Guide for Identifying, Classifying, Evaluating, and Mitigating Truck Freight Bottlenecks (2017)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

107 1. Highway Capacity Manual: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis, 6th ed. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016. 2. Margiotta, R., B. Eisele, and J. Short. Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arterials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report, Report No. FHWA-HOP-15-033, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C., August 2015. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15033/ fhwahop15033.pdf. 3. Moghaddam, S., and B. Hellinga. Evaluating the Performance of Algorithms for the Detection of Travel Time Outliers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2338, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2338-08. 4. Stogios, Y. C., A. Brijmohan, H. Mahmassani, J. Kim, Y. Chen, and P. Vovsha. SHRP 2 Report S2-L04-RR-1: Incorporating Reliability Performance Measures into Operations and Planning Modeling Tools. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014. https://doi.org/10.17226/22388. 5. Eisele, W. L. Estimating Travel Time Mean and Variance Using Intelligent Transportation Systems Data for Real-time and Off-line Transportation Applications. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University. Publi- cation No. AAT 3011705, College Station, Texas, May 2001. 6. Eisele, W. L., B. Naik, and L. R. Rilett. Estimating Route Travel Time Reliability from Simultaneously Collected Link and Route Vehicle Probe Data and Roadway Sensor Data. International Journal of Urban Sciences, Volume 19, Number 3, ISSN 1226-5934, Taylor and Francis, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, pp. 286–304, November 2015. 7. Isukapati, I. S., G. F. List, B. M. Williams, and A. F. Karr. 2013. Synthesizing Route Travel Time Distributions from Segment Travel Time Distributions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2396, pp. 71–81. DOI: 10.3141/2396-09. 8. List, G. L., B. Williams, N. Rouphail, R. Hranac, T. Barkley, E. Mai, A. Ciccarelli, L. Rodegerdts, K. Pincus, B. Nevers, A. Karr, X. Zhou, J. Wojtowicz, J. Schofer, and A. Khattak. SHRP 2 Report S2-LO2-RR-2: Guide to Establishing Monitoring Programs for Travel Time Reliability, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay. asp?ProjectID=2178. 9. Margiotta, R., B. Eisele, and J. Short. Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arte- rials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report. Report No. FHWA-HOP-15-033, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., August 2015. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop 15033/fhwahop15033.pdf. 10. Arterial Data and Performance Monitoring Workshop, North American Travel Monitoring Exhibition and Conference (NATMEC). July 2014, Chicago, available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/ 2014/NATMEC/ArterialWorkshop.pdf. 11. Margiotta, R., B. Eisele, and J. Short. Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arterials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report, Report No. FHWA-HOP-15-033, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C., August 2015. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15033/ fhwahop15033.pdf. 12. Lomax, T., B. Wang, D. Schrank, W. Eisele, S. Turner, D. Ellis, Y. Li, N. Koncz, and L. Geng. Improving Mobility Information with Better Data and Estimation Procedures, No. UTCM 09-17-09, 2010. http://utcm. tamu.edu/publications/final_reports/Lomax_09-17-09.pdf. 13. Eisele, W. L., and D. L. Schrank. Conceptual Framework and Trucking Application to Estimate the Impact of Congestion on Freight. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2168, 2010. References

108 Guide for Identifying, Classifying, Evaluating, and Mitigating Truck Freight Bottlenecks 14. AASHTO. Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2009. 15. AASHTO. Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2009. 16. FHWA. Traffic Monitoring Guide. Federal Highway Administration, September 2013, available: http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/tmguide/. 17. Hudson, J. G., N. Wood, B. Dai, and S. M. Turner. 2012. Roadway Congestion Analysis: Performance Report and Information System. Produced by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute for the Capital Area Metro- politan Planning Organization (CAMPO), Austin, Texas, September 2014. 18. AASHTO. Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2009. 19. AASHTO. Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2009. 20. Margiotta, R., T. Lomax, M. Hallenbeck, S. Turner, A. Skabardonis, C. Ferrell, and W. Eisele. 2006. NCHRP Web-Only Document 97: Guide to Effective Freeway Performance Measurement: Final Report and Guidebook. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., available: http://onlinepubs. trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w97.pdf. 21. Eisele, W. L., D. L. Schrank, and M. D. Fontaine. 2016. Preparing for MAP-21 System Performance Measures and Target-Setting Requirements: Lessons Learned in Virginia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2529, pages 1–9, DOI: 10.3141/2529-01. 22. Margiotta, R., B. Eisele, and J. Short. Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arte- rials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report, Report No. FHWA-HOP-15-033, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., August 2015. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop 15033/fhwahop15033.pdf. 23. Texas Department of Transportation. Texas 100 Most Congested Roadways List. Available: http://www.txdot. gov/inside-txdot/projects/100-congested-roadways.html. Last accessed: April 10, 2015. Note that the full ranking of all segments throughout Texas beyond the top 100 are available here: http://mobility.tamu.edu/ most-congested-texas/. 24. 2012 Indiana Mobility Report, available from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/imr/3/ on November 11, 2014. 25. TTI. Urban Mobility Scorecard. https://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/. [Provides methods and values for the value of time delay for passenger cars and trucks. The values can be updated to the current year using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).] 26. U.S.DOT, Office of Operations. National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) Webinar, November 1, 2014, http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/perf_measurement/. 27. For example, see the web site of the New York City DOT Off-Hour Delivery Program, which can be found at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/motorist/offhoursdelivery.shtml. 28. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Operations. Traffic Bottlenecks, 2014. FHWA Programs Address Bottlenecks from Varied Perspectives, http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/bn/lbr.htm#g4. 29. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Operations. Recurring Traffic Bottlenecks: A Primer Focus on Low- Cost Operational Improvements, http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12012/index.htm. 30. U.S. Department of Transportation, Joint Program Office, Dynamic Mobility Applications (DMA) Pro- gram. Freight Advanced Traveler Information System (FRATIS), http://www.its.dot.gov/dma/bundle/ fratis_plan.htm#sthash.AZr6x0uv.dpuf and http://www.its.dot.gov/dma/bundle/fratis_plan.htm#sthash. AZr6x0uv.dpufFRATIS. 31. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2011. A Policy on Geo- metric Design of Highways and Streets, Sixth Edition. Washington, D.C. 32. Khattak, A. J., R. J. Schneider, and F. Targa. 2003. Risk Factors in Large Truck Rollovers and Injury Severity: Analysis of Single-Vehicle Collisions. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.463.4047&rep=rep1& type=pdf. 33. Donnell, E. T., M. L. Adolini, D. T. Torbic, J. M. Mason, and L. Elefteriadou. Truck Safety Considerations for Geometric Design and Traffic Operations. In Proceedings from ITE Annual Meeting, Institute of Transportation Engineers. August 2001. 34. ATRI. Mapping Larger Truck Rollovers: Identification and Mitigation Through Spatial Data Analysis, 2012, http://atri-online.org/2012/05/09/safety-impacts-of-roadway-geometric-design-standards- mapping-rollovers-and-designing-a-driver-information-delivery-system-2/. 35. Elefteriadou, L., D. W. Harwood, W. D. Glauz, J. Hawkins, J. McFadden, D. J. Torbic, and N. A. Webster. Evaluation of Limitations in Roadway Geometry and Impacts on Traffic Operations for Proposed Changes in Truck Size and Weight Policy. The Pennsylvania State University, July 1997.

References 109 36. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP Report 754: Improving Management of Transportation Information. 2013. Exhibit 1.1. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http:// onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_754.pdf. 37. U.S. Department of Transportation. Research and Innovative Technology Division, Best Practices in GIS- Based Transportation Asset Management. January 2012. http://www.gis.fhwa.dot.gov/documents/GIS_ AssetMgmt.pdf. 38. Washington State Transportation Center. 2011. GPS Truck Data Performance Measure Program in Washing- ton State. Report WA-RD 775.1. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Freight/publications.htm. 39. Texas Department of Transportation. Texas 100 Most Congested Roadways List. Available: http://www. txdot.gov/inside-txdot/projects/100-congested-roadways.html. Last accessed: April 10, 2015. Note that the full ranking of all segments throughout Texas beyond the top 100 are available here: http://mobility.tamu. edu/most-congested-texas/. 40. Mobility Investment Priorities—Web Site and Project Resources. Sponsored by Texas Legislature. http:// mobility.tamu.edu/mip/. Last Accessed: June 6, 2014. 41. Mobility Investment Priorities—Congestion Problems. Sponsored by Texas Legislature. http://mobility. tamu.edu/mip/congestion.php. Last Accessed: June 6, 2014. 42. DVRPC 2012 Congestion Management Process. http://www.dvrpc.org/reports/11042.pdf. 43. Virginia Department of Transportation Multimodal Transportation Planning Office, submitted by Cam- bridge Systematics, Inc. Virginia Statewide Multimodal Freight Study, Phase 1, undated. http://www.virginia dot.org/projects/vtrans/resources/VA_Statewide_Multimodal_Freight_Study_Final%20Report%20 COMPLETE.pdf. 44. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., FHWA. An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways, 2005. http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/bottlenecks/bottlenecks.pdf. 45. Zhao, W., E. McCormack, D. Daily, and E. Scharnhorst. Using Truck Probe GPS Data to Identify and Rank Roadway Bottlenecks. Journal of Transportation Engineering, American Association of Civil Engineers, January 2013. 46. Washington State Freight Mobility Plan. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Freight/freightmobilityplan. 47. Existing and Future Truck Delay in Hampton Roads: Preparation for Project Prioritization. http://www. hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Existing%20and%20Future%20Truck%20Delay%20in%20HR%20Final%20 Report.pdf. 48. Positioning Hampton Roads for Freight Infrastructure Funding: MAP-21 and Beyond. Available: http:// www.hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Positioning%20HR%20for%20Freight%20Infrastructure%20Funding %20-%20Final%20Report.pdf. 49. Schrank, D., B. Eisele, T. Lomax, and J. Bak. 2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard, August 2015. http://mobility. tamu.edu/ums. 50. Oregon State Highway Performance Data and Metrics Related to Freight. http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/ TD/TP/docs/Reports/FreightCorridorMetrics_RC_3.13.13.pdf. 51. 2013 Corridor Bottleneck Operations Study (CBOS). http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/REGION1/ pages/cbos.aspx. 52. American Transportation Research Institute. Freight Performance Measures Analysis of Freight-Significant Highway Locations 2013, Arlington, Virginia, July 2013. www.atri-online.org. 53. American Transportation Research Institute. Cost of Congestion to the Trucking Industry. Arlington, Virginia, July 2013. www.atri-online.org. 54. Georgia Department of Transportation. Truck Modal Profile. Georgia Statewide Freight and Logistics Plan, 2010–2050. http://www.dot.ga.gov/InvestSmart/Freight/Documents/Plan/TruckModal-Task3.pdf. 55. Freight Improvement Project Recommendations, Georgia Statewide Freight and Logistics Plan, 2010–2050, Task 5 Report. http://www.dot.ga.gov/Projects/programs/georgiafreight/logisticsplan/Documents/Plan/ GAFreightLogistics-FinalReport-Task5.pdf. 56. Southern California Association of Governments. Regional Transportation Plan 2012-2035 Sustainable Com- munities Strategy Towards a Sustainable Future. http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Pages/2012-2035-RTP-SCS.aspx. 57. Goods Movement Appendix, Southern California Association of Governments. http://rtpscs.scag. ca.gov/Documents/2012/final/SR/2012fRTP_GoodsMovement.pdf. 58. Cambridge Systematics for SCAG. Truck Bottleneck Strategy White Paper. May 2013. 59. Eisele, W. L., L. P. Tardif, J. C. Villa, D. L. Schrank, and T. J. Lomax, Evaluating Global Freight Corridor Performance for Canada. Inaugural Journal of Transportation of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, pp. 39-57. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Washington, D.C., March 2011. 60. Fluidity Indicator Methodology. https://stats.tc.gc.ca/Fluidity/Login.aspx. 61. Bottlenecks on Florida SIS. 2011. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/programs/mspi/pdf/ Executive%20Summary-letter%202-15-13.pdf.

110 Guide for Identifying, Classifying, Evaluating, and Mitigating Truck Freight Bottlenecks 62. Florida Freight Mobility and Trade Plan. June 2013. http://www.freightmovesflorida.com/docs/default- source/fmtp-freight-information/freight-mobility-and-trade-plan-policy-element_2013-06-19-web-(2). pdf?sfvrsn=0. 63. South Florida Regional Freight Plan. 2010. http://seftc.org/system/uploads/documents/MPO_regional_ freight_plan_201003.pdf?1359744012. 64. Application of Congestion Management Process (CMP) Strategies in Miami-Dade County. July 2013. https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=CB30042F1B5FAF4F!3009&app=WordPdf&wdo=2. 65. Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan. July 2012. http://tampabayfreight.com/wp-content/uploads/ StrategicFreightPlan_FinalOnlineVersion.pdf. 66. Eisele, W. L., D. L. Schrank, and M. D. Fontaine. 2016. Preparing for MAP-21 System Performance Measures and Target-Setting Requirements: Lessons Learned in Virginia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2529, pages 1–9, DOI: 10.3141/2529-01. 67. Eisele, W. L., R. M. Juster, K. F. Sadabadi, T. Jacobs, and S. Mahapatra. Implementing Freight Fluidity in the State of Maryland. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2548, pp. 78–88, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2548-08. 68. Bottleneck Performance in the I-95 Corridor: Baseline Analysis Using Vehicle Probe Data. http:// i95coalition.org/i95/Portals/0/Public_Files/p.m./reports/Final%20Report_Bottleneck%20Performance %20I-95_Baseline%20Analysis(Final).pdf. 69. Mazzenga, N. J., and M. J. Demetsky. 2010. Mitigation of Recurring Congestion on Freeways. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. http://www.kimley-horn. com/_public/documents/news/11/trb-2.pdf. 70. Cooner, S. A., S. E. Ranft, and P. B. Wiles. 2008. Improving Safety and Operations with Low-Cost Freeway Bottleneck Removal Projects, Conference Paper AB08H311 at ITE Annual Meeting and Exhibit. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Washington, D.C. http://www.ite.org/membersonly/annualmeeting/2008/ AB08H3101.pdf. 71. McCormack, E., E. Scharnhorst, and W. Zhao. Using GPS Truck Data to Identify and Rank Bottlenecks in Washington State. Available: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/0C4EC923-FB3C-443F-816B- BE5E2B671481/0/BottleneckMethodology_11Feb2011.pdf. 72. Guo, J. G., Q. Gong, and A. Obernesser. 2010, Identifying and Characterizing Truck Bottlenecks in the U.S. Mississippi Valley Region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2168. Washington, D.C. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2168-10. 73. Federal Highway Administration. An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways. Washington, D.C., 2005. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/bottlenecks/bottlenecks.pdf. 74. Columbus-Phoenix City MPO Congestion Management Process – 2007 Update. http://www.columbusga. org/planning/Transportation/CMP/2007.pdf. 75. Federal Highway Administration. Recurring Traffic Bottlenecks: A Primer Focus on Low-Cost Operational Improvement. FHWA-HOP-12-012, Washington, D.C., 2012. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/ fhwahop12012/fhwahop12012.pdf. 76. Anderson, K., S. Jones, and J. Lindly. 2011. Identifying, Anticipating, and Mitigating Freight Bottlenecks on Alabama Interstates. UTCA Report Number 07110. University Transportation Center for Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. http://utca.eng.ua.edu/files/2011/12/07110-Final-Report.pdf. 77. Skabardonis, A., N. M. Rouphail, K. Petty, and R. G. Dowling. 2008. Framework for Analysis of Recur- ring Freeway Bottlenecks. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. 78. Margiotta, R., B. Eisele, and J. Short. Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arterials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report, Report No. FHWA-HOP-15-033, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C., August 2015. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15033/ fhwahop15033.pdf. 79. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs, Washington, D.C., 2009. 80. Margiotta, R., T. Lomax, M. Hallenbeck, S. Turner, A. Skabardonis, C. Ferrell, and W. Eisele. 2006. NCHRP Web-Only Document 97: Guide to Effective Freeway Performance Measurement: Final Report and Guidebook. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://onlinepubs. trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w97.pdf. 81. Information Sharing on FHWA’s NPMRDS, Webinar. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, FHWA Pooled Fund Project: Mobility Measurement in Urban Transportation, April 2014. 82. Margiotta, R., B. Eisele, and J. Short. Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arte- rials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report, Report No. FHWA-HOP-15-033, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., August 2015. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop 15033/fhwahop15033.pdf.

References 111 83. Economic Development Research Group, Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., ICF International, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, and Weris, Inc. 2014. SHRP 2 Report S2-C11-RW-1: Development of Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_S2-C11-RW-1.pdf. 84. Texas Department of Transportation. Texas 100 Most Congested Roadways List. Available: http://www. txdot.gov/inside-txdot/projects/100-congested-roadways.html. Last accessed: April 10, 2015. Note that the full ranking of all segments throughout Texas beyond the top 100 are available here: http://mobility.tamu. edu/most-congested-texas/. 85. Roadway Usage Patterns: Urban Case Studies. Prepared for Volpe National Transportation Systems Center and Federal Highway Administration, July 22, 1994. 86. Development of Diurnal Traffic Distribution and Daily, Peak and Off-peak Vehicle Speed Estimation Procedures for Air Quality Planning, Final Report, Work Order B-94-06, prepared for Federal Highway Administration, April 1996. 87. FHWA Pooled Fund Project—Mobility Monitoring in Urban Transportation, 2013, TPF-5(198). 88. Margiotta, R., B. Eisele, and J. Short. Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arterials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report, Report No. FHWA-HOP-15-033, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C., August 2015. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15033/ fhwahop15033.pdf. 89. Eisele, W. L., R. M. Juster, K. F. Sadabadi, T. Jacobs, and S. Mahapatra. Implementing Freight Fluidity in the State of Maryland. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2548, pp. 78–88, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2548-08. 90. Fluidity Indicator. Transport Canada. https://stats.tc.gc.ca/Fluidity/Login.aspx (last accessed November 7, 2014). 91. Eisele, W. L., L. P. Tardif, J. C. Villa, D. L. Schrank, and T. J. Lomax. Evaluating Global Freight Corridor Performance for Canada. Journal of Transportation of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Spring/ Summer 2011 Edition, pp. 39–57, Institute of Transportation Engineers. Washington, D.C., March 2011. http://www.ite.org/jot/. 92. Schrank, D., B. Eisele, T. Lomax, and J. Bak. 2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard. August 2015. http://mobility. tamu.edu/ums. 93. 2015 Maryland State Highway Mobility Report, Maryland Department of Transportation-State Highway Administration. http://www.roads.maryland.gov/Index.aspx?PageId=711. 94. Qin, X., M. A. Sultana, M. V. Chitturi, and D. A. Noyce. 2013. Developing Truck Corridor Crash Severity Index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2386, pp. 103–111, http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2386-12. 95. Donnell, E. T., M. L. Adolini, D. T. Torbic, J. M. Mason, and L. Elefteriadou. Truck Safety Considerations for Geometric Design and Traffic Operations. In Proceedings from ITE Annual Meeting, Institute of Transporta- tion Engineers, August 2001. 96. Porter, R. J., Donnell, E. T., and J. M. Mason. 2012. Geometric Design, Speed, and Safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2309, pp. 39–47, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3141/2309-05. 97. Dong, C., D. B. Clarke, S. H. Richards, and B. Huang. 2014. Differences in Passenger Car and Large Truck Involved Crash Frequencies at Urban Signalized Intersections: An Exploratory Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 62, pp. 87–94. 98. Sultana, M. A., X. Qin, M. Chitturi, and D. A. Noyce. 2014. Analysis of Safety Effects of Traffic, Geometric, and Access Parameters on Truck Arterial Corridors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, 2404(1), 68–76. 99. Khattak, A. J., R. J. Schneider, and F. Targa. 2003. Risk Factors in Large Truck Rollovers and Injury Severity: Analysis of Single-Vehicle Collisions. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.463.4047&rep=? rep1&type=pdf. 100. Dissanayake, S., and N. Amarasingha. 2012. Effects of Geometric Design Features on Truck Crashes on Limited-Access Highways. Report 25-1121-0001-454. Mid-America Transportation Center, Research and Innovative Technology Administration. 101. Morris, C. M., and E. T. Donnell. 2014. Passenger Car and Truck Operating Speed Models on Multilane Highways with Combinations of Horizontal Curves and Steep Grades. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140.11. 102. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2011. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Sixth Edition. Washington, D.C. 103. Middleton, D. 2003. Truck Accommodation Design Guidance: Policy-Maker Workshop. Number FHWA/ TX-04/4364-3, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System.

112 Guide for Identifying, Classifying, Evaluating, and Mitigating Truck Freight Bottlenecks 104. Brewer, M. 2012 NCHRP Report 432: Recent Roadway Geometric Design Research for Improved Safety and Operations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 105. Poe, C. M. 2008. Geometric Design and Operational Factors that Impact Truck Use of Toll Roads. Texas Trans- portation Institute, Texas A&M University System. 106. Gong, Q., A. Obernesser, and J. Guo. 2009. Freight Bottlenecks in the Upper Midwest: Identification, Col- laboration, and Alleviation. In Proceedings of the 2009 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium. 107. U.S. Department of Transportation, Western Uniformity Scenario Analysis, April 2004, http://www.fhwa. dot.gov/policy/otps/truck/wusr/wusr.pdf. 108. Donnell, E. T., M. L. Adolini, D. T. Torbic, J. M. Mason, and L. Elefteriadou. Truck Safety Considerations for Geometric Design and Traffic Operations. In Proceedings from ITE Annual Meeting, Institute of Transportation Engineers. August 2001. 109. U.S. Department of Transportation, Western Uniformity Scenario Analysis. 110. U.S. Department of Transportation. Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, August 2000. http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/truck/index.htm. 111. Mannering, F., and J. Milton. The Relationship Between Highway Geometrics, Traffic-Related Elements, and Motor Vehicle Accidents, prepared for the Washington State Department of Transportation, WA-RD 403.1, March 1996. 112. Montana Department of Transportation. Road Design Manual. Chapter 10, Vertical Alignment, April 2006. https://www.mdt.mt.gov/other/roaddesign/external/montana_road_design_manual/10_vertical_ alignment.pdf. 113. Donnell, E. T., M. L. Adolini, D. T. Torbic, J. M. Mason, and L. Elefteriadou. Truck Safety Considerations for Geometric Design and Traffic Operations. In Proceedings from ITE Annual Meeting, Institute of Transporta- tion Engineers. August 2001. 114. Elefteriadou, L., D. W. Harwood, W. D. Glauz, J. Hawkins, J. McFadden, D. J. Torbic, and N. A. Webster. Evaluation of Limitations in Roadway Geometry and Impacts on Traffic Operations for Proposed Changes in Truck Size and Weight Policy. The Pennsylvania State University, July 1997. 115. NCHRP 17-18(3), AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan: Horizontal Curves, Executive Summary, http:// safety.transportation.org/htmlguides/horz_crvs/default.htm. 116. Poe, C. M. 2008. Geometric Design and Operational Factors that Impact Truck Use of Toll Roads. Texas Trans- portation Institute, Texas A&M University System. 117. Qin, X., M. A. Sultana, M. V. Chitturi, and D. A. Noyce. 2013. Developing Truck Corridor Crash Severity Index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2386, pp. 103–111, http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2386-12. 118. Cambridge Systematics, An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways, October 2005, http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/bottlenecks/. 119. Poe, C. M. 2008. Geometric Design and Operational Factors that Impact Truck Use of Toll Roads. Texas Trans- portation Institute, Texas A&M University System. 120. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety Programs. Lane Width, October 2014, http://safety. fhwa.dot.gov/geometric/pubs/mitigationstrategies/chapter3/3_lanewidth.htm. 121. Qin, X., M. A. Sultana, M. V. Chitturi, and D. A. Noyce. 2013. Developing Truck Corridor Crash Severity Index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2386, pp. 103–111, http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2386-12. 122. Donnell, E. T., M. L. Adolini, D. T. Torbic, J. M. Mason, and L. Elefteriadou. Truck Safety Considerations for Geometric Design and Traffic Operations. In Proceedings from ITE Annual Meeting, Institute of Transporta- tion Engineers, August 2001. 123. Donnell, E. T., M. L. Adolini, D. T. Torbic, J. M. Mason, and L. Elefteriadou. Truck Safety Considerations for Geometric Design and Traffic Operations. In Proceedings from ITE Annual Meeting, Institute of Transporta- tion Engineers, August 2001. 124. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., FHWA. An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways, 2005. http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/bottlenecks/bottlenecks.pdf. 125. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., North River Consulting Group, and University of Washington. NCFRP Report 25: Freight Data Sharing Guidebook. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington, D.C. 2013. 126. Cambridge Systematics. Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Trends and Advanced Strategies for Congestion Mitigation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., September 2005. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/ congestion_report/. 127. Remias, S. M., A. M. Hainen, C. M. Day, T. M. Brennan, Jr., H. Li, E. Rivera-Hernandez, J. R. Sturdevant, S. E. Young, and D. M. Bullock, Performance Characterization of Arterial Traffic Flow with Probe Vehicle Data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2380, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013.

References 113 128. American Transportation Research Institute, An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: 2015 Update, September 2015. Available at: http://atri-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ATRI- Operational-Costs-of-Trucking-2015-FINAL-09-2015.pdf. 129. Indiana DOT. 2013–2014 Indiana Mobility Report: Summary Version, December 2014. Available at http:// docs.lib.purdue.edu/imr/. 130. The Gray Notebook, Washington Department of Transportation, 2014, Available at: http://www.wsdot. wa.gov/Accountability/GrayNotebook/SubjectIndex.htm. 131. Developing Twin Cities Arterial Mobility Performance Measures Using GPS Speed Data, Minnesota DOT, May 2013, http://www.lrrb.org/media/reports/201314.pdf. 132. American Highway User’s Alliance, Unclogging America’s Arteries, 2015. http://www.highways.org/ wp-content/uploads/2015/11/unclogging-study2015-hi-res.pdf.