National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 6 - Findings, Recommendations, and Suggested Future Research
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22757.
×
Page 58
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22757.
×
Page 59
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22757.
×
Page 60
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22757.
×
Page 61
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22757.
×
Page 62
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22757.
×
Page 63

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

58 References ACRP (2011). Measurement of Gaseous HAP Emissions from Idling Aircraft as a Function of Engine and Ambient Conditions. TRB ACRP Project 02-03A. Expected Completion Date: December 30, 2011. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) (2004). Sensitivity Analysis of PVMRM and OLM in AERMOD. Final Report. Alaska DEC, Division of Air Quality. Alaska DEC Contract No. 18-8018-04. American Petroleum Institute (API) (1980). “An Evaluation of Short-Term Air Quality Models Using Tracer Study Data.” API Report No. 4333, October. Aiyyer, Anantha, et al. (2007). Final Report: Third Peer Review of the CMAQ Model. Submitted to: Community Modeling and Analysis System Center, Carolina Environmental Program, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. February 20. Appel, K. W., et al. (2011). “Overview of the Atmospheric Model Evaluation Tool (AMET) v1.1 for Evaluating Meteorological and Air Quality Model.” Environmental Modeling and Software, 26, 4, 434–443. Arunachalam, S., et al. (2008). An Improved Method to Represent Aviation Emissions in Air Quality Modeling Systems and their Impacts on Air Quality, In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology, New Orleans, LA. Arunachalam, S. et al. (2009). The Influence of Chemistry-Transport Model Scale and Resolution on Population Exposure due to Aircraft Emissions from Three Airports in the United States In Proceedings of the 30th NATO International Technical Meeting on Air Pollution and its Applications, May 2009, San Francisco, CA. Arunachalam, S., et al. (2011). An Investigation of the Impacts of Aviation Emissions on Future Air Quality and Health. D.G. Steyn and S. T. Castelli (eds.), Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXI, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security 4, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1359-8_108, Springer, The Netherlands. Benarie, M. M. (1987). Editorial: The limits of air pollution modeling. Atmospheric Environment, 21:1–5. Bench, G., et al. (2002). “The Use of STIM and PESA to Measure Profiles of Aerosol Mass and Hydrogen Con- tent, Respectively, across Mylar Rotating Drum Impactor Samples.” Aerosol Sci. and Tech. 36: 642–651. Bieser, J., et al. (2011). SMOKE for Europe—adaptation, modification and evaluation of a comprehensive emission model for Europe, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 47–68, doi:10.5194/gmd-4-47-2011. Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J. (2003). Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component, 1 Model description. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 108(D6): 4183. Brode, Roger and Bret Anderson (2008). Technical Issues Related to the Use of CALPUFF for Near-Field Applica- tions. Technical Memorandum. September 26. Bowne, N. J. et al. (1983). Overview, results and conclusions for the EPRI plume model validation and development project: Plains Site. Electric Power Research Institute, Final Report 1616-1 for Project EA-3704. Boylan, J. W. and A. G. Russell (2006). PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models. Atmospheric Environment, 40(26), 4946–4959. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) (2011). Airline On-Time Performance Data. http://www.transtats. bts.gov/Tables.asp?DB_ID=120&DB_Name=Airline%20On-Time%20Performance%20Data& DB_Short_Name=On-Time. Burdick, D. S. (1995). An introduction to tensor products with applications to multiway data analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 28, 229–237. Byun, D. W., and Ching, J. K. S. (1999). Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. EPA/600/R-99/030, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC. Byun, D. W., and Schere, K. L. (2006). Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System. J. Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 59 (2):51–77.

References 59 California Energy Commission and the California Air Resources Board (CEC/CARB) (2002). Summary of Short- Range Dispersion Modeling Workshop. Co-sponsored by the California Energy Commission and the California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, January. Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants (CERC). (2011). ADMS-Airport. http://www.cerc.co.uk/ environmental-software/ADMS-Airport-model.html. Carlton, Annmarie G., et al. (2010). Model Representation of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7. Environ- mental Science & Technology 2010 44 (22), 8553–8560. Carr, Edward L., Robert G. Johnson, and Robert G. Ireson (2002). CRP-CD-32: Intersection Air Quality Model. NCHRP Project 25-06, Transportation Research Board. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. July. CDM (2010). Air Quality Monitoring Study, Baseline Year Report. Massachusetts Port Authority, Logan Inter- national Airport. August. Chow, J. C., et al. (2008). Advances in Integrated and Continuous Measurements for Particle Mass and Chemical Composition. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 58:141–163. Cimorelli, A. J., et al. (2005). AERMOD: A Dispersion Model for Industrial Source Applications. Part I: General Model Formulation and Boundary Layer Characterization. J. Applied Meteorology, 44. pp 682–693. Cliff, S. S., (2005). Quality Assurance Analysis of Filter Samples Collected during the Lake Tahoe Atmospheric Deposition Study using Synchrotron X-Ray Fluorescence (LTADS-sXRF QA). Final report for Agreement No. 03-344. May 30. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (2005). Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and Complex Terrain) Dispersion Model and Other Revisions; Final Rule. 40 CFR Part 51. November 9, 2005. CFR (2006). Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations; Final Rule. 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58, Federal Reg- ister, Vol. 71, No. 200. Tuesday, October 17, 2006. CFR (2011). Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act and Assessing the Environmental effects abroad of EPA Actions. http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&rgn=div5&view=text&no de=40:1.0.1.1.6&idno=40. 40 CFR, Part 6. Current as of October 14, 2011. Cook, Richard, et al. (2007). Impact of Understanding the Effects of Cold Temperature on Motor Vehicle Start Emis- sions of Air Toxics in the United States. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. Vol ume 57: 1469–1479. December. Cooper, J. A., J. G. Watson, and J. J. Huntzicker (1984). The Effective Variance Weighting for Least Squares Calculations Applied to the Mass Balance Receptor Model. Atmospheric Environ. 18:1347–1355. Draper, Julie, et al. (1997). Air Quality Procedures for Civilian Airports and Air Force Bases. FAA. FAA-AEE-97-03, AL/EQ-TR-1996-0017. April. DuBois, Doug and Gerald C. Paynter (2006). “Fuel Flow Method2” for Estimating Aircraft Emissions. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Technical Paper Series. 2006-01-1987. Duchene, N., et al. (2007). Comparison of Measured and Modeled NO2 Values at Zurich Airport, Sensitivity of Aircraft NOX Emissions Inventory and NO2 Dispersion Parameters. Paper H11-178, 11th Harmonization Conference, Cambridge, UK. Eder, B., and S. Yu. (2006). An evaluation of model performance of EPA models-3/CMAQ. Atmospheric Environ- ment, 40 (26): 4811–4824. Ellis, H. M. et al. (1980). Comparison of predicted and measured concentrations for 58 alternative models of plume transport in complex terrain. Air & Waste Management Association (A&WMA). June. ENVIRON (2006). CAMx User’s Guide, Version 4.40. Environ International Corporation. September. ENVIRON (2008). Teterboro Airport, Detailed Air Quality Evaluation. Prepared for the New Jersey Depart- ment of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), Trenton, New Jersey. ENVIRON International Corpora- tion, Groton, Massachusetts, and Newark, New Jersey. Project #08-14189A, Final Report. February 11. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre (EEC) (2011). User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Revision 3.9. EEC Technical/Scientific Report No. 11/03/08-08. April. FAA (2007). Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS) Version 5 Technical Manual. FAA-AEE-07-07. Draft. FAA (2008). Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS) user’s Manual, EDMS 5.1. FAA-AEE-07-01. Revision 5. FAA (2009). Guidance for Quantifying Speciated Organic Gas Emissions from Airport Sources. Office of Environment and Energy. Ver. 1. September 2. FAA (2010). Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS) User’s Manual, EDMS 5.1.3. FAA-AEE-07-01. Revision 8. FAAa (2011). Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT). http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_ offices/apl/research/models/aedt/. Updated: February 2, 2011. FAAb (2011). Terminal Area Forecast (TAF). FAA Operations and Performance Data. http://aspm.faa.gov/main/ taf.asp.

60 Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality Federal Register (FR) (1998). Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System Policy for Airport Air Quality Analysis; Interim Guidance to FAA orders 1050.1D and 5050.4A. 18068 Federal Register, Vol. 63, No. 70. April 13. Foley, K. M., et al. (2010). Incremental testing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 205–226, doi:10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010. Grell, G. A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R. (1994). A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-398#STR. Henry, R. C. (1987). Current Factor Analysis Models are Ill-Posed. Atmos. Environ. 1987, 21, 1815–1820. Henry, R. C. (2003). Multivariate receptor modeling by N-dimensional edge detection. Chemometrics and Intel- ligent Laboratory Systems 65: 179–189. Hill, J. S., P. D. Patel, and J. R. Turner (1999). Performance Characterization of the MiniVol™ PM2.5 Sampler. 92nd Annual AWMA Meeting, St. Louis, MO., June 20–24. Hopke, P. K. (1985). Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Houyoux, M. R., et al. (2000). Emission inventory development and processing for the seasonal model for regional air quality (SMRAQ) project. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 105(D7): 9079–9090. ICF Consulting (2005). User’s Guide to the Regional Modeling System for Aerosols and Deposition (REMSAD), Version 8. October. ICF International and T&B Systems (2010). Development and Evaluation of an Air Quality Modeling Approach for Lead Emission from Piston-Engine Aircraft Operating on Leaded Aviation Gasoline. Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, USEPA. EPA-420-R-10-007. February. Isakov, Vlad, John S. Irwin, and Jason Ching (2007). “Using CMAQ for Exposure Modeling and Characterizing the Subgrid Variability for Exposure Estimates.” J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 1354–1371. DOI: 10.1175/ JAM2538.1 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) (2002). Final Report, Chicago O’Hare Airport, Air Toxic Monitoring Program. IEPA, Bureau of Air. May. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) (2004). Guidance on the use of LTO Emissions Certification Data for the Assessment of Operational Impacts. ICAO Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP), Sixth Meeting. CAEP/6-IP/5. Montreal. February 2–12. ICAO (2010). ICAO Emissions Databank. Issue 17. December 10. Janicke Consulting (2011). LASPORT, A Program System for the Calculation of Airport-Related Pollutant Emis- sions and Concentrations in the Lower Atmosphere. LASPORT 2.0. Uberlingen, Germany. KB Environmental (KBE) (2007). Air Quality Monitoring Work Plan for T. F. Green Airport. Prepared for the Rhode Island Airport Corporation (RIAC) and in Support of the State of Rhode Island Permanent Air Qual- ity Monitoring Act. Prepared by KB Environmental Sciences, Inc. October 29. Kelly, J. T., et al. (2010). Simulating emission and chemical evolution of coarse sea-salt particles in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 257–273, doi:10.5194/gmd-3-257-2010. Kiers, H. A. L. (2000). Towards a standardized notation and terminology in multiway analysis. J. of Chemom. 14, 105–122. Kim, Brian, Roger Wayson, and Gregg Fleming (2006). Transportation Research Record 1987: Development of the Traffic Air Quality Simulation Model (TRAQSIM). Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Kim, Brian, and Jawad Rachami (2008). Aircraft Emissions Modeling under Low Power Conditions. A Paper Pre- sented to the Air & Waste Management Association, 101st Annual Meeting. Portland, Oregon. Kim, E., P. K. Hopke, and E. S. Edgerton. (2003). “Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization.” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 53: 731–739. Kim, E., et al. (2005). “Characterization of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds Sources in Houston during 2001 Using Positive Matrix Factorization.” Atmospheric Environ. 39: 5934–5946. Kim, E., and P. K. Hopke. (2007). Source Characterization of Ambient Fine Particles in the Los Angeles Basin. J. Environmental Engineering Science 6:343–353. Knighton, W. B., S. C. Herndon, and R. C. Miake-Lye (2009). Aircraft Engine Speciated Organic Gases: Speciation of Unburned Organic Gases in Aircraft Exhaust. Developed for the Federal Aviation Administration. http://www. faa.gov/regulations_policies/policy_guidance/envir_policy/media/FAA-EPA_TSD_Speciated%20OG_ Aircraft_052709.pdf. Knochel, A. (1990). Basic Principles of XRF with Synchrotron Radiation. 2nd International Workshop on XRF and PIXE Applications in Life Science, Capri, Italy, 29–30 June, 1989, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore. Lee, J. H., P. K. Hopke, and J. R. Turner. (2006). Source Identification of Airborne PM2.5 at the St. Louis-Midwest Supersite. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D10S10. Levy, Jonathan, Hsiao-Hsien Hsu, and Steven Melly (2008). High-Priority Compounds Associated with Aircraft Emissions: PARTNER Project 11 final report on subtask: Health Risk Prioritization of Aircraft Emissions Related Air Pollutants. October 2008. Report No. PARTNER-COE-2008-008.

References 61 Lioy, P. J., et al. (1989). The effect of sampling duration on the ability to resolve source types using factor analysis. Atmospheric Environment 23: 239–254. Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) (2011). LAX Air Quality and Source Apportionment Study. LAWA. http:// www.lawa.org/welcome_lax.aspx?id=1060. Lu, J., and F. M. Bowman (2004). “Conversion of multicomponent aerosol size distributions from sectional to modal representations.” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38, 391–399. Lu, Jim, et al. (2007). Comparison of CMAQ and CAMx for an Annual Simulation over the South Coast Air Basin. Presentation at the 6th Annual CMAS Meeting. October 1–3. Luecken, D. J., W. T. Hutzell, and G. L. Gipson (2006). “Development and analysis of air quality modeling simulations for hazardous air pollutants.” Atmospheric Environment. 40, 5087–5096. Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport 2011). Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring, Tracking Air Quality Changes at Boston Logan. http://www.massport.com/environment/environmental_reporting/Air%20 Quality/Nitrogen DioxideMonitoring.aspx. 2011. Miller, M. S., S. K. Friedlander, and G. M. Hidy. (1972). A Chemical Element Balance for the Pasadena. Aerosol, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 39:65–176. Morris, Ralph E., et al. Recent Advances in Photochemical Air Quality Modeling using the CAMx Model: Current Update and Ozone Modeling of Point Source Impacts. Air & Waste Management Association (A&WMA). Paper #43180. 2002. Morris, Ralph, Bonyound Koo, and Bo Wang (2006). Preliminary 2002 PM modelling Performance Evaluation using CMAQ and CAMx. Presentation at the Joint Workgroup Meeting, St. Louis 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 Study. St. Louis, Missouri. September 26, 2006. Otte, T. L. and J. E. Pleim. (2010). The Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the CMAQ mod- eling system: updates through MCIPv3.4.1. Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 243–256, doi:10.5194/gmd-3-243-2010. Paatero, P. (1997). Least Squares Formulation of Robust, Non-Negative Factor Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 37:23–35. Paatero, P. (1999). “The Multilinear Engine—Table-driven Least Squares Program for Solving Multilinear Problems. Including the n-way Parallel Factor Analysis Model.” J. Computational and Graphical Stat. 8: 854–888. Peeters, S. (2003). ALAQS-AV Application Reference Manual. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre. Perry K. D., S. S. Cliff, and M. P. Jimenez-Cruz. (2004). “Evidence for hygroscopic mineral dust particles from the Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation Experiment.” J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23S28, doi:10.1029/2004JD004979. Pere-Trepat, E., P. K. Hopke, and P. Paatero. (2007). Source Apportionment of Time and Size Resolved Ambi- ent Particulate Matter Measured with a Rotating DRUM Impactor. Atmospheric Environ. 41: 5921–5933. Polissar, A. V., et al. (1998). “Atmospheric Aerosol Over Alaska 2. Elemental Composition and Sources.” J. Geophys. Res. 103, 19045–19057. Public Law (Pub. L.) (1982 Latest). National Environmental Policy Act. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, January 1, 1970, as amended by Pub. L. 94-52, July 3, 1975, Pub. L. 94-83, August 9, 1975, and Pub. L. 97-258, § 4(b), Sept. 13, 1982. Raabe, O. G., et al. (1988). “Calibration Studies of the DRUM Impactor.” J. Aerosol Sci. 19: 183–195. Scire, Joseph S., et al. (2000). A User’s Guide for the CALPUFF Dispersion Model, Version 5. Earth Tech, Inc. January. Seibert, Petra (2000). Uncertainties in atmospheric dispersion modeling. Institute of Meteorology and Physics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna, Proceedings Informal Workshop on Meteorological Modelling in Support of CTBT Verification, December. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) (2009). Procedure for the Calculation of Aircraft Emissions. SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) 5715. July. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) (2010). General Aviation Airport Air Monitoring Study. Final Report. August. Spicer, C. W., et al. (2004). “Chemical-Composition and Photochemical Reactivity of Exhaust from Air- craft Turbine-Engines.” Annales Geophysicae-Atmospheres Hydrospheres and Space Sciences 12(10–11): 944–955. Stein, Ariel F., et al. (2007). A hybrid modeling approach to resolve pollutant concentrations in an urban area, Atmospheric Environment, Volume 41, Issue 40, December 2007, Pages 9410-9426, ISSN 1352-2310, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.004. Stiggins, T. E., et al. (2002). Errors Associated With Time Average Concentrations in Gaussian Modeling. Depart- ment of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Presented at the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN. Timin, Brian, et al. (2007). An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx. Pre- sentation. EPA/OAQPS. October 3.

62 Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality TRB (2012). ACRP 02-03A, Measurement of Gaseous HAP Emissions from Idling Aircraft as a Function of Engine and Ambient Conditions. ACRP, Transportation Research Board, The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Project to be completed in 2012. http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay. asp?ProjectID=2424. United Kingdom Department of Transport (UKDOT) (2006). Project for the Sustainable Development of Heath- row: Air Quality Technical Report. July. USEPA (1995). User’s Guide to CAL3QHC Version 2.0: A Modeling Methodology for Predicting Pollutant Con- centrations Near Roadway Intersections. USEPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. September. USEPA (2002). User’s Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source Emission Factor Model. USEPA, Office of Air and Radiation. EPA420-R-02-028. October. USEPA (2003). Comparison of Regulatory Design Concentrations, AERMOD vs. ISCST3, CTDMPLUS, ISC- PRIME. Staff Report. USEPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/R-03-002. June. USEPAa (2004). User’s Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model—AERMOD. EPA-454/B-03-001. USEPAb (2004). AERMOD: Description of Model Formulation. EPA-454/R-03-004. USEPAc (2004). User’s Guide for the AERMOD Terrain Preprocessor (AERMAP). EPA-454/B-03-003. USEPAd (2004). User’s Guide for the AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor (AERMET). EPA-454/B-03-002. USEPA (2005). User’s Guide for the Final NONROAD2005 Model. USEPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division. EPA420-R-05-013. December 2, 2005. USEPAa (2007). The Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act. http://www.epa.gov/oar/caa/peg/index.html. Last Updated on June 11, 2007. USEPAb (2007). Guidance on the use of Models and other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B-07-002. April. USEPA (2008). Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Health Research: Summary of April 16–17, 2008 Workshop to Discuss Key Issues. USEPA, Office of Research and Development, Air Quality and Assessment Division, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office of Air and Radiation. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA 452/S-08-001. December. USEPAa (2009). User’s Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model—AERMOD, Addendum. EPA-454/B-03-001. USEPAb and FAA (2009). Aircraft Engine Speciated Organic Gases: Speciation of Unburned Organic Gases in Aircraft Exhaust. FAA AEE. USEPA Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. EPA-420-R-09-902. May. USEPAc and FAA (2009). Recommended Best Practice for Quantifying Speciated Organic Gas Emissions from Air- craft Equipped with Turbofan, Turbojet, and Turboprop Engines, Version 1.0. FAA AEE. USEPA Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. EPA-420-R-09-901. May. USEPAa (2010). National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Office of Air and Radiation. http://www.epa.gov/air/ criteria.html. Site last updated on Thursday, June 03, 2010. USEPAb (2010). Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES), User Guide for MOVES2010a. Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. EPA-420-B-10-036. August. USEPAc (2010). Emissions Modeling Clearinghouse Speciation. Technology Transfer Network, Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emissions Factors. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/speciation/. USEPAa (2011). Technology Transfer Network (TTN), Air Quality System (AQS). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/ airsaqs/detaildata/downloadaqsdata.htm. Site last updated on Thursday, February 17, 2011. USEPAb (2011). Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) Modeling http://www.epa.gov/asmdnerl/ biogen.html. USEPAc (2011). Air Quality Model Evaluation. Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division. http://www.epa. gov/AMD/ModelEvaluation/. USEPAd (2011). Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling. http://www.epa.gov/scram001/. USEPAe (2011). Air Toxics—Monitoring Methods. Technology Transfer Network, Ambient Monitoring Technology Information Center. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/airtox.html#compendium. USEPAf (2011). Ambient Monitoring Technology Information Center. Technology Transfer Network. http://www. epa.gov/ttn/amtic/. USEPAg (2011). Aircraft. Nonroad Engines, Equipment, and Vehicles. Transportation and Air Quality. http:// www.epa.gov/otaq/aviation.htm#regs. USEPAh (2011). Quality Assurance Guidance Documents. Technology Transfer Network, Ambient Monitoring Technology Information Center. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/qalist.html. USEPAi (2011). List of Designated Reference and Equivalent Methods. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Human Exposure & Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-D205-03). Research Triangle Park, NC. USEPAj (2011). Current Air Quality, Air Quality Monitoring. http://www.epa.gov/region02/air/aq_cond.html. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010). USGS Geographic Data Download. http://edc2.usgs.gov/ geodata/index.php.

References 63 University of North Carolina (UNC) (2009). SMOKE version 2.6 User’s Manual. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. http://www.smoke-model.org/version2.3/index.cfm. Watson, J. G., et al. (1990). “The USEPA/DRI chemical mass balance receptor model.” CMB 7.0, Environ. Soft- ware 5:38–49. Wayson, Roger L., et al. (2003). Validation of FAA’s Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS): Carbon Monoxide Study. A Paper Presented to the Air and Waste Management Association, 96th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA. Wayson, Roger L., Gregg G. Fleming, and Ralph Iovinelli (2009). “Methodology to Estimate Particulate Matter Emissions from Certified Commercial Aircraft Engines.” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Associa- tion. 59:91–100. White House (WH) (2011). Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). Home, The Administration, Council on Environmental Quality. http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ceq. Winchester, J. W. and G. D. Nifong. (1971). “Water Pollution in Lake Michigan by Trace Elements from Pollu- tion Aerosol Fallout.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 1:50–64. Whitefield, Philip D., et al. (2007). The Development of Exhaust Speciation Profiles for Commercial Jet Engines. University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR). Contract number 04-344. FAA PARTNER. Prepared for the Califor- nia Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. October 31, 2007. Wood, Ezra, et al. (2008). ACRP Report 7: Aircraft and Airport-Related Hazardous Air Pollutants: Research Needs and Analysis. Transportation Research Board. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Woody, Mathew, et al. (2011). “An Assessment of Aviation’s Contribution to Current and Future Fine Particu- late Matter in the United States.” Atmospheric Environment. Volume 45, Issue 20. June. Yarwood, G., et al. (2005). Updates to the Carbon Bond Chemical Mechanism: CB05. Final report to USEPA, RT-0400675, Yocke and Company, Novato, CA. http://www.camx.com/publ/pdfs/CB05_Final_ Report_120805.pdf. Zhao, W., and P. K. Hopke. (2006). “Source Investigation for Ambient PM2.5 in Indianapolis, IN.” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40:898–909. Zhao, W., et al. (2007). “Use of an Expanded Receptor Model for Personal Exposure Analysis in Schoolchildren with Asthma.” Atmospheric Environ. 41:4084–4096.

Next: Acronyms and Abbreviations »
Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality Get This Book
×
 Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Report 71: Guidance for Quantifying the Contribution of Airport Emissions to Local Air Quality addresses procedures for using air quality models in combination with on-site measurement equipment to prepare a comprehensive assessment of air pollution concentrations in the vicinity of airports.

The report is designed to help airports respond to regulatory needs, including those of the National Environmental Policy Act, and generate information desired by local communities as they seek to develop more detailed local air quality assessments.

ACRP Report 71 also provides information on the capabilities and limitations of modeling and measurement tools and describes how to use available models, in combination with potential on-site monitoring programs, to conduct air quality assessments.

Information on monitoring campaigns and modeling assessments is included in a set of appendices that are integrated with the printed version of the report in CD-ROM format.

The CD-ROM is also available for download from TRB’s website as an ISO image. Links to the ISO image and instructions for burning a CD-ROM from an ISO image are provided below.

Help on Burning an .ISO CD-ROM Image

Download the .ISO CD-ROM Image

(Warning: This is a large file and may take some time to download using a high-speed connection.)

CD-ROM Disclaimer - This software is offered as is, without warranty or promise of support of any kind either expressed or implied. Under no circumstance will the National Academy of Sciences or the Transportation Research Board (collectively "TRB") be liable for any loss or damage caused by the installation or operation of this product. TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, in fact or in law, including without limitation, the warranty of merchantability or the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not in any case be liable for any consequential or special damages.

Errata: In August 2012 the list of authors from Wyle Laboratories Inc. on the title page of ACRP Report 71 was corrected in the PDF version of the report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!