Using Existing Pavement in Place and Achieving Long Life (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

40 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2008. Guide Specifications for Highway Construction, 9th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Caltrans. 2004. “Interim PCC Pavement Rehabilitation Guidelines,” Pavement Tech Notes, July 28. Caltrans. 2008. Crack Existing Concrete Pavement. Standard Special Provision 41-250. Coley, C. C., and I. Carswell. 2006. Improved Design of Overlay Treat- ments to Concrete Pavements: Final Report on the Monitoring of Trials and Schemes. Report TRL657. U.K. Transport Research Laboratory, Wokingham, United Kingdom. Hall, K. T., C. E. Correa, S. H. Carpenter, and R. P. Elliott. 2001. NCHRP Web Document 35 (Project C1-38): Rehabilitation Strategies for High- way Pavements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Hall, K. T., D. Dawood, S. Vanikar, R. Tally, Jr., T. Cackler, A. Correa, P. Deem, J. Duit, G. M. Geary, A. J. Gisi, A. N. Hanna, S. Kosmatka, R. O. Rasmussen, S. Tayabji, and G. Voigt. 2007. Long-Life Concrete Pavements in Europe and Canada. Report FHWA-PL-07-027. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Harrington, D. 2008. Guide to Concrete Overlays: Sustainable Solution for Resurfacing and Rehabilitating Existing Pavements, 2nd ed. National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Ames, Iowa. Heckel, L. 2002. Rubblizing with Bituminous Concrete Overlay: 10 Years’ Experience in Illinois. Physical Research Report 137. Illinois Depart- ment of Transportation, Springfield. Jordan, R. W., C. Coley, H. M. Harding, I. Carswell, and K. E. Hassan. 2008. Best Practice Guide for Overlaying Concrete. TRL Road Note RN41. U.K. Transport Research Laboratory, Wokingham, United Kingdom. Liu, J., D. G. Zollinger, S. D. Tayabji, and K. D. Smith. 2003. Repair and Rehabilitation of Concrete Pavements: Volume IV: Strategic Analysis of Pavement Evaluation and Repair (SAPER). Draft Final Report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Merrill, D. 2005. Guidance on the Development, Assessment and Mainte- nance of Long-life Flexible Pavements. Report TRL639. Highways Agency, Quarry Products Association, and Refined Bitumen Asso- ciation, U.K. Transport Research Laboratory, Wokingham, United Kingdom. Michigan Department of Transportation. 2003. Standard Specifications for Construction. Michigan Department of Transportation Publications Office, Lansing. Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2005. Standard Specifications for Construction, 2005 ed. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul. Missouri Department of Transportation. 2004. Missouri Standard Spec- ifications for Highway Construction, 2004 ed. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City. Monismith, C., J. Harvey, B. Tsai, F. Long, and J. Signore. 2009. Summary Report: The Phase One I-710 Freeway Rehabilitation Project—Initial Design (1999) to Performance after Five-Plus Years of Traffic (2009). Report UCPRC-SR-2008-04. Pavement Research Center, University of California, Davis and Berkeley. Newcomb, D. E., M. Buncher, and I. J. Huddleston. 2001. Transportation Research Circular 503: Concepts of Perpetual Pavements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Sebesta, S., and T. Scullion. 2007. Field Evaluations and Guidelines for Rubblization in Texas. Report FHWA/TX-08/0-4687-2. Texas Trans- portation Institute. Smith, K. D., H. T. Yu, and D. G. Peshkin. 2002. Portland Cement Concrete Overlays: State of the Technology Synthesis. Report DTFH61-00- P-00507. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Tayabji, S., and S. Lim. 2007. Long Life Concrete Pavements: Best Practices and Directions from the States. Concrete Pavement Technology Pro- gram, Technical Brief FHWA-HIF-07-030. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Texas Department of Transportation. 2004. Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. Texas Department of Transportation. 2009a. “Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement—One Layer Steel Bar Placement,” Design Division Standard, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. Texas Department of Transportation. 2009b. “Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement—Two Layer Steel Bar Placement,” Design Division Standard, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. Texas Department of Transportation. 2011. Section 5: Determining Concrete Pavement Thickness, “Pavement Design Guide,” Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. Virginia Department of Transportation. 2007. Road and Bridge Specifi- cations. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond. Von Quintus, H. L., C. Rao, J. Mallela, B. Aho, Applied Research Associates, Incorporated, and Wisconsin DOT. 2007. Guidance, Parameters, and Recommendations for Rubblized Pavements: Final Report. Project WHRP 06-13, Project 16730. National Technical Information Service, Alexandria, Va. Washington State Department of Transportation. 2010. “Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction,” M41-10, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia. References