National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 6 - Benefit-Cost Analysis Examples
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"References and Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Design Guidelines for Mitigating Collisions with Trees and Utility Poles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26777.
×
Page 35
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"References and Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Design Guidelines for Mitigating Collisions with Trees and Utility Poles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26777.
×
Page 36

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

35   Albeck, W. H., and S. Estomin. (2003). Cost Benefits for Overhead vs. Underground Utilities. Report SP208B4C, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2014). Highway Safety Manual: Supplement. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2011). Roadside Design Guide. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2010). Highway Safety Manual. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2005a). A Policy on the Accommodation of Utilities within Freeway Right-of-Way. American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2005b). A Guide for Accom- modating Utilities within Highway Right-of-Way. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1977). Guide for Selecting, Locating, and Designing Traffic Barriers. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO). (1967). Highway Design and Operational Practices Related to Highway Safety. American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, DC. American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA). (2015). Preventing Vehicle Departures from Roadways. American Traffic Safety Services Association, Fredericksburg, VA. Baye, R. (2012). The Price of a Utility Pole. Washington Examiner. Cairney, P., and P. Bennett. (2009). Surface Characteristics and Crash Occurrence on Selected Roads in Australia. Austroads, Sydney, Australia. Cooper, P. (1985). Analysis of Roadside Encroachments–Single-Vehicle Run-off-Road Accident Data Analysis for Five Provinces. B.C. Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Harmon, T., G. Bahar, and F. Gross. (2018). Crash Costs for Highway Safety Analysis. Report FHWA-SA-17-071. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Harwood, D. W., F. M. Council, E. Hauer, W. E. Hughes, and A. Vogt. (2000). Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways. Report FHWA-RD-99-207, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Hutchinson, J. W., and T. W. Kennedy. (1966). Medians of Divided Highways – Frequency and Nature of Vehicle Encroachments. Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 487, University of Illinois Urbana-Champlain. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013a). iRAP Methodology Fact Sheet 5: External Flow and Median Traversability. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013b). iRAP Methodology Fact Sheet 6: Star Rating Score Equations. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013c). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Curvature. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013d). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Delineation. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013e). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Grade. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013f). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Lane Width. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. References and Bibliography

36 Design Guidelines for Mitigating Collisions with Trees and Utility Poles International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013g). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Operating Speed. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013h). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Paved Shoulder Width. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013i). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Quality of Curve. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013j). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Road Con- dition. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013k). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Roadside Severity – Distance. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013l). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Roadside Severity – Object. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013m). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Shoulder Rumble Strips. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2013n). iRAP Road Attribute Adjustment Factors: Skid Resistance/Grip. https://www.irap.org/methodology/. International Road Assessment Program (iRAP). (2014). iRAP Methodology Fact Sheet 10: Casualty Estimation and Calibration. http://www.irap.org/methodology/. Lacy, K., R. R. Srinivasan, C. V. Zegeer, R. Pfefer, T. R. Neuman, K. L. Slack, and K. K. Hardy. (2004). NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 8: A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving Utility Poles. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Mak, K. K., and D. L. Sicking. (2003). NCHRP Report 492: Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) – Engineer’s Manual. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). (n.d.). Fatality Analysis Reporting System. https:// www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/fatality-analysis-reporting-system-fars. Neuman, T. R., R. Pfefer, K. L. Slack, K. K. Hardy, K. Lacy, and C. V. Zegeer. (2003). NCHRP Report 500: Guid- ance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 3: A Guide for Addressing Collisions with Trees in Hazardous Locations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Nilsson, G. (2004). Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety. Bulletin 221. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2015). Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. Circular A-94, revised. RoadSafe LLC. (2012a). Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) Update, Appendix A: User’s Manual, Ver- sion 3.0.0. Final report, NCHRP Project 22-27. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. http:// rsap.roadsafellc.com. RoadSafe LLC. (2012b). Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) Update, Appendix B: Engineer’s Manual. Version 3.0.0. Final report, NCHRP 22-27. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. http://rsap. roadsafellc.com. Turner B., J. Affum, M. Tziotis, and C. Jurewicz. (2009). Review of iRAP Risk Parameters. 001496 Draft Contract Report. Australian Road Research Board Group. Turner, B., K. Imberger, P. Roper, V. Pyta, and J. McLean. (2010). Road Safety Engineering Risk Assessment, Part 6: Crash Reduction Factors. Report No. AP-T151/10. Austroads, Sydney, Australia. Turner, B., L. Steinmetz, A. Lim, and K. Walsh. (2012). Effectiveness of Road and Safety Engineering Treatments. Report No. AP-R422-12, Project ST1571. Austroads, Sydney, Australia. Turner, S., A. P. Roozenburg, and T. Francis. (2006). Predicting Accident Rates for Cyclists and Pedestrians. Land Transport New Zealand Research Report 289. Wellington, New Zealand. Ziegler, A. J., et al. (1986). Guide to Management of Roadside Trees. Report No. FHWA-IP-86-17. Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, VA.

Next: Appendix A - Current iRAP Model for Predicting Run-Off-Road Crashes »
Design Guidelines for Mitigating Collisions with Trees and Utility Poles Get This Book
×
 Design Guidelines for Mitigating Collisions with Trees and Utility Poles
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Each year, roadway departure crashes in the United States result in serious injuries and fatalities. More than 1 in 3 fatalities are associated with impacting fixed objects such as trees and utility poles.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Research Report 1016: Design Guidelines for Mitigating Collisions with Trees and Utility Poles presents guidelines to quantitatively determine the safety risks posed by fixed objects placed in close proximity to roadways.

Supplemental to the report is NCHRP Web-Only Document 336: Proposed Guidlines for Fixed Objects in the Roadside Design Guide, a Spreadsheet Tool, an Implementation Plan, and a PowerPoint Slide Summary.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!