National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix F: FFRDC Response to National Academy of Sciences Recommendations for "Review of the Continued Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #2"
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the Continued Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26872.
×

Appendix G

Acronyms and Abbreviations

AoA Analysis of Alternatives
CAPEX capital expenditures
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
DFLAW direct-feed low-activity waste
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
DOE-EM U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management
DOE-ORP U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection
DOT U.S. Department of Transportation
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FBSR fluidized bed steam reforming
FFRDC federally funded research and development center
GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office
HLW high-level waste
IDF Integrated Disposal Facility
IP industrial package
LAW low-activity waste
LLW low-level waste
LSA low-specific activity
NAS National Academy of Sciences
NASEM National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the Continued Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26872.
×
NDAA National Defense Authorization Act
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OPEX operations costs
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
SLAW supplemental low-activity waste
SNF spent nuclear fuel
SoT Statement of Task
SRNL Savannah River National Laboratory
SRS Savannah River Site
TPA Tri-Party Agreement
TRU transuranic waste
WA Ecology State of Washington Department of Ecology
WCS Waste Control Specialists
WRPS Washington River Protection Solutions, Limited Liability Company
WTP Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the Continued Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26872.
×
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Acronyms and Abbreviations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the Continued Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26872.
×
Page 58
Next: Appendix H: Committee, Consultant, and Staff Biographies »
Review of the Continued Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3 Get This Book
×
 Review of the Continued Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3
Buy Paperback | $23.00 Buy Ebook | $18.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the state of Washington produced about two-thirds of the nations plutonium for nuclear weapons from 1944 until the last reactor was shut down in 1987. The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) manages the ongoing clean-up at Hanford and has built a plant to convert the high-level radioactive waste into a glass form (vitrification) for safe disposal. However, decisions remain about how best to treat and dispose of the low-level waste at Hanford, which comprises over 90% of the volume of waste. To inform its decision, DOE contracted with key Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC), led by Savannah River National Laboratory, to carry out an analysis. This final in a trilogy of reports from the National Academies reviews the FFRDC third report released in January 2023.

The review finds that the FFRDC team made a strong technical case that converting the supplemental low-level waste from the vitrification process to a grout form (like cement) is the best option in terms of cost-effectiveness and timeliness, and that off-site disposal of that grout is a valid option as it will be away from potable water. The FFRDC provided a useful framework to help decision-makers understand the issues and trade-offs of the disposal options and did an excellent job of isolating specific factual considerations that can be analyzed, often quantified, and compared with each other. The FFRDC chose to provide a purely technical analysis that excluded analysis of two important factors to be considered - securing regulatory permissions and public acceptance - treating them, for now, as uncertainties. Looking ahead, the DOE faces many uncertainties and should emphasize flexibility in its overall approach, allowing for multiple, redundant options and pathways, as well as the ability to change over time.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!