High-Speed Weigh-in-Motion System Calibration Practices (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

43 1. Cunagin, W.D., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 124: Use of Weigh-in-Motion Systems for Data Collection and Enforcement, Transportation Research Board, Na- tional Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, 34 pp. 2. Jacob, B., E.J. O’Brien, and W. Newton, Assessment of the Accuracy and Classification of Weigh-in-Motion Sys- tems, Part 2: European Specification, Vol. 7, No. 2/3, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. 3. COST 323: WIM Load (1993–1998); Weigh-in-Motion of Road Vehicles, Final Report, Apr. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://cordis.europa.eu/cost-transport/src/cost- 323.htm. 4. Papagiannakis, A.T., K. Senn, and H. Huang, On-Site Evaluation and Calibration of Weigh-in-Motion Systems, Final Report for NCHRP Project 3-39(02), Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996. 5. Weigh-in-Motion of Axles and Vehicles for Europe (WAVE), General Report, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris, Apr. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://wim.zag/si/wave. 6. Standard Specification for Highway Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Systems with User Requirements and Test Method, ASTM E1318-02, American Society for Testing and Mat- erials, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2002. 7. COST 323; Weigh-In-Motion of Road Vehicles; Appen- dix 1, European Specification Version 3.0, Aug. 1999. 8. Smoothness of Pavement at the Approaches to WIM Scales, AASHTO Standard Specification MP 14-05, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2006. 9. Karamichas, S.M. and T.D. Gillespie, Smoothness Cri- teria for WIM Scale Approaches, Report UMTRI-2002- 37, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Sep. 2002. 10. Nichols, A.P. and D.M. Bullock, Quality Control Proce- dures for WIM Data, Final Report, FHWA/IN/JTRP- 2004/12, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., June 2004. 11. Weigh-in-Motion of Axles and Vehicles for Europe (WAVE), Report Package 3.2, Calibration of WIM Sys- tems, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris [Online]. Available: http://wim.zag/si/wave. 12. Traffic Monitoring Guide, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., 2001. 13. Dahlin, C., “Proposed Method for Calibrating Weigh-in- Motion Systems and for Monitoring That Calibration Over Time,” Transportation Research Record 1364, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 161–168. 14. Hallenbeck, M., Long Term Pavement Performance Protocol for Calibrating Traffic Data Collection Equip- ment, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Apr. 1998, 16 pp. 15. McCall, W. and W.C. Vodrazka, Jr., States’ Successful Practices Weigh-in-Motion Handbook, Iowa State University, Ames and Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1997, 146 pp. 16. Quinley, R., “The CTWIM Suite,” North American Travel Monitoring Exhibition and Conference 2002/3rd International Conference on WIM, Orlando, Fla., May 13–15, 2002. 17. Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Specific Pave- ment Study (SPS) Traffic Data Collection, FHWA Pool Fund TPF-5(004) awarded to IRD Inc., and MACTEC Inc. [Online]. Available: http://www.pooledfund.org/project details.asp?id=123&status=6 [accessed Nov. 17, 2008]. 18. Hallenbeck, M. and H. Weinblatt, NCHRP Report 509: Equipment for Collecting Traffic Load Data, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004, 66 pp. 19. Traffic Analysis Software, User’s Guide, Version 1.6.2, Long Term Pavement Performance, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2006. 20. Hedrick, J.K. and K. Yi, VESYM User’s Manual, Vehi- cle Dynamics and Control Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, July 1989. 21. Weigh-in-Motion of Axles and Vehicles for Europe (WAVE), Report Package 1.1, Multiple Sensor WIM, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris, May 2001 [Online]. Available: http://wim.zag/si/wave. 22. Gonzalez, A., A.T. Papagiannakis, and E. O’Brien, “Evaluation of an Artificial Neural Network Technique Applied to Multiple-Sensor Weigh-in-Motion Systems,” In Transportation Research Record 1855, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2003, pp. 151–159. 23. Schultz, G.G. and L.W. Seegmiller, Utah’s Commercial Motor Vehicle WIM Data Analysis and Calibration Method, Report UT-06.10, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, June 2006. 24. Commercial Motor Vehicle Size and Weight Enforcement, International Technology Scanning Program, American Trade Initiatives, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2006. 25. Weigh-in-Motion of Axles and Vehicles for Europe (WAVE), Report Package 4, Optical WIM Systems, Technology for the Future, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris, Oct. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://wim.zag/si/wave. 26. Weigh-in-Motion of Axles and Vehicles for Europe (WAVE), Report Package 2, A Quality Data Assurance System for the European WIM Database, Laboratoire REFERENCES

Central des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris [Online]. Avail- able: http://wim.zag/si/wave. 27. Papagiannakis, A.T., W.A. Phang, J.H.F. Woodrooffe, A.T. Bergan, and R.C.G. Haas, “Accuracy of Weigh-in- Motion Scales and Piezoelectric Cables,” Transportation Research Board Record 1215, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1989, pp. 189–196. 28. AASHTO Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs, AASHTO, Joint Task Force on Traffic Monitoring Standards, Washington, D.C., 1992. 29. Karamichas, S.M. and T.D. Gillespie, Advancement of Smoothness Criteria for WIM Scale Approaches, Uni- versity of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Report UMTRI-2004-12, Ann Arbor, April 2004. 44 30. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established Inertial Profiling Reference, ASTM E-950- 98, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2004. 31. U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST Handbook 44: Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Require- ments for Weighing and Measuring Devices, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, D.C., 1993. 32. Woodrooffe, J.H.F., P. LeBlanc, and K.R. LePiane, “Effect of Suspension Variations on the Dynamic Wheel Loads of a Heavy Articulated Vehicle,” Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study, Road and Transportation Asso- ciation of Canada, Vol. 11, July 1986.