Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
NCHRP 3-74 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections References Page R-1 References 1. Agent, K.R. ÂTransverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction. Transportation Research Record: 773. TRB, National Research Council: Washington D.C. (1980) pp. 11-14. 2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 4th Edition. AASHTO: Washington, D.C. (2001). 3. Arndt, O. Email. ÂContext Sensitive DesignÂSelf Enforcing Geometry  Documentation? August 21, 2001. 4. Arndt, O.K. Geometric Design of Roundabouts for Optimum Safety  Use of the Software Program ÂARNDT. Department of Main Roads: Brisbane, Queensland (2000). 5. Arnold, Jr., E.D. and K.E. Lantz, Jr. ÂEvaluation of Best Practices in Traffic Operations and Safety: Phase 1: Flashing LED Stop Sign and Optical Speed Bars. Virginia Transportation Research Council: Charlottesville, Virginia (2007). 6. Bauer, K.M., D.W Harwood, W.E. Hughes, and K.R. Richard. ÂSafety Effects of Using Narrow Lanes and Shoulder-Use Lanes to Increase the Capacity of Urban Freeways. Paper 04-2678 presented at TRB 84th Annual Meeting: Washington, D.C. (2004). 7. Belmont, D.M., ÂEffect of Shoulder Width on Accidents on Two-Lane Tangents. Highway Research Bulletin, No. 91: Washington D.C. (1957). 8. Beneficial Designs, Inc. ÂDesigning Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide. FHWA: Washington, D.C. (2004). 9. Benekohal, R. F., L. M. Kastel, and M. I. Suhale. ÂEvaluation and Summary of Studies in Speed Control Methods in Work Zones. FHWA: Washington D.C. (1992). 10. Bretherton Jr., W. M. ÂDo Speed Tables Improve Safety? Paper presented at ITE 2003 Annual Meeting: Seattle, WA (2003). 11. Brewer, Jim, John German, Ray Krammes, Kam Movassaghi, John Okamoto, Sandra Otto, Wendell Ruff, Seppo Sillan, Nikiforos Stamatiadis, and Robert Walters. ÂGeometric Design Practices for European Roads. FHWA-PL-01-026. FHWA: Washington D.C. (2001). 12. Bucko, T.R. and A. Khorashadi. ÂEvaluation of Milled-In Rumble Strips, Rolled-In Rumble Strips and Audible Edge Stripe. California Department of Transportation: Sacramento, CA (2001). 13. Carstens, R.L., and R.Y. Woo. ÂWarrants for Rumble Strips on Rural Highways. No. HR-235. Iowa Highway Research Board (1982). 14. Cochituate Rail Trail Design and Construction Issues; http://www.millermicro.com/crt- design.html. (accessed August 2007). 15. Corkle, J., M. Marti, and D. Montebello. ÂSynthesis on the Effectiveness of Rumble Strips. Report No. MN/RC-2002-07 Minnesota Department of Transportation: St. Paul, MN (2001). 16. Cottrell, B.H. ÂEvaluation of Wide Edgelines on Two-Lane Rural Roads. Transportation Research Record 1160. TRB, Washington D.C. (1988). 17. Down with Speed: A Review of the Literature, and the Impact of Speed on New Zealanders. Accident Compensation Corporation and Land Transport Safety Authority, (2000).
NCHRP 3-74 References Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections Page R-2 18. Elefteriadou, L., D. Torbic, M. El-Gindy, S. Stoffels, and M. Adolini. ÂRumble Strips for Roads with Narrow or Non-Existent Shoulders. Report No. PTI 2002 11. Pennsylvania State University, The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute: State College, PA (2001). 19. Elefteriadou, L., M. El-Gindy, D. Torbic, P. Garvey, A. Homan, Z. Jiang, B. Pecheux, and R. Tallon. ÂBicycle-Friendly Shoulder Rumble Strips. Report No. PTI 2K15, Pennsylvania State University, The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute: State College, PA (2000). 20. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) ÂVegetation Control for Safety: A Guide for Street and Highway Maintenance Personnel. FHWA-RT-90-003. 3 FHWA: Washington, D.C (1990). 21. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Research and Technology. Rumble Strips. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/rnt4u/ti/rumblestrips.htm. (Accessed August 2007). 22. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Safety. Rumble Strips. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/rumble.htm. (Accessed August 2007). 23. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). ÂFlexibility in Highway Design. FHWA: Washington, D.C (2000). 24. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). ÂRoadway Shoulder Rumble Strips. Technical Advisory T 5040.35. FHWA: Washington, D.C (2001). 25. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). ÂRoundabouts: An Informational Guide. Report FHWA-RD-00-67. FHWA: Washington, D.C. (2000). 26. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA: Washington, D.C (2003). 27. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Proposed Low-Cost Treatments for Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersections on High Speed, Two Lane, Two-Way, Rural Highways. Concept Illustration Video: DTFH61-03-D-00105. Vienna, Virginia: BMI-SG, Federal Highway Administration. 28. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). FHWA Low-Cost Intersection Treatments on High- Speed Rural Roads. PowerPoint Presentation. BMI-SG, Federal Highway Administration (2006). 29. Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants. Traffic Calming. http://www.trafficcalming.org. (Accessed August 2007). 30. Fildes, B. N, G. Rumbold, and A. Leening. ÂSpeed Behavior and Drivers' Attitude to Speeding. Report No. 16. Monash University Accident Research Centre: Victoria, Australia (1991). 31. Fildes, Brian and Stephen Lee. ÂThe Speed Review: Road Environment, Behaviour, Speed Limits, Enforcement and Crashes.Â(1993). 32. Fitzpatrick, Kay, Paul Carlson, Marcus A. Brewer, Mark D. Wooldridge, and Shaw-Pin Miaou. NCHRP Report 504: Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices. TRB: Washington, D.C. (2003). 33. Fylan, Fiona, and Mark Conner. ÂEffective Interventions for Speeding Motorists. Road safety research report. no. 66. Department for Transport: London. (2006). 34. Gannett Fleming, Inc. ÂCollision Avoidance System Evaluation Report PennDOT: Harrisburg, PA (2004). 35. Gates, T. J. and H. G. Hawkins. ÂThe Use of Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings in the United States. Paper VIS2002-31. Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2002).
36. Gates, T. J., S. T. Chrysler, and H. G. Hawkins. ÂInnovative Visibility-Based Measures of Effectiveness for Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings. Paper VIS2002-30., Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2002). 37. Gattis, J. L. ÂUrban Street Cross Section and Speed Issues. Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, TX, Proceedings in Transportation Research E-Circular E-C019. TRB: Washington D.C. (1999). 38. Godley, S.T., T.J. Triggs, and B.N. Fildes. ÂSpeed Reduction Mechanisms of Transverse Lines. Transportation Human Factors: Volume 6, No. 2 (2000). 39. Griffin, L. I. and R. N. Reinhardt. ÂA Review of Two Innovative Pavement Marking Patterns that have been Developed to Reduce Speeds and Crashes. Prepared for the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Available at http://www.aaafoundation.org/resources/index.cfm?button=pavement. Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (1995). 40. Guth, David, Richard Long, Paul Ponchillia, Dan Ashmead, and Robert Wall. Non-visual gap detection at roundabouts by pedestrians who are blind: A summary of the Baltimore Roundabout Study. U.S. Access Board, The National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health, and The American Council of the Blind (2000). 41. Hallmark, S., K. Knapp, G. Thomas and D. Smith. ÂTemporary Speed Hump Impact Evaluation. Center for Transportation Research and Evaluation, Iowa State University: Ames, Iowa (2002). 42. Hanscom, F. R. ÂEvaluation of the Prince William County Collision Countermeasure System. Paper VTRC 01-CR5. Virginia Transportation Research Council: Charlottesville, VA (2001). 43. Harder, K.A., J. Bloomfield, and B. Chihak. ÂThe Effects of In-Lane Rumble Strips on the Stopping Behavior of Attentive Drivers. Report No. MN/RC-2002-11. University of Minnesota/Minnesota Department of Transportation (2001). 44. Harwood, D. W. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 191: Use of Rumble Strips to Enhance Safety. TRB: Washington, D.C (1993). 45. Hauer, E. ÂLane Width and Safety. Unpublished. Available at http://www.roadsafetyresearch.com/ (2000). 46. Hauer, E. ÂAccidents, Overtaking and Speed Control. Elsevier: United Kingdom (1971). 47. Hughes, W.E., H.W. McGee, S. Hussain, and J. Keegel. ÂField Evaluation of Edgeline Widths. FHWA-RD-89-111. FHWA: Washington D.C. (1989). 48. Human Factors North, Inc. in association with TSH. ÂReview of Freeway to Highway Transitions and Speed Reducing Countermeasures for the Highway 7 Carleton Place Transition. Ministry of Transportation. (2002). 49. Hutchins, Nick, HIL-Tech Ltd. Email. ÂRoad, LEDline® daylight visible, solid, encapsulated LED lighting for improving safety on roads. November 12, 2004. 50. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, D.C. (1993). 51. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Calming for Communities. http://www.ite.org/traffic/table.htm. (Accessed August 2007). 52. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers/ Federal Highway Administration: Washington, D.C. (1999). NCHRP 3-74 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections References Page R-3
NCHRP 3-74 References Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections Page R-4 53. Joerger, Mark. ÂAdjustment of Driver Behavior to an Urban Multi-Lane Roundabout. Oregon Department of Transportation: Salem, OR (2007). 54. Joksch, H.C. ÂVelocity Change and Fatality Risk in a Crash-A Rule of Thumb. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 1 (1993). 55. Jones, Forrest. ÂTo Plant or not to Plant . . . Roadside Landscaping and Safety. Article 20-04. Washington State County Engineers: Olympia, WA (2004). 56. Katz, B. J. ÂPavement Markings for Speed Reduction  Draft Report. Science Applications International Corporation, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center: McLean, VA (2003). 57. Katz, B. J., T. Shafer and G. Rousseau. ÂPerceptual Countermeasures to Speeding: Literature Review. Prepared for A.J. Nedzesky and Davey Warren, June 2003. 58. Kermit, M.L., and T.C. Hein. ÂEffect of Rumble Strips on Traffic Control and Behavior. Highway Research Board, Volume 41 (1962). 59. Kyte, Michael. NCHRP 03-46: Capacity and Level of Service at Unsignalized Intersections. TRB: Washington D.C. (1995). 60. Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) and Transit New Zealand and Local Authorities. ÂJoint Crash Reduction Programme: Outcome Monitoring. New Zealand (2001). 61. Lerner, Neil. NCHRP 3-50(2): Additional Investigations on Driver Information Overload. TRB: Washington D.C. (2002). 62. Maryland State Highway Administration. ÂWhen Main Street is a State Highway. Maryland Department of Transportation: Dover, MD (2001). 63. Maze, T., A. Kamyab and S. Schrock. ÂEvaluation of Work Zone Speed Reduction Measures. Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University: Ames, Iowa (2000). 64. Miles, J.D., P.J. Carlson, M.P. Pratt, and T.D. Thompson. ÂTraffic Operational Impacts of Transverse, Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips. Report No. 0-4472-2. Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2005). 65. Ministry of Equipment: Accommodations Planning Land Development Planning, and Transportation Planning. ÂSafety: An Intersection Plan for Interurban Roads. 66. Ministry of Equipment: Accommodations Planning Land Development Planning, and Transportation Planning and SETRA. ÂConstruction of Interurban Intersection Plans on Principal Roads. (1998). 67. Minnesota Department of Transportation. ÂRumble Strips Installed to Reduce Chances of Fatal Crashes. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d3/newsrels/03/10/06_rumble_strips.html. (Accessed September 2004). 68. Mok, Jeong-Hun, Harlow Landphair, and Jody Naderi,. ÂLandscape Improvement Impacts on Roadside Safety Performance Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 78 Issue 3 (2006). 69. Morgan, R. L. and D. E. McAuliffe. ÂEffectiveness of Shoulder Rumble Strips: A Survey of Current Practice. Special Report 127. Available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/fourthlevel/rumble/state_ny.htm., FHWA: Washington, D.C. (1997). 70. National Highway Traffic Safety. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov. (Accessed October 2004). 71. Nixon, P.F. ÂShoulder Practices and Performance in Texas, Abstract. Highway Research Circular. TRB: Washington, D.C. (1973).
72. Outcalt, W. ÂBicycle-Friendly Rumble Strips. CDOT-DTD-R-2001-4. Colorado Department of Transportation, Research Branch (2001). 73. Owens, R.D. ÂEffect of Rumble Strips at Rural Stop Locations on Traffic Operation.  Highway Research Record 170. Highway Research Board (1967). 74. Parham, A.H. and K. Fitzpatrick. ÂSpeed Management Techniques for Collectors and Arterials. Transportation Research E-Circular E-C019. TRB: Washington D.C. (2000). 75. Persaud, B.N., R.A. Retting, and C.A. Lyon. ÂCrash Reduction following Installation of Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural Two-Lane Roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36 (2004). 76. Persuad, Bhagwant N., Richard A. Retting, Per E. Garder, and Dominique Lord. ÂCrash Reductions Following Installation of Roundabouts in the United States.ÂInsurance Institute for Highway Safety: Arlington, VA (2000). 77. Porter, R.J., E.T. Donnell, and K.M. Mahoney. ÂEvaluation of Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips on Lateral Vehicle Placement. Transportation Research Record 1862. TRB: Washington D.C. (2004). 78. Rakha, Hesham Ahmed, Bryan Katz, and Dana Duke. ÂDesign and Evaluation of Peripheral Transverse Bars to Reduce Vehicle Speed TRB: Washington D.C (2006). 79. Richards, S. H. and C. L. Dudek. ÂImplementation of Work-Zone Speed Control Measures. Transportation Research Record 1086. TRB: Washington D.C. (1986). 80. Rodegerdts, L., M. Blogg, E. Wemple, E. Myers, M. Kyte, M. Dixon, G. List, A. Flannery, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, N. Wu, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, D. Harkey, and D. Carter. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2007. 81. Roy Jorgensen Associates, Inc. NCHRP Report 197: Cost and Safety Effectiveness of Highway Design Elements. TRB: Washington D.C. (1978). 82. Schermers, G. and P. van Vliet. Sustainable Safety  A Preventative Road Safety Strategy for the Future: 2nd Edition AVV Transport Research Centre: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, (2001). 83. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) ÂSynthesis of Shoulder Rumble Strip Practices and Policies. Available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/fourthlevel/pro_res_rumble.library.htm#Papers. FHWA: Washington D.C. (2001). 84. Shinar, D., E. McDowell, and T. H. Rockwell. ÂImproving Driver Performance on Curves in Rural Highways through Perceptual Changes. Report EES428B. The Ohio State University, Engineering Experiment Station: Columbus, OH (1974). 85. Smiley, Alison. ÂDriver Speed Estimation: What Road Designers Should Know. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 78th Annual Meeting. (1999). 86. Straub, A.L., P.F. Dudden, and F.T. Moorhead. ÂFrost Penetration and Moisture Changes Related to Highway Pavement Shoulder Color, Abstract Highway Research Record No. 276, (1969). 87. Stuster, Jack, Zail Coffman, and Davey Warren. ÂSynthesis of Safety Research Related to Speed and Speed Management. FHWA-RD-98-154. FHWA: Washington D.C. (1998). 88. Taylor, W C and T.J. Foody. ÂSpeed Zoning: A Theory and Its Proof. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, D.C. (1965). NCHRP 3-74 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections References Page R-5
NCHRP 3-74 References Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections Page R-6 89. Torbic, D.J., D.W. Harwood, D.K. Gilmore, R. Pfefer, T.R. Neuman, K.L. Slack, and K.K. Hardy. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan: --Volume 7: A Guide for Reducing Collisions on Horizontal Curves. TRB: Washington D.C. (2004). 90. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB: Washington D.C. (2000). 91. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB: Washington D.C. (1985). 92. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB: Washington D.C. (1994). 93. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 254: Managing Speed: Review of Current Practice for Setting and Enforcing Speed Limits. TRB, National Research Council: Washington, D.C. (1998). 94. Ullman, Gerald L, and Elisabeth R. Rose. ÂEffectiveness of Dynamic Speed Display Signs in Permanent Applications Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, TX (2004). 95. University of Calgary. Transportation Safety. http://www.eng.ucalgary.ca/CSCE- Students/transportation_safety.htm. (Accessed September 2004.) 96. Varhelyi, A. ÂDynamic Speed Adaptation Based on Information Technology: A Theoretical Background. Bulletin 142, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund, Sweden (1996). 97. Vest, Adam, Nikiforos Stamatiadis, Adam Clayton and Jerry Pigman. ÂEffect of Warning Signs on Curve Operating Speeds. Research Report KTC-05-20/ SPR-259-03-1F. Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky: Lexington, KY (2005). 98. Walls, A. ÂA Silver Bullet: Shoulder Texture Treatments. Public Roads, , Vol. 62, No. 4 (January/February 1999). 99. Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Design Manual. WSDOT: Olympia, WA (2000). 100. Zaidel, D., A.S. Hakkert, and R. Barkan. ÂRumble Strips and Paint Stripes at a Rural Intersection. Transportation Research Record 1069, TRB: Washington D.C. (1986). 101. Zegeer, C.V., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerwey, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and B. Schneider. ÂPedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and Mobility. FHWA-RD-01-102. FHWA: Washington D.C. (2002).