National Academies Press: OpenBook

Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors (2023)

Chapter: Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States

« Previous: Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

Appendix D

Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States

In the United States, categories of radioactive waste include high-level waste, spent nuclear fuel, transuranic waste, low-level waste (which is further separated into Class A, Class B, Class C, and Greater Than Class C), depleted uranium, and uranium mill tailings. These classifications, defined in Table D.1, are generally based on the origin of the waste, but also on isotopic composition, radiotoxicity level, and concentration, and dictate how the waste must be treated, stored, transported, and disposed. Note that the United States does not have an Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) category as is the practice internationally1; the closest U.S. category to ILW is Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) waste, as defined in Table D.1.

WASTES FROM DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE FUEL CYCLE

Radioactive waste streams are generated throughout the fuel cycle, regardless of fuel and reactor type, including from uranium mining and milling, uranium enrichment, fresh fuel fabrication, reactor operation, reprocessing operations (if applicable), recycle fuel fabrication (if applicable), and decommissioning. The relative amounts (volumes) of waste generated from each stage of the nuclear fuel cycle differ significantly, as shown in Table D.2. This section provides a brief overview of the types of wastes generated during each stage of the nuclear fuel cycle; more detailed discussions of new and unique wastes that may be generated from advanced reactors and fuel cycles can be found in Chapter 5.

Wastes from the Front End of the Fuel Cycle

Wastes from the front end of the fuel cycle include those generated from mining and milling, enrichment, and fuel fabrication. In the United States, uranium mining and milling wastes are classified as Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, not as radioactive waste; therefore,

___________________

1 According to the IAEA General Safety Guide, No. GSG-1, “Classification of Radioactive Waste”: “Intermediate Level Waste is waste that, because of its content, particularly of long lived radionuclides, requires a greater degree of containment and isolation than that provided by near surface disposal. However, ILW needs no provision, or only limited provision, for heat dissipation during its storage and disposal. ILW may contain long lived radionuclides, in particular, alpha emitting radionuclides that will not decay to a level of activity concentration acceptable for near surface disposal during the time for which institutional controls can be relied upon. Therefore, waste in this class requires disposal at greater depths, of the order of tens of meters to a few hundred meters.”

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

TABLE D.1 Radioactive Waste Categories and Definitions Used in the United States

Category Definition Source
High-Level Waste “(A) the highly radioactive material resulting from the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel, including liquid waste produced directly in reprocessing and any solid material derived from such liquid waste that contains fission products in sufficient concentrations; and (B) other highly radioactive material that the Commission, consistent with existing law, determines by rule requires permanent isolation.” Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, 42 U.S.C. 10101
Spent Nuclear Fuel “fuel that has been withdrawn from a nuclear reactor following irradiation, the constituent elements of which have not been separated by reprocessing” Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, 42 U.S.C. 10101
Transuranic Waste “waste containing more than 100 nanocuries of alpha-emitting transuranic isotopes, with half-lives greater than twenty years, per gram of waste, except for: (1) high-level radioactive wastes; (2) wastes that the Department has determined, with the concurrence of the Administrator, do not need the degree of isolation required by this part; or (3) wastes that the Commission has approved for disposal on a case-by-case basis in accordance with 10 CFR Part 61.” 40 CFR 191.02
Low-Level Waste “waste that is not high-level radioactive waste, spent nuclear fuel, transuranic waste, byproduct material (as defined in section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended), or naturally occurring radioactive material.” Radioactive Waste Management Manual, DOE M 435.1-1
Class A Most radioactivity from relatively short-lived radionuclides that reach background levels in several decades. See 10 CFR 61.55(a)(2)(i) and 10 CFR 61.56(a). DOE-EM, 2019
Class B Contains mostly short-lived radionuclides but at higher concentrations than Class A. See 10 CFR 61.56. DOE-EM, 2019
Class C Contains both short- and long-lived radionuclides, and at higher concentrations than Class B. See 10 CFR 61.56. DOE-EM, 2019
Greater-Than-Class C Contains higher concentrations of short- and long-lived radionuclides than Class C and sometimes requires disposal in geologic repository. See 10 CFR 61.55(a)(2)(iv) and 10 CFR 61.58. DOE-EM, 2019
Depleted Uranium “the source material uranium in which the isotope uranium-235 is less than 0.711 weight percent of the total uranium present.” 10 CFR 40.4
Uranium Mill Tailings “the remaining portion of a metal-bearing ore after some or all of such metal, such as uranium, has been extracted.” 40 CFR 192.01

TABLE D.2 Relative Characteristics of Fuel Cycle Generated Waste

Waste-Generating Process Relative Volume Relative Activity Relative Radiotoxicity
Enrichment Small Low Low
Fuel fabrication Small Low Low
Plant operation Large Medium Low
Reprocessing Small/Medium High/Very high High
Spent nuclear fuel for disposal Medium High High
Decommissioning Very large Low Very low

SOURCE: NEA-OECD (2006b).

they are not included in this report. Enrichment plants are characterized by low specific activity of the materials treated; they generate only low-level waste (LLW) and only in relatively small amounts. A modern centrifuge plant generates about 4 × 10–5 m3/SWU of LLW (NEA-OECD, 2006b), where SWU is separative work unit, or the amount of separation done by an enrichment process. The amount of waste that will be generated by the production of high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) is unknown at this time. Most of the U.S. fuel fabrication experience is in uranium oxide fuels, a process that generally involves the preparation and formation of fuel pellets, followed by the

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

assembly of those pellets into pins. LLW “from fuel fabrication includes filter media from water cleanup, waste oils, spent acids and bases, spent analytical solutions,” cleaning solutions, and discarded scrap metals and equipment. The volume of LLW from fuel fabrication is estimated to be 0.6 m3/metric tons of heavy metal (IAEA, 2019a).

Wastes from Reactor Operations

The nature and amount of waste produced during nuclear power plant operation “depend on the type of reactor, its specific design features, its operating conditions,” maintenance activities performed, and the fuel integrity. The radioactive waste consists of activated structures and components, “moderator and coolant materials, corrosion products captured” in plant components, filters and resins, maintenance materials and consumables, and fission product contamination arising from activated corrosion product transport or leaks in the fuel. “Corrosion products, which originate within the reactor core or out of the reactor and are carried through the reactor core by the coolant or moderator, are neutron activated isotopes” (NEA-OECD, 2006b). Within 8 days of shut down, these activated isotopes decay by about an order of magnitude and are almost all short lived (Zhang et al., 2016). “Both fission products and activation products are distributed throughout the coolant and moderator systems, becoming the primary contributors to liquid processing waste and decontamination and maintenance waste” (NEA-OECD, 2006b). When nonwater coolants such as liquid sodium are used, new unique waste streams are generated because of the hazardous characteristics of liquid sodium.

Wastes from Decommissioning of Power Plants

Decommissioning nuclear power plants generates a significant amount of LLW, which results from the removal of fuel and coolant, the dismantling of the reactor structure, the containment and associated buildings, components, and equipment. This LLW includes mostly

  • “activated equipment and materials, such as reactor internals, reactor vessel, and concrete shielding surrounding the reactor vessel”;
  • “corrosion products, such as deposits formed from corrosion and release into circulating coolants” and deposits on the various coolant system surfaces;
  • environmental media contaminated from accumulation of radioactive isotopes released during operations, including soil, water, and building materials;
  • on-site waste filtration and removal systems, such as off-gas charcoal adsorption beds (NEA-OECD, 2006b).

Most of the decommissioning wastes from advanced reactors may be similar to that of conventional reactors; however, waste from innovative coolant and reactor cores may differ significantly, as discussed in Chapter 5.

WASTE TREATMENT

Upon its initial generation, waste is usually treated directly at the facility to reduce volume for storage at the facility, reduce operational releases to the environment, and/or facilitate its further conditioning for storage or disposal. Waste treatments are well established and commercially available for most common waste streams, and vast operational experience has been accumulated.

Solid waste treatment technologies are used to predominantly reduce the waste volume to facilitate storage or reduce disposal costs. Aqueous liquid waste is verified to be within operational limits prior to discharge and diluted via the release pathway. Some aqueous liquid waste treatment technologies achieve further reductions in the bulk volume of liquid waste or in the amount of radioactivity discharge, mostly through evaporation or by separation of radionuclides using various filtration and sorption techniques (with the exception of tritium). The latter yields a substantially smaller volume of filtration materials and absorbents retained on site, although it results in higher concentrations of radionuclides. Gaseous waste streams are monitored to verify that releases are within limits and can be held for short-term decay prior to release or captured with filters and charcoal absorbers.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

Treated waste also often requires additional conditioning before final disposal, with a goal of providing proper isolation of radioactive materials from the environment. Conditioning processes include transforming the waste into more stable solid forms or incorporating it into an inert matrix. For liquid waste conditioning, cementation and bituminization are well-matured and commonly used technologies.

WASTE DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Different disposal requirements exist for the different waste categories described in Table D.1. Transuranic waste generated from the nuclear defense program has been disposed of at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) since 1999 (DOE, n.d.-b). Low-level activity waste streams are being or will be disposed of in near-surface disposal sites at four facilities: EnergySolutions Barnwell Operations in Barnwell, South Carolina; U.S. Ecology in Richland, Washington; EnergySolutions Clive Operations in Clive, Utah; and Waste Control Specialists, LLC, in Andrews, Texas (U.S. NRC, 2020k). DOE’s inventory of depleted uranium hexafluoride, located primarily at the Paducah Site in Kentucky and the Portsmouth Site in Ohio, is in the process of being converted to depleted uranium oxide, which is more stable and therefore better suited for disposal (U.S. DOE, 2016). Uranium mine and mill tailings also require specific disposal sites to prevent long-term contamination of soil, air, and groundwater around inactive mining and milling sites; for example, the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project is transporting approximately 15.5 million tons of tailings from the Moab site to a disposal cell near Crescent Junction, Utah (DOE-EM, 2021).

Per the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA) (Public Law 97-425), high-level waste and spent nuclear fuel must ultimately be disposed of in a geologic repository, but they are currently stored at 113 sites across the country (Peters et al., 2020) since no such repository exists. Table D.3, reproduced from Peters et al. (2020), depicts the projected growth of spent nuclear fuel that will have to be managed and disposed of for the scenarios of (1) assuming 60 years of operations of the fleet of light water reactors as of 2012, (2) addition of two new reactor builds, (3) shutdown at end of current license period of 40 years, and (4) addition of two new builds plus 8 additional current reactors obtaining a second 20-year license renewal to 80 years of operations. For any of these scenarios, the projected inventory will exceed the current legislated capacity of Yucca Mountain’s repository, if licensed. Thus, an additional repository will be required.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

TABLE D.3 Projected U.S. Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel Inventories Through 2082 Under Different Scenariosa

Scenario Fuel Discharges as of 12/31/2012 Forecast Discharges 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2019 Forecast Future Discharges 1/1/2020 to 12/31/2082 Total Projected Discharged Fuel Delta from Reference
Assy. Initial Uranium (MT) Assy. Initial Uranium (MT) Assy. Est. Initial Uranium (MT) Assy. Initial Uranium (MT) Assy. Initial Uranium (MT)
Reference Scenario
60-year operation unless announced otherwise
240,138 69,187 52,954 15,154 174,811 51,539 467,903 135,880 N/A N/A
Scenario 1
Addition of 2 new builds
240,138 69,187 52,954 15,154 181,983 54,573 475,075 139,914 7,172 3,034
Scenario 2
Shutdown at end of current license period
240,138 69,187 52,954 15,154 164,369 48,431 457,461 132,772 (10,442) (3,108)
Scenario 3
Addition of 2 new builds and 8 additional reactors obtaining a second 20-year license renewal
240,138 69,187 52,954 15,154 192,587 57,928 485,679 142,269 17,776 6,389

a Includes commercial light water reactor inventory and Morris and U.S. Department of Energy sites, other than Three Mile Island-Unit 2 fuel debris.

SOURCE: Reproduced from Table 2-22 of Peters et al. (2020). Courtesy of Savannah River National Laboratory.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page 269
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page 270
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page 271
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page 272
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page 273
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Radioactive Waste Classifications and Waste Characteristics from Different Stages of the Fuel Cycle in the United States." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page 274
Next: Appendix E: Fuel Cycle Characteristics and Geologic Repository Metrics of Advanced Nuclear Reactors »
Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors Get This Book
×
 Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors
Buy Paperback | $46.00 Buy Ebook | $36.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States has deployed commercial nuclear power since the 1950s, and as of 2021, nuclear power accounts for approximately 20 percent of U.S. electricity generation. The current commercial nuclear fleet consists entirely of thermal-spectrum, light water reactors operating with low-enriched uranium dioxide fuel in a once-through fuel cycle. In recent years, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Energy, and private sector have expressed considerable interest in developing and deploying advanced nuclear reactors to augment, and possibly replace, the U.S. operating fleet of reactors, nearly all of which will reach the end of their currently licensed operating lives by 2050. Much of this interest stems from the potential ability of advanced reactors and their associated fuel cycles - as claimed by their designers and developers - to provide a number of advantages, such as improvements in economic competitiveness, reductions in environmental impact via better natural resource utilization and/or lower waste generation, and enhancements in nuclear safety and proliferation resistance.

At the request of Congress, this report explores merits and viability of different nuclear fuel cycles, including fuel cycles that may use reprocessing, for both existing and advanced reactor technologies; and waste management (including transportation, storage, and disposal options) for advanced reactors, and in particular, the potential impact of advanced reactors and their fuel cycles on waste generation and disposal.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!