National Academies Press: OpenBook

Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs (2021)

Chapter: Appendix C - List of Participating Agencies

« Previous: Appendix B - Questionnaire
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - List of Participating Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26337.
×
Page 54
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - List of Participating Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26337.
×
Page 55
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - List of Participating Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26337.
×
Page 56
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - List of Participating Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26337.
×
Page 57

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

54 A P P E N D I X C List of Participating Agencies Table C-1 lists the agencies that contributed to the synthesis through their participation in the questionnaire and/or the interviews. Each row in the table includes the location of the agency, the name of the agency, and the department or role of each participating individual. Table C-1. Participating agencies. State Agency Department or Role Questionnaire Interview Alaska Alaska DOT&PF Chief Engineer x Arizona Arizona DOT Performance/Asset Manager x Arkansas Arkansas DOT Division Engineer - System Information & Research x California California DOT State Asset Management Engineer x x California California Metropolitan Transportation Commission Street Saver Program Manager x Colorado Colorado DOT Performance and Asset Management Branch Manager x Connecticut Connecticut DOT Transportation Supervising Engineer x x Delaware Delaware DOT Assistant Director, Division of Planning x Delaware, Pennsylvania Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Manager, Capital Project Development/Office of Capital Programs x

List of Participating Agencies 55   based Management and Research Hawaii Hawaii DOT Highways Division Planning Manager x Idaho Idaho Transportation Department State Asset Management Engineer x Illinois Illinois DOT Bureau Chief, Planning x Indiana Indiana DOT Managing Director of Asset Management x Iowa Iowa DOT Transportation Asset Management Administrator x Kansas Kansas DOT Asset Management / Performance Measures Manager x Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Assistant State Highway Engineer x Louisiana Louisiana DOT and Development Asset Management Engineer x Maryland Maryland DOT State Highway Administration Chief of Innovative Planning and Performance x Michigan Michigan DOT Transportation Planner x x Michigan Southeast Michigan Council of Governments PASER Program, Transportation Planning and Programming x State Agency Department or Role Questionnaire Interview Florida Florida DOT Administrator for Metropolitan Planning x x Georgia Georgia DOT Assistant Office Head - Office of Performance- x Minnesota Minnesota DOT Asset Management Planning Director, Investment Planning Director, Director of Performance, Risk and Investment Analysis x x

56 Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs State Agency Department or Role Questionnaire Interview Mississippi Mississippi DOT Planner x Missouri Missouri DOT Organizational Performance Specialist x Montana Montana DOT Policy, Program & Performance Analysis Chief x x Nebraska Nebraska DOT Roadway Asset Management Engineer x Nevada Nevada DOT Chief Maintenance and Asset Management Engineer x New Hampshire New Hampshire Department of Transportation Administrator: Office of Asset Management, Performance & Strategy x New Jersey New Jersey DOT Project Manager x New Jersey North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority Manager, Data Analysis and Forecasting x New Mexico New Mexico DOT Capital Program and Investments Director x New York New York State DOT Director, Office of Policy, Planning and Performance x North Dakota North Dakota DOT Planning/Asset Management Division Engineer x Ohio Ohio DOT Administrator, Office of Technical Services x Oklahoma Oklahoma DOT Assistant Division Manager x Oregon Oregon DOT Transportation Economist x Pennsylvania Pennsylvania DOT Bridge Asset Management Section Chief, Asset Management Engineer x x Rhode Island Rhode Island DOT Principal Economic & Policy Analyst x South Dakota South Dakota DOT Transportation Programs Administrator x Texas Texas DOT Pavement Asset Management Section Director x

List of Participating Agencies 57   State Agency Department or Role Questionnaire Interview Utah Utah DOT Asset Manager for Maintenance x Vermont Vermont Agency of Transportation Director - Asset Management Bureau x Washington Washington State DOT Highway Asset Manager x Washington D.C. District Department of Transportation Civil Engineer x West Virginia West Virginia DOT TAMP Manager/Acting Assistant Director: Strategic Performance Management Division x Wyoming Wyoming DOT State Planning Engineer x

Next: Appendix D - Questionnaire Results »
Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs Get This Book
×
 Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The degree of collaboration between state departments of transportation (DOTs) and metropolitan planning organzations (MPOs) on goals and performance targets for management of transportation assets varies. Collaboration may also involve investment decisions.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Synthesis 577: Collaborative Practices for Performance-Based Asset Management Between State DOTs and MPOs documents DOT practices for collaborating with MPOs relative to target setting, investment decisions, and performance monitoring of pavement and bridge assets.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!