National Academies Press: OpenBook

Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft (2021)

Chapter: Appendix D: Ethylene Dibromide

« Previous: Appendix C: Statutory Provisions (42 U.S.C. 7571 7573 and 49 U.S.C. 44714)
Page 153
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Ethylene Dibromide." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26050.
×
Page 153
Page 154
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Ethylene Dibromide." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26050.
×
Page 154

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix D Ethylene Dibromide Ethylene dibromide (EDB [(C2H4Br2]) is added to leaded aviation gasoline as a scavenger to help remove lead, which is volatilized from tetraethyl lead (TEL [(Pb(C2H5)4)]) during aircraft engine operation. EDB is transformed to lead bromide (PbBr2) when the vaporized lead from TEL reacts with the bromine during combustion. The ethylene is burned as fuel. The removal of this lead is critical to the performance, reliability, and durability of the engine. The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA) to prioritize chemical substances for risk evaluation. In accordance with TSCA section 6(b) and 40 CFR § 702.7, on March 21, 2019, EPA initiated the prioritization process for 20 chemical substances identified as candidates for High-Priority Substance designation.1 EDB was among the 20 chemical substances identified for risk evaluation. Subsequently, on August 23, 2019, EPA proposed to designate the same 20 chemical substances as High-Priority Substances for risk evaluation.2 Under TSCA section 6(b)(1)(B) and implementing regulations (40 CFR § 702.3), a High-Priority Substance is defined as a chemical substance that [EPA] concludes, without consideration of costs or other non-risk factors, may present an unreasonable risk of injury to 1  EPA. Initiation of Prioritization Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 84 Federal Register 10491, March 21, 2019. 2  EPA. Proposed High-Priority Substance Designations Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 84 Federal Register 44300, August 23, 2019. 153

154 OPTIONS FOR REDUCING LEAD EMISSIONS FROM PISTON-ENGINE AIRCRAFT health or the environment because of a potential hazard and a potential route of exposure under the conditions of use, including an unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation identified as relevant by [EPA]. A designation as a High-Priority Substance is not a finding of unrea- sonable risk. Rather, when prioritization is complete, for those chemicals designated as High-Priority Substances, EPA will have evidence on hazards and exposures that may support a finding that the substance may present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment under the con- ditions of use. Final designation of a High-Priority Substance initiates the risk evaluation process (40 CFR § 702.17), which culminates in a finding of whether the chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment under the conditions of use. On April 9, 2020, EPA published a notice of the availability of two reports related to the draft risk assessment for EDB and sought comment on these reports.3 The reports, “Draft Scope of the Risk Evaluation for Ethylene Dibromide CASRN 106-93-4” and “Draft Scope of the Risk Evaluation for Ethylene Dibromide Supplemental File: Data Extraction and Data Evaluation Tables for Physical-Chemical Property Studies CASRN: 106-93-4,” and the related public comments can be found in EPA public docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0488. The timeline for EPA completing its as- sessment of whether EDB should be designated as a High-Priority Substance is not clear and any discussion of follow-on regulatory action is premature. However, this is of great significance to the future composition of additive packages for leaded aviation gasoline. 3  85 Federal Register 19941, April 9, 2020.

Next: Appendix E: Occupational Health »
Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft Get This Book
×
 Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Small gasoline-powered aircraft are the single largest emitter of lead in the United States, as other major emission sources such as automobile gasoline have been previously addressed. A highly toxic substance that can result in an array of negative health effects in humans, lead is added to aviation gasoline to meet the performance and safety requirements of a sizable portion of the country’s gasoline-powered aircraft.

Significantly reducing lead emissions from gasoline-powered aircraft will require the leadership and strategic guidance of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and a broad-based and sustained commitment by other government agencies and the nation’s pilots, airport managers, aviation fuel and service suppliers, and aircraft manufacturers, according to a congressionally mandated report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

While efforts are underway to develop an unleaded aviation fuel that can be used by the entire gasoline-powered fleet, the uncertainty of success means that other steps should also be taken to begin reducing lead emissions and exposures, notes the report, titled TRB Special Report 336: Options for Reducing Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Aircraft.

Piston-engine aircraft are critical to performing general aviation (GA) functions like aerial observation, medical airlift, pilot training, and business transport. Other GA functions, such as crop dusting, aerial firefighting, search and rescue, and air taxi service, have particular significance to communities in rural and remote locations.

Accompanying the report is a three-page highlight summary that provides a condensed version of the findings.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!