Review of the Inland Estimated Recovery System Potential (ERSP) Prototype Calculator
Committee on the Review of the Inland Estimated Recovery System Potential (ERSP) Prototype Calculator
Ocean Studies Board
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Consensus Study Report
NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001
This activity was supported by contracts between the National Academy of Sciences and the United States Coast Guard. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-69144-4
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-69144-3
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/26649
This publication is available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Copyright 2022 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and National Academies Press and the graphical logos for each are all trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Review of the Inland Estimated Recovery System Potential (ERSP) Prototype Calculator. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26649.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Rapid Expert Consultations published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are authored by subject-matter experts on narrowly focused topics that can be supported by a body of evidence. The discussions contained in rapid expert consultations are considered those of the authors and do not contain policy recommendations. Rapid expert consultations are reviewed by the institution before release.
For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.
COMMITTEE ON THE REVIEW OF THE INLAND ESTIMATED RECOVERY SYSTEM POTENTIAL (ERSP) PROTOTYPE CALCULATOR
Berrin Tansel, Chair, Florida International University, Miami
Victoria Broje, Shell Projects & Technology, Houston, Texas
Brian House, Moran Environmental Recovery, LLC (ret.) & Spill Control Association of America, Scituate, Massachusetts
Scott Pegau, Prince William Sound Science Center, Cordova, Alaska
Malcolm Spaulding, Spaulding Environmental Associates, LLC & University of Rhode Island (ret.), Wakefield
William Stafford, Marine Spill Response Corporation, Herndon, Virginia
Susan Roberts, Director, Ocean Studies Board
Stacee Karras, Senior Program Officer, Ocean Studies Board
Vanessa Constant, Program Officer, Ocean Studies Board
Kenza Sidi-Ali-Cherif, Senior Program Assistant, Ocean Studies Board (until April 2022)
OCEAN STUDIES BOARD
Claudia Benitez-Nelson, Chair, University of South Carolina, Columbia
Mark Abbott, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts
Rosie ‘Anolani Alegado, University of Hawai’i, Manoa
Carol Arnosti, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Amy Bower, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts
Lisa Campbell, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
Thomas S. Chance, ASV Global, LLC (ret.), Broussard, Louisiana
Daniel Costa, University of California, Santa Cruz
John Delaney, University of Washington (ret.), Seattle
Timothy Gallaudet, Ocean STL Consulting, LLC, North Beach, Maryland
Scott Glenn, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Marcia Isakson, University of Texas, Austin
Lekelia Jenkins, Arizona State University, Tempe
Nancy Knowlton, Smithsonian Institution (ret.), Washington, District of Columbia
Anthony MacDonald, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, New Jersey
Galen McKinley, Columbia University, Palisades, New York
Thomas Miller, University of Maryland, Solomons
S. Bradley Moran, Ex-Officio, University of Alaska, Fairbanks
Ruth M. Perry, Shell Exploration & Production Company, Houston, Texas
Dean Roemmich, Scripps Institution of Oceanography (ret.), Solana Beach, California
James Sanchirico, University of California, Davis
Mark J. Spalding, The Ocean Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia
Paul Williams, Suquamish Indian Tribe, Seattle, Washington
OSB Staff Members
Susan Roberts, Director
Stacee Karras, Senior Program Officer
Kelly Oskvig, Senior Program Officer
Emily Twigg, Senior Program Officer
Vanessa Constant, Program Officer
Thanh Nguyen, Financial Business Partner
Elizabeth Costa, Program Assistant
This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.
We thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
Anna Burkholder, California Fish and Wildlife
Erick M. Carreira, ETH Zurich
Dylan Righi, NOAA
Matthew A. Tarr, University of New Orleans
Peter Velez, Shell (ret.)
Glenn Watabayashi, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (ret.)
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations of this report nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Andrew Solow, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Glen Daigger, University of Michigan. They were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies.
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.