National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Summary and Conclusions
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Investigation of Material Requirements for Highway Guardrail Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26811.
×
Page 77
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Investigation of Material Requirements for Highway Guardrail Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26811.
×
Page 78
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Investigation of Material Requirements for Highway Guardrail Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26811.
×
Page 79

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

77   AASHTO. Work Zone Barrier Supplement to A Guide to Standardized Highway Rail Hardware. 1990. AASHTO. A Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier Hardware: AASHTO-AGC-ARTBA Joint Committee, Subcommittee on New Highway Materials, Task Force 13 Report. 1995. AASHTO. Guide to Standardized Highway Drainage Products. AASHTO-AGC-ARTBA Joint Committee Task Force 13 Report. 1999. AASHTO. Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. 2009. AASHTO. Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. 2016. AASHTO. Strategic Plan for the Committee on Materials and Pavements. 2018a. AASHTO. Summary of Changes to AASHTO Materials Standards by Edition. 2018b. AASHTO. AASHTO Publications Style Manual and Process Guide. Washington DC. 2019. AASHTO and Association of American Road Builders. A Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier Rail Hard- ware. 1971. AASHTO and American Road and Transportation Builders Association. A Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier Rail Hardware: A Report. 1979. AASHTO and American Road and Transportation Builders Association. A Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier Rail Hardware: A Report. 1980. Abu-Odeh, A.Y., McCaskey, K.M., Bligh, R.P., Menges, W.L., Kuhn, D.L., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transportation, and Federal Highway Administration. Crash Test and MASH TL-3 Evaluation of the TxDOT Short Radius Guardrail. 2015. Abu-Odeh, A.Y., Smith, C., Menges, W.L., Kuhn, D.L., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transportation, and Federal Highway Administration. Optimization of Thrie Beam Terminal End Shoe Connection. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX. 2017. Alabama Department of Transportation. Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. 2018. American Galvanizers Association. Storage. https://galvanizeit.org/specification-and-inspection/post-hdg- considerations/storage/. Accessed 6/14/2021. 2017. Asadollahipajouh, M., Bielenberg, B., Rasmussen, J., Lingenfelter, J., Faller, R., and Reid, J. Placement of Break- away Light Poles Located Directly Behind Midwest Guardrail System (MGS). Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2017. Bielenberg, R.W., Gutierrez, D., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., and Tenhulzen, P. Development of a Test Level 3 Tran- sition Between Guardrail and Portable Concrete Barriers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2638. 2017. Bligh, R.P., Abu-Odeh, A.Y., Menges, W.L., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transpor- tation, and Federal Highway Administration. MASH Test 3-10 on 31-Inch W-Beam Guardrail with Standard Offset Blocks. 2011. Bligh, R.P., Menges, W.L., Griffith, B.L., Schroeder, G.E., and Kuhn, D.L. MASH Evaluation of TxDOT Roadside Safety Features – Phase III. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, 2020. Buth, C.E., Bullard, D.L., Menges, W.L., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, and Washington State Department of Transportation. NCHRP Report 350 Test 3-11 of the Long-Span Guardrail with 5.7 m Clear Span and Nested W-Beams over 11.4 m. 2006. Cattan, J. Steel Industry Embraces A992, Modern Steel Construction, April 1999. CDOT. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. 2017. Dobrovolny, C.S., Menges, W.L., and Kuhn, D.L. MASH Test 3-11 of 28-Inch W-Beam Guardrail System with 8-Inch Composite Blockouts Raised 4 Inches on Steel Posts. Texas A&M Transportation Institute Proving Ground, College Station, TX. 2017. References

78 Investigation of Material Requirements for Highway Guardrail Systems Elzly Technology Corporation. Comparing the Corrosion Protection of Hot Dip Batch Versus Hot Dip Con- tinuously Galvanized W-Beam Guardrail Sections. Contractor’s final report for NCHRP Project 20-07/ Task 333. 2014. FHWA. Frequently Asked Questions: Barriers, Terminals, Transitions, Attenuators, and Bridge Railings: What Guidance Is Available on the Timeliness of Guardrail Repair? Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/countermeasures/faqs/qa_bttabr.cfm. Accessed August 15, 2018. 2018. FHWA and Willett, T. O. Technical Advisory - Uncoated Weathering Steel in Structures, Publication Technical Advisory 5140.22. 1989. Fleck, J. 1997 Chevrolet C2500 Pickup Impact with the Strong Steel Post W-Beam Guardrail – Part 2. MGA Research Corporation, Burlington, WI. 2008. Fossa, A. and Duran III, B.A. ASTM F2329 vs. ASTM A153. American Galvanizers Association. https:// galvanizeit.org/knowledgebase/article/astm-f2329-vs-astm-a153. Accessed 04/06/2021. 2017. Gripne, D.J. and Task Force 13. Letter to State Specifiers – Overlength Post Stamping. 2019. Gutierrez, D.A., Lechtenberg, K.A., Bielenberg, R.W., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Sicking, D.L., University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) with Southern Yellow Pine Posts. 2013. Haase, A., Kohtz, J., Lechtenberg, K., Bielenberg, B., Reid, J., and Faller, R. Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) Placed Adjacent to a 1V:2H Fill Slope with 6-ft Posts. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2016. Highway Safety Information Systems. HSIS Resources. https://www.hsisinfo.org/resources.cfm. Accessed 7/29/2019. 2019. Lingenfelter, J.L., Rosenbaugh, S., Bielenberg, R.W., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) with an Omitted Post. 2016. Maricopa Association of Governments. Uniform Standard Specifications and Details for Public Works Con- struction. Phoenix, AZ. 2019. Meyer, D.T., Reid, J.R., Lechtenberg, K.A., Bielenberg, R.W., Faller, R.K., University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. Increased Span Length for the MGS Long-Span Guardrail System Part II: Full-Scale Crash Testing. 2017. Michie, J. D. NCHRP Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. 1981. MwRSF. View Q&A – Steel Specifications for Guardrail Posts. mwrsf.unl.edu. https://mwrsf.unl.edu/q&a/view. php?id=1128. Accessed 12/26/2019. 2016. NHDOT. Prolonging Service Life of Weathering Steel Guardrail. In New Hampshire DOT Focus on Research. New Hampshire. 2003. NHDOT. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. 2016. Ohio Bureau of Highways. Guardrail. 1956. Polivka, K.A., Faller, R.K., Sicking, D.L., Rohde, J.R., Reid J.D., Holloway, J.C., University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. Guardrail and Guardrail Terminals Installed Over Curbs. The University of Nebraska–Lincoln, TRP-03-83-99, Lincoln, NE. 2000. Rosenbaugh, S., Schrum, K., Faller, R., Lechtenberg, K., Sicking, D., and Reid, J.D. Development of Alternative Wood-Post MGS Approach Guardrail Transition. 2011. Rosenbaugh, S.K., Faller, R.K., Lechtenberg, K.A., Holloway, J.C., Mid-America Transportation Center, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Nebraska Department of Roads, Federal Highway Administration, and Research and Innovative Technology Administration. Development and Evaluation of Weak-Post W-Beam Guardrail in Mow Strips. 2015. Rosenbaugh, S.K., Stolle, C. S., Ronspies, K.B., University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. MGS with Curb and Omitted Post: Evaluation to MASH 2016 Test Designation No. 3-10. MwRSF. 2019. Ross, H.E., Sicking, D.L., Zimmer, R.A., and Michie, J.D. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. 1993. Schmidt, T.L., Mongiardini, M., Bielenberg, R.W., Lechtenberg, K.A., Reid, J.D., Faller, R.K., University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. Dynamic Test- ing of MGS W6x8.5 Posts at Decreased Embedment. 2012. Schneider, A.J., Rosenbaugh, S.K., Faller, R.K., Sicking, D.L., Lechtenberg, K.A., Reid, J.D., University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. Safety Perfor- mance Evaluation of Weak-Post, W-Beam Guardrail Attached to Culvert. 2014.

References 79   Schrum, K., Lechtenberg, K., Bielenberg, B., Rosenbaugh, S., Faller, R., Reid, J., and Sicking, D. Safety Perfor- mance Evaluation of the Non-blocked Midwest Guardrail System (MGS). Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2013. Sheikh, N.M., Menges, W.L., and Kuhn, D.L. MASH TL-3 Evaluation of 31-Inch W-Beam Guardrail with Wood and Steel Posts in Concrete Mow Strip. Texas A&M Transportation Institute Proving Ground, College Station, TX. 2019. Stolle, C., Lechtenberg, K., Reid, J., Faller, R., Bielenberg, B., Rosenbaugh, S., Sicking, D., and Johnson, E. Deter- mination of the Maximum MGS Mounting Height - Phase I Crash Testing. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2012. Stolle, C., Lechtenberg, K., Reid, J., Faller, R., Bielenberg, B., Rosenbaugh, S., Sicking, D., and Johnson, E. Deter- mination of the Maximum MGS Mounting Height - Phase I Crash Testing - Revision- 1. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2015. Tavarez, J. Are You Properly Specifying Materials? Steelwise, April 2018. TF13. TF13 Hardware Guide. http://www.tf13.org/. Accessed 9/20/2019. 2019. Thiele, J.C., Lechtenberg, K.A., Reid, J.D., Faller, R.K., Sicking, D.L., Bielenberg, R.W. University of Nebraska– Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, and Federal Highway Administration. Performance Limits for 6-in. (152-mm) High Curbs Placed in Advance of the MGS Using MASH Vehicles Part II: Full-Scale Crash Testing. 2009. Thiele, J.C., Reid, J.D., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Sicking, D.L., and Bielenberg, R.W. Performance Limits for 6-in. (152-mm) High Curbs Placed in Advance of the MGS Using MASH Vehicles Part III: Full-Scale Crash Testing (TL-2). University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE. 2010. TxDOT. Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges. 2014. VDOT. Road and Bridge Specifications. 2016. Weiland, N., Reid, J., Faller, R., Sicking, D., Bielenberg, B., and Lechtenberg (Polivka), K. Minimum Effective Guardrail Length for the MGS. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2013. WYDOT. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. 2010.

Next: Appendix A: Proposed AASHTO M 180 Specification Update »
Investigation of Material Requirements for Highway Guardrail Systems Get This Book
×
 Investigation of Material Requirements for Highway Guardrail Systems
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Manufacturers and hardware suppliers use significant time and resources to provide guardrail materials according to one state agency’s design and material standards, only to start the process all over again to satisfy another state’s specifications. Such inconsistency often leads to increased fabrication costs for hardware suppliers that are ultimately passed along to transportation agencies.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Research Report 1020: Investigation of Material Requirements for Highway Guardrail Systems provides a comprehensive review of the various current standards and proposes needed revisions to bring specifications into conformance with current requirements and the state of practice for highway guardrail systems.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!