Understanding How Individuals Make Travel and Location Decisions: Implications for Public Transportation (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

134 1. Stanley, Robert, et al. TCRP Report 97: Emerging New Paradigms. A Guide to Fundamental Change in Local Public Transportation Orga- nizations. Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington DC, 2003. 2. Lucy, W., and D. Phillips. Confronting Suburban Decline: Strategic Planning for Metropolitan Renewal. Island Press, Washington DC, 2000. 3. Cervero, R. The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry. Island Press, Washington DC, 1998. 4. Myers, D., and E. Gearin. Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2001, pp. 633–660. 5. Hobbs F., and N. Stoops. Demographic Trends in the 20th Century: Census 2000 Special Reports. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington DC, 2002. 6. National Association of Realtors. Smart Growth: A Resource for Realtors—The Issues, the Economics, and the Debate. Chicago IL, 2000. 7. American Public Transit Association. Historical Ridership Trends. Washington DC. http://www.apta.com/research/stats/ridershp/ ridetrnd.cfm. Accessed May 25, 2006. 8. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transportation Sta- tistics 2003. Washington DC. http://www.bts.gov/publications/ national_transportation_statistics/2003/index.html. 9. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. American Housing Survey. Washington, DC, various years. 10. Coogan, M. Why Care about Walking? U.S. Department of Trans- portation, Washington, DC. http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/presentations/ walking/walking.ppt. Accessed August 5, 2006. 11. Crane, R. The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2000, pp. 3–23. 12. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment—A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB: National Research Coun- cil, Washington, DC, 2001. 13. Cervero, R., C. Ferrell, and S. Murphy. Transit-Oriented Develop- ment and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review. Research Results Digest No. 52. TRB: National Research Council, Washington, DC, October 2002. 14. Handy, S. Smart Growth and the Transportation–Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us? International Regional Science Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2005, pp. 146–167. 15. J. R. Kuzmyak, R. H. Pratt, and G. B. Douglas. TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Chapter 15— Land Use and Site Design. TRB, National Research Council, Wash- ington, DC, 2003. 16. Frank, L., T. Schmid, J. Sallis, J. Chapman, and B. Saelens. Linking Objectively Measured Physical Activity with Objectively Measured Urban Form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 28 (2S2), 2005, pp. 117–125. 17. Kitamura, R, P. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. A Micro-Analysis of Land Use And Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, Issue 2, 1997, pp. 125–158. 18. Bagley, M., and P. Mokhtarian. The Impact of Residential Neigh- borhood Type on Travel Behaviour: a Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 279–297. 19. Bhat, C., and J. Guo. A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environ- ment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels. Presented at the TRB Annual Meeting, Paper # 06-0990, Washington DC, 2006. 20. National Association of Realtors. 1999 National Association of Realtors Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. Chicago IL, 2000. 21. Malizia, E., and S. Exline. Consumer Preferences for Residential Development Alternatives. Working Paper 2000-02. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Chapel Hill NC, 2000. 22. Decision Data Inc. Seattle Planning Department Residential Pref- erence Study. Seattle WA, December 1993. 23. Naess, P. Residential Location Influences Travel—But How and Why? Paper for the Traffic Days at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, Denmark, 2002. 24. Weisbrod, G., M. Ben-Akiva, and S. Lerman. Tradeoffs in Resi- dential Location Decisions: Transportation versus Other Factors. Transportation Policy and Decision-Making, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1980. Earlier version also available at http://www.edrgroup.com/edr1/ library/lib_trans_general/index.shtml. 25. Lerman, S. Location, Housing, Automobile Ownership, and the Mode to Work: A Joint Choice Model. In Transportation Research Record 610. TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 1977, pp. 6–11. 26. Srour I., K. Kockelman, and T. Dunn. Accessibility Indices, Connection to Residential Land Prices and Location Choices. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, 2003, pp. 25–34. 27. Waddell, P., and F. Nourzad. Incorporating Nonmotorized Mode and Neighborhood Accessibility in an Integrated Land Use and References

Transportation Model System. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805. Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, 2003, pp. 119–127. 28. Krizek, K., and P Waddell. Analysis of Lifestyles Choices: Neigh- borhood Type, Travel Patterns, and Activity Participation. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1807. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, 2003, pp. 119–128. 29. Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, 1991, pp. 179–211. 30. Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975. 31. Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980. 32. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, Vol. 84, 1977, pp. 191–215. 33. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, Vol. 37, 1982, pp. 122–147. 34. Bandura, A., N. Adams, A. Hardy, and G. Howells. Tests of the Generality of Self-Efficacy Theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 4, 1980, pp. 39–66. 35. Armitage C.J., and M. Conner. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a Meta-Analytic Review. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40, 2001, pp. 471–499. 36. Godin, G., and G. Kok. The Theory of Planned Behavior: a Review of its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 5, No. 11, Nov-Dec, 1996, pp. 87–98. 37. Bamberg S., I. Ajzen, and P. Schmidt. Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2003, pp. 175–187. 38. UK Department for Transport. A Review of the Effectiveness of Personalized Journey Planning Techniques. http://www.dft.gov. uk/stellent/groups/dft_susttravel/documents/page/dft_susttravel_ 504131.hcsp. Accessed August 6, 2006. 39. Forward, S. Short Journeys—Why Do We Choose the Way We Do? A VTI report from the Swedish National Road Transport Re- search Institute. www.vti.se/info/rapporter/edetalj.asp?recID=731. Accessed 2003. 40. Aarts, H., B. Verplanken, and A. van Knippenberg. Habit and Information Use in Travel Mode Choices. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 96, 1997, pp. 1–14. 41. Gärling, T., A. Gärling, and P. Loukopoulos. Forecasting Psycho- logical Consequences of Car Use Reduction: A Challenge to an Environmental Psychology of Transportation. Applied Psychology, Vol. 51, January 2002, p. 90. 42. Verplanken, B., H. Aarts, A. van Knippenberg, and A. Moonen. Habit versus Planned Behavior: A Field Experiment. British Jour- nal of Social Psychology, Vol. 37, 1998, pp. 111–128. 43. Harms, S. From Routine Choice to Rational Decision Making Between Mobility Alternatives. Centre for Innovation Research in the Utility Sector. Conference Paper STRC 2003. 3rd Swiss Trans- port Research Conference, March 19-21, 2003. 44. Kaiser, F., S. Wolfing, and U. Fuhrer. Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 19, 1999, pp. 1–19. 45. Swensen, M., and W. Wells. Useful Correlates of Pro-Environ- mental Behavior. In Social Marketing: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. M. Goldbert, M. Fishbein, S. Middlestadt, eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, pp. 3–19. 46. Ajzen, I. http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~Ajzen/tpb.html, Uni- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. Accessed 2006. 47. Adler, T., L. Rimmer, and D. Carpenter. Use Of Internet-Based Household Travel Diary Survey Instrument. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Researc Board, No. 1804. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, 2002, pp. 134–143. 48. Tierney, J. The Autonomist Manifesto (Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Road). New York Times Magazine, Sep- tember 26, 2004. 49. Yalch, R. TCRP Report 36: A Handbook. Using Market Segmentation to Increase Transit Ridership. TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 1998. 50. Stradling, S. G. Changing Individual Travel Behaviour: From Policy to Perceived Behavioural Control. Transport Research Institute, Napier University, UK, 2003. 51. Cohen, S., and B. Orme. What’s Your Preference? Asking Survey Respondents About Their Preferences Creates New Scaling Deci- sions. Journal of Marketing Research, Summer 2004, pp. 33–37. 52. Anable, J. ‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmental- ists’? Identifying Travel Behaviour Segments Using Attitude Theory. Transport Policy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2005, pp. 65–78. 135