National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter Eight - Conclusions
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Environmental Assessment of Air and High-Speed Rail Corridors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22520.
×
Page 32
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Environmental Assessment of Air and High-Speed Rail Corridors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22520.
×
Page 33
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Environmental Assessment of Air and High-Speed Rail Corridors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22520.
×
Page 34

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

32 Campos, J. and G. de Rus, “Some Stylized Facts About High-Speed Rail: A Review of HSR Experiences Around the World,” Transport Policy, Vol. 16, 2009, pp. 19–28. CCR, Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environ- mental Quality Act, 2012. Center for Clean Air Policy and Center for Neighborhood Technology, High-Speed Rail and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Center for Clean Air Policy and Center for Neighborhood Technology, Washington, D.C., 2006. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Opportunities and Challenges for High-Speed Rail Corridors in Texas, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 2011. CFR, CEQ Regulations for Implementing NEPA, Title 40 of Code of Federal Regulations, 2012. Chang, B. and A. Kendall, “Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Assessment of Infrastructure Construction for California’s High-Speed Rail System,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, 2011, pp. 429–434. Charles River Associates, Independent Ridership and Passen- ger Revenue Projections for High Speed Rail Alternatives in California, Boston, Mass., 2000. Cheng, Y.-H., “High-speed Rail in Taiwan: New Experience and Issues for Future Development, Transport Policy, Vol. 17, 2010, pp. 51–63. Chester, M. and A. Horvath, “Life-cycle Assessment of High-Speed Rail: The Case of California, Environmental Research Letters, 2010, Vol. 5, No. 1, 8 pp. Chester, M. and A. Horvath, “High-speed Rail with Emerg- ing Automobiles and Aircraft Can Reduce Environmental Impacts in California’s Future,” Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2012, 11 pp. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Draft Nepa Guid- ance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, CEQ, Washington, D.C., 2010. Eagan, M.E. and R. Mazur, “A Comparison of Noise Impacts of Intercity Rail and Short-haul Air Travel,” Proceedings of 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2011. Ekvall, T. and B. Weidema, “System Boundaries and Input Data in Consequential Life Cycle Inventory Analysis,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 9, 2004, pp. 161–171. Environmental Policy Act, Solano Press Books, Point Arena, Calif. European Commission, EU Position Paper on Dose Response Relationships Between Transportation Noise and Annoy- ance, Brussels, Belgium, 2002. European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Euro- control), Challenges of Growth, Brussels, Belgium, 2008. European Regions Airline Association, Air and Rail: Setting the Record Straight. Surrey, United Kingdom, 2011. Adler, N., E. Pels, and C. Nash, “High-speed Rail and Air Transport Competition: Game Engineering as Tool for Cost-Benefit Analysis,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 44, 2010, pp. 812–833. Airport Cooperative Research Program Project 3-10, Approaches to Addressing Aviation Capacity in Coastal Mega-regions, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies,Washington, D.C., 2009. Airport Cooperative Research Program Project 3-23, Integrat- ing Aviation and Passenger Rail Planning, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013. Åkerman, J., “The Role of High-Speed Rail in Mitigating Climate Change: The Swedish Case Europabanan from a Life Cycle Perspective,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, 2011, pp. 208–217. Albalate, D. and G. Bel, “High-Speed Rail: Lessons for Policy Makers from Experiences Abroad,” Public Admin- istration Review, Vol. 72, 2012, pp. 336–349. American Public Transportation Association (APTA), An Inventory of the Criticisms of High-Speed Rail, APTA, Washington, D.C., 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Policy State- ment 402—High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail, ASCE, Reston, Va., 2010. Amtrak, The Amtrak Vision for the Northeast Corridor, Washington, D.C., 2012. Anderson, Z., “Scott Says No to High Speed Rail Plan,” Herald Tribune, 2011. Bass, R.E., A.I. Herson, and K.M. Bogdan, The NEPA Book: A Step-by-Step Guide on How to Comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, 2001, Solano Press, Point Arena, Calif., 2001. Bastress, E.K., “Impact of Aircraft Exhaust Emissions at Airports,” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 7, 1973, pp. 811–816. Behrens, C. and E. Pels, “Intermodal Competition in the London–Paris Passenger Market: High-Speed Rail and Air Transport,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 71, 2012, pp. 278–288. Brownstone, D., M. Hansen, and S. Madanat, Review of Bay Area/California High Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Study, Institute of Transportation Studies Research Report #UCB-ITS-RR-2010-1, 2010. Burgess, E., Sustainability of Intercity Transportation Infra- structure: Assessing the Energy Consumption and Green- house Gas Emissions of High-Speed Rail in the U.S., Arizona State University, Tucson, 2011. California Air Resources Board (CAB), California Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change, Califor- nia Air Resources Board, Sacramento, 2008. Cambridge Systematics, High Speed Rail: A National Perspec- tive, High Speed Rail Experience in the United States, 2008. REFERENCES

33 and High-Speed Train Operations,” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 1, 2007, pp. 209–230. Gosling, G.D., ACRP Synthesis 5: Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, 141 pp. Greene, D.L. and M. Wegener, “Sustainable Transport,” Jour- nal of Transport Geography, Vol. 5, 1997, pp. 177–190. Hensher, D.A., “A Practical Approach to Identifying the Mar- ket Potential for High Speed Rail: A Case Study in the Sydney–Canberra Corridor,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 431–446. Hsu, C.-W., Y. Lee, and C.-H. Liao, “Competition Between High-Speed and Conventional Rail Systems: A Game Theoretical Approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, 2010, pp. 3162–3170. Hu, S., S. Fruin, K. Kozawa, S. Mara, A.M. Winer, and S.E. Paulson, “Aircraft Emission Impacts in a Neighborhood Adjacent to a General Aviation Airport in Southern Cali- fornia,” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 8039–8045. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. Jamin, S., A. Schafer, M. Ben-Akiva, and I. Waitz, “Aviation Emissions and Abatement Policies in the United States: A City-Pair Analysis,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 9, 2004, pp. 295–317. Janic, M., “High-speed Rail and Air Passenger Transport: A Comparison of the Operational Environmental Per- formance,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 217, 2003, pp. 259–269. Janic, M., “Assessing Some Social and Environmental Effects of Transforming an Airport into a Real Multimodal Trans- port Node,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, 2011, pp. 137–149. Jolliet, O., et al., “IMPACT 2002+: A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 8, 2003, pp. 324–330. Jørgensen, M.W. and S.C. Sorenson, “Estimating Emissions from Railway Traffic,” Estimating Emissions from Rail- way Traffic, 1997, pp. 209–216. Kageson, P., Discussion Paper 2009–28, The Future for Interurban Passenger Transport, OECD/ITF, Stockholm, Sweden, 2009. Karkkainen, B.C., “Toward a Smarter NEPA: Monitoring and Managing Government’s Environmental Performance,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 102, 2002, pp. 903–972. Kim, B., I.A. Waitz, M. Vigilante, and R. Bassarab, ACRP Report 11: Guidebook on Preparing Airport Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, 53 pp. Kosinksi, A., L. Schipper, and E. Deakin, “Analysis of High- speed Rail’s Potential to Reduce CO2 Emissions from Transportation in the United States,” Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper #11-3720, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2010. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), O’Hare Modern- ization Final Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Washington, D.C., 2005b. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Final Environmental Impact Statement for New Runways, Terminal Facilities and Related Facilities at Washington Dulles International Airport, FAA, Washington, D.C., 2005c. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Final Environmen- tal Impact Statement for the Development and Expansion of Runway 9R/27L and Other Associated Airport Proj- ects at Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood International Airport, FAA, Washington, D.C., 2008. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems Narrative 2011–2015, FAA, Washington, D.C., 2010. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Airport Environ- mental Records of Decision, FAA, Washington, D.C., 2012a. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Considering Green- house Gases and Climate Under the National Environ- mental Policy Act (NEPA): Interim Guidance, FAA, Washington, D.C., 2012b. Federal Register, “Federal Aviation Administration Order 1050.1E Policies and Procedures for Considering Envi- ronmental Impacts & Federal Aviation Administra- tion Order 5050.4B National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions,” Federal Register Vol. 25279, 2006. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), High Speed Ground Transportation Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, FRA, Washington, D.C., 2005a. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Florida High Speed Rail Tampa to Orlando Final Environmental Impact Statement, FRA, Washington, D.C., 2005b. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Statewide Program Environmental Report Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the Pro- posed California High-Speed Train System, FRA, Wash- ington, D.C., 2005c. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Federal Railroad Administration High-Speed Rail Strategic Plan, FRA, Washington, D.C., 2009a. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Compliance With the National Environmental Policy Act in Implementing the High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program, FRA, Washington, D.C., 2009b. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), National Rail Plan, FRA, Washington, D.C., 2010. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Chronology of High Speed Rail Corridors, FRA, Washington, D.C., 2012a. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Chicago to St. Louis High Speed Rail Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact State- ment, FRA, Washington, D.C., 2012b. Freeman, J. and A. Vermeule, Massachusetts v. EPA: From Politics to Expertise Harvard Law School, 2007. Givoni, M., “Environmental Benefits from Mode Substitution: Comparison of the Environmental Impact from Aircraft

34 Replacing Automobile Travel in the Georgetown–San Anto- nio Corridor, Texas State University, San Marcos, 2011. Skamris, M.K. and B. Flyvbjerg, Inaccuracy of Traffic Fore- casts and Cost Estimates on Large Transport Projects, Transport Policy, Vol. 4, 1997, pp. 141–146. Smith, R.A., “Railways: How They May Contribute to a Sustainable Future,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 217, 2003, pp. 243–248. Sonnenberg, A., Transportation Energy and Carbon Foot- prints for U.S. Corridors, Georgia Institute of Technol- ogy, Atlanta, 2010. Stallen, P., “A Theoretical Framework for Environmental Noise Annoyance,” Noise Health, Vol. 1, 1999, pp. 69–79. Steer Davies Gleave, Air and Rail Competition and Comple- mentarity, Final Report, European Union, 2006. Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), Potential Development of an Intercity Passenger Transit System in Texas—Report on Tasks 1-5, 2009, TTI, College Station. Thiebault, V., Design of Railway Bridges Considering LCA, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010. Tucker, D.R., An Economic and Policy Analysis of the Intro- duction of High-Speed Rail in California: Phase One from the San Francisco Bay Area to Los Angeles and Ana- heim, Duke University, Durham, N.C., 2012. United States Code (USC), Supplement 5, Title 49 Transpor- tation, 49 U.S.C. §47107(a)(1), 2006 ed., 2012 van Wee, B., R. van den Brink, and H. Nijland, “Envi- ronmental Impacts of High-Speed Rail Links in Cost– Benefit Analyses: A Case Study of the Dutch Zuider Zee Line,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 8, 2003, pp. 299–314. Wang, X. and L. Sanders, “Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint of High-speed Rail Projects: Using CAHSR and FHSR as Examples,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 226, 2011, pp. 26–35. Westerdahl, D., S.A. Fruin, P.L. Fine, and C. Sioutas, “The Los Angeles International Airport as a Source of Ultrafine Particles and Other Pollutants to Nearby Communities,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 42, 2008, pp. 3143–3155. Westin, J. and P. Kageson, “Can High Speed Rail Offset Its Embedded Emissions?” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2012, Vol. 17, 2012, pp. 1–7. Xiong, J. and M. Hansen, “Value of Flight Cancellation and Cancellation Decision Modeling,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2106, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 83–89. Yang, D., S.H. Kwan, and T. Lu, “An Emission Inventory of Marine Vessels in Shanghai in 2003,” Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 41, 2007, pp. 5183–5190. Zanin, M., R. Herranz, and S. Ladousse, “Environmental Benefits of Air–Rail Intermodality: The Example of Madrid Barajas,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 48, 2012, pp. 1056–1063. Lave, L.B., C.T. Hendrickson, and F.C. McMichael, “Environ- mental Implications of Electric Cars,” Science, Vol. 268, 1995, pp. 993–995. Levinson, D., J. Mathieu, D. Gillen, and A. Kanafani, “The Full Cost of High-Speed Rail: An Engineering Approach,” The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 189–215. Lynch, T.A., “Energy-related, Environmental, and Economic Benefits of Florida’s High-Speed Rail and Maglev Systems Proposals,” Transportation Research Record 1255, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 122–138. MacLean, H.L. and L.B. Lave, “A Life-Cycle Model of an Automobile,” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 32, 1998, pp. 322A–330A. Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al. Supreme Court of the United States (MA vs EPA 2007), Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Meltz, R., Federal Agency Actions Following the Supreme Court’s Climate Change Decision in Massachusetts v. EPA: A Chronology Congressional Research Service, 2012. Miedema, H.M., “Exposure-response Relationships for Environmental Noise,” Proceedings of Inter-Noise, Istan- bul, Turkey, 2007. Negroni, C., “Train or Plane? More Travelers Choose Both,” New York Times, New York, N.Y., 2012. Network Rail, Comparing Environmental Impact of Conven- tional and High Speed Rail, London, United Kingdom, 2009. Nuworsoo, C. and E. Deakin, “Transforming High-speed Rail Stations to Major Activity Hubs: Lessons for California,” 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009. Patterson, J. and A. Perl, “The TGV Effect: A Potential Oppor- tunity for Reconciling Sustainability with Aviation,” World Transport Policy and Practice, Vol. 5, 1999. Ree, R., N. Gulle, K. Holland, E. Grift, C. Mata, and F. Suarez, Overcoming the Barrier Effect of Roads-How Effective Are Mitigation Strategies? 2007. Rus, G.D., “Should the Government Invest in High Speed Rail Infrastructure?” The BCA of HSR, 2011. Ryerson, M.S., Optimal Intercity Transportation Services with Heterogeneous Demand and Variable Fuel Price, Univer- sity of California, 2010. Ryerson, M. and M. Hansen, “The Potential of Turboprops for Reducing Aviation Fuel Consumption,” Transporta- tion Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 15, 2010, pp. 305–314. Ryerson, M., M. Hansen, and J. Bonn, “Fuel Consumption and Operational Performance,” Proceedings of Proceed- ings of the 9th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Berlin, Germany, 2011. Schrooten, L., I.D. Vlieger, L.I. Panis, and R. Torfs, “Forecasted Maritime Shipping Emissions for Belgium with an Activity Based Emission Model,” Proceedings of Proceedings of the TAC-Conference, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2006. Scott, K., How Big Are the Environmental Benefits of High- Speed Rail? A Cost Benefit Analysis of High-Speed Rail

Next: Appendix A - Literature Survey »
Environmental Assessment of Air and High-Speed Rail Corridors Get This Book
×
 Environmental Assessment of Air and High-Speed Rail Corridors
Buy Paperback | $44.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Synthesis 43: Environmental Assessment of Air and High-Speed Rail Corridors explores where additional research can improve the ability to assess the environmental outcomes of these two systems.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!