National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 4 - Summary and Conclusions
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Performance Specifications for Rapid Highway Renewal. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22560.
×
Page 49
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Performance Specifications for Rapid Highway Renewal. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22560.
×
Page 50

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

49 AASHTO. 2006. Standard Practice for Developing a Quality Assurance Plan for Hot-Mix Asphalt. R 42. American Association of State High- way and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Anderson, S. D., and I. Damnjanovic. 2008. NCHRP Synthesis of High- way Practice 379: Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Aschenbrener, T. B., and J. E. Goldbaum. 2007. Current Cost-Benefit Eval- uation of Short-Term Warranties for Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. Report No. CDOT-2007-10, Research Branch, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colo. Ashley, D. B., J. E. Diekmann, and K. R. Molenaar. 2006. Guide to Risk Assessment and Allocation for Highway Construction Management, Report No. FHWA-PL-06-032, Office of International Programs, Fed- eral Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Brokaw, T., B. Duckert, S. Krebs, S. Schwandt, W. Shemwell, J. Volker, and G. Waelti. 2001. Asphaltic Pavement Warranties: Five-Year Prog- ress Report. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison. Buttlar, W. G., and J. J. Hausman. 2000. ILLISIM Program for End-Result Specification Development. In Transportation Research Record: Jour- nal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1712, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 125–136. Cox, D. O., K. Molenaar, J. Ernzen, G. Henk, T. C. Matthews, N. Smith, R. Williams, R. Gee, J. Kolb, L. Sanderson, G. Whited, J. Wight, and G. Yakowenko. 2002. Contract Administration: Technology and Prac- tice in Europe. Report No. FHWA-PL-03-002, Office of International Programs, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. DoD. 2000. Guidebook for Performance-Based Services Acquisition (PBSA) in the Department of Defense. U.S. Department of Defense. DoD. 2009. Guide for Performance Specifications. Doc. ID SD-15. Defense Standardization Program, U.S. Department of Defense. Egan, J. 1998. Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force. Department of Trade and Industry. London. Epps, J. A., A. Hand, S. Seeds, T. Schultz, S. Alavi, C. Ashmore, C. Monismith, J. Deacon, J. Harvey, and R. Leahy. 2002. NCHRP Report 455: Recommended Performance-Related Specification for Hot-Mix Asphalt Construction: Results of the WesTrack Project. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Evans, L., M. I. Darter, and B. K. Egan. 2005. Development and Imple- mentation of a Performance-Related Specification: I-65 Tennessee. Report No. FHWA-IF-06-008, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Evans, L., K. L. Smith, N. G. Gharaibeh, and M. I. Darter. 2008. Develop- ment and Implementation of a Performance-Related Specification for SR 9A Florida. Report No. FHWA-HIF-09-016. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. FHWA. 2004. Performance Specifications Strategic Roadmap: A Vision for the Future. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. FHWA. 2010. Technical Advisory: Development and Review of Specifi- cations. HIAM-20. March 24. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ construction/specreview.cfm. Accessed Sept. 27, 2012. Gallivan, V. L. 2011. Transportation Research Circular E-C154: Develop- ment of Warranty Programs for Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Golder Associates, K. Molenaar, M. Loulakis, and T. Ferragut. 2013. Forthcoming. SHRP 2 Report S2-R09-RW-02: Guide for the Process of Managing Risk on Rapid Renewal Projects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://www.trb .org/Main/Blurbs/168369.aspx Haldar, A., M. Feng, and A. E. Aktan. 2004. Issues on Performance- Based Engineering for Buildings and Bridges. Proc., 2004 Structures Congress, American Society of Civil Engineers, Nashville, Tenn. Hoerner, T. E., and M. I. Darter. 1999a. Guide to Developing Performance- Related Specifications for PCC Pavements—Volume I: Practical Guide, Final Report, and Appendix A. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-155. Fed- eral Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Hoerner, T. E., and M. I. Darter. 1999b. Guide to Developing Performance- Related Specifications for PCC Pavements—Volume II: Appendix B— Field Demonstrations. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-156. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Hoerner, T. E., M. I. Darter, L. Khazanovich, L. Titus-Glover, and K. L. Smith. 2000a. Improved Prediction Models for PCC Pavement Performance-Related Specifications, Volume I: Final Report. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-130. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Hoerner, T. E., M. I. Darter, L. Khazanovich, L. Titus-Glover, and K. L. Smith. 2000b. Improved Prediction Models for PCC Pavement Performance-Related Specifications, Volume II: PaveSpec 3.0 User’s Guide. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-131. Federal Highway Adminis- tration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Huber, G. A., and J. S. Scherocman. 1999. Superpave and Westrack: Did They Perform as Expected? Proc., 1999 Canadian Technical Asphalt Association Conference, Quebec, Canada, Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Victoria, British Columbia. References

50 Hughes, C. S., and C. Ozyildirim. 2005. End-Result Specification for Hydraulic Cement Concrete. VTRC 05-R29, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville. Hughes, C. S., J. S. Moulthrop, S. Tayabji, R. Weed, and J. Burati. 2011. Guidelines for Quality-Related Pay Adjustment Factors for Pavements. NCHRP Project No. 10-79. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Matthews, T. 2001. Highways Agency Procurement Strategy. http://www .highways.gov.uk/business/10838.htm. Accessed June 5, 2007. Michigan DOT. 2007. Special Provision for Highways for LIFE, Contrac- tor Proposal Using Best-Value Practices. Aug. 24, 2007. Minnesota DOT. 2005. Warranties. Innovative Contracting in Minnesota: 2000 to 2005. Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting, Minnesota Department of Transportation. pp. 17–21. Mooney, M., R. Rinehart, N. Facas, O. Musimbi, D. White, and P. Vennapusa. 2010. NCHRP Report 676: Intelligent Soil Compaction Systems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Moulthrop, J., and M. Witczak. 2011. NCHRP Report 704: A Performance- Related Specification for Hot-Mix Asphalt. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. National Highway Institute. Alternative Contracting. NHI Course No. 134058. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Obla, K., and C. Lobo. 2005. Laboratory Demonstration of Advantages of Performance Specifications. Indian Concrete Journal, Vol. 79, No. 12. OFPP. 1998a. A Guide to Best Practices for Performance-Based Service Contracting. Office of Federal Procurement Policy, Office of Manage- ment and Budget, Washington, D.C. http://www.whitehouse.gov/ omb/procurement_guide_pbsc OFPP. 1998b. A Report on the Performance-Based Service Contracting Pilot Project. Office of Federal Procurement Policy, Office of Manage- ment and Budget, Washington, D.C. https://www.acquisition.gov/ sevensteps/library/OFPP_report-on-the-perf.pdf. Accessed Sept. 26, 2012. Olek, J., A. Lu, X. Feng, and B. Magee. 2002. Performance-Related Speci- fications for Concrete Bridge Superstructures, Volume 2: High Perfor- mance Concrete. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind. ORTA. 1987. Development and Implementation of End-Result Specifica- tions for Bridge Deck Waterproofing. pp. C61–C81. Design of Bridges and Retaining Walls, Ottawa Roads and Transportation Association, Canada. Rao, S. P., K. L. Smith, and M. I. Darter. 2007. Development and Imple- mentation of a Performance-Related Specification for a Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement: I-39/90/94 Madison, Wisconsin. Report No. WI/ SPR-01-06. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison. SAIC. 2006. Performance Contracting Framework Fostered by Highways for LIFE. Submitted to Federal Highway Administration under Contract DTFH61-01-C-00180 Task 115, Science Applications International Corporation, McLean, Va. Scott, S., and L. Konrath. 2007. Performance-Based Contracting: A Viable Contract Option? Proc. Third International Conference on Performance Management. NCHRP, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Shober, F. S., G. C. Whited, and K. W. McMullen. 1996. Transportation Research Record 1543: Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s Asphaltic Pavement Warranties. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Sprinkel, M., 2004. Performance Specification for High Performance Concrete Overlays on Bridges—VTRC 05-R2, Virginia Transporta- tion Research Council, Charlottesville. Tayabji, S., D. Ye, and N. Buch. 2012. SHRP 2 Report S2-R05-RR-1: Pre- cast Concrete Pavement Technology. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Tikalsky, P. J., D. G. Tepke, G. Kurgan, and A. J. Schokker. 2004. High- Performance Concrete Bridge Deck Initiative: Performance-Based Specifications in Pennsylvania. Proc., 2004 Concrete Bridge Confer- ence, Charlotte, N.C. TRB. 2005. Transportation Research Circular E-C074: Glossary of Highway Quality Assurance Terms, 3rd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. TRB. 2009. Transportation Research Circular E-C137: Glossary of Transportation Construction Quality Assurance Terms, 6th ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C. van der Zwan, J. T. 2003. Functional Specifications for Road Pavements: A Question of Risk Assessment. Proc., XXIInd PIARC World Road Congress, Durban, South Africa. Wenzel, T. H. 2000. Identification of Performance Indicators and Develop- ment of Performance Based Specifications for Bridge Decks. Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wis. Whiteley, L., S. Tighe, and Z. Zhang. 2005. Incorporating Variability into Pavement Performance, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, and Performance- Based Specification Pay Factors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1940, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. World Bank. 2006. Performance-based Contracting for Preservation and Improvement of Road Assets. TN-27, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Next: Appendix A - Workshop and Demonstration Project Participants »
Performance Specifications for Rapid Highway Renewal Get This Book
×
 Performance Specifications for Rapid Highway Renewal
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Report S2-R07-RR-1: Performance Specifications for Rapid Highway Renewal describes suggested performance specifications for different application areas and delivery methods that users may tailor to address rapid highway renewal project-specific goals and conditions.

SHRP 2 Renewal Project R07 also produced:

A separate document, Guide Performance Specifications, includes model specifications and commentary to address implementation and performance targets (for acceptance) for 13 routine highway items. Agencies may adapt guide specifications to specific standards or project conditions. The commentary addresses gaps, risks, and options.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!