Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
APPENDIX B HOUSE SCIENCE COMMITTEE LETTER GEORGE E 8AOWN J11 Câ¢i.lo"' ⢠R1nlongM 1no..1v M1mb<t ⢠SHERWOOD L &OEHLERT N1w Ym⢠HARRIS W FAWELL 11110011 RALPH M MALL r ... n CO'<STA NCE A MORELLA M1â¢yl1nd BART GOR DON l11ones ut CURT WELDON fl1nn1yhâ¢1n1i. J AMES A IAAFIC ANT J⢠On«1 OMllA ROHRABACHER C1l1h:11n1 a TIM ROEMHI l<>d1 1n1 STEVEN SCHIFF New M1â¢1co U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ROBERT E 18U01 CRAMER J~ A â¢.1c.1..,;i JAMES A BARCIA Mochu;it n Jct'O.vtTOh tu â¢â¢ KEN CALVERT C1hlarn1i1 PAUL MCHALE Pennsy1,,,.n1 a ROSCOE G 8AA1'tETl M11yl1ng VEllNON J EHLERS Mic h 1g11· COMMITIEE ON SCIENCE WDtE BEll,.,I CE JOHNSON l1n~ ALCEE l '"' AS TINGS floud ;i l YNN N RIVE.FIS Moch",tan DAVE WELDON F1 a,.da MA n SALMO ... Ar110llil ZOE LOFGFIEN Cahfo,.111 THOMAS M DAVIS "'"9"''⢠SUITE 2320 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING MICHAEL~ OQVLE Penn s ~â¢vl"'' ~' oo rcNf t_wf .........._.. u SHEILA JACl<SO N LEE Tun MARK FOlE'I flOâ¢â¢da WASHINGTON, DC 20515-6301 BIL L LU THEA M 1'ln.no11 THOMAS W EWl"!C lllmoi'I WA L TEA H CAPPS C.a 1loâ¢nâ¢i CHAIRES W CH1fl⢠PICKER ING M1s .. n1pp1 12021 225~371 DE BBIE STABE ... OW M â¢t hoeiJ I~ CHRIS CANNON U11h BOBETHERIOGE ... or111 Ca1olo nB KEVIN 8RADV Ten s TTY: 12021 22&-4410 ~ICK LAMPS ON Tuin MERfULL COOK U 11h DARLENE HOOLEY 0"!110" PHll E NGUSH P1nn,y lvan.1 ELLEN 0 TAUSCHER Calolor" a GEORGE R NET HflKUTT J~ Wnli1n E11 on TOM A COBURN O~laho,,.,a PETE SESSIONS hâ¢as October 23. 1997 Dr Bruce Alberts President National Academy of Sciences 210 I Constitution Avenue. NW Washington, D C 20418 Dear Dr Alberts As you may know. the House Committee on Science is actively involved in the implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Results Act) The Act requires federal agencies to develop and provide to Congress three basic reports: overseeing five-year strategic plans due this September; annual performance plans to be presented by the Office of Management and Budget next February; and annual performance reports due each year The Results Act has the potential to provide information necessary to strengthen program management and improve program performance This is a challenge for all agencies and in particular tho e conduc ting research. At a July 30 hearing before the House Committee on cicnce. several science-related agencies testified about their efforts to implement the requirements of the Act. h became clear from thi hearing that the agencies need to work harder at improving interagenc coordination and identifying areas where programs overlap In the world of research. overlap can be producti e and beneficial or it can be duplicative and wasteful -- that is why the agencies must coordinate Vv'e we;e pi.:a~eu to it:am uf your intt:rest in perfurming a siudy 10 assist with the implementation of the Results Act. We endorse a study that would review how science-related agencies may better incorporate their fundamental research activities into strategic plans and performance plans to improve the management and effectiveness of their science programs. Specifically. we would be interested in a cross-agency comparison of similar types of research Of particular interest to us is the development of a thorough interagency coordination process; common outcome-oriented analytic paradigm(s) that could be used across agencies for assessing the results of extramural and intramural fundamental research programs and training and education of the scientific and engineering workforce; and any principles that might assist us in our review of the agencies' performance plans as they relate to research 53
EVALUATING FEDERAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS Dr Bruce Alberts I0/23/97 Page 2 Another area for study would be the agencies' implementation of their performance plans. including how they relate to their trategic goats and missions. focusing on the impact of the Re ults Act on agency programmatic decisions and on the practice of research. the lessons learned from that implementation. and identification of best practices that could be u. ed by other agencies or programs In conducting the study, we hope you take the opportunit to hear from the various stakeholders in the process and work with the research agencies. The ommittee looks forward to reviewing the results of this effort . If you have any question please contact Beth okul of the Majority Staff(225-0585) or Dan Pearson of the Minority Staff(225-4494) Sincerely, ENBRENNER,~~E~~o~''r Ranking Democrat House Committee on Science 54