/270339005. Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), “Alternate Pavement Bidding (APB) Process,” Engineering Operations Committee, MDOT, East Lansing, 2013. Mikesell, L.A., Alternative Pavement Bidding, SEP-14 Project Interim Report, Michigan DOT, East Lansing, Nov. 5, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/sep14list.cfm [accessed Jan. 28, 2016]. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Design-Build Manual, MnDOT, St. Paul, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/designbuild/documents/online/ DBv12.htm#_Toc305159425 [accessed May 19, 2015]. Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), Pavement Design and Type Selection Process (Phase I report), MoDOT, Jefferson City, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www. modot.org/newsandinfo/documents/MasterPavementReport.pdf. Mogawer, W.S., A.J. Austerman, J.S. Daniel, F. Zhou, and T. Bennert, “Evaluation of the Eeffects of Hot Mix Asphalt Density on Mixture Fatigue Performance, Rutting Performance and MEPDG Distress Predictions,” International Journal of Pave- ment Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 02, 2011, pp. 161–175. Newnan, D.G. and J.P. Lavelle, Engineering Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, 2013. Pierce, L.M. and G. McGovern, NCHRP Synthesis 457: Implementation of the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide and Software, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014. Pittenger, D.M., D.D. Gransberg, M. Zaman, and C. Riemer, “Stochastic Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement Preservation Treatments,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2292, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 45–51. Reynolds, A., Y. Raj, and D.D. Gransberg, “Economic Haul Radius as Affected by Diesel Fuel Cost,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2504, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 3–9.

59 Roark, N., “Alternative Pavement Bidding in Missouri,” unpublished presentation to the 2011 Virginia Concrete Conference, Richmond, Mar. 3, 2011, 55 pp. Rozycki, D. and F. McCullough, Missouri DOT Pavement Design and Type Selection Process, an Independent Peer Review Report, The Transtec Group, Inc. Austin, Tex., 2008, 4 pp. Scott, S., T. Ferragut, M. Syrnick, and S. Anderson, NCHRP Report 699: Guidelines for the Use of Pavement Warranties on Highway Construction Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. Skolnik, J., “Price Indexing in Transportation Construction Contracts,” Jack Faucett Associates, Bethesda, Md., 2011. Smith, T. and R. Fung, “Review of Alternate Bid Tenders for Canadian Highway Construction Projects with Life Cycle Cost Component,” Proceedings, 2006 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, 2006, 23 pp. Souliman, M.I., M.S. Mamlouk, M.M. El-Basyouny, and C.E. Zapata, “Calibration of the AASHTO MEPDG for Flexible Pavement for Arizona Conditions,” Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, Report No. 10-1817, 2010. Stone, M.L.C., “Development of Unit Cost Estimating Models with Respect to Scale Economies and Material Price Volatility for Use in Probabilistic Life Cycle Cost Analyses,” PhD Dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, 2013. Temple, W., Z. Zhang, J. Lambert, and K. Zeringue, “Agency Process for Alternate Design and Alternate Bid of Pavements,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1900, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 122–131. Tighe, S., “Guidelines for Probabilistic Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1769, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 28–38. Tinni, A., “Cautions with Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Optimal Pavement Selection,” Concrete Association of Estonia, Mar. 2013, 28 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.betoon.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Cautions-with-LCC-Analysis-for- Optimal-Pavement-Selection.pdf [accessed Apr. 12, 2016]. Vandenbossche, J.M., F. Mu, J.J. Gutierrez, and J. Sherwood, “An Evaluation of the Built-In Temperature Difference Input Parameter in the Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement Cracking Model of the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 03, 2011, pp. 215–228. Velasquez, R., K. Hoegh, I. Yut, N. Funk, G. Cochran, M. Marasteanu, and L. Khazanovich, “Implementation of the MEPDG for New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures for Design of Concrete and Asphalt Pavements in Minnesota,” 2009. Von Quintus, H.L. and J.S. Moulthrop, Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Flexible Pavement Performance Prediction Models for Montana Volume III—Field Guide Calibration and User’s Guide for the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Report No. FHWA/MT-07-008/8158-3, Montana Department of Transportation, Helena, 2007. Walls, J. and M.R. Smith, “Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design—Interim Technical Bulletin,” FHWA-SA-98-079, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 13–106. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), “WSDOT Pavement Policy,” WSDOT, 2011 [Online]. Available: http:// www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/D7971B81-5443-45B9-8B9B-BFC0D721F5A1/0/WSDOTPavementPolicyFinal71211.pdf. Waters, J. and B. Pidwerbesky, “Resurfacing Roads Using Ultra-High-Pressure Watercutting” 22nd ARRB Conference— Research into Practice, Canberra, Australia, 2006. West, R., N. Tran, M. Musselman, J. Skolnik, and M. Brooks, A Review of the Alabama Department of Transportation’s Poli- cies and Procedures for Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement-Type Selection, NCAT Report No. 13-06, National Center for Asphalt Paving Technology, Auburn, Ala., Oct. 2013. Wimsatt, A., C.M. Chang-Albitres, P.E. Krugler, T. Scullion, T.J. Freeman, and M.B. Valdovinos, Considerations for Rigid vs. Flexible Pavement Designs When Allowed as Alternate Bids, Technical Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-6085-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2009. Yin, R., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, New York, 2008. Youngs, C. and B. Krom, SEP-14 Alternative Pavement Bidding: I-69 Design Build Finance, SEP-14 Project Interim Report, Michigan DOT, East Lansing, July 10, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.got.gov/Programs/Construction_/ Contract_Administration_/SEP-14_Approval_list/I-69_Design_Build_Finance_Project_Interim_Report.