National Academies Press: OpenBook

Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options (2015)

Chapter: Appendix A: Observations about the Charge to the Committee

« Previous: Appendixes
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations about the Charge to the Committee." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

A

Observations about the
Charge to the Committee

The committee makes several clarifying observations about the charge it was given:

• The charge distinguishes explicitly between bulk and targeted collection. In fact, the vast majority of applications interesting to the Intelligence Community demonstrate that bulk collection and targeted collection play complementary roles. Drawing a sharp line between bulk and targeted collection does not accurately reflect how these approaches are used in practice. Furthermore, and as discussed in Section 2.2, bulk and targeted collection exist along a continuum without a bright line to differentiate between them.

• The charge calls for the committee to “use cases” to the extent possible. Although the committee’s report does discuss a number of use cases (Chapter 3), and these use cases helped it to understand how bulk collection functions as a part of the analytic process, in the end the committee did not find that these use cases were particularly helpful in identifying or explicating possible alternatives to bulk collection. The committee found it more useful to rely on general principles to reach its conclusions.

• The charge implicitly assumes that technology alternatives could make a contribution to the missions of the intelligence community that is roughly comparable to the contribution that bulk collection makes. As noted above, the committee found that this was not the case—in many cases, bulk collection does in fact make unique contributions to the mis-

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations about the Charge to the Committee." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

sions of the intelligence community that other kinds of collection cannot provide. See Chapter 4.

• The charge asks the committee to develop relevant criteria or metrics for comparing bulk collection to targeted collection. But the committee found that decisions about bulk versus targeted collection—and indeed about all manner of collection decisions—are driven by the concerns of policy makers, which are themselves shaped by their perception of the threat environment. Thus, it is not at all obvious that metrics for comparing bulk collection to targeted collection are particularly relevant in the big picture.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations about the Charge to the Committee." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations about the Charge to the Committee." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page 96
Next: Appendix B: Acronyms »
Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options Get This Book
×
 Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options study is a result of an activity called for in Presidential Policy Directive 28 (PPD-28), issued by President Obama in January 2014, to evaluate U.S. signals intelligence practices. The directive instructed the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to produce a report within one year "assessing the feasibility of creating software that would allow the intelligence community more easily to conduct targeted information acquisition rather than bulk collection." ODNI asked the National Research Council (NRC) -- the operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering -- to conduct a study, which began in June 2014, to assist in preparing a response to the President. Over the ensuing months, a committee of experts appointed by the Research Council produced the report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!