National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix D: Biographical Sketches of the Committee
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×

Appendix E

Acronyms and Abbreviations

DMR Denitration Mineralizing Reformer
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
DOE-EM U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management
DOE-ORP U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection
DWPF Defense Waste Processing Facility
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FBSR fluidized bed steam reforming
FFRDC Federally Funded Research and Development Center
HLW high-level waste
IDF Integrated Disposal Facility
ILAW immobilized low-activity waste
INL Idaho National Laboratory
IWTU Integrated Waste Treatment Unit
LAW low-activity waste
LOI line of inquiry
NNSS Nevada National Security Site
PRA probabilistic risk assessment
SLAW supplemental low-activity waste
SRNL Savannah River National Laboratory
TPA Tri-Party Agreement
TRIDEC Tri-Cities Washington Economic Development Council
TRL technology readiness level
WAC waste acceptance criteria
WCS Waste Control Specialists
WRPS Washington River Protection Solutions
WTP Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×
Page 42
Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1 Get This Book
×
 Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1
Buy Ebook | $14.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 1943, as part of the Manhattan Project, the Hanford Nuclear Reservation was established with the mission to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. During 45 years of operations, the Hanford Site produced about 67 metric tonnes of plutonium—approximately two-thirds of the nation's stockpile. Production processes generated radioactive and other hazardous wastes and resulted in airborne, surface, subsurface, and groundwater contamination. Presently, 177 underground tanks contain collectively about 210 million liters (about 56 million gallons) of waste. The chemically complex and diverse waste is difficult to manage and dispose of safely.

Section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 calls for a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) to conduct an analysis of approaches for treating the portion of low-activity waste (LAW) at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation intended for supplemental treatment. The first of four, this report reviews the analysis carried out by the FFRDC. It evaluates the technical quality and completeness of the methods used to conduct the risk, cost benefit, schedule, and regulatory compliance assessments and their implementations; waste conditioning and supplemental treatment approaches considered in the assessments; and other key information and data used in the assessments.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!