National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Acronyms
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Commonsense Approaches for Improving Transit Bus Speeds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22421.
×
Page 54
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Commonsense Approaches for Improving Transit Bus Speeds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22421.
×
Page 55

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

55 1. Levinson, H.S., “Analyzing Transit Travel Time Perfor- mance,” Transportation Research Record 915, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 1–6. 2. St. Jacques, K. and H.S. Levinson, TCRP Report 26: Operational Analysis of Bus Lanes on Arterials, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. 3. St. Jacques, K. and H.S. Levinson, TCRP Research Results Digest No. 38: Operational Analysis of Bus Lanes on Arterials: Application and Refinement, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 4. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. et al., TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd ed., Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 5. Kuukka-Ruotsalainen, V., S. Airaksinen, M. Lehmuskoski, M. Musto, and P. Murole, “Speeding up Public Transporta- tion as a Central Competitive Factor,” Liikenne—Ja Vies- tintaministerion Julkaisuja (Finland Ministry of Transport and Communications), Vol. 53, 2007. 6. Rutherford, G.S. and K.E. Watkins, Measurement and Evaluation of Transit Travel Time Reliability, Report No. TNW2010-10, Transportation Northwest Regional Center X, Seattle, Wash., 2010. 7. Ryus, P. and T. Bartee, “Forecasting Transit Speed and Delay for Planning Applications in Florida,” Transpor- tation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2006, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 21–27. 8. Maloney, M. and D. Boyle, “Components of Travel Time on the Glendale Beeline Bus Network,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1666, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 23–27. 9. Pessaro, B. and C. Van Nostrand, “Measuring the Impacts of Transit Signal Priority by Synchronizing Manually Collected Data with APC Data,” presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D.C., Jan. 22–26, 2012. 10. Albright, E. and M. Figliozzi, “Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Transit Signal Priority and Late Bus Recovery at Signalized-Intersection Level,” Transpor- tation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2311, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 186–194. 11. Surprenant-Legault, J. and A.M. El-Geneidy, “Intro- duction of a Reserved Bus Lane: Impact on Bus Run- ning Time and On-Time Performance,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2218, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 10–18. 12. Schwartz S.I., D. Hollander, C. Louie, and R. Amoruso, “Madison Avenue Dual-Width Bus Lane Project,” Trans- portation Research Record 854, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 70–77. 13. Pangilinan, C. and K. Carnarius, “Traffic Signal Tim- ing for Optimal Transit Progression in Downtown San Francisco,” TRB 90th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Jan. 2011. 14. Texas Transportation Institute, TCRP Report 19: Guide- lines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops, Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996. 15. Cooper, P.J., “Effect of Minor Traffic Engineering Improvements on Transit Operation,” presented at 1982 Roads and Transportation Association of Canada Confer- ence, Halifax, NS, 1982. 16. Fitzpatrick, K., K.M. Hall, S. Farnsworth, and M.D. Finley, TCRP Web Document 19 in connection with TCRP Report 65: An Evaluation of Bus Bulbs on Transit, Traffic, and Pedestrian Operations, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 17. Furth, P.G. and J.L. SanClemente, “Near-Side, Far-Side, Uphill, Downhill: Impact of Bus Stop Location on Bus Delay,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1971, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 66–73. 18. Furth, P.G., M.C. Mekuria and J.L. SanClemente, “Stop Spacing Analysis Using Geographic Information Tools with Parcel and Street Network Data,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2034, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 73–81. 19. King, R.D., TCRP Synthesis Report 49: Yield to Bus— State of the Practice, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 20. Fabregas, A., P.-S. Lin, E. Gonzalez-Velez, A. Gatz, and H. Zhou, “Safety and Operational Assessment of Yield- to-Bus Electronic Warning Signs on Transit Buses,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 2218, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 1–9. 21. Estrada-Romeu, M., J. Ortigosa, and F. Robuste, “Tandem Bus Stop Capacity,” presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2011. 22. Alonso, B., J.L. Moura, A. Ibeas, and F.J. Ruisanchez, “Public Transport Line Assignment Model to Dual- Berth Bus Stops,” Journal of Transportation Engineer- ing, Vol. 137, No. 12, 2011, pp. 953–961. rEFErENCES

56 23. Levinson, H.S., S. Zimmerman, J. Clinger, S. Rutherford, R. Smith, J. Cracknell, and R. Soberman, TCRP Report 90: Bus Rapid Transit: Vol. 1, Case Studies in Bus Rapid Tran- sit and Vol. 2, Implementation Guidelines, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 24. Kittelson & Associates, Inc.; Herbert S. Levinson Trans- portation Consultants; and DMJM+Harris, TCRP Report 118: Bus Rapid Transit Practitioner’s Guide, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2007. 25. Callaghan, L. and W. Vincent, “Preliminary Evaluation of Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Project,” Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- tion Research Board, No. 2034, Transportation Research Board, of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 37–44. 26. Levinson, H.S., “Bus Rapid Transit on City Streets: How Does it Work,” Proceedings of 2nd Urban Street Sym- posium: Uptown, Downtown, or Small Town: Designing Urban Streets That Work, Anaheim, Calif., 2003. 27. Diaz, O.E., “Guatemala City: Bus Rapid Transit Comes to Central America,” Sustainable Transportation, Issue No. 20, 2008, pp. 10–11. 28. Barr, J.E., E.B. Beaton, J.V. Chiarmonte, and T.V. Orosz, “Select Bus Service on Bx12 in New York City,” Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- tion Research Board, No. 2145, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 40–48. 29. Beaton, E.B., J.E. Barr, J.V. Chiarmonte, T.V. Orosz, D. Paukowits, and A. Sugiura, “Select Bus Service on M15 in New York City: Bus Rapid Transit Partnership,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 2277, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 1–10. 30. Foletta, N., M. Estrada-Romeu, M. Roca-Riu, and Pere Martí, “New Modifications to Bus Network Design Methodology,” Transportation Research Record: Jour- nal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2197, Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 43–53. 31. Bekhor, S., “Adapting Transit Capacity Manual for Local Planning Purposes: Operational Models for Arterial Street Bus Lanes in Tel Aviv, Israel,” 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Washington, D.C., 2008. 32. Tranhuu, M., F. Montgomery, and P. Timms, “Modeling Bus Lane Priorities in a Motorcycle Environment Using SATURN,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2038, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 167–174. 33. Muzyka, A., “Bus Priority Strategies and Traffic Simula- tion,” TRB Special Report 153, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1975, pp. 39–49. 34. Saberi M., A. Zockaie, W. Feng, and A. El-Geneidy, “Definition and Properties of Alternative Bus Service Reliability Measures at the Stop Level,” Journal of Pub- lic Transportation, Vol. 16, No. 1, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2013. 35. Fernandez, R. and A. Valencia, “Macrosimulation of Operations at Public Transport Corridors,” 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Compen- dium of Papers DVD, Washington, D.C., 2010. 36. Furth, P.G., B. Cesme, and T. Rima, “Signal Priority near Major Bus Terminal: Case Study of Ruggles Sta- tion, Boston, Massachusetts,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2192, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 89–96. 37. Li, M., Y. Lin, W.-B. Zhang, K. Zhou, and H. Nakamura, “Modeling and Implementation of Adaptive Transit Sig- nal Priority on Actuated Control Systems,” Computer- Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2011, pp. 270–284. 38. Winters, K.E. and M.A. Abbas, “Optimization of Transit Signal Priority Extensions along an Uncoordinated Arte- rial,” 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Compendium of Papers DVD, Washington, D.C., 2011. 39. Zhou, G. and A. Gan, “Performance of Transit Signal Pri- ority with Queue Jumper Lanes,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1925, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 265–271. 40. Pye, R. and C. Bode, “Demonstrating Intensive Bus Pri- ority,” Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 46, No. 11, 2005, pp. 404–409. 41. Rouphail, N.M., “Operational Evaluation of Bus Priority Strategies,” Transportation Research Record 994, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 30–34. 42. Horn, D.M. and E.M. Widstrand, “NE 85th Street and Redmond Way Transit Corridor Study,” ITE 2005 Annual Meeting and Exhibit Compendium of Technical Papers, Melbourne Australia, 2005. 43. Koonce, P., “Transit Priority Treatments White Paper” [Online]. Available: http://www.ite.org/transitpriority/ ITE-White-Paper.pdf [accessed Feb. 2013]. 44. Blake, H.W. and W. Jackson, Electric Railway Transpor- tation, McGraw–Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, NY, 1924. 45. Levinson, H.S., TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 15: Supervision Strategies for Improved Reliability of Bus Routes, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991. 46. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, FHWA, U.S. DOT, Washington, D.C., 2012 [Online]. Available: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/.

Next: Appendix A - List of Participating Transit Agencies »
Commonsense Approaches for Improving Transit Bus Speeds Get This Book
×
 Commonsense Approaches for Improving Transit Bus Speeds
Buy Paperback | $68.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Synthesis 110: Commonsense Approaches for Improving Transit Bus Speeds explores approaches transit agencies have taken to realize gains in average bus speeds.

The report also identifies metrics pertaining to measures such as changes in travel speed and its components, operating cost, and ridership. It shows the results of each or a combination of approaches implemented.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!