National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 7 Suggested Research
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23095.
×
Page 184
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23095.
×
Page 185
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23095.
×
Page 186
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23095.
×
Page 187
Page 188
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23095.
×
Page 188
Page 189
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23095.
×
Page 189

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

NCHRP 3-74 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections References Page R-1 References 1. Agent, K.R. “Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction.” Transportation Research Record: 773. TRB, National Research Council: Washington D.C. (1980) pp. 11-14. 2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 4th Edition. AASHTO: Washington, D.C. (2001). 3. Arndt, O. Email. “Context Sensitive Design–Self Enforcing Geometry – Documentation?” August 21, 2001. 4. Arndt, O.K. Geometric Design of Roundabouts for Optimum Safety – Use of the Software Program ‘ARNDT.’ Department of Main Roads: Brisbane, Queensland (2000). 5. Arnold, Jr., E.D. and K.E. Lantz, Jr. “Evaluation of Best Practices in Traffic Operations and Safety: Phase 1: Flashing LED Stop Sign and Optical Speed Bars.” Virginia Transportation Research Council: Charlottesville, Virginia (2007). 6. Bauer, K.M., D.W Harwood, W.E. Hughes, and K.R. Richard. “Safety Effects of Using Narrow Lanes and Shoulder-Use Lanes to Increase the Capacity of Urban Freeways.” Paper 04-2678 presented at TRB 84th Annual Meeting: Washington, D.C. (2004). 7. Belmont, D.M., “Effect of Shoulder Width on Accidents on Two-Lane Tangents.” Highway Research Bulletin, No. 91: Washington D.C. (1957). 8. Beneficial Designs, Inc. “Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide.” FHWA: Washington, D.C. (2004). 9. Benekohal, R. F., L. M. Kastel, and M. I. Suhale. “Evaluation and Summary of Studies in Speed Control Methods in Work Zones.” FHWA: Washington D.C. (1992). 10. Bretherton Jr., W. M. “Do Speed Tables Improve Safety?” Paper presented at ITE 2003 Annual Meeting: Seattle, WA (2003). 11. Brewer, Jim, John German, Ray Krammes, Kam Movassaghi, John Okamoto, Sandra Otto, Wendell Ruff, Seppo Sillan, Nikiforos Stamatiadis, and Robert Walters. “Geometric Design Practices for European Roads.” FHWA-PL-01-026. FHWA: Washington D.C. (2001). 12. Bucko, T.R. and A. Khorashadi. “Evaluation of Milled-In Rumble Strips, Rolled-In Rumble Strips and Audible Edge Stripe.” California Department of Transportation: Sacramento, CA (2001). 13. Carstens, R.L., and R.Y. Woo. “Warrants for Rumble Strips on Rural Highways.” No. HR-235. Iowa Highway Research Board (1982). 14. Cochituate Rail Trail Design and Construction Issues; http://www.millermicro.com/crt- design.html. (accessed August 2007). 15. Corkle, J., M. Marti, and D. Montebello. “Synthesis on the Effectiveness of Rumble Strips.” Report No. MN/RC-2002-07 Minnesota Department of Transportation: St. Paul, MN (2001). 16. Cottrell, B.H. “Evaluation of Wide Edgelines on Two-Lane Rural Roads.” Transportation Research Record 1160. TRB, Washington D.C. (1988). 17. Down with Speed: A Review of the Literature, and the Impact of Speed on New Zealanders. Accident Compensation Corporation and Land Transport Safety Authority, (2000).

NCHRP 3-74 References Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections Page R-2 18. Elefteriadou, L., D. Torbic, M. El-Gindy, S. Stoffels, and M. Adolini. “Rumble Strips for Roads with Narrow or Non-Existent Shoulders.” Report No. PTI 2002 11. Pennsylvania State University, The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute: State College, PA (2001). 19. Elefteriadou, L., M. El-Gindy, D. Torbic, P. Garvey, A. Homan, Z. Jiang, B. Pecheux, and R. Tallon. “Bicycle-Friendly Shoulder Rumble Strips.” Report No. PTI 2K15, Pennsylvania State University, The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute: State College, PA (2000). 20. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) “Vegetation Control for Safety: A Guide for Street and Highway Maintenance Personnel.” FHWA-RT-90-003. 3 FHWA: Washington, D.C (1990). 21. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Research and Technology. Rumble Strips. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/rnt4u/ti/rumblestrips.htm. (Accessed August 2007). 22. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Safety. Rumble Strips. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/rumble.htm. (Accessed August 2007). 23. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). “Flexibility in Highway Design.” FHWA: Washington, D.C (2000). 24. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). “Roadway Shoulder Rumble Strips.” Technical Advisory T 5040.35. FHWA: Washington, D.C (2001). 25. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). “Roundabouts: An Informational Guide.” Report FHWA-RD-00-67. FHWA: Washington, D.C. (2000). 26. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA: Washington, D.C (2003). 27. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Proposed Low-Cost Treatments for Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersections on High Speed, Two Lane, Two-Way, Rural Highways. Concept Illustration Video: DTFH61-03-D-00105. Vienna, Virginia: BMI-SG, Federal Highway Administration. 28. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). FHWA Low-Cost Intersection Treatments on High- Speed Rural Roads. PowerPoint Presentation. BMI-SG, Federal Highway Administration (2006). 29. Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants. Traffic Calming. http://www.trafficcalming.org. (Accessed August 2007). 30. Fildes, B. N, G. Rumbold, and A. Leening. “Speed Behavior and Drivers' Attitude to Speeding.” Report No. 16. Monash University Accident Research Centre: Victoria, Australia (1991). 31. Fildes, Brian and Stephen Lee. “The Speed Review: Road Environment, Behaviour, Speed Limits, Enforcement and Crashes.”(1993). 32. Fitzpatrick, Kay, Paul Carlson, Marcus A. Brewer, Mark D. Wooldridge, and Shaw-Pin Miaou. NCHRP Report 504: Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices. TRB: Washington, D.C. (2003). 33. Fylan, Fiona, and Mark Conner. “Effective Interventions for Speeding Motorists.” Road safety research report. no. 66. Department for Transport: London. (2006). 34. Gannett Fleming, Inc. “Collision Avoidance System Evaluation Report” PennDOT: Harrisburg, PA (2004). 35. Gates, T. J. and H. G. Hawkins. “The Use of Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings in the United States.” Paper VIS2002-31. Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2002).

36. Gates, T. J., S. T. Chrysler, and H. G. Hawkins. “Innovative Visibility-Based Measures of Effectiveness for Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings.” Paper VIS2002-30., Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2002). 37. Gattis, J. L. “Urban Street Cross Section and Speed Issues.” Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, TX, Proceedings in Transportation Research E-Circular E-C019. TRB: Washington D.C. (1999). 38. Godley, S.T., T.J. Triggs, and B.N. Fildes. “Speed Reduction Mechanisms of Transverse Lines.” Transportation Human Factors: Volume 6, No. 2 (2000). 39. Griffin, L. I. and R. N. Reinhardt. “A Review of Two Innovative Pavement Marking Patterns that have been Developed to Reduce Speeds and Crashes.” Prepared for the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Available at http://www.aaafoundation.org/resources/index.cfm?button=pavement. Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (1995). 40. Guth, David, Richard Long, Paul Ponchillia, Dan Ashmead, and Robert Wall. Non-visual gap detection at roundabouts by pedestrians who are blind: A summary of the Baltimore Roundabout Study. U.S. Access Board, The National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health, and The American Council of the Blind (2000). 41. Hallmark, S., K. Knapp, G. Thomas and D. Smith. “Temporary Speed Hump Impact Evaluation.” Center for Transportation Research and Evaluation, Iowa State University: Ames, Iowa (2002). 42. Hanscom, F. R. “Evaluation of the Prince William County Collision Countermeasure System.” Paper VTRC 01-CR5. Virginia Transportation Research Council: Charlottesville, VA (2001). 43. Harder, K.A., J. Bloomfield, and B. Chihak. “The Effects of In-Lane Rumble Strips on the Stopping Behavior of Attentive Drivers.” Report No. MN/RC-2002-11. University of Minnesota/Minnesota Department of Transportation (2001). 44. Harwood, D. W. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 191: Use of Rumble Strips to Enhance Safety. TRB: Washington, D.C (1993). 45. Hauer, E. “Lane Width and Safety.” Unpublished. Available at http://www.roadsafetyresearch.com/ (2000). 46. Hauer, E. “Accidents, Overtaking and Speed Control.” Elsevier: United Kingdom (1971). 47. Hughes, W.E., H.W. McGee, S. Hussain, and J. Keegel. “Field Evaluation of Edgeline Widths.” FHWA-RD-89-111. FHWA: Washington D.C. (1989). 48. Human Factors North, Inc. in association with TSH. “Review of Freeway to Highway Transitions and Speed Reducing Countermeasures for the Highway 7 Carleton Place Transition.” Ministry of Transportation. (2002). 49. Hutchins, Nick, HIL-Tech Ltd. Email. “Road, LEDline® daylight visible, solid, encapsulated LED lighting for improving safety on roads.” November 12, 2004. 50. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, D.C. (1993). 51. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Calming for Communities. http://www.ite.org/traffic/table.htm. (Accessed August 2007). 52. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers/ Federal Highway Administration: Washington, D.C. (1999). NCHRP 3-74 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections References Page R-3

NCHRP 3-74 References Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections Page R-4 53. Joerger, Mark. “Adjustment of Driver Behavior to an Urban Multi-Lane Roundabout.” Oregon Department of Transportation: Salem, OR (2007). 54. Joksch, H.C. “Velocity Change and Fatality Risk in a Crash-A Rule of Thumb.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 1 (1993). 55. Jones, Forrest. “To Plant or not to Plant . . . Roadside Landscaping and Safety.” Article 20-04. Washington State County Engineers: Olympia, WA (2004). 56. Katz, B. J. “Pavement Markings for Speed Reduction – Draft Report.” Science Applications International Corporation, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center: McLean, VA (2003). 57. Katz, B. J., T. Shafer and G. Rousseau. “Perceptual Countermeasures to Speeding: Literature Review.” Prepared for A.J. Nedzesky and Davey Warren, June 2003. 58. Kermit, M.L., and T.C. Hein. “Effect of Rumble Strips on Traffic Control and Behavior.” Highway Research Board, Volume 41 (1962). 59. Kyte, Michael. NCHRP 03-46: Capacity and Level of Service at Unsignalized Intersections. TRB: Washington D.C. (1995). 60. Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) and Transit New Zealand and Local Authorities. “Joint Crash Reduction Programme: Outcome Monitoring.” New Zealand (2001). 61. Lerner, Neil. NCHRP 3-50(2): Additional Investigations on Driver Information Overload. TRB: Washington D.C. (2002). 62. Maryland State Highway Administration. “When Main Street is a State Highway.” Maryland Department of Transportation: Dover, MD (2001). 63. Maze, T., A. Kamyab and S. Schrock. “Evaluation of Work Zone Speed Reduction Measures.” Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University: Ames, Iowa (2000). 64. Miles, J.D., P.J. Carlson, M.P. Pratt, and T.D. Thompson. “Traffic Operational Impacts of Transverse, Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips.” Report No. 0-4472-2. Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2005). 65. Ministry of Equipment: Accommodations Planning Land Development Planning, and Transportation Planning. “Safety: An Intersection Plan for Interurban Roads.” 66. Ministry of Equipment: Accommodations Planning Land Development Planning, and Transportation Planning and SETRA. “Construction of Interurban Intersection Plans on Principal Roads.” (1998). 67. Minnesota Department of Transportation. “Rumble Strips Installed to Reduce Chances of Fatal Crashes.” http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d3/newsrels/03/10/06_rumble_strips.html. (Accessed September 2004). 68. Mok, Jeong-Hun, Harlow Landphair, and Jody Naderi,. “Landscape Improvement Impacts on Roadside Safety Performance” Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 78 Issue 3 (2006). 69. Morgan, R. L. and D. E. McAuliffe. “Effectiveness of Shoulder Rumble Strips: A Survey of Current Practice.” Special Report 127. Available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/fourthlevel/rumble/state_ny.htm., FHWA: Washington, D.C. (1997). 70. National Highway Traffic Safety. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov. (Accessed October 2004). 71. Nixon, P.F. “Shoulder Practices and Performance in Texas, Abstract. Highway Research Circular. TRB: Washington, D.C. (1973).

72. Outcalt, W. “Bicycle-Friendly Rumble Strips.” CDOT-DTD-R-2001-4. Colorado Department of Transportation, Research Branch (2001). 73. Owens, R.D. “Effect of Rumble Strips at Rural Stop Locations on Traffic Operation. “ Highway Research Record 170. Highway Research Board (1967). 74. Parham, A.H. and K. Fitzpatrick. “Speed Management Techniques for Collectors and Arterials.” Transportation Research E-Circular E-C019. TRB: Washington D.C. (2000). 75. Persaud, B.N., R.A. Retting, and C.A. Lyon. “Crash Reduction following Installation of Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural Two-Lane Roads.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36 (2004). 76. Persuad, Bhagwant N., Richard A. Retting, Per E. Garder, and Dominique Lord. “Crash Reductions Following Installation of Roundabouts in the United States.”Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: Arlington, VA (2000). 77. Porter, R.J., E.T. Donnell, and K.M. Mahoney. “Evaluation of Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips on Lateral Vehicle Placement.” Transportation Research Record 1862. TRB: Washington D.C. (2004). 78. Rakha, Hesham Ahmed, Bryan Katz, and Dana Duke. “Design and Evaluation of Peripheral Transverse Bars to Reduce Vehicle Speed” TRB: Washington D.C (2006). 79. Richards, S. H. and C. L. Dudek. “Implementation of Work-Zone Speed Control Measures.” Transportation Research Record 1086. TRB: Washington D.C. (1986). 80. Rodegerdts, L., M. Blogg, E. Wemple, E. Myers, M. Kyte, M. Dixon, G. List, A. Flannery, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, N. Wu, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, D. Harkey, and D. Carter. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2007. 81. Roy Jorgensen Associates, Inc. NCHRP Report 197: Cost and Safety Effectiveness of Highway Design Elements. TRB: Washington D.C. (1978). 82. Schermers, G. and P. van Vliet. Sustainable Safety – A Preventative Road Safety Strategy for the Future: 2nd Edition AVV Transport Research Centre: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, (2001). 83. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) “Synthesis of Shoulder Rumble Strip Practices and Policies.” Available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/fourthlevel/pro_res_rumble.library.htm#Papers. FHWA: Washington D.C. (2001). 84. Shinar, D., E. McDowell, and T. H. Rockwell. “Improving Driver Performance on Curves in Rural Highways through Perceptual Changes.” Report EES428B. The Ohio State University, Engineering Experiment Station: Columbus, OH (1974). 85. Smiley, Alison. “Driver Speed Estimation: What Road Designers Should Know.” Presented at the Transportation Research Board 78th Annual Meeting. (1999). 86. Straub, A.L., P.F. Dudden, and F.T. Moorhead. “Frost Penetration and Moisture Changes Related to Highway Pavement Shoulder Color, Abstract” Highway Research Record No. 276, (1969). 87. Stuster, Jack, Zail Coffman, and Davey Warren. “Synthesis of Safety Research Related to Speed and Speed Management.” FHWA-RD-98-154. FHWA: Washington D.C. (1998). 88. Taylor, W C and T.J. Foody. “Speed Zoning: A Theory and Its Proof.” Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, D.C. (1965). NCHRP 3-74 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections References Page R-5

NCHRP 3-74 References Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections Page R-6 89. Torbic, D.J., D.W. Harwood, D.K. Gilmore, R. Pfefer, T.R. Neuman, K.L. Slack, and K.K. Hardy. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan: --Volume 7: A Guide for Reducing Collisions on Horizontal Curves. TRB: Washington D.C. (2004). 90. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB: Washington D.C. (2000). 91. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB: Washington D.C. (1985). 92. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB: Washington D.C. (1994). 93. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 254: Managing Speed: Review of Current Practice for Setting and Enforcing Speed Limits. TRB, National Research Council: Washington, D.C. (1998). 94. Ullman, Gerald L, and Elisabeth R. Rose. “Effectiveness of Dynamic Speed Display Signs in Permanent Applications” Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2004). 95. University of Calgary. Transportation Safety. http://www.eng.ucalgary.ca/CSCE- Students/transportation_safety.htm. (Accessed September 2004.) 96. Varhelyi, A. “Dynamic Speed Adaptation Based on Information Technology: A Theoretical Background.” Bulletin 142, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund, Sweden (1996). 97. Vest, Adam, Nikiforos Stamatiadis, Adam Clayton and Jerry Pigman. “Effect of Warning Signs on Curve Operating Speeds.” Research Report KTC-05-20/ SPR-259-03-1F. Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky: Lexington, KY (2005). 98. Walls, A. “A Silver Bullet: Shoulder Texture Treatments.” Public Roads, , Vol. 62, No. 4 (January/February 1999). 99. Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Design Manual. WSDOT: Olympia, WA (2000). 100. Zaidel, D., A.S. Hakkert, and R. Barkan. “Rumble Strips and Paint Stripes at a Rural Intersection.” Transportation Research Record 1069, TRB: Washington D.C. (1986). 101. Zegeer, C.V., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerwey, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and B. Schneider. “Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and Mobility.” FHWA-RD-01-102. FHWA: Washington D.C. (2002).

Next: Appendix A Literature Review Abstracts »
Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613 Get This Book
×
 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 124: Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections documents the research efforts associated with production of NCHRP Report 613 that explores the effectiveness of geometric design features as well as signage and pavement markings to reduce vehicle speeds at high-speed intersections.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!